Background. Spinal deformity has a known deleterious effect upon the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty and acetabular component positioning. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between severity of spinal deformity parameters and acetabular cup position, rate of dislocation, and rate of revision among patients with total hip arthroplasties and concomitant spinal deformity. Methods. A prospectively collected database of patients with spinal deformity was reviewed and patients with total hip arthroplasty were identified. The full body standing stereoradiographic images (EOS) were reviewed for each patient. From these images, spinal deformity parameters and acetabular cup anteversion and inclination were measured. A chart review was performed on all patients to determine dislocation and revision arthroplasty events. Statistical analysis was performed to determine correlation of deformity with acetabular cup position. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with spinal fusion, dislocation events, and revision THA. Results. One-hundred and seven spinal deformity patients were identified, with 139 hips for analysis. The rate of THA dislocation in this cohort was 8.0%, with a revision rate of 5.8% for instability. Patients who sustained dislocations had significantly higher spinopelvic tilt, T1-pelvic angle, and mismatch of lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence. Among all patients, only 68.8% met the radiographic “safe zone” for anteversion in the standing position (Figure 1). A comparison of radiographic cup position on supine x-ray with standing EOS imaging demonstrated an increase in anteversion of 6.2 degrees. Standing decreased rate of safe zone anteversion of the cup by 20%. Conclusions. In this cohort, patients with THA and concomitant spinal deformity have a particularly high rate of dislocation. This dislocation risk may be driven by the degree of spinal deformity and by spinopelvic compensation, which is suggested by our findings. Arthroplasty surgeons should be aware of the elevated dislocation rate and consider a surgical strategy for maintaining hip stability in this population

Introduction. Accurate and reproducible cup positioning is one the most important technical factors that affects outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although Lewinnek's safe zone is the most accepted range for anteversion and abduction angles socket orientation, the effect of fixed lumbosacral spine on pelvic tilt and obliquity is not yet established. Questions:. What is the change in anteversion and abduction angle from standing to sitting in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing THA?. What is the effect of fixed and flexible spinal deformities on acetabular cup orientation after THA?. Material and Methods. Between July 2011 and October 2011, 68 consecutive unilateral THAs were implanted in 68 patients with a mean age of 71 ± 6 years old. Radiographic evaluation included standing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral pelvic radiographs, and sitting lateral pelvic radiograph, measuring lumbosacral angle (LSA), sacral angle (SA), and sagittal pelvic tilt angle (SPTA). Computer generated 3D pelvis models were used to analyze the correlation between different pelvic tilts and acetabular cup orientation in abduction and anteversion. Results. The mean standing STPA was 3.7º of anterior tilt (range: −9º of anterior tilt to 25º of posterior tilt). The mean SPTA in sitting was −17.7º of posterior tilt (range: −38º of posterior tilt to 7º of anterior tilt). In a fixed spinal deformity (54%) the SPTA was significantly smaller compared to the flexible pelvis group (10º versus 30.9º, p=0.0001). Flexible pelvises (46%) had a posterior tilt from standing to sitting resulting in increased anteversion. Overall, mean change in LSA and SA from standing to sitting was 22.5º and 20.2º, respectively. The mean post-operative functional anteversion and abduction angles were 19.2º and 42.1º, respectively. In the virtual 3D pelvic models, when the abduction angle was between 40 and 45 degrees, anteversion changed of 0.75 degrees for 1 degree of change of pelvic tilt. Discussion. There is a significant change in pelvic tilt from standing to sitting, especially in patients with flexible spines, where the functional anteversion increases with sitting. Patients with a fixed pelvis have significantly less change in sagittal tilt and therefore less change in anteversion from standing to sitting position. Care should be taken to adjust cup positioning in fixed spinal deformity

Objective. Posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) is indicated in the management of severe rigid spine deformities. It is a complex surgical procedure and is only performed in a few spine centres due to the technical expertise required and associated risk. The purpose of this study is to review the indications, surgical challenges and outcomes of patients undergoing PVCR. Methods. 12 patients with severe spinal deformities who underwent PVCR were retrospectively reviewed after a follow-up of 2 years. Surgery was performed with the aid of motor evoked spinal cord monitoring and cellsaver when available. The average surgical duration was 310 minutes (100–490). The average blood loss was 1491 ml (0–3500). The indication for PVCR was gross deformity and myelopathy which was due to congenital spinal deformities and one case of old tuberculosis. Clinical records and the radiographic parameters were reviewed. Results. Kyphosis of an average of 72 degrees was corrected to 28 degrees. The associated scoliosis was corrected from an average of 49.2 to 21.2 degrees. Ten patients improved neurologically to ASIA D and E. One patient deteriorated markedly, required revision with no initial improvement but reached ASIA E at 6 months after surgery. Four patients had associated syringomyelia. All were re-scanned at 1 year. The three with small syrinx's demonstrated no progression on MRI and the large syrinx resolved completely. In addition to the neurological deterioration, complications included 1 right lower lobe pneumonia. Conclusion. PVCR is an effective option to correct complex rigid kyphoscoliosis. In addition it allows excellent circumferential decompression of the cord and neurological recovery. When the congenital scoliosis is associated with syringomyelia with no other cause evident, it may allow resolution of the syrinx. Key words: Posterior vertebral column resection, severe spinal deformities, myelopathy, syringomyelia. NO DISCLOSURES

