Introduction. Dual Mobility (DM) implants have gained popularity for the treatment and prevention of hip dislocation, with increased stability provided by a large diameter mobile insert. However, distal regions of the insert may impinge on soft tissues like the iliopsoas, leading to groin pain. Additionally, soft-tissue impingement may trap the mobile insert, leading to excessive loading of the insert rim from engagement with the femoral neck and subsequent intra-prosthetic dislocation. To address this, an Anatomically Contoured Dual Mobility (ACDM) insert with a soft-tissue friendly distal geometry was developed (Fig.1). Previously, the ACDM insert was shown to maintain the femoroacetabular contact area and joint stability of a conventional DM insert [Duffy et al. BJJ 2013, 95-B:34, p298; Zumbrunn et al. BJJ 2013, 95-B:34, p605]. The goal of this study was to utilize cadaver specimens to verify whether the ACDM insert could reduce soft-tissue impingement relative to a conventional DM insert. Methods. Fluoroscopic imaging was used to evaluate soft-tissue interaction with ACDM and conventional DM inserts in four cadaver hips (Fig. 2). A metal wire was sutured to the deep fibers of the iliopsoas muscle/tendon, and metal wires were embedded in the inner head and the mobile insert for fluoroscopic visualization. All soft tissue except the anterior hip capsule and iliopsoas were removed, and a rope was attached to the iliopsoas to apply tension along its native orientation. A femoral stem and a DM acetabular shell were implanted sothe ACDM or conventional DM inserts, together with the inner heads, could be inserted. Fluoroscopic images of the hip joint were taken at maximum hyperextension, 0°, 15° and 30° hip flexion with the insert positioned in neutral and anteverted orientations (Fig. 2). Neutral orientation corresponded to the insert axis parallel to the femoral neck, while anteverted orientation corresponded to a flexed insert that contacted the femoral neck posteriorly. Results. In all hips, fluoroscopic images revealed iliopsoas tenting with the conventional DM insert, and impingement of the iliopsoas occurred at low hip flexion angles (hyperextension, 0°, 15°) with the insert in neutral and anteverted orientations (Fig. 2 and 3). Further, at certain low flexion positions during dynamic motion, the movement of the conventional DM insert was blocked due to trapping of the insert by the anterior soft tissue and the femoral stem (Fig. 2B). At flexion angles above 30°, the iliopsoas moved away from the mobile insert and no impingement was seen. In all hips, the soft-tissue impingement and insert trapping was significantly reduced with the ACDM insert (Fig. 2 and 3). The reduction in impingement occurred with the insert in both neutral and anteverted orientations, although it was more evident for the latter. Conclusion. This study showed that conventional DM inserts impinge against the iliopsoas in low flexion, and their motion can be blocked by soft-tissue impingement. The Anatomically Contoured Dual Mobility (ACDM) insert significantly reduced this undesirable soft-tissue impingement. Thus, the ACDM insert may reduce the risk of groin pain and intra-prosthetic dislocation resulting from soft-tissue impingement and entrapment of the mobile insert

Introduction. Dual Mobility (DM) implants have gained popularity for the treatment and prevention of hip dislocation, with increased stability provided by a large diameter mobile liner. However, distal regions of the liner can impinge on soft-tissues like hip capsule and iliopsoas, leading to anterior hip pain. Additionally, soft-tissue impingement may trap the mobile liner, leading to excessive loading of the liner rim, from engagement with the femoral stem, and subsequent intra-prosthetic dislocation. The hypothesis of this study was that reducing the liner profile below the equator (contoured design) can mitigate soft-tissue impingement without compromising inner-head pull-out resistance and overall hip joint stability (Fig. 1). Methods. The interaction of conventional and contoured liners with anterior soft-tissues was evaluated in 10 cadaveric hips (5 specimens; 2 male, 3 female; age 65 ± 10 yrs; liner diameter 42–48mm) via visual observation and fluoroscopic imaging. A metal wire was sutured to the deep fibers of the iliopsoas tendon/muscle, and metal wires were embedded in the mobile liners for fluoroscopic visualization (Fig. 2). All soft-tissue except the anterior hip capsule and iliopsoas was removed, and a rope was attached to the iliopsoas to apply tension along its natural orientation. Resistance to inner-head pull-out was evaluated via Finite Element Analysis (FEA) by simulating a full cycle of