Our primary objective was to compare healing rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for degenerative tears, with and without bone channeling. Our secondary objectives were to compare disease-specific quality of life and patient reported outcomes as measured by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score between groups. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at three sites were randomized to receive either bone channeling augmentation or standard repair. Healing rates were determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months post operatively. WORC, ASES, and Constant scores were compared between groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively. One hundred sixty-eight patients were recruited and randomized between 2013 to 2018. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from pre-operative to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). Intention to treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in healing rates between the two interventions at 24 months post-operative. No differences were observed in WORC, ASES or Constant scores at any time-point. This trial did not demonstrate superiority of intra-operative bone channeling in rotator cuff repair surgery at 24 months post-operative. Healing rates and patient-reported function and quality of life measures were similar between groups

Thoracic hyperkyphosis (TH – Cobb angle >40°) is correlated with rotator cuff arthropathy and associated with anterior tilting and protraction of scapula, impacting the glenoid orientation and the surrounding musculature. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a reliable surgical treatment for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and recent literature suggests that patients with TH may have comparable range of motion after RTSA. However, there exists no study reporting the possible link between patient-reported outcomes, humeral retroversion and TH after RTSA. While the risk of post-operative complications such as instability, hardware loosening, scapular notching, and prosthetic infection are low, we hypothesize that it is critical to optimize the biomechanical parameters through proper implant positioning and understanding patient-specific scapular and thoracic anatomy to improve surgical outcomes in this subset of patients with TH. Patients treated with primary RTSA at an academic hospital in 2018 were reviewed for a two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were as follows: no pre-existing chest radiographs for Cobb angle measurement, change in post-operative functional status as a result of trauma or medical comorbidities, and missing component placement and parameter information in the operative note. As most patients did not have a pre-operative chest radiograph, only seven patients with a Cobb angle equal to or greater than 40° were eligible. Chart reviews were completed to determine indications for RTSA, hardware positioning parameters such as inferior tilting, humeral stem retroversion, glenosphere size/location, and baseplate size. Clinical data following surgery included review of radiographs and complications. Follow-up in all patients were to a period of two years. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score was used for patient-reported functional and pain outcomes. The average age of the patients at the time of RTSA was 71 years old, with six female patients and one male patient. The indication for RTSA was primarily rotator cuff arthropathy. Possible correlation between Cobb angle and humeral retroversion was noted, whereby, Cobb angle greater than 40° matched with humeral retroversion greater than 30°, and resulted in significantly higher ASES scores. Two patients with mean Cobb angle of 50° and mean humeral retroversion 37.5° had mean ASES scores of 92.5. Five patients who received mean humeral retroversion of 30° had mean lower ASES scores of 63.7 (p < 0 .05). There was no significant correlation with glenosphere size or position, baseplate size, degree of inferior tilting or lateralization. Patient-reported outcomes have not been reported in RTSA patients with TH. In this case series, we observed that humeral stem retroversion greater than 30° may be correlated with less post-operative pain and greater patient satisfaction in patients with TH. Further clinical studies are needed to understanding the biomechanical relationship between RTSA, humeral retroversion and TH to optimize patient outcomes

