Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 101 - 101
1 May 2017
Jordan R Aparajit P Docker C El-Shazly M
Full Access

Introduction. Osteonecrosis of the knee encompasses three conditions; spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee, secondary osteonecrosis (ON) and post-arthroscopic ON. Early stage lesions can be managed by non-operative measures that include protected weight-bearing and analgesia. The aim of this study was to report the experience of the authors in managing early stages of knee ON by analysing the functional outcome and need for surgical intervention. Methods. All patients treated for osteonecrosis of the knee between 1st August 2001 and 1st April 2014 were prospectively collected. Treatment consisted of touch-down weight bearing for four to six weeks. The cases were retrospectively reviewed. MR imaging was evaluated for the stage of disease according to Koshino's Classification system, the condyles involved and the time taken for resolution. Tegner Activity Scale, VAS pain, Lysholm, WOMAC and IKDC scores were recorded at presentation and final follow up. Results. 51 cases were treated for knee ON at our centre; 40 cases of SONK, seven secondary ON and four post-arthroscopic ON. Of the seven cases of secondary osteonecrosis; 5 were secondary to self-reported high ethanol intake and two secondary to corticosteroid treatment. The mean age of the group was 56.9 years and 68.7% were male. The medial femoral condyle was the most commonly affected (54.9%). 86% reported resolution of clinical symptoms and a statistically significant improvement was reported in all functional outcome measures. Four patients required total knee arthroplasty; three in the post-arthroscopic group within 15 months and one following ON secondary to corticosteroids performed at 5 months. Conclusion. Early stage spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee can be managed successfully without surgery if diagnosed early. Although secondary and post-arthroscopic ON seem to be more resistant. Larger studies are required to confirm or refute this. Level of Evidence. IV – a case series. Conflict of Interests. The authors confirm that they have no relevant financial disclosures or conflicts of interest. Ethical approval was not sought as this was a systematic review


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 46 - 46
1 Jan 2017
Errani C Leone G Cevolani L Spazzoli B Frisoni T Donati D
Full Access

The purpose of our study was to identify possible risk factors of patients with GCT of the long bones after curettage and packing the bone cavity with bone cement or bone allografts. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 249 patients with GCT of the limbs treated at Musculoskeletal Oncology Department of our institution between 1990 and 2013, confirmed histologically and recorded in the Bone Tumor Registry. We reviewed 219 cases located in the lower limb and 30 of the upper limb. This series includes 135 females and 114 males, with mean age 32 years (ranging 5 to 80 yrs). According to Campanacci's grading system, 190 cases were stage 2, 48 cases stage 3, and 11 cases stage 1. Treatment was curettage (intralesional surgery). Local adjuvants, such as phenol and cement, were used in 185 cases; whereas in the remaining 64 cases the residual cavity was filled with allografts or autografts only. Oncological outcome shows 203 patients alive and continuously disease-free (CDF), 41 patients NED1 after treatment of local recurrence (LR), 2 patients NED1 after treatment of lung metastases, 2 AWD with lung metastases. One patient died of unrelated causes (DOD). LR rate was 15.3% (38 pts). Lung metastases rate was 1.6% (4 pts). In patients treated by curettage and cement (185 cases) LR was 12% (22 pts). Conversely, in patients treated curettage and bone allografts it was higher (16/64 cases), with an incidence of 25% of cases (p=0.004). Oncological complications seemed to be related with site, more frequently occurring in the proximal femur (p=0.037). LR occurred only in stage 2 or 3 tumors without statistical significance (p>0.05). The mean interval between the first surgical treatment and LR was 22 months (range: 3–89 mos). However, in the multivariate analysis no significant statistical effect on local recurrence rate could be identified for gender, patient's age, Campanacci's grading, or cement vs allografts. The only independent risk factor related to the local recurrence was the site, with a statistical significance higher risk for patients with GCT of the proximal femur (p= 0.008). Our observation on the correlation of tumor location and risk of local recurrence is new. Therefore, special attention must be given to GCTs in the proximal femur. In fact, primary benign bone tumors in the proximal femur are difficult to treat due to the risk of secondary osteonecrosis of the femoral head or pathologic fracture. Numerous methods of reconstructions have been reported. Among these, total hip arthroplasty (THA) or bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) should be avoided when possible as more cases are observed in young patients. Therefore, we do not suggest different approach for the proximal femur. GCT in the proximal femur is much more difficult to treat than in other sites, but if curettage is feasible, the best way is to save the joint with a higher risk of local recurrence, knowing that the sacrifice of the hip articulation in case of recurrence is always possible with THA or BHA