Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 13 of 13
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 43 - 43
1 Apr 2022
Clesham K Storme J Donnelly T Wade A Meleady E Green C
Full Access

Introduction. Hip arthrodiastasis for paediatric hip conditions such as Perthes disease is growing in popularity. Intended merits include halting the collapse of the femoral head and maintaining sphericity by minimising the joint reaction force. This can also be applied to protecting hip reconstruction following treatment of hip dysplasia. Our aim was to assess functional outcomes and complications in a cohort of paediatric patients. Materials and Methods. A retrospective single-surgeon cohort study was performed in a University teaching hospital from 2018–2021. Follow-up was performed via telephone interview and review of patient records. Complications, time in frame and functional scores using the WOMAC hip score were recorded. Results. Following review, 26 procedures were identified in 24 patients. Indications included 16 cases of Perthes disease, 4 following slipper upper femoral epiphysis, 3 avascular necrosis, and single cases following infection, dysplasia and a bone cyst. Pre-treatment WOMAC scores averaged 53.9, improving to 88.5 post-removal. Pin site infections were encountered in 11 patients, all treated with oral antibiotics. Two patients required early removal of frame due to pin loosening. Average time in frame was 3.9 months. Conclusions. This series displays how hip arthrodiastasis can be used to manage paediatric hip conditions. Complex reconstructions may be required in patients with severe deformity following perthes disease, DDH or SUFE. The use of arthrodiastasis in these patients aims to protect the reconstruction and potentially improve outcomes. A dedicated team of specialist nurses, physiotherapists and psychologists are crucial to the treatment program


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 153 - 153
1 Sep 2012
Cousins G MacLean J Campbell D
Full Access

Introduction. Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in the treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has been shown to be safer than continued observation of the contralateral hip. This treatment remains controversial due to the potential for harm caused to an apparently unaffected hip. There is evidence that pinning of an already slipped epiphysis causes growth disturbance of the proximal femur, however this has been questioned in that the slip occurs at the hypertrophic layer of the growth plate with no damage to the germative layer. Aim. To determine whether prophylactic pinning affects subsequent growth of the unaffected hip in cases of unilateral SUFE. Method. In order to determine the effect of prophylactic pinning we compared radiographs of skeletally mature patients who had either undergone prophylactic pinning (group 1), pinning of the affected side only (group 2), and adults with no history of SUFE (group 3). We measured the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) and calculated the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance to articulo-trochanteric distance. These measures have been used in previous studies and have been shown to be reliable indicators of disturbed proximal femoral growth. As this was a pilot study we recruited 8 to each group. Results. The absolute sum of the ATDs were 219mm (average 27.3mm) Group 1, 213mm (average 26.6mm) Group2 and 258mm (average 32.5mm). The average trochanter-trochanter: ATD ratio in group 1 was 2.7 (1.9–3.8) compared to 2.7 (2.3–3.2) and 2.3 (1.9–2.7) in groups 2 and 3 respectively. Conclusion. Our results suggest no difference in subsequent growth between hips that are prophylactically pinned and those that are not. Abnormal growth was observed in unpinned hips suggesting undiagnosed SUFE in some cases. In this series pinning had no effect on proximal femoral growth in patients with SUFE


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 43 - 43
1 May 2021
Hutchinson R Ferguson D
Full Access

Introduction. Retention and removal of children's orthopaedic metalwork is a contentious issue that has implications for current resource allocation, health economics, complication risks and can impact on future treatments. Understanding how to guide families make informed choices requires an overview of all the relevant evidence to date, and knowledge of where the evidence is lacking. Our aim was to systematically review the literature and provide a meta-analysis where possible, recommending either retention or removal. Materials and Methods. A search of the literature yielded 2420 articles, of which 22 papers were selected for the study analysis. Inclusion criteria: Any paper (evidence level I-IV) assessing the risks or benefits of retaining or removing orthopaedic metalwork in children. Exclusion criteria: Spinal implants; implant number < 40; < 75% recorded follow up; papers including implants in their analysis that always require removal; patients aged >18 years. Results. In total, 4988 patients (6412 implants) were included across all 22 studies. There was a significant amount of heterogenicity between studies. Overall the short term risks of metalwork retention and removal are low, with a few exceptions. In forearm plating re-fracture rates following removal were lower than those seen in studies looking at retained metalwork, provided removal occurred later than 12 months from the initial operation. Forearm re-fracture rates after removal of flexible nails significantly increased if removal was performed before 6 months. Major complications following routine metalwork removal from the proximal femur are relatively rare, with re-fracture rates of 1–5%. The majority of these re-fractures are seen in neuromuscular patients or in patients where removal occurs earlier than 6 months. Routine metalwork removal following SUFE had a complication rate of 30–60%. Conclusions. We found that there are certain subgroups of children that benefit from retention of metalwork and some that benefit from removal. There are several subgroups that we have identified which do not yet have sufficient long term evidence to make a balanced recommendation. We advise that families are made aware of what is known and what is unknown in order to allow for shared decision making


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 154 - 154
1 Sep 2012
Tsang K Alshryda S Ahmad M Adedapo S Montgomery R
Full Access

