Introduction. We perform PAO via a modified
The increasing desire to protect the periarticular structures led the need of a Tissue Sparing Surgery. The accesses most widely used are the direct-lateral approach and the postero-lateral one, both with patient in lateral decubitus. Aim: This accesses require however an incision of tendons and muscles even in their minimally invasive technique, so we looked for an approach that would wholly protect the periarticular structures and allow us not to revise our experience in patient positioning, preparation of the operating field and surgeon's position during surgery. Our intent was to leave the acquired knowledge unchanged and to preserve unaltered the anatomical landmarks that we had previously identified and consolidated for the correct positioning of the components. We have used this approach in more than 180 cases of primary hip arthroplasty. Clinical control includes: Oxford Hip Score, VAS and X-Ray.Background
Methods
The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established procedure in the management of symptomatic hip dysplasia. The associated
Direct anterior approach (DAA) is one of the best way to the hip joint for prevention of post-operative dislocation. We have applied this method as minimum invasive surgery (MIS) to more than two hundred developmental dysplastic hip of Japanese patients in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and there is no post-operative dislocation within three years of last observation carried forward (LOCF). The reason of this benefit is derived from the accuracy of cup positioning and keeping good muscle balance. But the learning curve is very important and some technical pitfalls are there in this approach. We have chosen thirty four patients that the duration of operating time more than one and half hours and loss of blood more than five hundred gram in hour series. The most important factors of the difficulties are the combinations of shortening of femoral neck, especially Perthes like deformity of developmental deformities of the hip joint (DDH) and widening of pelvic bone for the reason of insufficiency working spaces and the difficulties of broaching insertion (8/34). The second factor is the contracture of hip and knee joints combinations for the difficulties of lift up the proximal femur as broaching stem (3/34). The obesity, Body Mass Index (BMI) above thirty is not the reason of difficulties of women in our series. DAA can be extended to
Introduction. The anterior approach to primary total hip arthroplasty is an unfamiliar approach to most surgeons that is considered to be minimally invasive based on the premise that there is less soft tissue damage and quicker post-operative recovery time. We present our experience of using the anterior approach exclusively by a single surgeon at multiple surgical centers for a period of 3.5 years. Method. 709 consecutive patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasties from 8/2007 to 12/2010 through a direct anterior approach were performed by single surgeon with extensive training in the approach. The procedure was performed with the patient supine on a fracture table (Trumph arch table extension) through an anterior approach as described by Dr. Joel Matta through a Smith-Peterson interval. Intra-operative data and complications were collected prospectively and to avoid missing any complications, electronic medical records (Alteer) were retrospectively reviewed. Results. The demographic characteristics of patients are listed in Table 1 and intra-operative data collected presented in Table 2. The overall major complication rate was 2.81% (19/709). Overall revision rate due to any cause was 1.83% (13/709). Wound related complications were 6.67% which included any type of drainage noted during post op clinic visits, wound dehiscence, stitch abscesses, or superficial infections requiring irrigation and debridement. Discussion. The anterior approach through a modified