Introduction. Day Case Surgery (defined as same day discharge) is a priority within the National Health Service and has been shown to provide beneficial outcomes for patients and hospitals. We report our experience developing a Day Case Programme for Total Ankle Replacement (TAR). Methods. Prior to the introduction of a Day Case Programme, average length of stay following TAR in our unit was 3.5 days. Stakeholders were consulted about ways in which same day discharge could be facilitated. Patients' post-operative pain charts were reviewed prior to the introduction of this programme. Inclusion criteria included non-complex surgery (anticipated tourniquet < 2hrs), friend or relative support and pre-operative walking-aid assessment. An enhanced recovery protocol included long-acting popliteal block and dexamethasone. Patients were discharged with opiate analgesia and written pain instructions. Patients were asked to complete a pain and satisfaction questionnaire. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were recorded. Results. From September 2017 to April 2019 21 of 70 patients underwent TAR as a Day Case. Mean age was 67 years (43-85 years). Complications included two delayed wound healings and one representation on day three with urinary retention. No patients reported post-operative nausea or vomiting, 60% did not use Oramorph at home. Average Visual Analogue Score for pain was 23/100 on day one and 21/100 day three post-operatively. There was no significant difference in pre-operative or overall change in MOXFQ, VAS or EQ5D PROMS. Conclusions. Early results suggest that Day Case Total Ankle Replacements are safe. Appropriate patient selection is necessary. Day Case Surgery relies on support and communication between multiple teams to organise and run effectively

Introduction. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery and improved post-operative pain management make it possible to perform major foot/ankle operations as day-case. This could have significant impact on length of stay, saving resources and is in keeping with government policy. However, there are theoretical concerns about complications and low patient satisfaction due to pain. Methods. The survey was developed following review of the literature and was approved for distribution by the BOFAS (British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society) scientific committee. An online survey (19 questions) was sent to UK foot and ankle surgeons via the BOFAS membership list. Major foot/ ankle procedures were defined as surgery that is usually performed as an inpatient in majority of centres and day-case as same day discharge, with day surgery as the intended pathway. Results. A total of 132 surgeons responded, 80% from Acute NHS Trusts. The majority (78%) thought that more procedures could be performed as day-case at their centre. Currently 45% of respondents perform less than 100 day-case surgeries per year for these procedures. Despite post-operative pain and patient satisfaction being theoretical concerns for day-case surgery in this population; these outcomes were only measured by 34% and 10% of respondents respectively. The top perceived barriers to performing more major foot and ankle procedures as day-case were: Lack of physiotherapy input pre/post-operatively (23%), Lack of out of hours support (21%). Conclusions. There is consensus among surgeons to do more major foot/ ankle procedures as day-case. Despite theoretical concerns about post-operative pain and satisfaction this was only measured by a third of those surveyed. Out of hours support and physiotherapy input pre/ post-op were perceived as the main barriers. There is a need to scope the provision of physiotherapy pre/post-operatively and out of hours support at sites where this is a perceived barrier

Regional anaesthetic for foot surgery has been discussed as a method of post operative analgesia. Ankle block as the sole anaesthetic for foot surgery has not been extensively reviewed in the literature. Aim. To describe our experience of forefoot surgery under ankle block. Methods. 71 consecutive forefoot procedures (65 patients) were carried out under ankle block. A mixture of 10ml 2% Lidocaine with 10ml 0.5 % Bupivacine was administered to the superficial peroneal, deep peroneal, sural and saphenous nerves. Ankle tourniquet was employed in all procedures. Patients were contacted post operatively and completed a standardised questionnaire including an incremented pain assessment ranging from 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 severe pain). Results. 61 female and 4 male patients were contacted (age range 33-67y). Procedures included 48 first metatarsal osteotomies, 15 cheilectomies, 2 first MTP joint replacements, and 6 fusions. 17 patients (26 %) reported some discomfort during the block procedure (average pain score 1.2). No patients reported any pain during their operation(s). 14 patients (22%) required supplementation of the block. Average pain score at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours following surgery were 0.66, 2.9, 2.4 and 1.3 respectively. All patients were discharged home and walking on the same day. None complained of nausea or required parentral analgesia. There were no readmissions. Each patient confirmed they would have surgery under regional block rather than general anaesthesia and would recommend this technique to family and friends. Discussion. There are many advantages in being able to perform these small procedures under regional anaesthesia. Our initial observational study suggests forefoot surgery under ankle block alone may be safe and effective. Anaesthesia obtained permits the majority of forefoot procedures and provides lasting post-operative analgesia. Combined with intra-operative sedation, use of ankle tourniquet and same day discharge it has very high patient acceptance and satisfaction