Aims

A significant percentage of patients remain dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether the sequential addition of accelerometer-based navigation for femoral component preparation and sensor-guided ligament balancing improved complication rates, radiological alignment, or patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared with a historical control group using conventional instrumentation.

Aims. Intraoperative pressure sensors allow surgeons to quantify soft-tissue balance during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether using sensors to achieve soft-tissue balance was more effective than manual balancing in improving outcomes in TKA. Methods. A multicentre randomized trial compared the outcomes of sensor balancing (SB) with manual balancing (MB) in 250 patients (285 TKAs). The primary outcome measure was the mean difference in the four Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (ΔKOOS. 4. ) in the two groups, comparing the preoperative and two-year scores. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative balance data, additional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and functional measures. Results. There was no significant difference in ΔKOOS. 4. between the two groups at two years (mean difference 0.4 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.6 to 5.4); p = 0.869), and multiple regression found that SB was not associated with a significant ΔKOOS. 4. (0.2-point increase (95% CI -5.1 to 4.6); p = 0.924). There were no significant differences between groups in other PROMs. Six-minute walking distance was significantly increased in the SB group (mean difference 29 metres; p = 0.015). Four-times as many TKAs were unbalanced in the MB group (36.8% MB vs 9.4% SB; p < 0.001). Irrespective of group assignment, no differences were found in any PROM when increasing ICPD thresholds defined balance. Conclusion. Despite improved quantitative soft-tissue balance, the use of sensors intraoperatively did not differentially improve the clinical or functional outcomes two years after TKA. These results question whether a more precisely balanced TKA that is guided by sensor data, and often achieved by more balancing interventions, will ultimately have a significant effect on clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):604–612

Orthopaedic surgeons are currently faced with an overwhelming number of choices surrounding total knee arthroplasty (TKA), not only with the latest technologies and prostheses, but also fundamental decisions on alignment philosophies. From ‘mechanical’ to ‘adjusted mechanical’ to ‘restricted kinematic’ to ‘unrestricted kinematic’ — and how constitutional alignment relates to these — there is potential for ambiguity when thinking about and discussing such concepts. This annotation summarizes the various alignment strategies currently employed in TKA. It provides a clear framework and consistent language that will assist surgeons to compare confidently and contrast the concepts, while also discussing the latest opinions about alignment in TKA. Finally, it provides suggestions for applying consistent nomenclature to future research, especially as we explore the implications of 3D alignment patterns on patient outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):102–108.

Post-operative stability in a primary TKA procedure requires surgical skill in establishing symmetric flexion and extension spaces. Many surgeons further utilise techniques associated with “gap balancing” by attending to the dimensional space between the femur and tibia in developing flexion and extension gaps following bone resections and/or soft tissue releases. Questions still arise related to these gaps, in particular whether or not these gaps should be created dimensionally equal to each other by adjusting bone resections. Previous publications on this subject point to the conclusion that they are not dimensionally the same, but have a relationship to the supporting soft tissue in the flexion and extension positions. This study has been designed to investigate this premise. A soft tissue force sensing device, enabling the surgeon to create accurate balanced posterior femoral condylar resections relative to the soft tissues and the proximal tibia, has been integrated into the current surgical technique to create reliable flexion gap symmetry. To extend the concept of using balanced relative force readings to a more complete gap balancing technique, a preliminary distal femoral resection is made to facilitate mounting the adjustable instrument interfacing with the force sensor. Femoral rotation is adjusted to establish a symmetric flexion space based on balancing the relative force values in the tow femoral-tibial joint compartments. This sensor guided balancing step establishes the desired tibial insert thickness in the reconstructed knee. The final distal femoral bone resection is then made to equate the extension gap to the balanced flexion gap. Taking the concept of balanced resection to the next level, special angled inserts have been developed to fit onto the sensor and fill the extension space, in efforts to determine and create a balanced extension space. Data was gathered to relate the relative flexion force value to the resulting relative extension force value to see how this compares in a series of TKA’s. The results of this data will begin to shed light on the supporting soft tissue conditions when a true balanced resection technique is utilised. The focus of this study is to evaluate the extension forces resulting from this technique to better define a functional relationship between the flexion and extension gaps in the gap balancing technique