Background:. A large percentage of the patients who present for unilateral TKA have bilateral disease. Performing simultaneous, bilateral TKA has been debated and currently there is no consensus on the risks and benefit of this approach. In addition, specific selection criteria have not been defined to more accurately identify which patients are potentially appropriate candidates for this approach. Objectives:. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and peri-operative complications in simultaneous, bilateral TKA's using pre-operative patient selection criteria. Methods:. A retrospective analysis of 117 consecutive patients, (234 knees), was performed between February 2008 and March 2012 who underwent simultaneous, bilateral TKA performed by one surgeon under a single anesthetic. Pre-operative selection criteria were used for all patients to qualify for a simultaneous bilateral approach. This included the following: . 1). BMI less than 34,. 2). Minimum arc of motion to 100 degrees flexion,. 3). Flexion contracture less than 10 degrees,. 4). Varus or valgus alignment less than 10 degrees,. 5). No prior history of cardiovascular disease. 6). Age Less than 70 years old. Clinical outcomes were assessed including anesthesia type, tourniquet time, length of stay, transfusion rate, pre- op hemoglobin, post-op hemoglobin, pre-op range of motion, post-op range of motion, DVT and PE. Knee Society Score (KSS) and Functional KSS were assessed pre-operatively and 1 year post-operatively. Anatomic and mechanical axis evaluation was also performed on all patients with long standing radiographs pre and post operatively. A control group of 573 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty during this same time period were identified and matched for the year of surgery, and prosthesis type. The same selection criteria were used for the control group and the same data points were evaluated. Results:. One hundred and seventeen consecutive patients, (234 knees), undergoing simultaneous, bilateral TKA were reviewed. There were no DVT's, or PE's. Nineteen percent required a transfusion for post-operative anemia. There were no cases of deep infection. Average pre-op KSS score was 49, with a post KSS score of 89 at an average follow-up of 1 year. Average pre-op Functional KSS score was 52, with an average post-op Functional KSS score of 91. Average ROM at one year post-op was 0 degrees of extension and 123 degrees of flexion. Average anatomic axis was 6 degrees valgus with a neutral mechanical axis restored in all patients. The clinical outcomes of the control group were comparable, with no statistically significant increase in the incidence of perioperative complications between the study group and the control group. Conclusion:. When the degenerative process involves both knees with comparable severity, the decision to perform total knee arthroplasty on one knee at a time with a staged approach, verses a simultaneous bilateral approach, has been challenging for many surgeons. There have been previous reports of increased perioperative complications associated with bilateral total knee arthroplasty, including increased risks of cardiovascular, neurological complications, as well as the increased demands on rehabilitation. Similarly, benefits of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty have also been identified such as, shortened rehabilitation, improved patient satisfaction, and decreased costs both to the patient and the hospital system. Using pre-operative patient selection criteria, the decision process in determining which patients are appropriate candidates for a bilateral approach can be facilitated, with clinical outcomes comparable to unilateral total knee arthroplasty