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a well established treatment that provides reproducible results in the treatment of shoulder arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency in the older patient population. However, the results of arthroplasty in younger, more active patients are currently unclear and not as predictable. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mid-term results of RTSA for patients aged younger than 60 years. A retrospective review of twenty-six patients (twenty six RTSAs) with a mean age of 58.3 years was performed. Minimum follow-up of 5 years was available at a mean follow-up of 73.3 months postoperatively (range, 60–84 months). The preoperative conditions compelling RTSA were as follows: failed rotator cuff repair (17), fracture sequelae (5), failed arthroplasty (1), and cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) (3). We assessed range-of-motion and strength, visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant scores. Radiographs were also evaluated for component loosening and scapular notching. All patients were analyzed radiologically and clinically using patient-reported outcome measures. Active forward elevation improved from 56° to 134° and average active external rotation improved from 10.0° to 19.6°. Scores measured with a visual analog pain scale, the Constant score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scale all improved significantly. The Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain improved from 7.5 to 3.0 and the ASES score improved from 31.4 to 72.4, respectively. The normalized postoperative mean Constant score was 88.03. No radiograph showed loosening of the implant at follow-up. Complications included one traumatic subscapularis rupture at six weeks, and one case of periprosthetic fracture. The remaining twenty-four patients were satisfied with the outcome at the time of the latest follow-up and had returned to their desired activity. RTSA in younger patients provided significant subjective improvement in self-assessed shoulder comfort and substantial gain in overall function. Implant loosening and glenoid wear did not appear to be concerns in the mid-term despite the high activity levels of younger patients. Longer-term studies are required to determine whether similar results are maintained over time

Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. No previous comparative trials have reported on the long-term follow-up of single and double row fixation in arthroscopic cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term functional outcomes of single-row and double-row suture techniques for repair of the rotator cuff 10-years post-operatively. Ninety patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either single-row or double-row repair. The primary objective was to compare the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score 10-years post-operatively. Secondary objectives included comparison of the Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and supraspinatus strength between groups. Out of 90 patients originally randomized, 57 returned for the long-term 10-year follow-up. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups. The WORC score was not significantly different between groups at long-term follow-up (p=0.13). No statistical differences were observed between groups for the Constant (p=0.51), ASES (p=0.48) scores, or strength scores (p=0.93). A significant improvement was observed between pre-operative and the final 10-year follow-up. There were no differences observed in all outcomes between two and 10-years post-operatively. No statistically significant differences in functional or quality of life outcomes were identified between single-row and double-row fixation techniques at long-term follow-up

Rotator cuff disease encompasses a spectrum from partial to full thickness tears. Despite being 2–3 times more common than full–thickness tears, effective non-operative treatment for partial thickness tears has remained elusive. Platelet enriched plasma (PRP) has been proposed to enhance rotator cuff healing by enhancing the natural healing cascade. However, its utility in rotator cuff disease remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the patient reported outcomes between PRP and corticosteroid injection in patients with symptomatic partial thickness tears. This double blind randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with symptomatic, partial thickness rotator cuff tears or rotator cuff tendinopathy proven on ultrasound or MRI. Patients were randomized to either corticosteroid or PRP ultrasound-guided injection of the affected shoulder. Patients completed patient reported outcomes at 6 weeks and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and failure of non-operative management as determined by consent for surgery or progression to operative intervention. Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study with equal demographics between the two groups. Taking into account pre-injection scores, patients with PRP injections demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in VAS scores compared to patients receiving corticosteroid injections at 12 weeks (p=0.045) but not at 6 weeks (p=0.704). There was no difference in other outcome measures or progression of the two groups to surgical intervention. The use of PRP in the management of partial thickness rotator cuff tears demonstrates significant improvement of pain scores at 12 week follow up compared to corticosteroid injections. However, this did not affect the rate of progression to surgical intervention. Continued study is required to determine the utility of PRP in this patient population

Shoulder arthroplasty procedures continue to increase in prevalence and controversy still remains about the optimal method to manage the subscapularis. Scalise et al. performed an analysis of 20 osteotomies and 15 tenotomy procedures, and found the tenotomy group had a higher rate of abnormal subscapularis tendons on ultrasound examination. There was one tendon rupture in the subscapularis tenotomy group and no ruptures in the osteotomy group. Jandhyala et al. retrospectively examined 26 lesser tuberosity osteotomies and 10 subscapularis tenotomies for arthroplasty, and their study demonstrated a significant improvement in the belly press test for the osteotomy group. Lapner et al. performed a randomised controlled trial assigning patients to either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or a subscapularis peel procedure. They evaluated 36 osteotomies and 37 subscapularis peels. The outcomes evaluated were Dynamometer internal rotation strength, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and in a subsequent paper they evaluated the healing rates and Goutallier grade. Their studies illustrated no difference in the internal rotation strength between groups. Both groups significantly improved WOOS and ASES scores postoperatively, but the difference was not significant between groups. Goutallier grade increased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Overall, the different approaches have not demonstrated a meaningful clinical difference. Further studies are needed to help understand issues leading to subscapularis complications after arthroplasty