insertion of the inner head into the mobile liner and subsequent pullout. The femoral head, acetabular shell, and stem were modeled as rigid, while the mobile liner was modeled as plastically deformable. Hip joint stability was evaluated by dynamic simulations in for two dislocation modes: (A) Posterior dislocation (at 90° hip flexion) with internal hip rotation; (B) Posterior dislocation (starting at 90° flexion) with combined hip flexion and adduction. A 44 mm diameter conventional and a 44 mm contoured liner were evaluated during these tests. Results. The cadaver experiments showed that distal portion of conventional liners impinge on anterior hip capsule and iliopsoas at low flexion angles (<30°). Additionally, when the hip moved from flexion into extension, the liner motion was blocked between posterior neck engagement, and anterior soft-tissue impingement. In all hips, the soft-tissue impingement / tenting was significantly reduced with contoured liners (Fig. 7). The change in tenting could be visualized as change in distance between the iliopsoas wire, and the contoured/conventional liners on sequential fluoroscopic images. The maximum reduction in iliopsoas tenting for a given specimen ranged from 1.8 mm to 5.5 mm. Additionally, the contoured and conventional liners had identical inner-head pull-out resistance (901N vs. 909N), jump distance (9.4 mm mode-A, 11.7 mm mode-B) and impingement-free range of motion (47° mode-A, 29° mode-B). Conclusion. This study showed that distal portions of conventional DM liners can impinge against iliopsoas and hip capsule in low flexion leading to functional impediment of liner motion. Additionally, reducing the liner profile below the equator led to significant reduction in soft-tissue impingement/tenting without affecting mechanical performance. Thus, a contoured dual mobility liner design may reduce the risk of anterior hip pain and intra-prosthetic dislocation resulting from soft-tissue impingement and liner entrapment. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Introduction:. Dual Mobility (DM) hip implants have gained popularity for the treatment and preventions of instability. In DM implants a large diameter mobile insert matches the native femoral head size. However, studies have shown that the peripheral regions of such large diameter implants overhang beyond the native anatomy and can directly impinge against nearby soft tissues, especially the iliopsoas, leading to groin pain (Fig. 1). Soft-tissue impingement can also trap the mobile DM insert, leading to damage of its peripheral rim, which secures the small diameter inner head (Fig. 2). The goal of this research was to develop an anatomically contoured soft-tissue friendly DM insert. Methods:. Various Anatomically Contoured Dual Mobility (ACDM) insert designs were constructed, wherein the outer articular surface extending from the pole to a theta (θ) angle, matched that of contemporary implants (Fig. 3). However, the articular surface in the peripheral region was moved inward towards the center, thereby reducing implant volume that could impinge on the soft tissue (Fig. 1 and Fig. 3). Finite element analyses were used to determine the insert-acetabular contact area under peak in vivo loads during different activities. Finite element analysis was also used to determine resistance to extraction of the inner head. Published data was used to compare the implant articular geometry to native anatomy. These analyses were used optimize the soft-tissue relief, while matching the load bearing contact area and the resistance to extraction of the inner head in contemporary implants. Results:. The resultant ACDM insert had the outer profile of contemporary implants over approximately a hemispherical portion (Fig. 3). Beyond this, the peripheral articular surface was composed of smaller convex radii. The coverage of the small diameter inner head by the insert was increased slightly (<4 deg) to match the extraction resistance of the inner head in contemporary implants. The outer insert-acetabular contact area of the ACDM insert remained adequate. Additionally, while contemporary prosthesis extended beyond the native articular surface in the distal-medial and proximal-lateral regions, the ACDM insert remained with the margins of the native anatomy. Conclusion:. A novel anatomically contoured dual mobility insert was developed to mitigate the risk of soft-tissue impingement present with contemporary prosthesis. The ACDM insert retains the outer profile of contemporary implants over approximately a hemispherical portion. However, in the peripheral region, exposed to the soft tissue, the ACDM insert has a smaller profile to reduce soft-tissue impingement