(Introduction). In Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), closed drains have been conventionally used to prevent hematoma. Recently reported “no-drain” methods have been demonstrated to be safe and effective, especially for decreasing hemorrhage. However, there has been no report of a major study on a no-drain method in simultaneous bilateral TKA, only a few small studies. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy of no-drain placement in simultaneous bilateral TKA. (Methods). Our study included 75 patients (150joints) with preoperative hemoglobin(Hb) level of at least 11.0 g/dl who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA performed by the same surgeon in our department between January 2012 and December 2013. There were 12men and 63women, of average age 70.7 ± 7.9years (mean ± SD) and BMI 25.6± 3.8 (mean ± SD). Among them 72 patients had knee osteoarthritis and 3 patients had rheumatoid arthritis. The patella was not replaced in any of the cases. TKAs were performed separately on each knee. A tourniquet was applied between the initial skin incision and the postoperative dressing, and 1000 mg of tranexamic acid was injected into each joint after wound closure. (Results). The surgical time per patient was 136.6 ± 30.3 minutes (mean ± SD). The Hb levels (mean ± SD) were 13.0 ± 1.1 g/dl before surgery, 10.9 ± 1.2 g/dl on the day after surgery. The estimated total blood loss until the day after surgery was 558.4 ± 253.9 ml (mean ± SD). No patient experienced hypotension requiring vasopressor or rapid fluid therapy between the end of surgery and the day after surgery, and no complication caused by a sudden change of hemodynamics was found in any case of bilateral TKA. A gait training/range of motion exercise while bearing full load of the body weight was initiated from the day after surgery. This allowed patients to be discharged from our hospital in an average of 6.1days (range 5–11days)after surgery. There were no serious complications that occurred within three months after surgery. (Discussion). In cases of TKA with closed drain, even in unilateral surgery, excessive hemorrhage may be discharged through drain tubes for the first few hours after surgery. Hypotension caused by postoperative sudden hemorrhage or burden on the cardiovascular system seem to be major issues. In this study, simultaneous bilateral TKA were performed without suction drainage. The estimated blood loss until the day after surgery was approximately 560 ml. As sudden hypotension causing shock was not found, the post-operative hemorrhage seemed to have gradually progressed naturally. So we did not need the blood transfusion or rapid fluid therapy to any patient. This is one of the advantage of no-drainage method. (Conclusion). The simultaneous bilateral TKA without drain placement can be applied safely

For 3 decades surgeons have vigorously debated whether it is reasonable to offer simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement (TKA) to patients. Even after this substantial period of time there remain no randomised clinical trials that have addressed this issue and thus, it remains difficult to fully evaluate both the relative risks and the absolute risks of bilateral simultaneous versus staged bilateral knee replacement. What has emerged over the past couple of decades, however, is an understanding that there is a subset of patients with substantial comorbidities such as pre-existent cardiac disease and advanced age for whom bilateral simultaneous knee replacement seems unwise. For younger or otherwise healthy patients the debate continues in 2016 and seems to be focused less on the data itself than on how individual surgeons come to reconcile the differences between Relative Risk and Absolute Risk. When data is pooled from multiple retrospective studies of simultaneous versus staged bilateral TKA there are 2 clear trends that appear in the data. First, the relative risk of certain substantial complications (cardiac, thromboembolic, neurologic, gastrointestinal, and death) seems to be higher after simultaneous bilateral TKA than after staged bilateral TKA. Oakes and Hanssen highlighted these differences in Relative Risk noting that for each of those 5 outcomes there was a 2 to 5 times greater incidence of these complications after bilateral versus unilateral TKA. At the same time, however, it is clear that for most medically uncomplicated patients the Absolute Risk of a major complication is still fairly low — it is likely that >93% of such patients can undergo simultaneous bilateral TKA without encountering a major complication. Individual surgeons and individual patients often view those kinds of statistics in markedly disparate ways. One set of surgeons and patients will view the Relative Risk as most important and be decidedly concerned about the 2–5 times higher risk of certain complications. Another set of patients and surgeons will look at the Absolute Risk as most important and determine that it is decidedly most likely (>93%) that an individual healthy patient will make it through bilateral simultaneous TKA without major medical complications. Overall the conclusions of Oakes and Hanssen from a decade ago remain relevant in 2016: the overall risk of a peri-operative complication is higher with simultaneous bilateral TKA … and this is particularly true for the risk of peri-operative death. While some surgeons and some patients will decide that the increases in Relative Risk is offset by the fairly low Absolute Risk of complications and thus, feel comfortable with bilateral simultaneous TKA, other patients and other surgeons will not