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has an increasing effective use in the treatment of patients with a variety of diagnoses, including rotator cuff deficiency, inflammatory arthritis, or failed shoulder prostheses. Glenoid bone loss is not uncommonly encountered in these cases due to the significant wear. Severe bone loss can compromise glenoid baseplate positioning and fixation, consequently increasing the risk for early component loosening, instability, and scapular notching. To manage severe glenoid bone deficiencies, bone grafts are commonly used. Although, many studies report outcome of bone grafting in revision RSA, the literature on humeral head autograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA is less robust. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary RSA with humeral head autograft for glenoid bone loss at our institution. Institutional review board approval was obtained to retrospectively review the records of 22 consecutive primary RTSA surgeries in 21 patients with humeral head autograft for glenoid bone loss between January 2008 and December 2016. Five patients died during follow-up, three were unable to be contacted and one refused to participate, leaving a final study cohort of 12 patients with 13 shoulders that underwent RSA. All patients had a clinical evaluation including detailed ROM and clinical evaluation using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, Constant Score, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaires. Preoperative and postoperative plain radiographs and CT scans were assessed for component position, loosening, scapular notching, as well as graft incorporation, resorption, or collapse. There were 6 males and 6 females, with an average age of 74 ± 6.8 years. The average BMI was 31.7 ± 5.3, and the median ASA score was 3. Average follow-up was 3.4 ± 1.1 years. The average postoperative range of motion measurements for the operative arm are: flexion = 120 ± 37, abduction = 106 ± 23, external rotation = 14 ± 12, internal rotation at 90 degrees of abduction = 49 ± 7, external rotation at 90 degrees of abduction = 50 ± 28. Average functional scores are: ASES: 76.9 ± 19.2, WOOS: 456 ± 347, SF12 physical: 34.2 ± 8.2, SF12 mental: 54.1 ± 10.2, Constant Score: 64.6 ± 14. No evidence of hardware loosening or evidence of bone graft resorption were encountered. On CT, the average of pre operative B-angle was 79.3 ± 9.3 while the pre operative reverse shoulder angle was 101.4 ± 28. Glenoid retroversion average on CT was 13.3 ± 16.6. Post operative baseplate inclination average was 82 ± 7.4 while the baseplate version 7.8 ±10. The operative technique was able to achieve up to 30 degrees of inclination correction and up to 50 degrees of version correction. In conclusion, primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with humeral head autograft for glenoid bone loss provides excellent ROM and functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up. This technique has a high rate of bone incorporation and small risk of bone resorption at mid term follow up