Introduction. The large diameter mobile polyethylene liner of the dual mobility implant provides increased resistance to hip dislocation. However, a problem specific to the dual mobility system is intra-prosthetic dislocation (IPD), secondary to loss of the retentive rim, causing the inner head to dissociate from the polyethylene liner. We hypothesized that impingement of the polyethylene liner with the surrounding soft-tissue inhibits liner motion, thereby facilitating load transfer from the femoral neck to the liner and leading to loss of retentive rim over time. This mechanism of soft-tissue impingement with the liner was evaluated via cadaver experiments, and retrievals were used to assess polyethylene rim damage. Methods. Total hip arthroplasty was performed on 10 cadaver hips using 3D printed dual mobility components. A metal wire was sutured to the posterior surface (underside) of the iliopsoas, and metal wires were embedded into grooves on the outer surface of the liner and inner head to identify these structures under fluoroscopy. Tension was applied to the iliopsoas to move the femur from maximum hyperextension to 90° of flexion for the purpose of visualizing the iliopsoas and capsule interaction with the mobile liner. The interaction of the mobile liner with the iliopsoas was studied using fluoroscopy and direct visual observation. Fifteen retrieved dual mobility liners were assessed for rim edge and rim chamfer damage. Rim edge damage was defined as any evidence of contact, and rim chamfer damage was classified into six categories: impact ribs on the chamfer surface, loss of machining marks, scratching or pitting, rim deformation causing a raised lip, a rounded rim edge, or embedded metal debris. Results. Manipulation of the cadaver specimens through full range of motion showed liner impingement with the iliopsoas tendon in low flexion angles, which impeded liner motion. At high flexion angles (beyond 30°), the iliopsoas tendon moved away from the liner and impingement was not observed. The fluoroscopy tests using the embedded metal wires confirmed what was observed during manual manipulation of the specimen. When observing the hip during maximum hyperextension, 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion, there was obvious tenting of the iliopsoas. All retrieved components showed damage on the rim and the chamfer surface. The most common damage seen was scratching/ pitting. There was no association between presence of damage and time in vivo controlling for age and Body Mass Index (p≥0.255). Discussion. The cadaver studies showed that the mobile liner motion could be impeded by impingement with the iliopsoas tendon and hip capsule. Visual and fluoroscopic observation showed impingement of iliopsoas and hip capsule with the distal portion of the mobile liner, particularly during low flexion angles. All retrieved liners showed damage despite their limited time in vivo and despite being retrieved for reasons other than IPD. This suggests that soft-tissue impingement may inhibit liner motion routinely in vivo, resulting in load transfer from the femoral neck on to the rim of the liner. This may be an important mechanism for IPD

Introduction. Dual-mobility (DM) liners have increased popularity due to the range of motion and stability provided by these implants. However, larger head diameters have been associated with anterior hip pain, due to surrounding soft-tissue impingement, particularly the iliopsoas. To address this, an anatomically contoured dual mobility (ACDM) liner was designed by reducing the volume of the liner below the equator (Fig1). Previous cadaver studies have shown that the ACDM significantly reduces iliopsoas tenting and trapping of the liner compared to conventional designs. We created a finite element study based on previous cadaver testing to further analyze the effectiveness of the ACDM design in reducing soft-tissue impingement, specifically the tendon-liner contact pressure and the tendon stress. Methods. The finite element model was developed within COMSOL 4.3b. The psoas tendon was modelled as a Yeoh hyper-elastic Material, which uses 3 constants (c1-c3), density (1.73g/cm3) and a bulk modulus (26GPa)[Hirokawa,2000]. In a previous, separate study, the average stiffness of 10 psoas tendon samples (5 cadavers), were measured to be 339[N/mm] in the linear region with average width and thickness of 14mmX4mm. The 3 constants were tuned to match experimental uniaxial test data, and were 5[GPa], 0[Gpa], and 46[GPa] for c1, c2, and c3 respectively. The implant components were rigidly modeled relative to the psoas. Cadaver specific CT models were used to create the FEA geometry. The insertion points for the Psoas were