Introduction. Peri-articular local anesthetic injections reduce post-operative pain in total knee arthroplasty and assist recovery. It is inconclusive whether intra-operative injection of peri-articular morphine is locally effective. The aim of this study is whether the addition of morphine to peri-articular injections in only unilateral knee improves post-operative pain, range of motion, swelling in patients with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. A prospective single-center double-blinded randomized controlled trial was undertaken to assess the local efficacy of adding morphine to intra-operative, peri-articular anesthesia in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Twenty eight patients with 56 TKAs were randomly divided into 2 groups, unilateral TKA with intraoperative peri-articular injection with adding morphine and the other side TKA without adding morphine. The morphine group received an intraoperative, peri-articular injection of local anesthetic (Ropivacaine 150mg), epinephrine (50μg), ketoprofen (25mg) and methylpredonisolone sodium (20mg) plus 0.1mg/kg of morphine. The no-morphine group received the same amount of local anesthetic, epinephrine, ketoprofen and methylpredonisolone sodium without morphine. The operating surgeon, operating staff, patients, physiotherapists, ward nursing staff and data collectors remained blinded for the duration of study. All surgeries were performed by the same operating team. A standard medial parapatellar approach was used in all operations. Post-operative analgesia was standardized to all participants with celecoxib daily for 3 weeks. Primary outcomes included visual analog pain scores (VAS), ROM and swelling of the thigh. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC and adverse outcomes. Result. There were no significant differences between two groups for pre-operative ROM, pre-operative pain VAS or the circumference of the thigh. There were no statistically significant differences in primary and secondary outcomes between two groups (Figure 1, 2, 3). Discussion. Multiple studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of multimodal peri-articular injection of analgesics in TKA for pain relief. However, the opioids often lead to nausea as an adverse effect, which is reported from 25% to 56%. The mechanism of pain relief by morphine is mainly the efficacy through the opioid receptor in central nerve system, and the other mechanism through local opioid receptor (μ-receptor) is rarely revealed for pain relief. Our study used morphine in unilateral TKA and no-morphine in the other side TKA and showed no significant difference in primary and secondary outcomes. These results revealed that the efficacy for pain relief in peri-articular injection without morphine is the same as that in no-morphine group. In conclusion, adding morphine in peri-articular injection could not be locally effective for pain relief

Background. Evidence from recent trials has supported the efficacy of periarticular analgesic injection for pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no randomized controlled trial has compared the efficacy of periarticular analgesic injection with that of other regimens for simultaneous bilateral TKA. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which patients scheduled for simultaneous bilateral TKA were randomly assigned to receive periarticular analgesic injection or epidural analgesia. In the periarticular analgesic injection group, the injection contained 7.5 mg/ml ropivacaine 40 ml, 10 mg/ml morphine hydrochloride hydrate 1.0 ml, 1.0 mg/ml epinephrine 0.6 ml, methylprednisolone 80 mg, and ketoprofen 50 mg. These agents were mixed with normal saline to a combined volume of 120 ml. The 60 ml of the cocktail was injected into each knee. In the epidural analgesia group, the catheter was placed at the L2–3 or L3–4 level, and connected to an infusion pump delivering continuous infusion (flow rate: 4 ml/h) of 100 ml of 2 mg/ml ropivacaine plus 1.0 ml of 10 mg/ml morphine hydrochloride hydrate. Surgery was managed under spinal anaesthesia. Surgical techniques and postoperative medication protocols were identical in both groups. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain at rest, quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of the score on a visual analogue scale. Results. Seventy-one patients with 142 knees were randomly assigned to receive periarticular analgesic injection or epidural analgesia. The flow chart presented in Figure 1 outlines the trial. The periarticular analgesic injection group had a significantly lower AUC at 4–24 hour compared with the epidural analgesia group (174.9 ± 181.5 versus 360.4 ± 360.6; p = 0.0073), while no difference in the AUC was noted at 24–72 hour (1388.1 ± 727.2 versus 1467.3 ± 810.1; p = 0.67). The consumption of diclofenac sodium suppositories as rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the periarticular analgesic injection group than in the epidural analgesia group on the night of surgery (0.16 ± 0.4 versus 0.70 ± 0.9; p = 0.0013). The incidence of nausea on the night of surgery and postoperative day 1 and that of pruritus were significantly lower in the periarticular analgesic injection group than in the epidural analgesia group (7.4 % versus 45.5 %; p = 0.0031, 7.4 % versus 54.5 %; P = 0.0003, and 0 % versus 15.2 %; p = 0.014, respectively). Conclusions. Compared with epidural analgesia, periarticular analgesic injection following simultaneous bilateral TKA was associated with better postoperative pain relief and decreased opioid-related side-effects. Periarticular analgesic injection is preferable to epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief after simultaneous bilateral TKA

