Previous studies have shown improved outcome following surgery for spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease. Further papers have shown that many patients with metastatic disease are not referred for orthopaedic opinion. The aims of this paper are to study the survival and morbidity of patients with spinal metastatic disease who receive radiotherapy. Do patients develop instability and progressive neurological compromise? Can we predict which patients will benefit from surgery?. Retrospective review of patients receiving radiotherapy for pain relief or cord compression as a result of metastatic disease. Patients were scored with regards to Tomita and Tokuhashi, survival and for deterioration in neurology or spinal instability. 94 patients reviewed. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year or until deceased. Majority of patients had a primary diagnosis of lung, prostate or breast carcinoma. Mean Tomita score of 6, Tokuhashi score 7, and mean survival following radiotherapy of 8 months. 11:94 patients referred for surgical opinion. Poor correlation with Tomita scores (-0.25) & Tokuhashi scores (0.24) to predict survival. Four patients developed progressive neurology on follow-up. One patient developed spinal instability. The remainder of the patients did not deteriorate in neurology and did not develop spinal instability. All patients with normal neurology at time of radiotherapy did not develop spinal cord compression or cauda equina at a later date. This study suggests that the vast majority of patients with spinal metastatic disease do not progress to spinal instability or cord compression, and that prophylactic surgery would not be of benefit. The predictive scoring systems remain unreliable making it difficult to select those patients who would benefit. The referral rate to spinal surgeons remains low as few patients under the care of the oncologists develop spinal complications

National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines on Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression recommend urgent consideration of patients with spinal metastases and imaging evidence of structural spinal failure with spinal instability for surgery to stabilise the spine and prevent Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. We aimed to compare neurological outcomes of patients managed operatively and non-operatively. Prospective collection of 397 patients' data over a 4-year period. Males represented 59.2% of patients. Median age was 69 years. Non-operative intervention in 62.2% of patients. Prostate, lung, Breast, Myeloma, Renal Cell Carcinoma and Lymphoma accounted for over 75% of all primary tumours (n=305). Median Length of hospital stay was longer in the operative group of 15 days compared to 10 days in the non-operative group (p<0.0001). Patients who were ambulating on presentation maintained their ambulation in 70.2% of cases in the operative group compared to 90.9% in the non-operative group (p<0.0001). However, upon discharge 41% of patients managed operatively were ambulatory compared to the non-operative group rate of 36.5% (p<0.0001). In Prostate, Breast, Myeloma, RCC and Lymphoma 100% of patients managed non-operatively maintained ambulation. Lung primaries managed operatively had an 80% chance of maintaining ambulation compared to 76.9% in the non-operative group (p<0.05). A higher proportion of patients managed non-operatively maintained ambulation than those managed operatively. With operative intervention, more patients regained ambulatory status. Whilst we have mainly focused on ambulatory status in this paper there are other factors to consider including pain relief and spinal stability which may be an indication for surgical intervention

Purpose of study:. The question of prolonged bracing following injury in patients diagnosed with SCIWORA remains controversial. Proponents of the ‘Segmental Spinal Instability’ hypothesis claim that there is occult ligamentous injury leading to instability and a risk of recurrent injury. Published reports of recurrent SCIWORA involve patients with minor, transient neurological symptoms and normal MRI findings. The contradicting ‘differential stretch hypothesis’ is based on the premise that the spinal column will deform elastically, exceeding the elastic deforming potential of the more fragile spinal cord, but will return to its baseline stability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for bracing in patients with SCIWORA based on MRI evidence of instability. Methods:. A retrospective chart review was performed for a series of eleven patients with documented SCIWORA that presented to Red Cross Children's Hospital over the past 8 years. Details regarding mode of injury, age at presentation, neurological deficit at presentation, MRI findings and long term prognosis were documented. MRI's were reviewed by the authors as well as a consultant radiologist. Results:. There were 9 males and 2 females. The average age was 4.5 years. All patients were victims of motor vehicle accidents and had multiple injuries. Five patients had cervical, five thoracic and one had both cervical and thoracic injuries. There were 1 monoplegia, 4 hemiplegias, 3 paraplegias and 3 triplegias. None of the MRIs performed on these patients demonstrated ligamentous or bony injury. Patients with only T2 changes demonstrated progressive neurological recovery within a few months following injury. There were no recurrences and none of the patients were braced following the diagnosis of SCIWORA. Conclusion:. Our results from this small series support the ‘differential stretch hypothesis’ and we maintain that patient's with SCIWORA does not demonstrate spinal instability and therefore does not require bracing following injury