Glenoid failure remains the most common mode of total shoulder arthroplasty failures. Porous tantalum metal (Trabecular Metal™, Zimmer) have grown in popularity in hip and knee arthroplasty. First-generation porous tantalum metal-backed glenoid components demonstrated metal debris, resulted in failure, and were revised to second-generation glenoid implants. Evidence for second-generation porous tantalum metal implants in shoulder arthroplasty is sparse.1–4 The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes in a series of patients with second-generation porous tantalum glenoid components at a minimum two-years postoperative. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who received a second-generation porous tantalum glenoid component anatomic shoulder arthroplasty between May 2009 and December 2017 with minimum 24 months follow-up. The shoulder arthroplasties were performed by one of two senior fellowship-trained surgeons. We collected postoperative clinical outcome indicators: EQ5D visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, and Constant Score (CS). Radiographic review was performed by an independent fellowship-trained surgeon. The Endrizzi metal debris grading system1 was utilized to grade metal debris. We computed descriptive statistics and compared outcome scores between groups via the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with group-wise comparisons defined by: metal debris and humeral head migration (secondary analyses). Thirty-five patients [23 male (65.7%) and 12 female (34.3%)] with 40 shoulder replacements participated in the study. Forty of 61 shoulders (65.6%) had an average of 64 ± 20.3 months follow-up (range 31 to 95). Average BMI was 27.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2 (range 19.5 to 39.1). The average postoperative EQ5D VAS at final follow-up was 74.6 ± 22.5, WOOS Index 87.9 ± 16.6, ASES Score 88.3 ± 10.9, and CS 80.4 ± 13. At final follow-up, 18 of 40 shoulders (45%) had metal debris [15 of 40 (37.5%) Endrizzi grade 1 and three of 40 (7.5%) Endrizzi grade 2], and 22 of 40 shoulders (55%) did not show evidence of metal debris. There was one non-revision reoperation (open subscapularis exploration), one shoulder with anterosuperior escape, three shoulders with glenoid radiolucencies indicative of possible glenoid loosening, and nine shoulders with superior migration of the humeral head (>2mm migration at final follow-up compared to immediate postoperative). When comparing postoperative scores between patients with vs without metal debris, we found no statistically significant difference in the EQ5D VAS, WOOS Index, ASES Score and CS. On further analyses, when comparing superior migration of the humeral head and postoperative outcomes scores, we found no statistically significant difference. We report the longest published follow-up with clinical and radiographic outcomes of second-generation porous tantalum glenoid anatomic shoulder arthroplasties. In this series of patients, 45% of total shoulder arthroplasties with a second-generation porous tantalum glenoid implant had radiographic evidence of metal debris. This metal debris was not statistically associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. Further investigation and ongoing follow-up are warranted

A reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is frequently performed in the revision setting. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes and complication rates following revision RSA (RRSA) stratified according to the primary shoulder procedure undergoing revision, including failed hemiarthroplasty (HA), anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), RSA, soft tissue repair (i.e., rotator cuff repair), and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). A systematic review of the literature was performed using four databases (EMBASE, Medline, SportDISCUS, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) between January 1985 and September 2017. The primary outcomes of interest included active range-of-motion (ROM), pain, and functional outcome measures including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Constant-Murley (CS) Score. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, such as infection, dislocation, perioperative fracture, base plate failure, neurovascular injury, soft tissue injury, and radiological evidence of scapular notching. Clinical outcome data was assessed for differences between preoperative and postoperative results and complication results were reported as pooled complication rates. Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis, which included 1,016 shoulder arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of 45.2 months (range, 31.1 to 57.2 months) (Fig. 1). The mean patient age at revision was 60.2 years (range, 36 to 65.2 years). Overall, RSA as a revision procedure for failed HA revealed favorable outcomes with respect to forward elevation (FE), CS pain, ASES, SST, and CS outcome assessment scores, with mean improvements of 52.5° ± 21.8° (P = < 0 .001), 6.41 ± 4.01 SD (P = 0.031), 20.1 ± 21.5 (P = 0.02), 5.2 ± 8.7 (P = 0.008), and 30.7 ± 9.4 (P = < 0 .001), respectively. RSA performed as a revision procedure for failed TSA demonstrated an improvement in the CS outcome score (33.8 ± 12.4, P = 0.016). RSA performed as a revision procedure for failed soft tissue repair demonstrated significant improvements in FE (60.2° ± 21.2°, P = 0.031) and external rotation (20.8° ± 18°, P = 0.016), respectively. Lastly, RSA performed as a revision procedure for failed ORIF revealed favorable outcomes in FE (61° ± 20.2°, P = 0.031). There were no significant differences noted in RSA performed as a revision procedure for failed RSA, or when performed for a failed TSA, soft tissue repair, and ORIF in any other outcome of interest. Pooled complication rates were found to be highest in failed RSA (10.9%), followed by soft tissue repair (7.1%), HA (6.8%), TSA (5.4%) and ORIF (4.7%). When compared to other revision indications, RRSA for failed HA demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, with significant improvements in ROM, pain, and in several outcome assessments. Complication rates were determined and stratified as per the index procedure undergoing RRSA, patients undergoing revision of a failed RSA were found to have the highest complication rates. With this additional information, orthopaedic surgeons will be better equipped to provide preoperative education regarding the risks, benefits and complication rates to those patients undergoing a RRSA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Background. Both anatomic (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are routinely performed for patients whom desire to continue to work or participate in sports. The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the ability of patients to work and participate in sports based on responses to clinical outcome surveys. Methods. A retrospective review of 335 patients treated with TSA (179 patients) and RSA (156 patients) who completed questions 9 and 10 on the activity patient self-evaluation portion of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Assessment Form was performed at average 30 months follow-up. Comparisons were made between TSA and RSA for the specific ASES score (rated 0–3) reported for usual work and sport, as well as ASES total score. Sports were subdivided based on those that predominantly use shoulder function. Results. Patients treated with TSA had a 32% greater ability to participate in sports (average specific ASES score 2.5 vs 1.9, p=0.001), with significantly higher scores for aquatic and sedentary sports (Figure 1). TSA patients demonstrated greater ability to participate in sports requiring shoulder function without difficulty, as 62% reported maximal scores (p=0.001) (Figure 2). TSA patients also demonstrated a 21% greater ability to perform work (average specific ASES score 2.6 vs. 2.1, p=0.001), with significantly higher scores for housework and gardening (Figure 3). Conclusion. Both TSA and RSA allow for participation in work and sport, with TSA patients reporting better overall ability to participate. For sports involving shoulder function, TSA patients more commonly report maximal ability to participate than RSA patients

