Using inaccurate quotations can propagate misleading information, which might affect the management of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of quotation inaccuracy in the peer-reviewed orthopaedic literature related to the scaphoid. We randomly selected 100 papers from ten orthopaedic journals. All references were retrieved in full text when available or otherwise excluded. Two observers independently rated all quotations from the selected papers by comparing the claims made by the authors with the data and expressed opinions of the reference source. A statistical analysis determined which article-related factors were predictors of quotation inaccuracy. The mean total inaccuracy rate of the 3840 verified quotes was 7.6%. There was no correlation between the rate of inaccuracy and the impact factor of the journal. Multivariable analysis identified the journal and the type of study (clinical, biomechanical, methodological, case report or review) as important predictors of the total quotation inaccuracy rate.

We concluded that inaccurate quotations in the peer-reviewed orthopaedic literature related to the scaphoid were common and slightly more so for certain journals and certain study types. Authors, reviewers and editorial staff play an important role in reducing this inaccuracy.

Surfing has rapidly grown in popularity as the sport made its debut at the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. Surfing injuries are becoming more relevant with the globalisation and increasing risks of the sport, but despite this, little is known about surfing injuries or prevention strategies in either the competitive or recreational surfer. We reviewed the literature for the incidence, anatomical distribution, type and underlying mechanism of acute and overuse injuries, and discuss current preventative measures. Four online databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2020. This review finds that skin injuries represent the highest proportion of total injuries. Acute injuries most frequently affect the head, neck and face, followed by the lower limbs. Being struck by one's own board is the most common mechanism of injury. Surfers are injured at a frequency of 0.30–6.60 injuries per 1000 hours of surfing. Most prior studies are limited by small sample sizes, poor data collection methodology and geographical constraints. The scientific literature on surfing injuries under-represents overuse musculoskeletal injuries and the efficacy of prevention strategies for surfing-related overuse musculoskeletal injuries has not been studied. Injuries to the head and neck pose greater risks to a surfer's morbidity and mortality, yet there is no consensus on the management protocol of spinal injuries that occur in open water. Non-contact acute ligament injuries have increased as surfing manoeuvres have become more acrobatic, and overuse musculoskeletal injuries are highly correlated with paddling. Further research is needed to establish preventative measures for both acute and overuse surfing injuries and to ensure the increasing popularity of surfing is met with an improved understanding of sport risks and safety. Specifically, we recommend research be prioritised regarding the efficacy of training programmes to prevent surfing-related overuse musculoskeletal injuries

The number of women entering medical school has been steadily increasing over the past two decades; however, the number of women pursuing careers in orthopaedic surgery has not increased at the same rate. One of the suggested reasons for this discrepancy is the perceived incompatibility of having a family while upholding the demands of a surgical career in orthopaedics. A growing body of scientific literature has also outlined the increased rate of infertility and pregnancy complications in women surgeons. The extent to which these factors play a role in the recruitment and retention of women in orthopaedic surgery is unknown. Understanding pregnancy and parenthood in orthopaedic surgery is a critical first step in addressing this issue. A scoping review was conducted to identify literature pertaining to the perceptions and experiences of pregnancy and/or parenthood of women in orthopaedic surgery. Embase, MEDLINE and PsychINFO were searched on June 7th, 2021 with Boolean operators to combine the following terms: orthop?e*, pregnancy, maternity, motherhood, parenthood, parental, and parenting. Studies pertaining to orthopaedic surgery residents, fellows and staff were included. The Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping studies was followed. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the included studies while thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke was used to analyze the qualitative data. A total of 17 studies from 2006 to 2021 met inclusion criteria. Over half of the available research was conducted within the last two years (n=9, 53%). The majority of studies were conducted in the United States (n=15, 88%) and the United Kingdom (n=2, 12%). The most commonly used study design was survey-based research (n=13, 76%), followed by review studies (n=3, 18%), and case series (n=1, 6%). Thematic analysis revealed five key themes contributing to the women's experiences of pregnancy and/or parenthood in orthopaedics: (1) women are subtly or blatantly discouraged from becoming pregnant by their colleagues and superiors, (2) women delay childbearing to preserve their professional reputation, (3) there are higher rates of infertility and preterm labor in orthopaedic surgeons than in the general population, (4) the orthopaedic work environment can be hazardous and challenging for the pregnant woman, but accommodations are possible to mitigate risks, and (5) overall, there is limited support for pregnant and/or parenting women in orthopaedics throughout their career. The first woman to be board-certified in orthopaedic surgery in the United States was Ruth Jackson in 1937. Eighty-four years later, orthopaedic surgery has the lowest number of women of the surgical specialties. The barriers related to pregnancy and/or parenthood during a woman's career in orthopaedics may be one cause. This study identified five themes related to pregnancy and parenthood that warrant further investigation. Qualitative research approaches can be used to elucidate the details of women's experiences and to provide suggestions for structural changes in the orthopaedic work environment