In 2021, Vigdorchik et al. published a large multicentre study validating their simple Hip-Spine Classification for determining patient-specific acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study was to apply this Hip-Spine Classification to a sample of Australian patients undergoing THA surgery to determine the local acetabular component positioning requirements. Additionally, we propose a modified algorithm for adjusting cup anteversion requirements. 790 patients who underwent THA surgery between January 2021 and June 2022 were assessed for anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPt) and sacral slope (SS) in standing and relaxed seated positions and categorized according to their spinal stiffness and flatback deformity. Spinal stiffness was measured using pelvic mobility (PM); the ΔSS between standing and relaxed seated. Flatback deformity was defined by APPt <-13° in standing. As in Vigdorchik et al., PM of <10° was considered a stiff spine. For our algorithm, PM of <20° indicated the need for increased cup anteversion. Using this approach, patient-specific cup anteversion is increased by 1° for every degree the patient's PM is <20°. According to the Vigdorchik simple Hip-Spine classification groups, we found: 73% Group 1A, 19% Group 1B, 5% Group 2A, and 3% Group 2B. Therefore, under this classification, 27% of Australian THA patients would have an elevated risk of dislocation due to spinal deformity and/or stiffness. Under our modified definition, 52% patients would require increased cup anteversion to address spinal stiffness. The Hip-Spine Classification is a simple algorithm that has been shown to indicate to surgeons when adjustments to acetabular cup anteversion are required to account for spinal stiffness or flatback deformity. We investigated this algorithm in an Australian population of patients undergoing THA and propose a modified approach: increasing cup anteversion by 1° for every degree the patient's PM is <20°

The spinopelvic alignment is often assessed via the Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch. Here we describe and validate a simplified method to evaluating the spinopelvic alignment through the L1-Pelvis angle (L1P). This method is set to reduce the operator error and make the on-film measurement more practicable. 126 standing lateral radiographs of patients presenting for Total Hip Arthroplasty were examined. Three operators were recruited to label 6 landmarks. One operator repeated the landmark selection for intra-operator analysis. We compare PI-LL mismatch obtained via the conventional method, and our simplified method where we estimate this mismatch using PI-LL = L1P - 90°. We also assess the method's reliability and repeatability. We found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the PI-LL mismatch from the conventional method (mean 0.22° ± 13.6) compared to L1P method (mean 0.0° ± 13.1). The overall average normalised root mean square error (NRMSE) for PI-LL mismatch across all operators is 7.53% (mean -3.3° ± 6.0) and 6.5% (mean -2.9° ± 4.9) for the conventional and L1P method, respectively. In relation to intra-operator repeatability, the correlation coefficients are 0.87 for PI, 0.94 for LL, and 0.96 for L1P. NRMSE between the two measurement sets are PI: 9.96%, LL: 5.97%, and L1P: 4.41%. A similar trend is observed in the absolute error between the two sets of measurements. Results indicate an equivalence in PI-LL measurement between the methods. Reproducibility of the measurements and reliability between operators were improved. Using the L1P angle, the classification of the sagittal spinal deformity found in the literature translates to: normal L1P<100°, mild 100°<L1P<110°, and severe L1P>110°. Surgeons adopting our method should expect a small improvement in reliability and repeatability of their measurements, and a significant improvement of the assessment of the mismatch through the visualisation of the angle L1P