digitally determined on the proximal end of the lesser trochanter, and the psoas notch on the pelvis for hip flexion angles of −15°, 0°, 15° and 30°. These insertion points determined the length of the psoas and its relative position to the femoral head in 3D. The specific liner size and position for each cadaver was determined by implant planning with the CT models. In this abstract, we only present data for 2 specimens (left/right hips) with 44mm conventional DM, and 44mm ACDM, matching specimen anatomy. A 500N tensile load was applied to the psoas tendon proximally to simulate moderate physiological loading, the average/max stresses and contact pressures between the psoas and the two liner designs were determined. Results. At all flexion angles from −15° to 30°, the ACDM had lower psoas-liner contact pressure and stress compared to the conventional liner. Both contact pressure and tendon stress decreased for both liners with increasing hip flexion. At −15° flexion angle, there was an average contact pressure difference of .51MPa between the conventional and ACDM designs, or 37% decrease in pressure when using the ACDM. The average difference in tendon stress was 67.9MPa, or a 59% decrease in stress when using the ACDM (fig2, fig3). Conclusion. This study utilized cadaver specific FEA models to evaluate interaction between the iliopsoas tendon and conventional and ACDM liners. Although this abstract presented FEA models for only four hips (two specimens), the results show a notable reduction in contact pressure and tendon stress with ACDM designs. This validates findings from previous cadaver studies, suggesting that anatomically contoured designs could reduce anterior hip pain and soft tissue impingement

Introduction:. Large diameter femoral heads have been used successfully to prevent dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). However, recent studies show that the peripheral region of contemporary femoral heads can directly impinge against the native soft-tissues, particularly the iliopsoas, leading to activity limiting anterior hip pain. This is because the spherical articular surface of contemporary prosthesis overhangs beyond that of the native anatomy (Fig. 1). The goal of this research was to develop an anatomically shaped, soft-tissue friendly large diameter femoral head that retains the benefits of contemporary implants. Methods:. Various Anatomically Contoured femoral Head (ACH) designs were constructed, wherein the articular surface extending from the pole to a theta (θ) angle, matched that of contemporary implants (Fig. 2). However, the articular surface in the peripheral region was moved inward towards the femoral head center, thereby reducing material that could impinge on the soft-tissues (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Finite element analysis was used to determine the femoroacetabular contact area under peak in vivo loads during different activities. Dynamic simulations were used to determine jump distance prior to posterior dislocation under different dislocation modes. Published data was used to compare the implant articular geometry to native anatomy (Fig. 3). These analyses were used to optimize the soft-tissue relief, while retaining the load bearing contact area, and the dislocation resistance of conventional implants. Results:. The resulting ACH prosthesis retained the large diameter profile of contemporary implants over an approximately hemispherical portion (Fig. 2). Beyond this, the peripheral articular surface was composed of smaller convex radii. With this design, the jump distance under posterior and anterior dislocation modes, and the femoroacetabular contact area under loads corresponding to walking, deep knee bend and chair sit, remained identical to that of contemporary implants. Additionally, while contemporary prosthesis extended beyond the native articular surface in the distal-medial and proximal-lateral regions (shaded grey), the ACH implant remained within the margins of the native anatomy (Fig. 3). Conclusion:. A novel large diameter anatomically contoured femoral head prosthesis was developed, to mitigate the soft-tissue impingement with contemporary prosthesis. The ACH retained the large diameter profile of contemporary implants over a hemispherical portion. However, in the peripheral region, the ACH had a smaller profile to reduce soft-tissue impingement