Purpose. With growing attention being paid to quality and cost effectiveness in healthcare, outcome evaluations are becoming increasingly important. This determination can be especially difficult in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) given the complex pathology and extensive disabilities in this patient population. Several different scoring systems have been developed and validated for use in various shoulder pathologies. The purpose of this study was to assess the use three outcome scores in a population of patients undergoing RSA. We aim to demonstrate the validity of three outcome scores in patients undergoing RSA, and to determine if one score or a combination of scores is superior to others. Methods. Using a database of patients treated with RSA, we assessed preoperative and postoperative Constant Scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and subjective shoulder values (SSV) in 148 shoulders. The outcomes at each scoring period were described and the scores were compared to one another as well as to active range of motion using linear regression modeling. Results. There were no significant differences in the mean improvement of any of the scores. All of the outcome scales improvements were correlated with each other and improvement in forward elevation but not with external rotation. Using multivariate regression analysis all 3 outcome measures were able to predict 38.9% of the variation in improvement in functional outcomes (forward elevation). This was only slightly greater than that provided by improvements in the outcome variable CS alone (36.7%). Conclusion. The three shoulder outcome scores evaluated, regardless of whether they were patient reported or physician based, appear to appropriately reflect improvements after RSA with equal validity. The objective physician assessed Constant score had the strongest correlation with function of the arm, and use of a combination of all 3 outcome scores does not increase the ability to predict range of motion compared to using the Constant Score alone

Shoulder arthroplasty procedures continue to increase in prevalence, and controversy still remains about the optimal method to manage the subscapularis. Scalise et al. performed an analysis of 20 osteotomies and 15 tenotomy procedures, and found the tenotomy group had a higher rate of abnormal subscapularis tendons on ultrasound examination. There was one tendon rupture in the subscapularis tenotomy group and no ruptures in the osteotomy group. Jandhyala et al. retrospectively examined 26 lesser tuberosity osteotomies and 10 subscapularis tenotomies for arthroplasty, and their study demonstrated a significant improvement in the belly press test for the osteotomy group. Lapner et al. performed a randomised controlled trial assigning patient to either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or a subscapularis peel procedure. They evaluated 36 osteotomies and 37 subscapularis peels. The outcomes evaluated were Dynamometer internal rotation strength, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and in a subsequent paper they evaluated the healing rates and Goutallier grade. Their studies illustrated no difference in the internal rotation strength between groups. Both groups significantly improved WOOS and ASES scores post-operatively, but the difference was not significant between groups. Goutallier grade increased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Overall, the different approaches have not demonstrated a meaningful clinical difference. Further studies are needed to help understand issues leading to subscapularis complications after arthroplasty