Introduction. Excessive standing posterior pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar spine stiffness, low pelvic Incidence (PI), and severe sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) have been linked to increased dislocation rates. We aimed to compare the prevalence of these 4 parameters in unstable and stable primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) patients. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, 40 patients with instability following primary THA for osteoarthritis were referred for functional analysis. All patients received lateral X-rays in standing and flexed seated positions to assess functional pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis (LL). Computed tomography scans were used to measure pelvic incidence and acetabular cup orientation. Literature thresholds for “at risk” spinopelvic parameters were standing pelvic tilt ≤ −10°, lumbar flexion (LL. stand. – LL. seated. ) ≤ 20°, PI ≤ 41°, and sagittal spinal deformity (PI – LL. stand. mismatch) ≥ 10°. The prevalence of each risk factor in the dislocation cohort was calculated and compared to a previously published cohort of 4042 stable THA patients. Results. Median supine cup inclination for the dislocating cohort was 43° (range, 26°- 58°). Median cup anteversion was 23° (range, 7° − 40°) for the dislocating cohort. 65% of the dislocating patients had socket positions within the Lewinnek safe zone (Figure 1). Standing PT (-10° v −1°), lumbar flexion (20° v 45°), and PI-LL mismatch (12° v −1°) were all significantly different (p < 0.001) in the dislocating group compared to the stable THA population (Figure 2). There was no difference in PI between the dislocating group and the stable THA population (58° v 56° respectively, p = 0.33), with the numbers available. 80% of the dislocating patients had one or more of the 3 statistically significant risk factors, compared to only 24% of the stable THA population. Conclusion. Excessive standing posterior pelvic tilt, low lumbar flexion and a severe SSD are highly prevalent in unstable THAs. Pre-op screening for these parameters may reduce the prevalence of dislocation. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Adverse spinopelvic characteristics (ASC) have been associated with increased dislocation risk following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). A stiff lumbar spine, a large posterior standing tilt when standing and severe sagittal spinal deformity have been identified as key risk factors for instability. It has been reported that the rate of dislocation in patients with such ASC may be increased and some authors have recommended the use of dual mobility bearings or robotics to reduce instability to within acceptable rates (<2%). The aims of the prospective study were to 1: Describe the true incidence of ASC in patients presenting for a THA 2. Assess whether such characteristics are associated with greater symptoms pre-THA due to the concomitant dual pathology of hip and spine and 3. Describe the early term dislocation rate with the use of ≤36mm bearings. This is an IRB-approved, two-center, multi-surgeon, prospective, consecutive, cohort study of 220 patients undergoing THA through anterolateral- (n=103; 46.8%), direct anterior- (n=104; 27.3%) or posterior- approaches (n=13; 5.9%). The mean age was 63.8±12.0 years (range: 27.7-89.0 years) and the mean BMI 28.0±5.0 kg/m. 2. (range: 19.4-44.4 kg/m. 2. ). There were 44 males (47.8%) and 48 females (52.2%). The mean follow-up was 1.6±0.5 years. Overall, 54% of femoral heads was 32 mm, and 46% was 36mm. All participants underwent lateral spinopelvic radiographs in the standing and deep-flexed seated positions were taken to determine lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic-femoral angle (PFA) and pelvic incidence (PI) in both positions. Spinal stiffness was defined as lumbar flexion <20° when transitioning between the standing and deep-seated position; adverse standing PT was defined as >19° and adverse sagittal lumbar balance was defined as mismatch between standing PI and LL >10°. Pre-operative patient reported outcomes was measured using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and EuroQol Five-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Dislocation rates were prospectively recorded. Non-parametric tests were used, significance was set at p<0.05. The prevalence of PI-LL mismatch was 22.1% (43/195) and 30.4% had increased standing PT (59/194). The prevalence of lumbar stiffness was 3.5% (5/142) and these patients had all three adverse spinopelvic characteristics (5/142; 3.5%). There was no significant difference in the pre-operative OHS between patients with (20.7±7.6) and patients without adverse spinopelvic characteristics (21.6±8.7; p=0.721), nor was there for pre-operative EQ5D (0.651±0.081 vs. 0.563±0.190; p=0.295). Two patients sustained a dislocation (0.9%): One in the lateral (no ASC) and one in the posterior approaches, who also exhibited ASC pre-operatively. Sagittal lumbar imbalance, increased standing spinal tilt and spinal stiffness are not uncommon among patients undergoing THA. The presence of such characteristics is not associated with inferior pre-operative PROMs. However, when all characteristics are present, the risk of instability is increased. Patients with ASC treated with posterior approach THA may benefit from the use of advanced technology due to a high risk of dislocation. The use of such technology with the anterior or lateral approach to improve instability is to date unjustified as the rate of instability is low even amongst patients with ASCs

