Aims. The Ponseti method is the gold standard treatment for congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), with the British Consensus Statement providing a benchmark for standard of care. Meeting these standards and providing expert care while maintaining geographical accessibility can pose a service delivery challenge. A novel ‘Hub and Spoke’ Shared Care model was initiated to deliver Ponseti treatment for CTEV, while addressing standard of care and resource allocation. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and outcomes of the corrective phase of Ponseti service delivery using this model. Methods. Patients with idiopathic CTEV were seen in their local hospitals (‘Spokes’) for initial diagnosis and casting, followed by referral to the tertiary hospital (‘Hub’) for tenotomy. Non-idiopathic CTEV was managed solely by the Hub. Primary and secondary outcomes were achieving primary correction, and complication rates resulting in early transfer to the Hub, respectively. Consecutive data were prospectively collected and compared between patients allocated to Hub or Spokes. Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, or chi-squared tests were used for analysis (alpha-priori = 0.05, two-tailed significance). Results. Between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2023, 92 patients (139 feet) were treated at the service (Hub 50%, n = 46; Spokes 50%, n = 46), of whom nine were non-idiopathic. All patients (n = 92), regardless of allocation, ultimately achieved primary correction, with idiopathic patients at the Hub requiring fewer casts than the Spokes (mean 4.0 (SD 1.4) vs 6.9 (SD 4.4); p < 0.001). Overall, 60.9% of Spokes’ patients (n = 28/46) required transfer to the Hub due to complications (cast slips Hub n = 2; Spokes n = 17; p < 0.001). These patients ultimately achieved full correction at the Hub. Conclusion. The Shared Care model was found to be feasible in terms of providing primary correction to all patients, with results comparable to other published services. Complication rates were higher at the Spokes, although these were correctable. Future research is needed to assess long-term outcomes, parents’ satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(11):865–872

Introduction. Albania is one of the poorest countries in Western European with a GDP per capita standing at 26 percent of the EU average in 2010. Whilst there is government-funded universal free provision of healthcare, it is accepted that delivery is patchy, not accessible to all and lacking expertise for more complex paediatric orthopaedic conditions. With the sponsorship of a UK-based charity, we have set up and completed 5 visits to Albania (3 assessment and 2 operative) to provide additional expertise for paediatric orthopaedic disorders running parallel to and utilising currently available local services. We present the results of this treatment and training programme to date. Patients and methods. Between 2008 and 2011, we assessed 204 children and adolescents with paediatric orthopaedic disorders in Tirana and Durres on 3 separate visits. Of these, 28 were listed for surgical procedures whilst the rest were treated non-operatively. Of the listed patients, 14 patients underwent surgical intervention (total of 18 procedures). Results. The most common diagnoses were developmental dysplasia of the hip, club feet, cerebral palsy and scoliosis. Most patients were treated non-operatively with advice and/or reassurance. Of those listed for surgery, the reasons for cancellation included problems with access to the treating hospital and failure to establish patient contact on the day of admission. Of the operated patients, the procedures performed, the perioperative challenges and significant complications (2/18) will be discussed. Conclusion. Although it is viable to establish parallel service delivery of paediatric orthopaedic surgical services in countries such as Albania, the perioperative and social challenges must be considered