Patients with spinal injuries are very vulnerable to early complications or secondary spinal cord injuries before and during transfer, which may delay their rehabilitation. We designed transfer guidelines following concerns raised in a pilot study of the transfer of 16 patients. We then examined the effectiveness of the guidelines in 100 consecutive patients and completed the cycle by re-auditing a further 254 consecutive admissions after incorporating changes from the initial audit. The transfer guidelines addressed ten areas of clinical concern. We recorded a 50% improvement in airway monitoring and management. There was also improvement in anti-ulcer therapy and thromboprophylaxis (from 50% to 96%). We saw a 50% improvement in the use of appropriate support staff during the transfer. The re-audit showed that initial improvements were maintained and further improvements were noted in the transfer of relevant documentation and investigations. Improvement was also noted in the use of a vacuum mattress for the transfer of spinal injury patients and subsequently reduced incidence of pressure sores by a statistically significant level, which helped in the early rehabilitation of these patients. The majority of transfers were safe. The transfer guidelines were easy to use and improved patient care by ensuring that common problems had been addressed before and during transfer. This system reduced the risk of preventable complications during inter-hospital transfer. There may be wider application of similar guidelines to other trauma patients who require inter-hospital transfer, where there is a possibility of preventable secondary injury

This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk orthopaedic patients. A total of 58 patients had a retrievable inferior vena cava filter placed as an adjunct to chemical and mechanical prophylaxis, most commonly for a history of previous deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, polytrauma, or expected prolonged immobilisation. In total 56 patients (96.6%) had an uncomplicated post-operative course. Two patients (3.4%) died in the peri-operative period for unrelated reasons.

Of the 56 surviving patients, 50 (89%) were available for follow-up. A total of 32 filters (64%) were removed without complication at a mean of 37.8 days (4 to 238) after placement. There were four filters (8%) which were retained because of thrombosis at the filter site, and four (8%) were retained because of incorporation of the filter into the wall of the inferior vena cava. In ten cases (20%) the retrievable filter was left in place to continue as primary prophylaxis. No patient had post-removal thromboembolic complications.

A retrievable inferior vena cava filter, as an adjunct to chemical and mechanical prophylaxis, was a safe and effective means of reducing the acute risk of pulmonary embolism in this high-risk group of patients. Although most filters were removed without complications, thereby avoiding the long-term complications that have plagued permanent indwelling filters, a relatively high percentage of filters had to be left in situ.