Introduction. A large proportion of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, present with bilateral symptoms at the outpatient department. A simultaneous total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedure is available for such patients. The first operation in a simultaneous surgery may provide information to the operator to determine component size, soft tissue balancing, and estimate gap size for the second operation, while the second team usually conducts an operation in a confined space on the contralateral side during closure for the first operation, which can disturb cooperation during the second operation and may lead to more intra-operative surgical errors. We hypothesized that the circumstances of the two consecutive operations of a simultaneous bilateral TKA are different, could lead to different outcomes of overlapping bilateral TKAs. We therefore addressed the following research questions to determine whether there would be differences in short-term clinical outcomes, radiographic results, and implanted component size between the two sides. Methods. A retrospective review of 451 consecutive patients, who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA between January 2011 and April 2012, was conducted. Bilateral TKAs were performed with the senior surgeon conducting the main procedure (from skin incision to implantation of first prosthesis until prior closure of the first knee) on the right side first and subsequently the left side with a second team. At 1 year after surgery, clinical outcome scores (the Knee Society Knee and Function scores, WOMAC score), radiologic findings were evaluated and clinical results as postoperative blood loss, operation time were compared between bilateral sides. Results. A greater incidence (16.1%) of outliers during postoperative coronal limb alignment (>±3o) were identified in the second TKA than those in the first TKA (9.0%) (p =0.003). Multivariate analysis for the association of outlier rates in the second TKA relative to the first revealed a significance for severity of the preoperative deformity (pre-op. coronal limb alignment, p = 0.002) and decreased ROM (p = 0.042) from the GEE analysis. The second knee also showed more blood loss (735 vs. 656mL), and longer operation time (61, 58 minutes respectively), as compared to the first TKA, while no significant differences in clinical outcomes. Discussion and Conclusion. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes even though few distinct outcomes due to different circumstances of the surgery. Awareness of these findings can help the continued success of bilateral TKA in an increasing patient population

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgical intervention, which alleviates pain and improves function and health-related quality of life in patients with end-stage arthritis of the knee joint. With improvements in anesthesia, general health care, and surgical techniques, this procedure has become widely accepted for use in very elderly patients. However, many elderly patients tend to have compromised function and low reserve capabilities of organs and are therefore likely to develop various complications during the perioperative period. Thus, elderly patients often hesitate to undergo simultaneous bilateral TKA (SBTKA). Our purpose was to report the short-term results and clinical complications of octogenarians undergoing SBTKA. Materials and Methods. Between 2015 and 2016 all patients greater than 80years of age who underwent SBTKA by a single surgeon were retrospectively evaluated demographics, comorbidity, complications, and 30days mortality following SBTKA. Arthroplasty was performed sequentially under general anesthesia by one team led by primary surgeon. After the first knee, the patient's cardiopulmonary status was assessed by anesthesiology to determine whether or not to begin the second side. Cardiopulmonary decompensation, such as significant shifts in heart rate, oxygen saturation or blood pressure, was not showed. Then the second procedure was undertaken. Inclusion criteria of this study was underlying diseases were osteoarthritis. Exclusion criteria were (1) previous knee surgery; (2) underlying diseases were osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, fracture, and others. Fifty-seven patients with an average age of 82.7years were identified. The results of these procedures were retrospectively compared with those of patients greater than 80years of age of 89 patients unilateral TKA (UTKA) that had been performed by the same surgeon. Results. The study groups did not differ significantly with regard to age, gender, or body mass index. The mean age was 82.7years with a mean body mass index of 25.8 for the SBTKA group, compared with 84.0years with a mean body mass index of 24.9 for the UBTKA group. The length of hospital stay was longer in SBTKA groups. There was no serious complication. No deaths, no pulmonary embolisms and no nerve paralysis occurred within 30days in both groups. There was one wound problem in SBTKA group, compared 10 wound problem in UBTKA group; this difference was significant. Three deliriums occurred in SBTKA group, compared 13 deliriums in UBTKA group; this difference was significant. Minor complications included urinary tract infection, decubitus ulcer, transfusion reaction and ileus were noted seven in SBTKA group, compared in 11 UBTKA group; this difference was not significant. Conclusions. Complications and mortality are not higher for SBTKA compared to UTKA, SBTKA can be a safe and effective option for octogenarians