Introduction. Pedicle Subtraction osteotomy (PRO) in correction of severe spinal deformities is well established. Prospective analysis of its efficacy in complex spinal deformities is sparse in literature. Aims and objectives. To assess the role of PRO in correction of uniplanar and multiplanar spinal deformity and to assess the role of revision PRO in failed corrections. Material and methods. 50 patients were operated between 1996-2007 and followed up for 2 years (2-6). 27 had uniplanar kyphosis (60-128 degrees) and kyphoscoliosis was seen in 10. Failed corrections were seen in 11 uniplanar and 2 multiplanar deformities. The average pre-operative kyphosis and sagittal balance was 78.7 degrees and 22 mm (7-30) respectively. Scoliotic deformity ranged from 97-138 (average 108 degrees) and the coronal imbalance from 10-55 (average 24mm). Deformity distribution was upper dorsal 5, mid dorsal 22, dorso-lumbar 18 and lumbar 5. A single posterior approach sufficed in 47 cases while 3 required an anterior approach for reconstruction. 13 patients had pre-operative neurological deficit (bedridden 10, ambulatory 3). The average surgical time required was 300 minutes and blood loss was 800cc. The anterior defect reconstructed averaged 16.5mm (5-28). Results. Pulmonary complications occurred in 8 (21%), (embolism 1, pneumonia 2, hypoxia 5). Wound infection required debridement in 3 (8%). Failed corrections were seen in 10 (3 out of 37 in our series, 8%) due to failure of construct 2, severe disease 2, infection (active 2, quiescent 4). Neurological deterioration occurred in 1(2%), medial pedicle wall perforation. 12 patients regained ambulation (independent 7, support 5). Post-operative kyphosis and sagittal balance was 36.5 (10-108) and 10mm (5-20) respectively. Average correction was: sagittal 46.4%, coronal 37.5% and revisions 58%. The correction of kyphosis and sagittal balance was statistically comparable between primary and revision cases (p >0.05). Conclusions. PRO offers an excellent single stage decompression and controlled correction of kyphosis

This study addresses a crucial gap in the knowledge of normative spinal growth in children. The objective of this study is to provide detailed and accurate 3D reference values for global and segmental spinal dimensions in healthy children under the age of 11. Radiographic spine examinations of healthy children conducted to rule out scoliosis were reviewed in four scoliosis referral centers in North America. All consecutive children aged three to eleven years old with EOS biplanar good quality x-rays, but without diagnosed growth-affecting pathologies, were included. Postero-Anterior and Lateral calibrated x-rays were used for spine 3D reconstruction and computation of vertebral body height and spine length. Median and interquartile range were calculated from cross-sectional data. Smooth centiles growth curves for 3D True Spinal Length (3DTSL) between T1 and S1, as well as for mid-vertebral heights of T5, T12 and L3, where fit and calibrated from data using the Lambda-Mu-Sigma method (GAMLSS package for R). This method automatically selects the best performing distribution from a familly of choices. Tables of centiles were then predicted from the computed models for selected ages. A total of 638 full spine examinations from asymptomatic patients were reconstructed in 3D, 397 in girls and 241 in boys. Medians and interquartile ranges were calculated for 3DTSL (T1-S1): 285 (24) mm, 314 (26) mm and 349 (31) mm, and for selected vertebral heights T5: 10 (1) mm, 11 (1) mm and 12 (1) mm, T12: 13 (2) mm, 14 (1) mm and 16 (2) mm, and L3: 14 (1) mm, 16 (2) mm and 18 (2) mm, respectively for the 3–6, 6–8 and 8–11 age groups. Centile curves ready for clinical use of the 3DTSL (T1-S1) and of the vertebral heights of T5, T12 and L3 as a function of age were derived for the 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90 and 95th centiles. In general, boys presented linear relationships between spinal dimensions and age, and girls presented more diverging trends with increased variance for older ages. Accordingly curves for boys follow the Normal distribution whereas those for girls follow the original Box-Cox-Cole-Green distribution. Model diagnostic tests (normally distributed residuals, adequate wormplots and |Z statistics| < 2) confirmed adequacy of the models and the absence of significant misfit. Accurate reference values were derived for spinal dimensions in healthy children. Spinal dimension charts showed that the spinal lengths and vertebral heights changed relatively constantly across the age groups closely resembling WHO total body height charts. The reference values will help physicians better assess their patients' growth potential. It could also be used to predict expected spinal dimensions at maturity or changes in pathologic conditions as well as to assess the impact of growth friendly interventions in the correction of spinal deformities