Introduction. This is the first study to illustrate spinal fracture distribution and the impact of different injury mechanisms on the spinal column during contemporary warfare. Methods. A retrospective analysis of Computed Tomography (CT) spinal images entered onto the Centre for Defence Imaging (CDI) database, 2005-2009. Isolated spinous and transverse process fractures were excluded to allow focus on cases with implications for immediate management and prospective disability burden. Fractures were classified by anatomical level and stability with validated systems. Clinical data regarding mechanism of injury and associated non-spinal injuries for each patient were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's Exact test. Results. 57 cases (128 fractures) were analysed. Ballistic (79%) and non-ballistic (21%) mechanisms contribute to vertebral fracture and spinal instability at all regions of the spinal column. There is a low incidence of cervical spine fracture, with these injuries predominantly occurring due to gunshot wounding. There is a high incidence of lumbar spine fractures which are significantly more likely to be caused by explosive devices than gunshot wounds (p<0.05). 66% of thoracolumbar spine fractures caused by explosive devices were unstable, the majority being of a burst configuration. Associated non-spinal injuries occurred in 60% of patients. There is a strong relationship between spinal injuries caused by explosive devices and lower limb fractures. Conclusion. Explosive devices account for significant injury to both combatants and civilians in current conflict. Injuries to the spine by explosions account for greater numbers, associated morbidity and increasing complexity than other means of injury

Study Design. A prospective cohort study was carried out looking at the functional outcome and post-procedure translational segmental instability after multi-level lumbar decompression using a Hinge osteotomy technique. Objective. The Hinge osteotomy technique involves unilateral subperiosteal muscle dissection with osteotomy of the base of the spinous processes thereby preserving the integrity of the posterior elements. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the results of this technique clinically and radiologically. Methods. Between February 2005 and February 2007, 120 patients (51 male and 69 female) diagnosed with degenerative and/or congenital lumbar stenosis with a mean age of 64 years, underwent central and bilateral canal decompression using the hinge osteotomy technique. A mean of 2 segments (range 2-4) was decompressed. All patients were followed up for a minimum of three years. Five outcome measures were used: visual analogue scale for leg pain, Likert scale for functional status, symptom specific well-being score, general well-being score, and ODI score. The outcome measures were recorded pre-operatively and at 6 months and 3 years post-operatively. Successful surgical outcome was defined as an improvement in at least four out of five outcome measures. Results. 108 patients (90%) had a successful surgical outcome. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcome criteria (p< 0.001) when measured at the 6-month post-operative mark as compared to pre-operatively, with further marginal significant improvement (p< 0.05) at 3 years post-surgery. There was no evidence of progressive lumbar segmental instability at 3 years post-operatively. Conclusion. Decompression of multi-level lumbar spine stenosis using the unilateral approach with the Hinge osteotomy technique is a safe approach for multi-level stenosis, with good outcome and no evidence of significant segmental translational spinal instability

Neck pain can be caused by pressure on the spinal cord or nerve roots from bone or disc impingement. This can be treated by surgically decompressing the cervical spine, which involves excising the bone or disc that is impinging on the nerves or widening the spinal canal or neural foramen. Conventional practise is to fuse the adjacent intervertebral joint after surgery to prevent intervertebral motion and subsequent recompression of the spinal cord or nerve root. However fusion procedures cause physiological stress transfer to adjacent segments which may cause Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD), a rapid degeneration of the adjacent discs due to increased stress. ASD is more likely to occur in fusions of two or more levels than single level fusions and is more common where there is existing degeneration of the adjacent discs, which is not unusual in people over 30 years of age. Partial dynamic stabilisation, which generally involves a semi-rigid spinal fixation, allows a controlled amount of intervertebral motion (less than physiological, but more than fusion) to prevent increased stress on the adjacent segments (potentially preventing ASD) whilst still preventing neural recompression. Partial dynamic stabilisation is suitable for treating spinal instability after decompression as well as certain degenerative instabilities and chronic pain syndromes. Dynamic stabilisation and semi-rigid fixation systems for the spine are typically fixated posteriorly. However, choice of posterior surgical stabilisation techniques in the cervical spine is limited due to the size of the osseous material available for fixation and the close proximity of the neural structures and the vertebral artery. Posterior dynamic stabilisation systems for stabilisation of the lumbar spine often use the pedicle as an anchor point. Using the pedicle of the cervical spine as an anchor point is technically difficult because of its small size, angulation and proximity to neurovascular structures. Therefore, one of the main challenges to provide stabilisation in the cervical spine is the limitations of the anatomy. This presentation will introduce a novel spinal implant (patent pending) which is proposed for the cervical spine to provide partial dynamic stabilisation in the C3 to T1 region from a posterior approach. The implant is a single unit with a safe and technically simple insertion technique into the lateral masses. The implant uses a simple mechanism to allow limited intervertebral motion at each instrumented level. It is hoped that the simplicity of the device and removing the need to provide a bone graft anteriorly may reduce the cost of the procedure compared to traditional fusion and competing surgeries