Background. NHS improvement advocates same day emergency care (SDEC) for patients requiring additional specialism than can be provided in an Emergency Department. A novel physiotherapist-led spinal SDEC unit was established in January 2020, integrated within the on-call spinal service. The aim of this paper was to evaluate patient and peer satisfaction with the spinal SDEC. Methods. Patient satisfaction questionnaires and/or friends and family tests were collected from patients over a six-month period. Questionnaires evaluated satisfaction with recommendations given, service given, staff friendliness. Anonymous, completed questionnaires were uploaded onto a spreadsheet. Peer satisfaction was assessed using a google sheets document emailed to interface, primary care and community services. The questionnaire captured the respondents’ role, how many patients they had referred to the SDEC, reasons for referral, ease of referral, and compared this new pathway with the previous pathway. All patient's satisfaction responses recommended the service to family and friends (n=110 extremely likely, 8 likely) (6% total seen). All respondents were satisfied with the service they received (n=80 very satisfied, n=12 satisfied) and recommendations made (n=86 very satisfied, n=6 satisfied). Of peer satisfaction, 26 respondents (n=12 (46%) physiotherapists, n=6 (23%) first contact practitioners, n=6 (23%) advanced practice physiotherapists, n=1 (4%) GP, n=1 (4%) nurse) reported the SDEC delivered a better pathway and outcomes (n=25, 96%), and 20 (77%) respondents reported favourable comments of the service and its impact on patients and referrers. Conclusion. Peer and patient satisfaction data support the use of a physiotherapist-led spinal SDEC in emergency and urgent spinal care pathways. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of Interest. Sources of interest: No sources of funding

Introduction. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is associated with progressive neurological deterioration. Surgical decompression can halt but not reverse this progression. The Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Assessment (MJOA) tool is recommended by international guidelines to grade disease severity into mild, moderate and severe, where moderate and severe are both recommended to undergo surgical intervention. During Covid-19 Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust, identified DCM patients as high risk for sustaining permanent neurological damage due to surgical delay. The Advanced Spinal Practitioner (ASP) team implemented a surveillance project to evaluate those at risk. Methods. A spreadsheet was compiled of all DCM patients known to the service. Patients were telephoned (Oct-Nov 2021) by an ASP. MJOA score was recorded and those describing progressive deterioration were reviewed by the ASP team on a spinal same day emergency assessment unit. Incident forms were completed for clinical deterioration and recorded as severe harm. Acute, progressive neurological deterioration was fast tracked for emergency surgical decompression. Results. 45 patients were telephoned, 18 (40%) had deteriorated. Of the 18, 9 underwent urgent surgical decompression, 6 still await surgery and 3 continue to be monitored. Those who had deteriorated were sent a formal apology and duty of candour letter. Conclusion. It appears that patients with a diagnosis of DCM deteriorate over time. Delays to timely surgical intervention can have a deleterious effect on patient's neurological function. Baseline assessment should be clearly documented and scoring system such as MJOA considered for effective monitoring. Safety netting for deterioration should be standard practice, and a clear pathway for emergency presentation identified. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Introduction. Monitoring of scoliosis is traditionally done with radiographs, which can be associated with an increased risk of cancer secondary to multiple exposures over many years. This study investigated whether the findings from surface topography can be used to monitor scoliosis curves and how much this method affects outcome scores in patients with scoliosis. This study therefore had two subsets: (1) to investigate whether lateral asymmetry (LA) from ISIS2 surface topography can predict radiographic Cobb angle, providing an alternative non-invasive means of monitoring patients with scoliosis (LA and Cobb subset); and (2) to establish the relationships between the magnitude of the deformity in scoliosis, measured by Cobb angle on radiograph and volumetric asymmetry (VA) with the ISIS2 surface topography, and the patient perception of self-image and mental health, measured with SRS-22 scores (Cobb, VA, and SRS subset). Methods. In the LA and Cobb subset, 72 untreated patients with scoliosis (77 curves) with a Cobb angle of 55° or less were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, Cobb angle measurement taken from a standard radiograph, and surface topography done on the same day. A comparison of Cobb angle and LA was done. In the Cobb, VA, and SRS subset, 89 untreated patients with scoliosis were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, Cobb angle measurement of radiograph, and surface topography done on the same day along with SRS-22 questionnaires. A comparison correlation of SRS scores for function, pain, self-image, and mental health against Cobb angle and VA was undertaken. All statistical analysis was done with software R. Results. In the LA and Cobb subset, for Cobb angle less than 55° on radiograph, ISIS2 was able to predict the Cobb angle within 13°. In the VA, Cobb, and SRS subset, Cobb angle contributed only about 10% to self-image, whereas VA contributed 14%. Cobb angle contributed about 6·2% to mental health, whereas VA contributed 8·6%. Conclusions. Cobb angles display poor reliability, with estimates ranging from 3° to 10°. Even so, the 95% CIs on the prediction of Cobb angle from ISIS2 LA are too wide to use it alone to monitor spinal curvature. Whether or not LA is capable of monitoring change in curvature will be investigated as more longitudinal data are built up. VA correlates better with both mental health and self-image than does Cobb angle, but the correlation is still poor. Neither Cobb angle nor VA can be used to predict patient's self-image or mental health. We are pursuing this study further to look at other parameters that may affect SRS-22 such as sex, age, type of deformity, waist asymmetry, and shoulder asymmetry