Introduction. Dual-mobility (DM) liners provide increased range of motion and stability. However, large head diameters have been associated with anterior hip pain due to impingement with surrounding soft-tissues, particularly the iliopsoas. Further, during hip extension the liner can get trapped due to anterior soft-tissue impingement that resists rotation being imparted to the liner from posterior stem-liner contact. Over time this can cause liner rim damage, leading to intra-prosthetic dislocation of the small diameter inner head. To address this, an anatomically contoured dual mobility (ACDM) liner was designed to reduce the volume of the liner below the equator that can interact with soft-tissues (Fig. 1). In this study, we utilized finite element analysis to evaluate tendon-liner contact pressure and tendon stresses with ACDM and conventional designs during hip extension, wherein the posterior edge of liner is in contact with the stem while the anterior edge is exposed to the soft-tissue. Methods. The average uniaxial stiffness (350 N/mm), and average dimensions (width × thickness = 14mm × 4mm) of 10 cadaver psoas tendon samples were determined in a separate study. The iliopsoas tendon was modelled as a Yeoh hyper-elastic material, and the material constants were tuned to match the experimental uniaxial test data. Cadaver specific FEA models were created for 5 specimens (10 hips) using computed tomography (CT) scans. The implant components were modeled as being rigid relative to the iliopsoas tendon. The iliopsoas tendon was modelled as extending from its insertion point on the lesser trochanter to the psoas notch on the pelvis for hip flexion angles of −15°, 0°, 15° and 30°. Appropriately sized DM components were implanted virtually for each specimen. Once placed in its proper position, the liner was rotated about the flexion axis until it contacted the stem posteriorly to represent its orientation during hip extension (Fig. 2). A 500N tensile load was applied to the iliopsoas tendon and the average/max stresses within the tendon, and average/max contact pressures between the tendon and liner were measured. Results. At all hip flexion angles from −15° to 30°, the tendon-liner contact pressure and tendon stresses were lower with the ACDM liners compared to the conventional liner. Contact pressure and tendon stress decreased for both liner designs with increasing hip flexion angle. At −15° flexion angle, the average contact pressure was 42.3% lower (0.36Mpa), and the maximum contact pressure was 45.1% (8.5Mpa lower), with the ACDM compared to conventional liner design. Similarly, at −15° flexion angle the average vonMises pressure in the tendon was 32.5% lower (14.8Mpa), and the maximum vonMises stress in the tendon was 55.7% (159Mpa lower) with the ACDM design. (Fig 3). Discussion. This study utilized cadaver specific FEA models to evaluate interaction between the iliopsoas tendon and conventional and ACDM liners during hip extension. The results showed a notable reduction in contact pressure and tendon stress resulting from reduced volume and more soft-tissue friendly profile of the ACDM design. Thus, the ACDM design may be able to reduce undesirable soft-tissue interaction with dual mobility liners

INTRODUCTION. Mechanical tissue properties of some ligaments and tendons have been described in the literature. However, to our knowledge no data exists describing the tensile properties of the Iliopsoas tendon. The iliopsoas complex is in very close proximity to the hip joint running through the psoas notch from the inner side of the pelvis to the lesser trochanter on the posterior aspect of the proximal femur. The tendon muscle complex wraps around the anterior aspect of the femoral head. Hip joint intervention such as total hip arthroplasty (THA) can interfere with iliopsoas function and contact mechanics, and thereby play a major role in the clinically known condition of anterior hip pain. For computer simulations such as finite element analysis (FEA) precise knowledge of soft-tissue mechanical properties is crucial for accurate models and therefore, the goal of this study was to describe the iliopsoas tensile properties using uniaxial testing equipment. METHODS. Ten iliopsoas tendons were harvested from five specimens (2 male, 3 female; 82.4 yrs ±7.4 yrs) and then carefully cleaned from any fat and muscle tissue. Two freeze clamps were fixed to each end of the tendon sample. The clamps were submerged in liquid nitrogen for 30 seconds to prevent tendon slip and attached to the test frame and load cell via carabiners allowing the tendon to rotate around its long axis. Width, thickness and initial gauge length of each tendon were measured before testing. The test protocol included 10 cycles of preconditioning between 6 N and 60 N at 0.4 mm/s, followed by continuous distraction at 0.4 mm/s until failure. For each tendon the linear stiffness was determined by fitting a straight line to the liner region on the force-displacement curve (Fig. 1). RESULTS. The average linear