Hemi shoulder arthroplasty is a rather successful procedure although revision surgery due to secondary glenoid erosion is reported in more than 25%. The downside of common shoulder arthroplasty is that in a deltopectoral approach the subscapularis tendon needs to be detached for exposure of the humeral head. Refixation of subscapularis tendon is associated with a retear rate of 4%, furthermore with progressing fatty muscle infiltration and loss of function. In case of revision surgery a second subscapularis tendon detachment is even more associated with worse function. Thus, arthroscopic humeral head resurfacing is an expedient alternative for minimal invasive humeral head arthroplasty without compromising subscapularis function. The purpose of this study was to report first clinical and subjective results after arthroscopic-assisted resurfacing of the humeral head. For this prospective case series, 24 patients (7 females, 17 males; mean age 59 years, range 42–73 years) undergoing arthroscopic-assisted partial shoulder resurfacing with the partial eclipse prosthesis were included in the study. Clinical conditions and subjective assessments were evaluated before surgery and annually thereafter using the Constant score (CS), active range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale (ASES). Radiological outcomes and major complications were monitored. The mean CS for all patients improved significantly from 51 points preoperatively to 83 points 12 months after surgery (p=0.005). Trends towards increasing ROMs were detected. Subjective scores significantly improved from baseline to the 1-year follow-up (VAS: from 6.4 to 2.5, p=0.010; ASES: from 47 to 76, p=0.026). The majority of patients (88%) stated that they would undergo the procedure again. Revisions were indicated in 17% due to progression of osteoarthritis. Arthroscopic-assisted partial humeral head resurfacing as a minimal invasive procedure with the advantages of bone stock preservation and intact subscapularis tendon allowed immediate postoperative active mobilization and provided significant improvements in subjective outcome. In case of revision surgery a primary situation was encountered with postoperative results comparable to primary arthroplasty

The Latarjet procedure is a successful primary and revision option for anterior shoulder instability; however recent reports have highlighted varying complication rates. Our aim was to prospectively study clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure. 50 consecutive patients underwent a Latarjet coracoid transfer between 2006 and 2012. Mean age was 27 years (17–63), 48 were male. Pre-/post-operative imaging, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OISS), American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Subjective Shoulder Value score (SSV) and clinical evaluation were documented. Mean follow up was 32 months (6–74). There were no dislocations or revision procedures. Subluxation occurred in one patient only. 95% of shoulders were subjectively graded “excellent” or “good;” 5% “fair;” and none as “poor”. The mean pre-op ASES was 58(50–66) and 95(92–98) post-operatively (p< 0.001). The mean pre-operative OISS was 19(18–22) and 43(41–45) post-operatively (p<0.001). The mean SSV increased from 46% to 89% (p < 0.001). 98% of patients considered their surgery to be “successful” and 95% would recommend the procedure to a friend. 82% returned to sport at their previous level. There were no infective or metalwork-related complications. Five experienced transient neurological symptoms all of which resolved within three months. These results suggest that the Latarjet procedure is safe and reliable with low complication rates