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a multi-modal blood conservation protocol that involved pre–operative autologous blood donations (2 units) in conjunction with erythropoietin supplementation as well as intra-operative conservation modalities. Methods. A retrospective chart review of 90 patients with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty done between 2006–2009 by one of the 3 senior authors was performed. Patients donated two units of blood 4 weeks prior to surgery and also received erythropoietin injections (40,000 units: 3 weeks, 2 weeks and 1 week prior to surgery). Intra- operative blood management included use of pneumatic tourniquet, re-infusion drains, local epinephrine injections and fibrin spray. Post-operatively, autologous transfusions were provided based on symptoms. Pre-donation blood levels, peri-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels along with transfusion records were assessed. Results. The mean pre-donation hemoglobin was 13.1 g/dL. After 2 units of autologous blood donation and procrit injections, the mean preoperative hemoglobin was 13.0 g/dL. The mean hemoglobin dropped to 9.8 g/dL on postoperative day 3. The mean drop in hemoglobin from preadmission testing was 3.3 g/dl. Overall, 30% patients required autologous blood transfusion and no patients required allogenic transfusion. Conclusion. This multi-modal protocol was effective in not only avoiding allogeneic transfusions following bilateral TKA but also resulted in high blood levels at the time of discharge. This protocol was effective in eliminating allogenic transfusions and maintaining blood levels

Approximately 20% of patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty complain of severe pain in the contralateral knee, and 10% of patients who have had a primary total knee (TKA) undergo contralateral surgery within 1 year. The number of patients suitable for primary TKA is rising, and so is the need for simultaneous bilateral TKA (BTKA) procedures. The advantages of single-stage BTKA include its low complication rates, high patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Others believe that there is increased morbidity and mortality. The goal of reducing the exposure to repeated anaesthesia, total hospitalization and recovery time, and cost, while maintaining patient safety, is a laudable one. Our data suggest that bilateral TKA patients have a lower total operating time, use less pain medication, have a shorter hospital stay and lower overall treatment costs. The cohort of patients selected for bilateral surgery in our unit is younger and has fewer comorbidities than unilateral controls. They have a high satisfaction rate and no increase in complication or readmission rates. We have seen a higher blood transfusion rate but no increase in cardiac, thromboembolic or septic complications. The key to BTKA is patient selection and the implementation of efficient care and surgical pathways that includes a thorough pre-assessment, careful education and well-resourced aggressive post-operative physiotherapy. When appropriately applied, the benefits include a shorter overall recovery time and an accelerated return to everyday life and work

Bilateral one stage total knee replacement (TKR) has a number of advantages. There is one operative procedure and anesthetic and overall recovery time is significantly reduced. It is a more cost-effective procedure in that acute hospital stay is less and although rehabilitation time is greater in the short term, overall it is less. Additionally, if there is a bilateral flexion contracture present there is an inevitable loss of extension if a single knee is operated upon as this knee will assume the position of the unoperated knee. Patients greatly prefer having both knees corrected at one operative setting rather than having to have the inconvenience and pain associated with a second operative procedure at three to six months after the first one.

There are potential disadvantages to a one stage procedure. One concern has been that there is more peri-operative morbidity associated with one stage bilateral total knee replacement. In a review of 501 patients undergoing bilateral one stage total knee replacement at the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) there were no peri-operative deaths, myocardial infarctions or cerebrovascular accidents. There were arrhythmias present in 5% of patients. Fat emboli were present in 3% and 2 patients (0.4%) had pulmonary emboli. The average transfusion requirement was 2.6 units and allogeneic blood was required in 42%. There were 2 deep infections, 3 hematomas and 5 patients with delayed wound healing There was an increased incidence of major complications in patients with ASA classification 3 and with increasing age over 70 years.

