Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 63 - 63
1 Apr 2018
Lum Z Coury J Huff K Trzeciak M
Full Access

Introduction. One method of surgical site infection prevention is lowering intraoperative environmental contamination. We sought to evaluate our hospitals operating room (OR) contamination rates and compare it to the remainder of the hospital. We tested environmental contamination in preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative settings of a total joint arthroplasty patient. Materials & Methods. 190 air settle plates composed of trypsin soy agar (TSA) were placed in 19 settings within our hospital. Locations included the OR with light and heavy traffic, with and without masks, jackets, and shoe covers, sub-sterile rooms, OR hallways, sterile equipment processing center, preoperative areas, post-anesthesia care units, orthopaedic floors, emergency department, OR locker rooms and restrooms, a standard house in the local community, and controls. The plates were incubated in 36 degrees celsius for 48 hours and colony counts were recorded. Numbers were averaged over each individual area. Results. The highest CFU was the OR locker room at 28 CFU/plate/hr. Preoperative & post anesthesia care unit holding areas were 7.4 CFU & 9.6 CFU, respectively. The main orthopaedic surgical ward had 10.0 CFU/plate/hr, while the VIP hospital ward had 17.0 CFU/plate/hr. The OR environment all had low CFUs. A live OR had slightly higher CFUs than ones without OR personnel. The OR sub-sterile room had 5.2 CFU/plate/hr, and the OR hallway had 11.2 CFU/plate/hr. The local community household measured 5.6CFU/plate/hr. Discussion. In comparison to the local community household, the OR locker room, restrooms, hospital orthopaedic wards, ED, pre-operative holding, PACU and OR hallway all had higher airborne contamination than the local household in our surrounding community. We were surprised to find some areas with high rates of contamination. Our hospital has since increased environmental cleaning and monitoring of these areas with improved effect. Based on our results, we can recommend environmental sampling as a simple, fast, inexpensive tool to monitor airborne contamination


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 5 | Pages 835 - 837
1 Sep 1996
Chosky SA Modha D Taylor GJS

The use of ultraclean air (UCA) in operating theatres reduces the infection rate after joint replacement but some cases of infection still occur. We investigated one possible source of contamination, namely the setting up of instruments in a conventional plenum-ventilated preparation room. We measured bacterial fallout using agar settle plates and compared instruments set up in the preparation room with those set up in the UCA theatre, assessed the effect of covering instruments after preparation and compared fallout during their preparation with total fallout throughout the operation. Our findings showed that covering the instruments reduced total bacterial fallout fourfold by reducing the exposure time, particularly during periods of increased activity and bacterial dispersal. Preparation in the UCA theatre and subsequent covering of the instruments reduced total fallout 28-fold. All measurable bacterial fallout occurred during the setting up and not during surgery