stiffness of the ten iliopsoas tendons was measured to be 339 N/mm ±81 N/mm and the average failure load resulted in 2154 N ±418 N (Fig. 2). Average width and thickness were determined to be 13.9 mm ±3.2 mm and 3.8 mm ±0.5 mm respectively. The initial gauge length of the ten tendons revealed an average of 56.5 mm ±10.5 mm. CONCLUSION. An average stiffness of 339 N/mm and average failure load of 2154 N was found in our experiments. A trend of increased stiffness and reduced failure load with higher age could be observed. Soft-tissue mechanical properties are dependent on tissue geometry such as cross-sectional area and length and therefore can be variable in comparison with other anatomical structures (e.g. patella tendon). To our knowledge no data has been published on the mechanical properties of iliopsoas tendons and therefore results from this research could be used for future simulation models involving the iliopsoas tendon such as FEA analysis to evaluate the effect of anterior hip pain due to soft-tissue impingement

INTRODUCTION. Femoral head diameter has a major influence on stability and dislocation resistance after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Although routine use of large heads is common, several recent studies have shown that contemporary large head prostheses can directly impinge against native soft tissues, particularly the iliopsoas which wraps around the femoral head, leading to refractory anterior hip pain. To address this, we developed a novel Anatomically Contoured large diameter femoral Head (ACH). We hypothesized that anatomical contouring of the ACH implant for soft tissue relief would not compromise dislocation resistance, and the ACH implant would provide increased stability compared to small heads. METHODS. In this study the dislocation resistance of a 36 mm ACH was compared to that of 28 mm and 36 mm contemporary heads. The ACH implant was based on a 36 mm sphere with smaller radii used to contour the peripheral region below the equator of the head. MSC Adams was used for dynamic simulations based on two previously described dislocation modes: (A) Posterior dislocation (at 90° hip flexion) with internal rotation of the hip and a posterosuperior directed joint force; (B) posterior dislocation (starting at 90° flexion) with combined hip flexion and adduction and a posteromedial force direction (Fig. 1). Impingement-free motion (motion without neck impingement against the acetabular liner) and jump distance (head separation from acetabulum prior to dislocation) were measured to evaluate the dislocation risk of each implant. The acetabular cup was placed at 42.5° abduction and 19.7° anteversion, while the femoral component was anteverted by 9.75° based on published data. RESULTS. The results showed no differences between the novel anatomically contoured 36 mm head and a conventional 36 mm head for both dislocation modes. The 36 mm ACH and conventional head showed greater impingement-free motion compared to the 28 mm conventional head, with an increase of 7° for dislocation mode A, and 4° for mode B. Relative to the 28 mm head, the jump distance for the 36 mm ACH and the 36 mm conventional head increased by 1.5 mm for dislocation mode A, and 2 mm for mode B (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). CONCLUSION. The novel Anatomically Contoured large diameter femoral Head (ACH) showed increased dislocation resistance compared to a conventional small diameter head and matched the stability of a conventional large head of the same size. This confirmed the hypothesis that large femoral heads can be anatomically shaped to alleviate the risk of soft-tissue impingement, as in the ACH implant, without jeopardizing the desired stability

There are numerous factors that influence total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability including surgical approach, soft-tissue tensioning, impingement, abductor status, and component positioning. A long-held tenet regarding acetabular component positioning is that cup inclination and anteversion of 40 ± 10 degrees and 15 ± 10 degrees, respectively, represents a “safe zone” as to minimise dislocation after primary THA. However, several studies have recently challenged that notion for individual patients. A study completed by Abdel et al. identified a cohort of 9784 primary THAs performed at a single institution with 206 THAs (2%) that subsequently dislocated. The authors determined that 58% of the dislocated THAs had their acetabular component within the safe zone for both acetabular inclination and anteversion. When looked at separately, 84% had their inclination within the safe zone (mean value of 44 ± 8 degrees), and 69% had their anteversion within the safe zone (mean value of 15 ± 9 degrees). As such, surgeons should take into account that cup positioning alone does not determine the risk of instability following THA, as there are a multitude of other factors that can contribute to dislocation. Hip stability is multifactorial and likely patient-specific, and must take into account bony and muscular anatomy, static and dynamic soft tissue balance and intraoperative tensioning, and the functional demand and rehabilitative efforts of the patient