New data indicates peri-operative administration of hydrocortisone may mitigate lung injury as demonstrated by reduction in cytokine and desmosine levels in a randomised trial. There was also a trend toward less need for narcotic medication and better range of motion in the steroid treated group

Patient selection is important and all patients are screened pre-operatively by an internist and anesthesiologist. In over 3000 bilateral TKRs at HSS infection rate and mortality were lower than in the unilateral total knee replacement patients. Much of this is due to patient selection criteria. All patients underwent the procedure with epidural anesthesia with post-operative epidural PCA for 48 hours. All patients are discharged on warfarin and spend the operative night in the recovery room. The procedure has acceptable morbidity and great advantage in properly selected patients.

Bilateral one stage total knee replacement has a number of advantages. There is one operative procedure and anesthetic and overall recovery time is significantly reduced. It is a more cost effective procedure in that acute hospital stay is less and although rehabilitation time is greater in the short term overall it is less. Additionally if there is a bilateral flexion contracture present there is an inevitable loss of extension if a single knee is operated upon as this knee will assume the position of the unoperated knee. Patients greatly prefer having both knees corrected at one operative setting rather than having to have the inconvenience and pain associated with a second operative procedure at three to six months after the first one.

There are potential disadvantages to a one stage procedure. One concern has been that there is more peri-operative morbidity associated with one stage bilateral total knee replacement. In a review of 501 patients undergoing bilateral one stage total knee replacement at the Hospital for Special Surgery there were no peri-operative deaths, myocardial infarctions or cerebrovascular accidents. There were arrhythmias present in 5% of patients. Fat emboli were present in 3% and 2 patients (0.4%) had pulmonary emboli. The average transfusion requirement was 2.6 units and allogeneic blood was required in 42%. There were 2 deep infections, 3 hematomas and 5 patients with delayed wound healing. There was an increased incidence of major complications in patients with ASA classification 3 and with increasing age over 70 years.

New data indicates peri-operative administration of hydrocortisone my mitigate lung injury as demonstrated by reduction in cytokine and desmosine levels in a randomised trial. There was also a trend toward less need for narcotic medication and better range of motion in the steroid treated group

Patient selection is important and all patients are screened pre-operatively by an internist and anesthesiologist. In over 3000 bilateral TKR at HSS infection rate and mortality were lower than in the unilateral total knee replacement patients. Much of this has is due to patient selection criteria. All patients underwent the procedure with epidural anesthesia with post-operative epidural PCA for 48 hours. All patients are discharged on warfarin and spend the operative night in the recovery room. The procedure has acceptable morbidity and great advantage in properly selected patients.

Introduction:

The safety of simultaneous bilateral knee replacement (BTKA) remains controversial. Some studies have proposed a higher incidence of serious complications, even death, following BTKA whilst others refute the latter. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety of BTKA.

To consider bilateral simultaneous knee replacement, both knees must have significant structural damage. It is best if the patient can't decide which knee is more bothersome. In borderline cases, ask the patient to pretend that the worse knee is normal and if so, would they be seeing you for consideration of knee replacement on the less involved side. If the answer to this question is “yes,” consider the patient a potential candidate for bilateral knee replacement. If the answer is “no,” recommend operating only on the worse knee, and expect that the operation on the second knee can probably be delayed for a considerable period of time.

Strong indications for bilateral simultaneous TKA are bilateral severe angular deformity, bilateral severe flexion contracture, and anesthesia difficulties, i.e., patients who are anatomically or medically difficult to anesthetise, such as some adult or juvenile rheumatoid arthritis patients or patients with severe ankylosing spondylitis.

Relative indications for bilateral simultaneous TKA include the need for multiple additional surgical procedures to achieve satisfactory function and financial or social considerations for the patient. Contraindications to bilateral TKA include medical infirmity (especially cardiac), a reluctant patient, and a patient with a very low pain threshold.