The use of scoring systems for surveillance of post-operative outcomes is increasing. However, the methodology of this follow-up is not universal. We set out to assess whether a postal Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was sufficient to identify patients who were dissatisfied and wanted further treatment. Of 88 patients who had undergone GlobalCap resurfacing in the previous 5 years, we received a completed postal OSS (Median score 33, Range 5–48) from 80 patients. Those with a score <24 (an agreed threshold for surgery pre-operatively) were brought to clinic for review. The 16 recalled patients (2 males, 14 females; age 58–85) had their OSS repeated, supervised by a clinic nurse, and had a Constant Score and an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score performed. Satisfaction was also questioned. OSS correlated well with the Constant Score (r=0.79) and ASES (r=0.86). However, supervision increased the OSS by an average of 6 points (Mean 13.9 to 19.9) and only three of the patients proved dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Used alone, an unobserved OSS may have limited value for this purpose and the use of comparative pre-operative scores or additional patient-reported outcome measures may be necessary to detect poor outcomes

The Latarjet procedure is a successful primary and revision option for anterior shoulder instability; however recent reports have highlighted varying complication rates. Our aim was to prospectively study clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure. 50 consecutive patients underwent a Latarjet coracoid transfer between 2006 and 2012. Mean age was 27 years (17–63), 48 were male. Pre-/post-operative imaging, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OISS), American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Subjective Shoulder Value score (SSV) and clinical evaluation were documented. Mean follow up was 32 months (6–74). There were no dislocations or revision procedures. Subluxation occurred in one patient only. 95% of shoulders were subjectively graded “excellent” or “good;” 5% “fair;” and none as “poor”. The mean pre-op ASES was 58(50–66) and 95(92–98) post-operatively(p<0.001). The mean pre-operative OISS was 19(18–22) and 43(41–45) post-operatively(p<0.001). The mean SSV increased from 46% to 89%(p < 0.001). 98% of patients considered their surgery to be “successful” and 95% would recommend the procedure to a friend. 82% returned to sport at their previous level. There were no infective or metalwork-related complications. 5 experienced transient neurological symptoms all of which resolved within 3 months. These results suggest that the Latarjet procedure is safe and reliable with low complication rates

Purpose. Chronic massive rotator cuff tears are challenging to repair completely because of the development of tendon retraction with inelasticity, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome and MRI findings after arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (ASCR) for symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears. Methods. From 2011 to 2013, 12 shoulders in 12 consecutive patients (mean, 70.8 years) with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears underwent ASCR using fascia lata. We used suture anchors to attach the graft medially to the glenoid superior tubercle and laterally to the greater tuberosity as same technique by Mihata et al. We added side-to-side sutures between the graft and infraspinatus tendon and between the graft and residual anterior supraspinatus/subscapularis tendon to improve force coupling. Physical examination, clinical rating system, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed before surgery; at 6 and 12 months after surgery; and 6 months thereafter. Average follow-up was 19.1 months (12 to 28 months) after surgery. We assessed patients preoperatively by using the scoring systems of the shoulder index of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, and the University of California, Los Angeles. Results. Mean active elevation increased from 59° to 111° significantly and external rotation increased from 28 to 33. The average preoperative scores were 16.0 points by ASES, 48.0 points by JOA, and 10.8 points by UCLA. Average clinical outcome scores all improved significantly after ASCR at the final follow-up (ASES, 73.3 points; JOA, 73.7 points; UCLA, 22.7 points). There was surgical complication as infection. Although infection was controlled by arthroscopic irrigation, the transplanted tendon was absorbed, and preoperative conditions did not functionally improve. Five patients had graft tear during follow-up. Postoperative active range of motion in the healed patients was significantly greater than in the unhealed patients who had graft tears. Conclusions. ASCR restored superior glenohumeral stability and function of the shoulder joint with irreparable rotator cuff tears compared to preoperative function in the cases without postoperative complications. However ratio of graft tears were 50% and clinical results of these cases were not improved sufficiently