Background. Advances in surgical and anesthetic technique have resulted in a reducing length of stay for lumbar decompression, with the first day case procedure published in the literature in 1980. Current evidence suggests day case surgery is associated with improved patient satisfaction, faster recovery, reduced infection rates and financial savings. Following the introduction of a locally agreed day case protocol for lumbar microdiscectomy, we reviewed our 30-day postoperative complication rates. Aims. To review postoperative complication rates for patients who underwent day case primary lumbar microdiscectomy. Methods. We studied all patients that met a locally agreed day case protocol for lumbar microdiscectomy and were operated upon between 1. st. March 2013 and 31. st. December 2015. Results. 134 patients underwent primary day case microdiscectomy (70 males, 64 females). The cohort had a mean age of 41 years (16–82). 96% (n=129) were single level procedures, 93% were unilateral (n=125). 81% (n=109) took place at either L4/L5 or L5/S1. All patients were discharged on the same day as admission and operation. 3% (n=4) of patients re-presented to hospital within 30 days of which 75% (n=3) were reviewed and discharged from the emergency department within 4 hours, following a satisfactory clinical review. One patient required an inpatient stay for a washout of a superficial postoperative infection. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that with adherence to robust listing and discharge protocols, day case lumbar microdiscectomy can be safely performed. Our 30-day postoperative complication rate of under 1% is comparable to that of traditional inpatient primary lumbar microdiscectomy. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Aims

To investigate the correlations among cytokines and regulatory T cells (T-regs) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, and their changes after anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) treatment.

Aims

Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of ‘full-time bracing’ versus ‘night-time bracing’ in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Introduction. Orthopaedic Spinal Rapid Access Service (OSRAS) was developed in our institute to provide a structured pathway for management of urgent spinal pathologies during working hours of Monday to Friday. It was delivered through a published rota by a multi displinary team of Extended Scope Practitioner carrying a bleep and a Spinal Surgeon. Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of OSRAS through a prospective audit. Results. From Nov 2013 till April 2014, 177 patients (48 Male: 119 Females) with an average age of 50 (17–95) years were referred to OSRAS. Wednesday was the busiest day with 26% referral in AM and 74% in PM. Main source of referrals were: Regional MSK services (50), Triage (34), ED (27) and GPs (20). The reasons were: suspected CESI (n=100), Acute LBP (n=30), pathological fractures (n=23), progressive neurology (n=16), discitis (n=5) and spinal stenosis (n=2). Depending on clinical need 29 patients were seen on same day, 33 next day, 53 with in 2–5 days and 31 more than 5 days. Eighty patients were discharged, 36 listed for surgery, 27 required further follow up and 31 were given telephone advise only. High user satisfaction rating was obtained. Conclusion. We propose an OSRAS model as an alternate to often un satisfactory current emergency department model, that can provide a structured pathway for timely expert management of serious spinal pathologies therefore prevent potential consequences whilst avoid unnecessary admissions. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Aims

The aim of the study was to determine if there was a direct correlation between the pain and disability experienced by patients and size of their disc prolapse, measured by the disc’s cross-sectional area on T2 axial MRI scans.

Aim:. To Determine The Effect Of Posterior Instrumented Fusion On Lung Function In Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis Aged 8–11. Method:. Lung Function (Fvc And Fev1) Was Measured Before Surgery In 13 Patients (Aged 8 To 11) With Idiopathic Scoliosis. All Patients Had Curves Greater Than 50 And Had Undergone Posterior Instrumented Scoliosis Correction And Fusion With (3 Patients) Or Without (10 Patients) Same Day Anterior Convex Growth Arrest. Lung Function Tests Were Repeated 1–8 Years (Mean 5.3 Years) After Surgery. The Data Was Normalised To Take Into Account Standing Height And Loss Of Stature Due To Lateral Curvature, Allowing A Direct Comparison Of Percent Predicted Fev1 And Fvc Before And After Surgery. Results:. Mean Fvc Was 75% Before Surgery And 79% At Longest Follow-Up (1.9l To 2.7l). Mean Fev1 Was 73% Before Surgery And 76% At Longest Follow-Up (1.7 To 2.4). The Change In Lung Function After Surgery Did Not Correlate With Length Of Time To Longest Follow-Up. The Ratio Of Fev1 To Fvc Was 0.86 Before And After Surgery. Discussion:. In Idiopathic Scoliosis Below The Age Of 8 Years, Most Would Accept That Instrumentation Should Allow Spinal Growth To Try And Maintain Lung Function. Above The Age Of 11, Lung Function Is Probably Sufficient To Allow Instrumented Fusion With Its Reduced Complication Rate And Reduced Need For Further Surgery. Between The Ages Of 8 And 11 Controversy Exists. This Pilot Study Suggests That A Larger (Possibly Rct) Study Should Be Performed To Evaluate This Group Of Patients As Fusion May Be Appropriate As Percent Lung Function Corrected For Loss Of Height Due To Curvature Appears To Be Maintained. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