When performing bilateral simultaneous TKA, both limbs are prepped and draped at the same time. An initial dose of an intravenous antibiotic is given (usually 1g of a cephalosporin) before inflation of the tourniquet. Surgery begins on the more symptomatic side or on either side if neither knee is significantly worse than the other. The reason for starting on the more symptomatic side is in case surgery has to be discontinued after only one procedure owing to anesthetic considerations.

After the components have been implanted on the first side, the tourniquet is deflated and a second dose of intravenous antibiotic is administered (usually 500mg of a cephalosporin). After the joint capsule is closed and flexion against gravity is measured, one team completes the subcutaneous and skin closure on the first side while the other team inflates the second tourniquet and begins the exposure of the second side. When the second tourniquet is deflated, a third dose of antibiotic is given (usually 500mg of a cephalosporin for a total dose of 2g for both knees).

Because of concern about the potential for cross-contamination of the knee wounds when instruments used during the final stages of skin closure on the first knee are maintained on the field and used on the second knee, they should probably be handed off the field and outer surgical gloves changed.

Most patients will report after their complete recovery that they are glad they did both knees at the same time. A patient who has any uncertainty about proceeding with bilateral surgery should have only one knee done at a time. In many cases, the second side receives a “reprieve,” becoming more tolerable after the first side has been operated on.

Bilateral one-stage total knee replacement has a number of advantages. There is one operative procedure and anesthetic and overall recovery time is significantly reduced. It is a more cost effective procedure in that acute hospital stay is less and although rehabilitation time is greater in the short term overall it is less. Additionally if there is a bilateral flexion contracture present there is an inevitable loss of extension if a single knee is operated upon as this knee will assume the position of the unoperated knee. Patients greatly prefer having both knees corrected at one operative setting rather than having to have the inconvenience and pain associated with a second operative procedure at three to six months after the first one.

There are potential disadvantages to a one-stage procedure. One concern has been that there is more peri-operative morbidity associated with one-stage bilateral total knee replacement. In a review of 501 patients undergoing bilateral one-stage total knee replacement at the Hospital for Special Surgery there were no peri-operative deaths, myocardial infarctions or cerebrovascular accidents. There were arrhythmias present in 5% of patients. Fat emboli were present in 3% and 2 patients (0.4%) had pulmonary emboli. The average transfusion requirement was 2.6 units and allogeneic blood was required in 42%. There were 2 deep infections, 3 hematomas and 5 patients with delayed wound healing. Average hospital stay was 7.2 days but this had decreased in the more recent patients. There was an increased incidence of major complications in patients with ASA classification 3 and with increasing age over 70 years.

New data indicates peri-operative administration of hydrocortisone may mitigate lung injury as demonstrated by reduction in cytokine and desmosine levels in a randomised trial.

Patient selection is important and all patients are screened pre-operatively by an internist and anesthesiologist. All patients underwent the procedure with epidural anesthesia with post-operative epidural PCA for 48 hours. All patients are discharged on warfarin and spend the operative night in the recovery room. The procedure has acceptable morbidity and great advantage in properly selected patients.

Introduction

The safety of simultaneous bilateral knee replacement (BTKA) remains controversial. Some studies have proposed a higher incidence of serious complications, even death, following BTKA whilst others refute the latter. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety of BTKA.

INTRODUCTION

Gross deformity such as severe flexion contraction or severe varus deformity in both knees is better corrected simultaneously to prevent recurrence of flexion contracture and also to have equal leg length which facilitate proper physiotherapy post operatively. However, there is great reluctance in many institute to perform Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacement (SBTKR) fearing higher complication rate. The purpose of this paper is to show that SBTKR is economical, safe and sometimes is necessary in gross deformity such as bilateral flexion contracture. In this paper we will review the most recent literature about SBTKR which support our argument. Also we will review our cases of over 7500 of SBTKR done at our institution. In this study we will focus on the process that we went through at our institution to upgrade our medical care to enable to do this SBTKR safely. We will share also our post-operative protocol and some hint on the administrative level in order to perform SBTKR.