Purpose. To examine measurement properties of four disability outcomes in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Methods. This was a prospective longitudinal study of patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint who underwent a Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) and were followed for 6 months. Four measures [Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) Index, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment, Constant-Murley score (CMS), and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH)] were completed 2-3 weeks before surgery and at 6 months after surgery. Results. Seventy-seven patients (average age: 66, range 35 to 86, 60% women, 40% men) participated in the study. The Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha of subjective measures was high at 0.91, 0.86, and 0.83 for WOOS, ASES, and QuickDASH respectively. All measures were able to discriminate between men and women's levels of disability at p< 0.05. Correlations between pre-operative scores were moderate (0.59 to -0.79) and slightly increased post-operatively (0.61 to -0.87). All measures were sensitive in detecting change in the disability status over a period of 6 months. Conclusion. All four disability measures were reliable and valid for use in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Outcome measurement in busy clinics can be facilitated by choosing valid and reliable measures that have the advantage of simplicity for use by patients and clinicians. The consensus-based standards for selection of outcome measures have been developed for hip and knee arthritis and need to take place for the shoulder joint. Developing consensus by an international group of experts will improve consistency in using outcome measures in patients with shoulder problems

Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the results of humerus intramedullary nail (IMN) and dynamic compression plate (DCP) for the management of diaphyseal fractures of humerus. Material & methods. 47 patients with diaphyseal fracture of shaft humerus were randomised prospectively and treated by open reduction and internal fixation with IMN or DCP. The criteria for inclusion were Grade 1.2a compound fractures; Polytrauma; Early failure of conservative treatment; Unstable fracture. Patients with pathological fracture, Grade 3 open fracture, refracture or old neglected fracture of humerus were excluded from the study. 23 patients underwent internal fixation by IMN and 24 by DCP. Reamed antegrade nailing was done in all cases. DCP was done through an anterolateral or posterior approach. Results. The outcome was assessed in terms of union time, union rate, functional outcome and incidence of complications. Functional outcome was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES). On comparing the results by independent samples t test, there was no significant difference in ASES score between the two groups. The average union time was found to be significantly lower for IMN compared to DCP(P<.05). The union rate was found to be similar in both the groups. Complications like infection were found to be higher with DCP compared to IMN, while shortening of the arm (1.5-4cm) and restriction of shoulder movements due to impingement of the nail were found to be higher with DCP compared with IMN. However, this improved in all patients following removal of the nail once the fracture healed. Conclusion. This study proves that IMN can be considerd as a better surgical option for these fractures as it offers shorter union time and less incidence of serious complications like infection. However, there appears to be no difference between two groups in union rate and functional outcome

Purpose. Management of massive, degenerative, and irreparable rotator cuff tears is challenging. Excessive re-tear rates and poor clinical outcome after standard repair have led to alternative methods of treatment. Tendon transfers and shoulder arthroplasty have had mixed results; both are invasive procedures with high potential morbidity. We began performing rotator cuff augmentation and replacement using GraftJacket allograft acellular human dermal matrix as a biologic minimally invasive alternative in this difficult population almost 6 years ago. This article highlights our preferred arthroscopic technique and early results. Method. From January 2004 to June 2007, 45 patients (36 men, 9 women) with massive rotator cuff tears were treated arthroscopically with the GraftJacket allograft. All patients completed a preoperative University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Follow-up was a minimum of 2 years (range, 24–68 months) and patients completed UCLA, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. Results. Analysis was performed using the 3 validated outcomes measurement scores. The mean UCLA score increased from 18.4 preoperatively to 27.5 postoperatively (P < .000). The average WORC score was 75.2, and the ASES score was 84.1 at the final follow-up. Conclusion. Evidence-based data to outline an algorithm for management of irreparable rotator cuff tears is being developed. We documented significant clinical improvement with arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using the GraftJacket allograft acellular human dermal matrix. The procedure is safe and associated with high patient satisfaction, without the morbidity of tendon transfer or arthroplasty. For those few cases where further surgery is required, no bridges are burned. The early success of this procedure warrants further study with more patients, longer follow-up, and higher levels of evidence-based investigation