In posterior fixation for deformity correction and spinal fusion, there is increasing discussion around auxiliary rods secured to the pedicle screws, sharing the loads, and reducing stresses in the primary rods. Dual-rod, multiaxial screws (DRMAS) provide two rod mounting points on a single screw shaft to allow unique constructs and load-sharing at specific vertebrae. These implants provide surgical flexibility to add auxiliary rods across a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) or over multiple vertebral levels where higher bending loads are anticipated in primary rods. Other options include fixed-angle devices as multiple rod connectors (MRC) and variable-angle dominoes (VAD) with a single-axis rotation in the connection. The objective in this simulation study was to assess rod bending in adult spinal instrumentation across an osteotomy using constructs with DRMAS, MRC, or VAD multi-rod connections. The study was performed using computer biomechanical models of two adult patients having undergone posterior instrumented spinal fusion for deformity. The models were patient-specific, incorporating the biomechanics of the spine, have been calibrated to assess deformity correction and intra- and postoperative loads across the instrumented spine. One traditional bilateral-rod construct was used as a control for six multi-rod configurations. Spinal fixation scenarios from T10 through S1 with the PSO at L4 were simulated on each patient-specific model. The multi-rod configurations were bilateral and unilateral DRMAS at L2 through S1 (B-DRMAS and U-DRMAS), bilateral DRMAS at L3 and L5 (Hybrid), bilateral MRC over L3-L5, bilateral and unilateral VAD over L3-L5 (B-VAD and U-VAD). Postoperative gravity plus 8-Nm flexion and extension loads were simulated and bending moments in the rods were computed and compared. In the simulated control for each case (#1 & #2), average rod bending moments (of the right and left rods) at the PSO level were 6.7Nm & 5.5Nm, respectively, in upright position, 8.8Nm & 7.3Nm in 8-Nm flexion, and 4.6Nm & 3.7Nm in 8-Nm extension. When the primary rods of the multi-rod constructs were normalized to this control, the bending moments in the primary rods of Case #1 & #2 were respectively 57% & 58% (B-DRMAS), 54% & 62% (B-VAD), 60% & 61% (MRC), 72% & 69% (Hybrid), 81% & 70% (U-DRMAS), and 81% & 73% (U-VAD). Overall, the reduction in primary rod bending moments ranged from 19–46% for standing loads. Under simulated 8-Nm functional moments, the primary rod moments were reduced by 18–46% in flexion and 17–48% in extension. More rods and stiffer connections produced the largest reductions for the primary rods, but auxiliary rods had bending moments that varied from 49% lower to 13% higher than the primary ones. Additional rods through DRMAS, MRC, and VAD connections noticeably reduced the bending loads in the primary rods compared with a standard bilateral-rod construct. Yet, bending loads in the auxiliary rods were higher or lower than those in the primary rods depending on the 3D spinal deformity and stiffness of the auxiliary rod connections. Additional studies and patient-specific analyses are needed to optimize instrumentation parameters that may improve load-sharing in these constructs

Despite the myriad new spinal instrumentation systems, scoliosis can rarely be fully corrected, especially when the curves are stiff. A novel superelastic nickel-titanium (nitinol) rod that maximises the ability to slowly correct spinal deformities by utilising the viscoelastic properties of the spine has been developed. This parallel, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of these new rods to conventional titanium rods in 23 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The superelastic nitinol rods were found to be safe, could gradually correct scoliosis curves, and ultimately resulted in better coronal and sagittal alignments compared to traditional rods. Despite the myriad new spinal instrumentation systems, scoliosis can rarely be fully corrected, especially when the curves are stiff. A novel superelastic nickel-titanium (nitinol) rod that maximises the ability to slowly correct spinal deformities by utilising the viscoelastic properties of the spine has been developed. This parallel, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of these new rods to conventional titanium rods in 23 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The superelastic nitinol rods were found to be safe, could gradually correct scoliosis curves, and ultimately resulted in better coronal and sagittal alignments compared to traditional rods

Introduction. Upright body posture is maintained with the alignment of the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities, and the muscle strength of the body trunk and lower extremities. Conversely, the posture is known to undergo changes with age, and muscle weakness of lower extremities and the restriction of knee extension in osteoarthritis of the knee (knee OA) have been considered to be associated with loss of natural lumbar lordosis and abnormal posture. As total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is aimed to correct malalignment of lower extremities and limited range of motion of knee, particularly in extension, we hypothesized that TKA positively affects the preoperative abnormal posture. To clarify this, the variation in the alignment of the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities before and after TKA was evaluated in this study. Patients and methods. Patients suffering from primary knee OA who were scheduled to receive primary TKA were enrolled in this study. However, patients with arthritis secondary to another etiology, i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, or previous surgical interventions to the knee, were excluded. Moreover, patients who suffered from hip and ankle OA, cranial nerve diseases, or severe spinal deformity were also excluded. The sagittal vertical axis (SVA), the horizontal distance between the posterosuperior aspect of the S1 endplate surface and a vertical plumb line drawn from the center of the C7 vertebral body, is an important index of sagittal balance of the trunk. Thus, patients were classified into two groups based on the preoperative SVA with preoperative standing lateral digital radiographs: normal (< 40mm) and abnormal (≥ 40mm) groups. The variations in the sagittal alignment of the spine, pelvis and lower extremities were evaluated preoperatively, and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. This study was approved by an institutional review board, and informed consent for participation was obtained from the patients. Results. Forty-nine knees in 49 patients were enrolled. Three different patterns of postural changes as well as hip and knee angles following TKA were observed. After TKA, the preoperatively normal SVA patients (26.5%) showed extension of the hip and knee joints and decrease of lumbar lordosis, while the SVA remained almost within the normal range. In the preoperatively abnormal SVA group, 13 patients (26.5%) showed extension of the knee joint while the SVA remained abnormal, however, 23 of the preoperatively abnormal SVA group patients (47.0%) showed improvement of SVA into the normal range with the extension of the hip and knee joints. Discussion. As the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities together affect body alignment, once limitation of knee extension due to severe knee OA is corrected and lower extremity alignment is improved with TKA, the lumbar lordosis may increase, and SVA could decrease. Recently, the relationship between the imbalance of the sagittal plane of the body and the risk of falls was described. From this, it could be said that TKA not only helped in recovering knee function and lower extremity alignment in severe knee OA, but also helped to improve posture and to protect from falls