This study aimed to verify the accuracy of the DIERS Formetric Scan when assessing vertebral rotation of the apical vertebrae in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (A.I.S) patients, to determine whether the DIERS Formetric Scans can be used instead of or alongside radiographs when assessing A.I.S patients. Both the radiographs and the DIERS Formetric Scans of 60 Preoperative A.I.S patients. All patients included in our study had predominant thoracic curves using the Lenke classification method, Cobb angle range 33° – 85°. Each radiograph was categorised into groups according to the severity of Nash-Moe rotation score of the apical vertebrae. Three groups were formed Nash-Moe +1 (20 patients), Nash-Moe +2 (27 patients), Nash-Moe +3 (13 patients). Each result was then compared to the maximal rotation analysed by the DIERS Formetric Scan, which took place on the same day as the radiographs. The results were then assessed using a Pearson Correlation Coefficient and a One-Way ANOVA with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD Analysis. The Nash-Moe +1 Group scored a mean maximal rotation of 14.65° ±6.56 (11.82 – 17.48) (95% Confidence Interval), Nash-Moe +2 mean maximal rotation was 19.6° ±7.1 (16.92 – 22.28) and Nash-Moe +3 scored 21.53° ±8.9 (16.99 – 26.37). The Pearson Correlation Coefficient of this assessment was +0.342 (p value 0.07) demonstrating a weak positive correlation. The One-Way ANOVA analysis with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD analysis. The results of this analysis was an F value score of +4.115 (p Value 0.021) for the overall One-Way ANOVA test. The Post-Hoc Tukey HSD tests demonstrate that there is a statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 3 (p value 0.030) but there is no statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (p value 0.068) as well as no statistical difference between Group 2 and Group 3 (p value 0.716). DIERS Formetric Scan assessment of vertebral rotation shows a positive correlation with the Nash-Moe method. This allows us to rely on the Formetric scans and thus a possible reduction in radiographs when assessing A.I.S, this reduces the exposure to ionising radiation in A.I.S patients

Purpose of the study. To establish the relation between the magnitude of the deformity in scoliosis, measured by cobb angle on radiograph & Volumetric asymmetry with the ISIS2 surface topography, and the patient perception of self image and mental health, measured with SRS-22 scores. Methodology. A total of 89 untreated patients with scoliosis were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, cobb angle measurement of radiograph and surface topography performed on the same day along with SRS-22 questionnaires. The cobb angle was measured by single surgeon using a digital PACS system, who was unaware of the volumetric asymmetry score. Volumetric asymmetry was measured by ISIS2 surface topography performed by a research nurse who was unaware of the cobb angle. Volumetric asymmetry was calculated using standard ISIS2 software. A comparison correlation of SRS scores for function, pain, self image and mental health against cobb angle and volumetric asymmetry was undertaken by clinical scientist. Scores for patient satisfaction to treatment was excluded as these were untreated patients. Statistical analysis was performed using cor. test on software R. Results. Correlation of both cobb angle and volumetric asymmetry for function and pain were statistically not significant (p value > 0.05). However for self image, correlation was statistically significant with cobb angle (p value-0.0033) and volumetric asymmetry (p value-0.00031), but the correlation was not high. Cobb angle contributed only around 10% to self image, whilst volumetric asymmetry contributed only 14%. Similarly for mental health, correlation was statistically significant with cobb angle (p value-0.0194) and volumetric asymmetry (p value-0.00559), but the correlation was not high. Cobb angle contributed only around 6.2% to mental health, whilst volumetric asymmetry contributed only 8.6%. Conclusion. Volumetric asymmetry correlates better to both mental health and self image as compared to cobb angle, but the correlation is still poor. Neither cobb angle or volumetric asymmetry can be used to predict patients self image or mental health. We are pursuing this study further to look at other parameters which may affect SRS-22 such as gender, age, type of deformity, waist asymmetry and shoulder asymmetry. Ethics approval: None. Interest Statement: None

