We present data relating to the Bryan disc arthroplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylosis in 46 patients. Patients with either radiculopathy or myelopathy had a cervical discectomy followed by implantation of a cervical disc prosthesis. Patients were reviewed at six weeks, six months and one year and assessment included three outcome measures, a visual analogue scale (VAS), the short form 36 (SF-36) and the neck disability index (NDI). The results were categorised according to a modification of Odom’s criteria. Radiological evaluation, by an independent radiologist, sought evidence of movement, stability and subsidence of the prosthesis. A highly significant difference was found for all three outcome measurements, comparing the pre-operative with the post-operative values: VAS (Z = 6.42, p < 0.0001), SF-36 (mental component) (Z = −5.02, p < 0.0001), SF-36 (physical component) (Z = −5.00, p < 0.0001) and NDI (Z = 7.03, p < 0.0001). The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis seems reliable and safe in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylosis

Background and purpose. The musculoskeletal system is a common, but often overlooked, cause of chest pain. Little is known about the efficacy of spinal manipulation for this condition. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the relative effectiveness of two conservative treatment approaches for acute musculoskeletal chest pain, 1) a spinal manipulation-based therapy as a typical example of chiropractic treatment and 2) self-management as an example of minimal intervention. Methods and results. In a non-blinded, randomised controlled trial set at an emergency cardiology department and four outpatient chiropractic clinics, 115 consecutive patients with acute chest pain and no clear medical diagnosis at initial presentation were included. After a baseline evaluation, patients with musculoskeletal chest pain were randomized to four weeks of chiropractic treatment or self-management, with post-treatment questionnaire follow-up four and 12 weeks later. Primary outcome measures were numeric change in pain intensity (11-point box numerical rating scale) and self-perceived change in pain (7-point ordinal scale). Secondary measures included Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores, change in pain intensity (chest, thoracic spine, neck and shoulder/arm), and self-perceived change in general health. Preliminary results will be available at the time of presentation. Conclusions. This is the first randomised controlled trial assessing chiropractic treatment versus a minimal intervention in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain. Results will indicate whether chiropractic treatment is a useful option for patients with musculoskeletal chest pain, but the design does not allow for standardisation of treatment or identification of potentially active ingredients of care

Introduction. This study aims to evaluate the impact of associated psychological co-morbidities (Depression/Anxiety), smoking history, gender, work benefits and employment status on the clinical outcome following anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR). Materials and Methods. We included in our study 100 patients who underwent ACDR in our Spinal Unit (between May 2006 – May 2010). We used as clinical outcome measures: Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Bodily Pain (SF36-BP) component of the Short Form 36 questionnaire. Statistics were obtained using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Independent sample t-test for normally distributed data and Man-Whitney U test for non-parametric data were used. Statistical significance was designated at p < 0.05. Results. There were 48 males and 52 females. Average age at operation was 52.96 years (Range 38-80) for males and 49.79 years (Range 31-71) for females. Average duration of follow up was 14.4 months (Range 6-35). Out of 100 patients, 28 patients had a history of anxiety/depression, 19 patients were smokers, 47 were actively working and 23 were receiving work benefits. We found that gender, smoking status, associated co-morbidities, working and benefit status had no statistically significant contribution to clinical outcome measures in the follow up period. For example, in the sub-group of non-smokers versus smokers, there was no significant difference in NDI (p=0.78), VAS-AP (p=0.12), SF-BP (p= 0.83) and VAS-NP (p=0.08). Conclusion. We conclude that in our study there was no statistically significant contribution of the associated psychosocial factors on the clinical outcomes following ACDR

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with poor outcome following coccygectomy on patients with chronic coccydynia and instability of the coccyx.

Aims

There is a paucity of information on the pre-operative coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and its influence on surgical outcomes.

Aims

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of coccygectomy for patients with chronic coccydynia.

The aim of this study was to determine whether obesity affects pain, surgical and functional outcomes following lumbar spinal fusion for low back pain (LBP).

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was made of those studies that compared the outcome of lumbar spinal fusion for LBP in obese and non-obese patients. A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference in the pain and functional outcomes. Lumbar spinal fusion in the obese patient resulted in a statistically significantly greater intra-operative blood loss (weighted mean difference: 54.04 ml; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.08 to 93.00; n = 112; p = 0.007) more complications (odds ratio: 1.91; 95% CI 1.68 to 2.18; n = 43858; p < 0.001) and longer duration of surgery (25.75 mins; 95% CI 15.61 to 35.90; n = 258; p < 0.001). Obese patients have greater intra-operative blood loss, more complications and longer duration of surgery but pain and functional outcome are similar to non-obese patients. Based on these results, obesity is not a contraindication to lumbar spinal fusion.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1395–1404.