Literature review about the current management strategies for U-shape sacral fractures. A thorough literature search was carried out to find out the current concepts in the management of U-shaped sacral fractures. Meta-analysis of 30 cases of U-Shaped sacral fractures. Radiological assessment for bone healing, and clinical examination for neurological recovery. 7 papers were published in the English literature between 2001 and 2009 about the management of U-shaped sacral fractures. In total 30 cases were included. The most common mechanism of injury was fall or jump from height (63%), followed by road traffic accidents and industrial injuries. Pre-operative neurological deficit was noted in 73% of patients. The average follow up time ranged from 2-12 months. 18 (60%) of patients were treated with sacroiliac screws. In this group pre-operative neurological deficit was found in 12(66%) patients. All of these patients had satisfactory radiological healing at follow up but 5(27%) patients had residual neurological deficit. No immediate complication was reported in this group. Incomplete sacroiliac screw disengagement was reported in one patient without fixation failure. Other procedures performed were lumbopelvic fixation, triangular osteosynthesis and transsacral plating. The most common cause of U-shaped sacral fractures is a fall or jump from height. There is a high association of neurological damage with U-shaped sacral fractures. From the current available evidence sacroiliac screw fixation is the most commonly performed procedure, it is however not possible to deduce which procedure is better in terms of neurological recovery

Introduction. Isolated U-shaped sacral fractures are rare entities, mostly seen in polytraumatized patients, and hence, they are difficult to diagnose. While the pelvic ring remains intact across S2/S3, the U-shaped fracture around S1 leads to marked instability between the base of the spine and the pelvis. As severe neurological deficits can occur, timely treatment of these fractures is crucial. We present a novel technique of percutaneous reduction and trans-sacral screw fixation in U-shaped fractures. Material and Methods. 3 multiply injured patients with u-shaped sacral fractures (female, age 21.7±7.23). Two underwent immediate fracture fixation. In the third case delayed reduction and fixation was performed after referral 6 weeks following open decompression. In prone position, a pair of Schanz pins was inserted into pelvis at the PSIS. A second pair of Schanz pins was inserted into S1 or L5. All pins were inserted percutaneously. The fracture was reduced indirectly, using the Schanz pins as levers. After image intensifier control of the reduction result, two trans-sacral screws were inserted for finite fixation. Results. In all three cases, this novel method of percutaneous reduction allowed an anatomical sacral alignment and stabilization with trans-sacral screws was initially sufficient. At 1 year follow-up, both immediately fixed fractures showed an anatomical sacral alignment. Both had no neurological deficits, no signs of screw-loosening and were pain free. Unfortunately the delayed fixation showed a new tilt and hence loss of sacral alignment. This might be due to posterior structural integrity loss after decompression. Conclusion. U-shaped sacral fractures are rare, but correct and immediate treatment is paramount to achieve good outcome. Percutaneous reduction and screw fixation offers a less invasive treatment method. Anatomical alignment and stabilisation is possible and time of surgery can be reduced significantly

To determine if there is a safe osseous corridor for trans-sacroiliac screw fixation of U-type sacral fractures using fluoroscopic landmarks. We reviewed the sacral anatomy of patients who underwent Computed Tomography (CT) investigations between October and December 2009. Agfa-IPMAX Version 5.2 software was used to determine if there was a trans-sacroiliac osseous corridor in the S1 and S2 vertebrae from one ilium to the other. 76 patients were in the study, 38 male and 38 female. Exclusion criteria were patients under 18 years old; patients with degenerate lumbar spine and lumbo-sacral junction; CT imaging slices greater than 2.5mm. We measured various parameters including the dimensions of the S1 and S2 mid-sagittal vertebral body; cross-sectional areas of the S1 and S2 corridor; location of the centre of the S1 and S2 corridor. The mean cross-sectional area for S1 and S2 corridors in males and females are 21mm. 2. and 15mm. 2 . respectively. The mean cross-sectional area for the S2 corridor in males and females were 15mm. 2 . and 11mm. 2 . respectively. The centre of the S1 and S2 corridor is located in the centre of both S1 and S2 vertebrae. Two-thirds of males and females have a complete osseous corridor to pass a trans-sacroiliac S1 screw. The S2 corridor was present in all males but only in 87% of females. Before placement of trans-sacroiliac screws, the surgeon should review the CT sacral anatomy to determine if the trans-sacroiliac osseous corridor is present. Ethics Approval: None – Audit Interest Statement: None

Aims

High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a disabling disorder for which many different operative techniques have been described. The aim of this study is to evaluate Scoliosis Research Society 22-item (SRS-22r) scores, global balance, and regional spino-pelvic alignment from two to 25 years after surgery for high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis using an all-posterior partial reduction, transfixation technique.