Aim. Although non-unions being one of the most common complication after long-bone fracture fixation, the definition of this entity remains controversial and varies widely among authors. A clear definition is crucial, not only for the evaluation of published research data but also for the establishment of uniform treatment concepts. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the definitions and different criteria used in the scientific literature to describe non-unions after long bone fractures. Method. A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Prospective therapeutic and diagnostic clinical studies in which adult long-bone fracture non-unions were investigated as main subject were included in this analysis. Results. One hundred fifty-two studies investigating 6432 long-bone non-unions met inclusion criteria for this analysis. In total 49% (75/152) of included studies did not define non-union at all, even though non-union was their main study subject. A definition of non-union on either clinical, radiologic or time criteria could be found in 51% (77/152) of the included studies. Non-union was defined based on time criteria in 83% (64/77), on radiographic criteria in 65% (50/77), and on clinical criteria in 43% (33/77). A combination of clinical, radiologic and time criteria for definition was only found in 35% (27/77) of all the included studies that defined non-union. The time point when authors defined an unhealed fracture as a nonunion showed a considerable heterogeneity, ranging from four to 24 months. Conclusions. In the current orthopaedic trauma literature, we found a lack of consensus with regard to the definition of long bones non-unions. Therefore, a standardized definition of non-union remains unclear. Without valid and reliable definition criteria of non-unions, the establishment of standardized diagnostic and treatment algorithms as well as the comparison of studies remain difficult. The lack of a clear definition emphasizes the need for consensus-based definition of fracture non-unions based on clinical, radiographic and time criteria

Aim. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a cornerstone of perioperative pain management in orthopedic trauma surgery, although concerns persist regarding the potential impact of these drugs on fracture healing. Furthermore, NSAIDs may also exert an influence on host immune defenses, which may also be important in the context of infection treatment. However, this has been very much under-investigated in the clinical and scientific literature. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of NSAIDs on the course of an orthopedic device-related infection (ODRI) and its response to antibiotic therapy in a rat model. Method. A polyetheretherketone (PEEK) screw was inserted in the proximal tibia of 48 skeletally mature female Wistar rats: 12 control animals received a sterile screw, of which 6 also received NSAID therapy (carprofen, 5 mg/kg s.c. once daily); 36 rats received a Staphylococcus epidermidis-inoculated screw, of which 18 received NSAID therapy. Antibiotic therapy was administered from day 7–21 in 9 animals from all groups receiving S. epidermidis-inoculated screws (cefazolin: 30 mg/kg; s.c., b.i.d. plus rifampin: 25 mg/kg; s.c., b.i.d.). Bone histomorphometric changes were monitored using longitudinal microCT scanning, performed postoperatively, and at 3, 6, 9, 14, 20 and 28 days (euthanasia). Quantitative bacteriology of the implant, bone and overlying soft tissue was performed to assess infection status of individual animals. Results. All animals receiving S. epidermidis-inoculated screws in the absence of antibiotic therapy were confirmed as infected at euthanasia. Quantitative microbiology showed no significant change in bacterial load in NSAID-treated animals versus control. However, NSAID administration dramatically impaired antibiotic efficacy, with 7/8 animals remaining infected when NSAIDs were co-administered, whilst only 2/9 of control animals were infected when NSAIDs were withheld. Pronounced osteolysis was observed by day 6–9 in control animals, with reparative processes (periosteal proliferation and mineralization) observed at day 14. NSAID treatment markedly prevented S. epidermidis-induced osteolysis, but also reparative processes. Antibiotic treatment did not affect the bone changes. Conclusions. NSAID administration dramatically affected the response of bone tissue to infection, reducing osteolysis but also impairing reparative processes. Crucially, NSAIDs dramatically reduced antibiotic efficacy. Given these pronounced negative effects, further investigations should be conducted to determine the underlying pathophysiological mechanism and better understand the consequences of the therapeutic use of NSAIDs in human patients with ODRI

My involvement in the DEFENSE side of MoM hip litigation has allowed me the luxury of reflection and continued study of the basic and clinical science and voluminous medical and scientific literature concerning this particular wear couple. Much of what I have learned is relevant to other articular couples, and might help you in your next THR. While useful, in vitro laboratory testing cannot wholly replicate or predict in vivo behavior of a particular wear couple. (Mother Nature always has something new to teach us!). Although MoM implants underwent rigorous pre-market testing and evaluation by the industry and appropriate regulatory approval in both the US and EU, the process cannot assure the clinical safety or success of new designs and materials for all implant recipients. Two year results obtained in pre-market (IDE) studies are of insufficient follow-up for accurate evaluation of the short, and certainly medium, or long-term clinical performance of new materials or designs, as demonstrated by the two year data from the Australian Joint Registry. In certain populations, MoM bearings have performed satisfactorily (to date) in individuals for whom traditional bearings were a poor option. Conclusions. Be conservative. Use appropriate clinical judgment and careful informed consent if you recommend new designs or materials to your patient