Purpose of the study. Monitoring of scoliosis is traditionally done with radiographs which can be associated with an increased risk of cancer secondary to multiple exposures over many years. This study investigates whether lateral asymmetry (LA) from ISIS2 surface topography can predict radiographic cobb angle, to provide an alternative non- invasive means of monitoring scoliosis patients. Methods. A total of 72 untreated patients with scoliosis (77 curves) with a Cobb angle of 55 degrees or less were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, cobb angle measurement taken from a standard radiograph and surface topography done on the same day. The cobb angle were measured by single surgeon using digital PACS system. The surgeon was unaware of the LA score. Lateral asymmetry was measured using ISIS2 surface topography done by a research nurse who was also unaware of the cobb angle as previously described. Lateral asymmetry was calculated using the standard ISIS2 software. A comparison of cobb angle and LA was performed. Linear regression analysis was performed to define an equation predicting Cobb from LA. The predicted Cobb angles were then compared with the measured radiographic Cobb angles using Bland-Altman analysis. All statistical analysis was carried out using R. Results. The regression equation is: Predicted Cobb = 1.04∗LA + 9.972 with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.85 for Cobb angles less than 55 degrees. Bland-Altman analysis of the difference between radiographic Cobb and predicted Cobb from LA gave a mean difference of 0.08 degrees, standard deviation of 6.71 degrees and 95% limits of agreement of −13.3 to 13.5 degrees. For cobb angle less than 55 degrees on radiograph, ISIS2 was able to predict the cobb angle within 13 degrees. Conclusion. Cobb angles themselves display poor reliability, estimates ranging from 3 degrees to 10 degrees. Even so, the 95% confidence limits on the prediction of Cobb angle from ISIS2 LA are too wide to use it alone for monitoring spinal curvature. Whether or not LA is capable of monitoring change in curvature will be investigated as more longitudinal data is built up. Ethics approval: None. Interest Statement: None

Aims

The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical relevance of increased facet joint distraction as a result of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for trauma.

We sought to determine whether specific characteristics of vertebral fractures in elderly men are associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis.

Mister osteoporosis Sweden is a population based cohort study involving 3014 men aged 69 to 81 years. Of these, 1427 had readable lateral radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Total body (TB) BMD (g/cm²) and total right hip (TH) BMD were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. The proportion of men with osteoporosis was calculated from TH BMD. There were 215 men (15.1%) with a vertebral fracture. Those with a fracture had lower TB BMD than those without (p < 0.001). Among men with a fracture, TB BMD was lower in those with more than three fractures (p = 0.02), those with biconcave fractures (p = 0.02) and those with vertebral body compression of > 42% (worst quartile) (p = 0.03). The mean odds ratio (OR) for having osteoporosis when having any type of vertebral fracture was 6.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9 to 9.5) compared with those without a fracture. A combination of more than three fractures and compression in the worst quartile had a mean OR of 114.2 (95% CI 6.7 to 1938.3) of having osteoporosis compared with those without a fracture.

We recommend BMD studies to be undertaken in these subcohorts of elderly men with a vertebral fracture.

Cite this article: 2015;97-B:1106–10.

We report the incidence of and risk factors for complications after scoliosis surgery in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and compare them with those of other neuromuscular conditions.

We identified 110 (64 males, 46 females) consecutive patients with a neuromuscular disorder who underwent correction of the scoliosis at a mean age of 14 years (7 to 19) and had a minimum two-year follow-up. We recorded demographic and peri-operative data, including complications and re-operations.

There were 60 patients with cerebral palsy (54.5%) and 26 with DMD (23.6%). The overall complication rate was 22% (24 patients), the most common of which were deep wound infection (9, 8.1%), gastrointestinal complications (5, 4.5%) and hepatotoxicity (4, 3.6%). The complication rate was higher in patients with DMD (10/26, 38.5%) than in those with other neuromuscular conditions (14/84, 16.7% (p = 0.019). All hepatotoxicity occurred in patients with DMD (p = 0.003), who also had an increased rate of deep wound infection (19% vs 5%) (p = 0.033). In the DMD group, no peri-operative factors were significantly associated with the rate of overall complications or deep wound infection. Increased intra-operative blood loss was associated with hepatotoxicity (p = 0.036).

In our series, correction of a neuromuscular scoliosis had an acceptable rate of complications: patients with DMD had an increased overall rate compared with those with other neuromuscular conditions. These included deep wound infection and hepatotoxicity. Hepatotoxicity was unique to DMD patients, and we recommend peri-operative vigilance after correction of a scoliosis in this group.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:943–9.