Aims

The current pandemic caused by COVID-19 is the biggest challenge for national health systems for a century. While most medical resources are allocated to treat COVID-19 patients, several non-COVID-19 medical emergencies still need to be treated, including vertebral fractures and spinal cord compression. The aim of this paper is to report the early experience and an organizational protocol for emergency spinal surgery currently being used in a large metropolitan area by an integrated team of orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons.

Objectives

To employ a simple and fast method to evaluate those patients with neurological deficits and misplaced screws in relatively safe lumbosacral spine, and to determine if it is necessary to undertake revision surgery.

The widespread use of MRI has revolutionised the diagnostic process for spinal disorders. A typical protocol for spinal MRI includes T1 and T2 weighted sequences in both axial and sagittal planes. While such an imaging protocol is appropriate to detect pathological processes in the vast majority of patients, a number of additional sequences and advanced techniques are emerging. The purpose of the article is to discuss both established techniques that are gaining popularity in the field of spinal imaging and to introduce some of the more novel ‘advanced’ MRI sequences with examples to highlight their potential uses.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1683–92.

The presacral retroperitoneal approach for axial lumbar interbody fusion (presacral ALIF) is not widely reported, particularly with regard to the mid-term outcome. This prospective study describes the clinical outcomes, complications and rates of fusion at a follow-up of two years for 26 patients who underwent this minimally invasive technique along with further stabilisation using pedicle screws. The fusion was single-level at the L5-S1 spinal segment in 17 patients and two-level at L4–5 and L5-S1 in the other nine. The visual analogue scale for pain and Oswestry Disability Index scores were recorded pre-operatively and during the 24-month study period. The evaluation of fusion was by thin-cut CT scans at six and 12 months, and flexion-extension plain radiographs at six, 12 and 24 months. Significant reductions in pain and disability occurred as early as three weeks postoperatively and were maintained. Fusion was achieved in 22 of 24 patients (92%) at 12 months and in 23 patients (96%) at 24 months. One patient (4%) with a pseudarthrosis underwent successful revision by augmentation of the posterolateral fusion mass through a standard open midline approach.

There were no severe adverse events associated with presacral ALIF, which in this series demonstrated clinical outcomes and fusion rates comparable with those of reports of other methods of interbody fusion.

We reviewed 15 consecutive patients, 11 women and four men, with a mean age of 48.7 years (37.3 to 62.6), who between July 2004 and August 2007 had undergone percutaneous sacroiliac fusion using hollow modular anchorage screws filled with demineralised bone matrix.

Each patient was carefully assessed to exclude other conditions and underwent pre-operative CT and MR scans. The diagnosis of symptomatic sacroiliac disease was confirmed by an injection of local anaesthetic and steroid under image intensifier control.

The short form-36 questionnaire and Majeed’s scoring system were used for pre- and post-operative functional evaluation. Post-operative radiological evaluation was performed using plain radiographs.

Intra-operative blood loss was minimal and there were no post-operative clinical or radiological complications. The mean follow-up was for 17 months (9 to 39). The mean short form-36 scores improved from 37 (23 to 51) to 80 (67 to 92) for physical function and from 53 (34 to 73) to 86 (70 to 98) for general health (p = 0.037). The mean Majeed’s score improved from 37 (18 to 54) pre-operatively to 79 (63 to 96) post-operatively (p = 0.014). There were 13 good to excellent results. The remaining two patients improved in short form-36 from a mean of 29 (26 to 35) to 48 (44 to 52). Their persistent pain was probably due to concurrent lumbar pathology.

We conclude that percutaneous hollow modular anchorage screws are a satisfactory method of achieving sacroiliac fusion.