Introduction. Wound closure following orthopaedic surgery is an important step requiring careful technique and suitable suture material. The use of subcuticular sutures has been advocated following use in animal models and has also been reported in the literature having been used in specialities such as Orthopaedic Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Obstetrics. Aims. The aim of this study is to assess the use of absorbable subcuticular INSORB® sutures in THR when compared with the standard Autosuture. TM. Signet. TM. metal skin staples. Patient satisfaction with wound appearance was measured at the six week review stage. Wound healing was also noted in the initial stages of recovery and at the six week review stage. Methods. A Randomised Control Trial of patients undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THR) was undertaken. Parameters measured included wound length, time taken for staple insertion, GP appointment for suture removal and patient satisfaction with wound appearance at 6 weeks post-operation. No exclusion criteria were applied in terms of the age, medical history, thromboembolic prophylaxis therapy or type of hip prosthesis. Results. 50 patients were recruited for this study. 25 patients had their wounds closed with INSORB® sutures and 25 patients had their wounds closed with skin staples. Wound healing was satisfactory at six weeks post operation. All patients in both groups described themselves as being satisfied or very satisfied with their wounds post-operation. Conclusion. INSORB® subcuticular skin staples act as an adequate method of skin closure in primary hip arthroplasty. They also provide an excellent cosmetic result and high levels of patient satisfaction

Introduction. Skin closure methods are various in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Subcuticular skin closure techniques, which do not require postoperative stitch removal, are considered to be useful for excellent cosmesis and patients' satisfaction. Basically, subcuticular skin closure provides the tightness and water-tight seal, which leads to loss of postoperative normal physiologic drainage. As a routine wound closure, we performed the subcuticular skin closure with use of absorbable sutures or barbed sutures without staples. According to some previous reports, subcuticular skin closure using barbed sutures resulted in worse clinical outcomes, comparing with conventional skin staples. However, little attention has been paid to the differences between conventional absorbable and barbed sutures in both capsular and subcuticular skin closures. Our purpose was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the barbed suture, comparing to conventional absorbable sutures in TKA. Methods. A total of 81 knees in 75 patients (60 females and 15 males) were enrolled in the current investigation. Mean age was 73 (58–89) years old. All the subjects underwent unilateral or staged bilateral TKA using Balanced Knee System, posterior stabilized design (Ortho Development, Draper, UT). All knees were divided into two groups, as presented in Table 1. In conventional group, capsule was repaired using interrupted number 1 braided absorbable sutures, followed by closure of subdermal layer using a 3-0 monofilament absorbable suture with inverted interrupted knots. Thereafter, subcuticular skin closure was done using 4-0 monofilament absorbable suture, followed by adhesive tape. On the other hand, in barbed suture group, 1-0 and 4-0 unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc, Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts) was used for capsule and subcuticular skin closure, respectively. Drains were removed on postoperative day 2. We evaluated closure time from capsule to skin, range of motion (ROM), Hollander Wound Evaluation Score (HWES: maximum score 6/6), and complications. Postoperative ROM and HWES were evaluated on postoperative day 14. As a statistical analysis, the data was compared between groups using Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher exact probability test. P-values of < 0.05 were considered as significant. Results. 20 knees were allocated to conventional group and 61 knees were allocated to barbed suture group. Preoperative patients' demographics were seen in Table 2. No significant differences were found between groups preoperatively. In terms of clinical results, surgical closure time was significantly fast in barbed suture group, while postoperative range of motion and HWES were not significantly different between groups. In each group, wound related complication was not found. Discussion. According to previous reports, V-Loc provided worse clinical outcomes in wound related complications. However, in the current investigation, barbed suture was safe in wound cosmesis and effective in surgical closure time, comparing to conventional closure. We considered that barbed suture would be safe and effective as a closure method in TKA

Introduction. Joint reconstruction remains a successful and popular surgery with advances in approaches, implants and techniques continually forthcoming. Various methods of skin closure exist to address issues in efficiency, aesthetics, and barrier to infection. While subcuticular skin closure techniques offer an aesthetic advantage to conventional skin stapling, no measurable differences have been reported. Furthermore, newer barbed sutures, such as the V-loc absorbable suture, theoretically distribute tension evenly through the wound and help decrease knot-related complications. To our knowledge, no literature exists on the rate of wound complications in joint arthroplasty with the use of V-loc suture for skin closure. We hypothesize that despite theoretical gains, skin closure with a V-loc (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) absorbable suture should be performed with caution. Methods & Materials. A retrospective chart review was conducted of 278 consecutive primary joint reconstruction cases performed by a single surgeon in 12 months from July 2009 through June 2010. Pre-operative history & physical reports were evaluated for co-morbidities (i.e diabetes mellitus), smoking status and body mass index (BMI). Operative dictations by the attending surgeon provided information on the surgical procedure, use of drain, wound closure technique and type of suture/staple used for skin closure. Skin was closed by the primary surgeon and his chief resident. Wounds were closed via staple gun or subcuticular stitch (3-0 Biosyn vs V-Loc) in a consecutive manner, depending on the surgeon's preference in that period. Post-operative clinic notes were reviewed to determine the occurrence of wound complications, issuance of antibiotic prescriptions, or return to the operating room. The cohort consisted of 106 males and 161 females at an average age of 63 years (range: 18–92). Overall, there were 153 procedures at the knee (including TKA, uni-compartmental arthroplasty, patello-femoral arthroplasty) and 125 procedures at the hip (including THA and hemi-arthroplasty). Results. In review of 278 consecutive primary joint reconstruction cases, there were 17 (6.1%) post-operative wound complications noted, including cellulitis, stitch abscesses, wound dehiscence, and deeper infections requiring OR irrigation and debridement. In 181 cases, staples were used for skin closure; in these cases, seven wound complications were noted (7/181, 3.9%). In 49 cases closed via a subcuticular Biosyn suture there were 4 wound complications noted (4/49, 8.1%). Six wound complications occurred in cases closed with a V-loc suture (6/45, 13.3%). Discussion. Aesthetics and efficiency often are the driving forces of innovation. We present the rate of wound complications in various superficial wound closure methods, including the V-loc, an innovative absorbable barbed suture. Based on our clinical experience, we promote consideration of wound and infectious complications when choosing a method of skin closure in joint reconstruction procedures

Limb lengthening by callus distraction and external fixation has a high rate of complications. We describe our experience using an intramedullary nail (Fitbone) which contains a motorised and programmable sliding mechanism for limb lengthening and bone transport. Between 2001 and 2004 we lengthened 13 femora and 11 tibiae in ten patients (seven men and three women) with a mean age of 32 years (21 to 47) using this nail. The indications for operation were short stature in six patients and developmental or acquired disorders in the rest.

The mean lengthening achieved was 40 mm (27 to 60). The mean length of stay in hospital was seven days (5 to 9). The mean healing index was 35 days/cm (18.8 to 70.9). There were no cases of implant-related infection or malunion.