A retrospective descriptive preliminary study on early experience using all pedicle screw correction. Pedicle screw fixation enables enhanced correction of spinal deformities. However, the technique is still in early development in our clinic. Tends of the scoliosis patient to come in late ages make maximum correction failed. A total 16 patients are subjected to pedicle screw fixation for spinal deformities were analyzed descriptively as an early follow-up in the last two-year. 14 patients are girl and 2 are boys. The age range between 12 to 18 year. 8 are Kings type II and 8 are Kings type III, 212 screws were inserted between Th3 – L2 (14-18 screws per-patient), all concave pedicles were inserted with screws but in convex side every two or three pedicles were inserted. The position of screws was analyzed using the post-operative plain X ray film. Before surgery the mean deformity measurement are 52.56° (range, 42-72°, correction achieved was 18° (range 10-34%, it was correlated to 68% achievement (range, 53-80%). All patients are happy with their image improvement. In total 212 screws inserted, 28 screws are malpositions (13.2%), but no clinical complication recorded. In this early experience using all pedicle screw scoliosis surgery, all patients are happy with the results although the correction only 53-80(. More patients are needed to improve this achievement

Purpose. Spinopelvic parameters describe the orientation, shape, and morphology of the spine and pelvis. In children without spinal deformity, these parameters have been shown to change during the first ten years of life; however, spinopelvic parameters have yet to be defined in children with significant Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of EOS on sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Method. Standing, lateral radiographs of 82 untreated patients with EOS greater than 50 degrees were evaluated. Sagittal spine parameters (sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL)) and sagittal pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), modified pelvic radius angle (PR)) were measured. These results were compared to those reported by Mac-Thiong et al (Spine, 2004) for a group of asymptomatic (i.e. without spinal deformity) children of similar age. Results. These patients had a mean age of 5.17 years and mean scoliosis of 73.3 17.3. Mean sagittal spine parameters were: sagittal balance (+2.4 4.03 cm), TK (38.2 20.8), and LL (47.8 17.7). These values were similar to those reported for asymptomatic subjects. Mean sagittal pelvic parameters were measured for PI (47.1 15.6), PT (10.3 10.7), SS (35.5 12.2), and PR (57.1 21.2). Although PI was similar to age-matched normals, PT was significantly higher and SS trended lower in the study population. Conclusion. Sagittal plane spine parameters in children with EOS were similar to those found in children without spinal deformity. Likewise, pelvic parameters (PI, SS, PR) were similar; however, those children with EOS signs of pelvic retroversion (increased pelvic tilt). This data may be useful as a baseline in determining prognosis for children with EOS who are treated with growing systems

Our prospective observational study of patients treated for Thoracolumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) by anterior instrumentation aimed at investigating the correlation between the radiographic outcome and the recently-developed scoliosis research society self-reported outcomes instrument (SRS-22) which has been validated as a tool for self-assessment in scoliosis patients. Previous patient based questionnaires demonstrated poor correlation with the radiological parameters. Materials and Methods. Pre-operative, post-operative and two years follow-up radiographs of 30 patients were assessed. Thirteen radiographic parameters including Cobb angles and balance were recorded. The percentage improvements for each were noted. The SRS-22 questionnaire was completed by all patients at final follow-up. Correlation was sought between each radiographic parameter, total SRS score and each of the five domains by quantifying Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (r). Results. Percentage improvement in primary Cobb angle (r = 0.052), secondary Cobb angle (r = 0.165), apical vertebra translation of the primary curve (r = -0.353), thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.043) and lumbar lordosis (r = 0.147) showed little or no correlation with the SRS-22 total score and its five individual domains. Significant inverse correlation was found between the upper instrumented vertebra angle and at follow-up and SRS-22 (r = -0.516). The same was true for Sagittal plumb line shift at final follow up (r = -0.447). Conclusion. SRS-22 is a validated tool for the self-assessment of health status in spinal deformity patients; however, it does not seem to correlate with most of the radiographic parameters commonly used by clinicians to assess patient outcome with the exception of upper instrumented vertebra angle and sagittal plumb line which do correlate significantly with the SRS-22 outcomes instrument. A comprehensive system of assessing the success of surgery both from the patient and clinicians perspective is required in the spinal deformity patient