Aims

This study was conducted to investigate the influence of surgical experience on the outcomes and component positioning of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared the outcomes and component positioning of simultaneous bilateral TKAs performed by supervisors and trainee surgeons.

INTRODUCTION. Patellofemoral compilcations are among the most frequently observed adverse events after total knee arthroplasty. The posterior location with Femoral component of conventional TKA in AP alignment cause paradoxical movement, but, guide motion TKA (Journey.2.BCS) with anterior post-cam remain a correct AP alignment. The purpose of this study was to investigate patellofemoral (PF) contact stress between Bi-Cruciate Substituting TKA (Journey.2.BCS) and CR TKA (Journey.CR). METHODS. We evaluated 22 knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis who underwent. Simultaneous bilateral TKA. The prospective randomized study was to measure intraoperative PF contact stress by a patellofemoral sensor (Kyowa Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) comparing the identical Bi-Cruciate Substituting or CR Journey.2 total knee prostheses implanted bilaterally in the same patient. RESULTS. The PF contact stress showed significantly greater at CR TKA than at BCS TKA in 120 and 140 degrees of flextion (p=0.04, p=0.018). and showed no significant correlations with postoperative flextion angles. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. In guide motion TKA, CR prosthesis increases PF contact stress than Bi-Cruciate Substituting prosthesis. The femoral rollback with medial pivot motion at CR TKA decreases more as the BCS TKA. Increased PF contact stress in guided motion TKA is not necessarily decrease postoperative flextion angle

Objective. Compare the safety and effectiveness of different anesthetic technique used in the simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). Methods. Medical records of patients admitted for simultaneous BTKA between January 1, 2014 and September 1, 2015 in ‘The safety and effect evaluation of joint arthroplasty’ database were analyzed. The general anesthesia (GA) and neuraxial anesthesia (NA) group were identified. Patient preoperative characteristics were compared. Perioperative outcomes measured included operating time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, length of hospitalization, joint range of motion at discharge, complications. Results. A total of 1191 patients from 25 hospitals were identified, 802 (67.34%) patients were performed under GA, and 389 (32.66%) patients were performed under NA. Patients characteristics were similar between the two groups (P<0.05), except that patients operated under NA were older than those under GA (P<0.01). NA was associated with significantly less overall complications and infection complications, and reduction of length of hospitalization (P<0.05). But operating time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, joint range of motion at discharge were similar between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion. Patients who underwent simultaneous BTKA under NA had shorter hospitalization, lower overall complication and infection complication rate than GA. And, it could have an important medical and economic impact on health-care practice

Background. There are several surgical options available for patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis including simultaneous bilateral TKA (BTKA) and staged approach. The appropriate and safe time interval between two stages is still controversial. The preset systematic review aims to determine the optimal time interval between two stages of BTKA. Methods. Pubmed database was searched from 1979 to 2013 for English-language studies that compared the outcomes of each surgical approach. Comparison was carried out on unilateral TKA and two-staged BTKA as well as on different time intervals in two-staged BTKA. Results. Eighteen studies that enrolled patients underwent TKA either unilaterally or bilaterally in one-stage and two-stage were enrolled in this systematic review. Statistically significant difference was observed in cardiac complications (OR= 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01–1.31; P=0.03) and wound complications (OR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.07–1.3; P<0.000) following two-staged BTKA compared with unilateral TKA. There observed significant differences in favor of bilateral two-stage TKA regarding other complications including mortality (OR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.7–0.95; P<0.00), PE (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.64–0.78; P<0.00), knee infection (OR=0.5, 95% CI: 0.45–0.55; P<0.00) and knee revision (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.37–0.48; P<0.00). Increasing time interval between two stages of TKA to more than 90 days, showed a lower risk for urinary (OR=0.12, 95% CI: 0.02–0.72; P=0.02) and respiratory (OR=0.05, 95% CI: 0–0.94; P=0.04) complications. Conclusion. The main finding of this study was that time interval of more than 90 days between two stages of BTKA may be associated with less complication rate, specially of urinary and respiratory system