The Stanford Upper Extremity Model (SUEM) (Holzbauer, Murray, Delp 2005, Ann Biomed Eng) includes the major muscles of the upper limb and has recently been described in scientific literature for various biomechanical purposes including modeling the muscle behavior after shoulder arthroplasty (Hoenecke, Flores-Hernandez, D'Lima 2014, J Shoulder Elbow Surg; Walker, Struk, Banks 2013, ISTA Proceedings). The initial publication of the SUEM compared the muscle moment arm predictions of the SUEM against various moment arm studies and all with the scapula fixed. A more recent study (Ackland, Pak, and Pandy 2008, J Anat) is now available that can be used to compare SUEM moment arm predictions to cadaver data for similar muscle sub-regions, during abduction and flexion motions, and with simulated scapular motion. SUEM muscle moment arm component vectors were calculated using the OpenSim Analyze Tool for an idealized abduction and an idealized flexion motion from 10° to 90° that corresponded to the motions described in Ackland for the cadaver arms. The normalized, averaged muscle moment arm data for the cadavers was manually digitized from the published figures and then resampled into uniform angles matching the SUEM data. Standard deviations of the muscle moment arms from the cadaver study were calculated from source data provided by the study authors. Python code was then used to calculate the differences, percent differences, and root-mean-square (RMS) values between the data sets. Of the 14 muscle groups in the SUEM, the smallest difference in predicted and measured moment arm was for the supraspinatus during the abduction task, with an RMS of the percent difference of 11.4%. In contrast, the middle latissimus dorsi had an RMS percent difference over 400% during the flexion task. The table presents the RMS difference and the RMS of the percent difference for the muscles with the largest abduction and adduction moment arms (during abduction) and the largest flexion and extension moment arms (during flexion). The moment arm data for the SUEM model and the cadaver data (with 1 standard deviation band) during the motion of the same muscles are provided in Figure 1 for the Abduction motion task and in Figure 2 for the Flexion motion task. It is challenging to simulate the three dimensional, time variant geometries of shoulder muscles while maintaining model fidelity and optimizing computational cost. Dividing muscles in to sub regions and using wrapping line segment approximations appears a reasonable strategy though more work could improve model accuracy especially during complex three dimensional motions

Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip enjoyed a resurgence of enthusiasm. A recent article has documented that the media played a significant role in its popularity, making claims that were not substantiated in scientific literature. Proponents of resurfacing arthroplasty state that it is bone conserving, provides greater stability, enhances range of motion, leads to a more normal gait, facilitates increased activity levels, decreases risk of dislocation, decreases the risk of leg length discrepancy and find that it is easier to insert in the face of deformity or retained hardware. The naysayers state that it is a more difficult operative procedure associated with a higher learning curve. They note that there are few patients who meet the selection criteria and there is an increased risk of fracture of the femoral neck. Finally, there is concern over metal ion toxicity and adverse tissue reaction. Furthermore, as we explore the literature, several studies have observed that resurfacing requires a bigger cup and results in a significantly higher volume of normal bone reamed from the acetabulum. Other studies note decreased range of motion with resurfacing compared with total hip arthroplasty (THA) secondary to an unfavourable head to neck ratio resulting in increased impingement. While resurfacing is purported to enhance functional outcomes, one randomized trial of 48 patients, 24 each resurfacing and large head THA, compared with 14 healthy control subjects found no difference in gait speed and postural balance evaluations, functional test, and clinical data at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operative. In another study comparing 337 resurfacings with 266 ceramic-on-ceramic THA, at 24 months there was no difference in Harris hip score, pain score or function score, but a statistically greater improved Harris hip range of motion score in THA. In a large meta-analysis study comparing 3269 hip resurfacings (3002 patients) with average follow-up of 3.9 years to 5907 cementless THA (5907 patients) with average follow-up of 8.4 years, the observed rate of femoral revision due to mechanical failure was 2.6% for resurfacing versus 1.3% for THA, yielding annualized rates of 0.67% and 0.15% respectively. An analysis of hip resurfacing data from national joint registries found that hip resurfacing demonstrates an overall increased failure rate compared with THA, except in males younger than 65 years old having a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis and except with head diameters larger than 50 mm, which may be especially relevant as a contraindication for use of the procedure in female patients