THA: Approaches and Recovery; THA: Instability and Spinal Deformity; Revision for THA Instability: Dual Mobility Cups; Removal of Infected THA: Risk Factors for Complications; Tribocorrosion: Incidence in the Symptomatic THA; THA: Outcomes and Education Levels; THA: Satisfaction levels and Residual Symptoms; THA: Expectations and LOS; TKA: Kneeling and Recreation Expectations; TKA: Alignment and Long Term Survival; Patello-Femoral Arthroplasty vs TKA; Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Age; Wound Treatments and Sepsis in TJA; TKA: Managing Sepsis With I & D; Chronic Salvage in TKA: When is Enough Enough?; Revision TKA: Single Component Revision

INTRODUCTION. Standing spinal alignment has been the center of focus recently, particularly in the setting of adult spinal deformity. Humans spend approximately half of their waking life in a seated position. While lumbopelvic sagittal alignment has been shown to adapt from standing to sitting posture, segmental vertebral alignment of the entire spine is not yet fully understood, nor are the effects of DEGEN or DEFORMITY. Segmental spinal alignment between sitting and standing, and the effects of degeneration and deformity were analyzed. METHODS. Segmental spinal alignment and lumbopelvic alignment (pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, sacral slope) were analyzed. Lumbar spines were classified as NORMAL, DEGEN (at least one level of disc height loss >50%, facet arthropathy, or spondylolisthesis), or DEFORMITY (PI-LL mismatch>10°). Exclusion criteria included lumbar fusion/ankylosis, hip arthroplasty, and transitional lumbosacral anatomy. Independent samples t-tests analyzed lumbopelvic and segmental alignment between sitting and standing within groups. ANOVA assessed these differences between spine pathology groups. RESULTS. There were 183 NORMAL, 216 DEGEN and 92 DEFORMITY patients with significant differences in age, gender, and hip OA grades. After propensity matching for these factors, there were 56 patients in each group (age 63±14, 58% female) [Fig. 1]. Significant differences were noted between spinal pathology groups with regard to changes from standing to sitting alignment with regard to NORMAL vs DEGEN vs DEFORMITY groups in PT (13.93° vs −11.98° vs − 7.95°; p=0.024), LL (21.91° vs 17.45° vs 13.23°; p=0.002), PI-LL (−22.32° vs −17.28° vs −13.18°; p<0.001), SVA (−48.99° vs −29.98° vs −32.12°; p=0.002), and TPA(−16.35° vs −12.69° vs −9.64; p=0.001). TK (−2.08° vs −2.78° vs −2.00°, p=0.943) and CL (−3.84° vs −4.14° vs −3.57°, p=0.621) were not significantly different across spinal pathology groups [Fig. 2]. NORMAL patients had overall greater mobility in the lower lumbar spine from standing to sitting compared to DEGEN and DEFORMITY patients. L4-L5 (7.50° vs 5.23° vs 4.74°, p=0.012) and L5-S1 (6.96° vs 5.28° and 3.69°, p=0.027). There were no significant differences in change in alignment from standing to sitting at the upper lumbar levels or lower thoracic levels between the three groups [Fig. 3]. CONCLUSION. The lower lumbar spine provides the greatest sitting to standing change in lumbopelvic alignment in normal patients. Degeneration and deformity of the spine significantly reduces the mobility of the lower lumbar spine and PT. With lumbar spine degeneration and flatback deformity, relatively more alignment change occurs at the upper lumbar spine and thoracolumbar junction