Introduction. Large diameter femoral heads provide increased range-of-motion and reduced dislocation rates compared to smaller diameter femoral heads. However, several recent studies have reported that contemporary large head prostheses can directly impinge against the local soft tissues leading to anterior hip pain. To address this we developed a novel Anatomically Contoured large diameter femoral Head (ACH) that maintains the profile of a large diameter femoral head over a hemispherical portion and then contours inward the distal profile of the head for soft-tissue relief. We hypothesized that the distal contouring of the ACH articular surface would not affect contact area. The impact of component placement, femoral head to acetabular liner radial clearance, and joint loading during different activities was investigated. Methods. A finite element model was used to assess the femoroacetabular contact area of a 36 mm diameter conventional head and a 36 mm ACH (Fig. 1). It included a rigid acetabular shell, plastically deformable UHMWPE acetabular liner, rigid femoral head and rigid femoral stem. The femoral stem was placed at 0°, 10° and 20° of anteversion. The acetabular shell and liner were placed in 20°, 40° and 60° of abduction and 0°, 20° and 40° of anteversion. The femoral head to acetabular liner radial clearances modeled were 0.06 mm, 0.13 mm and 0.5 mm. Three loading cases corresponding to peak in vivo loads during walking, chair sit and deep-knee bend were analyzed (Fig. 2). This allowed a range of component positions and maximum joint loads to be studied. Results. Under all tested conditions there was no difference between the two implants (Fig. 3). The contact area for both prosthesis depended on the radial clearance between the head and liner. The conventional head contact area (standard deviation) in mm. 2. for 0.5 mm, 0.13 mm and 0.06 mm of radial clearance was 230.5 (70.2), 419.8 (48.7) and 575.4 (60.1) respectively. Similarly, for the ACH these were 230.5 (70.4), 420.1 (48.7) and 575.9 (59.4). The average data for a head and radial clearance combination included all component placements and load conditions completed. A student T-Test (p = 0.05) confirmed that the ACH had the same contact area as the conventional head for all radial clearances. Conclusion. This study showed that, as intended, an anatomically contoured large diameter femoral head designed to provide soft-tissue relief maintained the load bearing articular contact area of a conventional implant. The novel ACH prosthesis could mitigate the risk of soft-tissue impingement with contemporary large head implants while retaining their benefits of additional stability and range-of-motion

There are numerous factors that influence total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability including surgical approach, soft-tissue tensioning, impingement, abductor status, and component positioning. A long-held tenet regarding acetabular component positioning is that cup inclination and anteversion of 40 degrees ± 10 degrees and 15 degrees ± 10 degrees, respectively, represents a “safe zone” as to minimise dislocation after primary THA. However, several studies have recently challenged that notion for individual patients. A study completed by Abdel et al identified a cohort of 9784 primary THAs performed at a single institution with 206 THAs (2%) that subsequently dislocated. The authors determined that 58% of the dislocated THAs had their acetabular component within the safe zone for both acetabular inclination and anteversion. When looked at separately, 84% had their inclination within the safe zone (mean value of 44 degrees ± 8 degrees), and 69% had their anteversion within the safe zone (mean value of 15 degrees ± 9 degrees). As such, surgeons should take into account that cup positioning alone does not determine the risk of instability following THA, as there are a multitude of other factors that can contribute to dislocation. Hip stability is multifactorial and likely patient-specific, and must take into account bony and muscular anatomy, static and dynamic soft tissue balance and intra-operative tensioning, and the functional demand and rehabilitative efforts of the patient