We present an analysis of manual and computer-assisted preoperative pedicle screw placement planning. Preoperative planning of 256 pedicle screws was performed manually twice by two experienced spine surgeons (M1 and M2) and automatically once by a computer-assisted method (C) on three-dimensional computed tomography images of 17 patients with thoracic spinal deformities. Statistical analysis was performed to obtain the intraobserver and interobserver variability for the pedicle screw size (i.e. diameter and length) and insertion trajectory (i.e. pedicle crossing point, sagittal and axial inclination, and normalized screw fastening strength). In our previous study, we showed that the differences among both manual plannings (M1 and M2) and computer-assisted planning (C) are comparable to the differences between manual plannings, except for the pedicle screw inclination in the sagittal plane. In this study, however, we obtained also the intraobserver variability for both manual plannings (M1 and M2), which revealed that larger differences occurred again for the sagittal screw inclination, especially in the case of manual planning M2 with average differences of up to 18.3°. On the other hand, the interobserver variability analysis revealed that the intraobserver variability for each pedicle screw parameter was, in terms of magnitude, comparable to the interobserver variability among both manual and computer-assisted plannings. The results indicate that computer-assisted pedicle screw placement planning is not only more reproducible and faster than, but also as reliable as manual planning

Most long-term follow-up studies report retrospective data, the quality of which remains limited due to their inherent biases. Prospective databases may overcome these limitations, however, feasibility and costs limit their application. To date there exists a paucity of evidence-based literature on which recommendations can be made for the ideal length of follow-up for spinal deformity research. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the added value of follow-up of patients beyond 2 years following surgery for AIS. A database registry evaluating surgical outcomes for all consecutive AIS patients with post-op data-points of 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year was analysed. Surgeon-reported complications, SRS-22 scores, and radiographic data were evaluated. Complications requiring surgical or medical intervention were compared between patients in whom complications developed within 2 years to those in which newly developed complications occurred between >2–5 years. 536 patients were analysed. SRS-22 scores significantly improved at 2 years post-op with no change at 5-year follow-up. Overall complication rate was 33.2% with majority occurring within 2 years (24.8%). The rate of complications occurring >2–5 years requiring intervention was significantly lower than those requiring intervention within 2 years of surgery (4.7% vs 9.7%, p=0.000), however was not negligible. The most common newly observed complication beyond 2 years was pain (1.9%), followed by surgical site infection (SSI) (1.3%) and implant issues (0.56%). There were no significant differences in the rates of crankshaft (p=0.48), implant issues (p=0.56), pseudarthrosis (p=0.19), and SSI (p=0.13) between the 2 time points. Although majority of complications following AIS surgery occurs within 2 years, a non-negligible rate of newly observed complications occur at >2–5 years post-op. Specifically crankshaft, pseudarthrosis, implant issues, and SSI have similar rates of occurrence at these 2 time points

The evolution of operative technology has allowed correction of complex spinal deformities. Neurological deficits following spinal instrumentation is a devastating complication and the risk is especially high in those with complex sagittal and coronal plane deformities. Prior to intraoperative evoked potential monitoring, spinal cord function was tested using the Stagnara Wake up test, typically performed after instrumentation once the desired correction has been achieved. This test is limited as it does not reflect the timeframe in which the problem occurred and it may be dangerous to some patients. Intraoperative neuromonitoring allows timely feedback of the effect of instrumentation and curve correction on the spinal cord. Pedicle screws that are malpositioned can result in poor fixation or neuronal injury. Evoked EMG monitoring can aid in accurate placement. A positive EMG response can alert the surgeon to a potential pedicle breech and allow them to reassess the placement of their hardware intraoperatively. The stimulation threshold is affected by the amount of surrounding bone acting as an insulator to electrical conduction and is variable in different regions of the spine. In the non-deformed, lumbar spine stimulation thresholds have been established. Such guidelines have not been well-developed for the thoracic spine, or for severely scoliotic spines. Thus our primary objective was to compare the stimulation threshold of the apical pedicle on the concave side to the stimulation threshold of the pedicles at the upper and lower instrumented levels. Intraoperative EMG stimulation thresholds were done at 192 apical pedicles on the concave side of the deformity and then compared to those thresholds found at 169 terminal level pedicles. Only pedicles for which a stimulation threshold was found were reported and excluded those where a breech was suspected. The lowest stimulation required for an EMG response was documented to a maximum stimulation of 20 mA. The mean threshold at the apex was 16.62 milliamps (mA) compared to 18.25mA at the terminal levels. This was compared with the t-test and showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). In this study we report only the thresholds for the concave side, the pedicle that is most likely to be reduced in size. The threshold for stimulation is reduced compared to those seen at the highest and lowest instrumented level. Most of the apexes are located in the mid-thoracic spine with the highest instrumented levels being in the high thoracic spine and the lowest levels being in the lumbar spine. This study provides preliminary evidence that the apical, concave pedicle has a lower threshold than the end pedicles and one cannot rely on established thresholds from different areas of the spine. The surgeon should be cognisant of these differences when instrumenting at the apical level. Ongoing work is examining the convex apex threshold as well as the relationship between the effect of age and a diagnosis other than adolescent idiopathic scoliosis