Aim. (1) To determine whether any difference exists in AVN risk between surgical reduction [Fish] or pinning-in-situ [PIS] of severe slips. (2) To review the different classifications of SUFE in relation to AVN. Materials and Methods. 56 children presented with slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) from 1998 to 2008; 29 males, 27 females; mean age 12.8 years. The Loder & Southwick classifications were used. All slips were treated surgically. The mild and moderate groups were treated with a single pin-in-situ. The severe group had either surgical reduction [Fish femoral neck osteotomy], alternatively a single pin-in-situ, randomised by day of admission. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) was the primary outcome measurement. Results. There were seven cases of AVN (12.5%). 2/41 in the stable group developed AVN compared to 5/15 in the unstable group, statistically significant [Chi-Square P=0.001]. No patient in the mild group, one out of seven in the moderate group, and six out of 22 in the severe group developed AVN. In the severe slip group, the AVN rate in the PIS group was 40%, after Fish osteotomy it was 23.5%. This is not statistically significant, but the trend favours surgical reduction. Conclusion and Significance. (1) Surgical reduction by Fish osteotomy is no riskier for AVN than pinning in situ for severe SUFE. Surgical reduction should therefore be performed to avoid gross deformity in these cases. (2) We have confirmed that the stability and the severity of the slip at presentation are the best indicators for predicting AVN


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 73 - 73
1 Feb 2012
MacLean J Reddy S
Full Access

The consequences of the complications associated with the management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis are a major source of disability in young adults. Whilst the management of chondrolysis, avascular necrosis or malunion of the femoral neck is usually undertaken by paediatric orthopaedic surgeons the initial management of SUFE in many regions is as part of an adult trauma service. This retrospective audit assessed the outcome of the management of SUFE in one such health region in which treatment occurred at three sites by a number of surgeons of varying experience, during the period July 1994 to June 2004. The aim was to compare our outcomes with those published and to identify whether our service should be altered as a consequence. The case notes and x-rays as recorded in theatre records were retrieved. Of the 64 cases that were treated during this period adequate records for 60 patients were available. Of these 60 patients there were 7 bilateral cases. Fixation in all 67 cases was by a single cannulated screw. In the 53 unilateral cases 17 underwent prophylactic pinning, the remaining 36 remained under observation. Of these nine patients presented with subsequent slips, eight of which were unstable and two had slip angles greater than 60° in which one developed avascular necrosis. Four other cases of avascular necrosis were observed (incidence 6%). Chondrolysis occurred in one patient with persistent pin penetration. In the remaining 73 cannulated screws used for stabilisation and 17 for prophylactic fixation no complications were observed. The complication rates observed in this series are within those accepted in the literature. The high incidence of subsequent slips and the attendant severity of these when compared with the relative safety of contemporary cannulated screw fixation has led us to recommend prophylactic pinning in our region


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 14 - 14
1 Feb 2012
Dalton P Nelson R Krikler S
Full Access

Metal on metal hip resurfacing is increasing in popularity for the young, active patient. We present the results of a consecutive series from a single surgeon over a ten year period; 295 hip resurfacings (McMinn and Cormet; Corin, Cirencester, UK) with a minimum follow up of 2 years and a mean follow up of 4 years. There were 173 males with a mean age of 53.4 years and 121 females with a mean age of 50.3 years. Forty-six patients underwent bilateral resurfacings. All resurfacings were performed through a posterior approach. The aetiology in this group was primary OA in 75.9%, inflammatory arthritis in 6.1%, DDH in 6.1%, AVN in 4.7%, trauma in 4.7%, Perthes in 1.7% and SUFE in 0.7%. Patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically on an annual basis. Follow-up was available on 93% of patients. 94.2% of hips have survived and the mean Harris Hip Score is 87.5. Females had a higher failure rate (10.7%) than males (2.3%). There was no clear trend between patient age and failure rate. The highest failure rate (33.3%) was seen in patients with DDH whilst only 4.5% of patients with OA failed. One patient with AVN failed but no failures occurred in patients with inflammatory arthritis, trauma, Perthes or SUFE. Failures occurred due to cup loosening (2.0%), neck fractures (1.7%), head loosening (1.0%), head collapse (0.3%), infection (0.3%) and pain (0.3%). The five patients who suffered neck fractures were symptomatic within 3 months of surgery. We remain cautiously optimistic about the medium term results of hip resurfacing. Careful patient selection is important and caution should be taken in females and patients with DDH


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLI | Pages 13 - 13
1 Sep 2012
Phillips P Willoughby R Phadnis J
Full Access

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is an uncommon condition with potentially severe complications including avascular necrosis (AVN) and chondrolysis. Children with a ‘slip’ are at a significantly higher risk of a contralateral slip. Controversy remains as to when to undertake prophylactic pinning. The primary aim of this study was to assess the Posterior Sloping Angle (PSA, as described by Barrios et al in 2005) as a predictor for contralateral slip in a large, multi ethnic cohort. All consecutive patients treated for SUFE presenting to Waikato Hospital between January 2000 and December 2009 were identified via medical coding. Patients without radiographs and those with bilateral slips on presentation were excluded. Clinical records were reviewed to document demographic data, slip characteristics and follow up outcomes. Radiographic analysis of the PSA in the unaffected hip was performed by a single author. Statistical analysis was performed using a student's t-test with Microsoft Excel 2003. 182 patients were identified, 50 were excluded [26 bilateral slips, 24 no radiograph available] to total a study population of 132 patients. 93 patients were male [72%]. Mean age was 11.8 years [6.2–15.6 years]. 72% were of Maori ethnicity and 26% were of New Zealand European descent. 90 patients [69%] had a unilateral slip, 42 [32%] had a contralateral slip. 48% were not followed until physeal closure and 50% did not attend at least one scheduled appointment Mean PSA of those with a unilateral slip was 10.8° [2–21°]. Patients who subsequently developed a contralateral slip had a statistically significantly higher mean PSA of 17.2° [6–36°] [p<0.0001]. Children with a contralateral slip were significantly younger 11.1 years than those with a unilateral slip 12.2 years (p<0.0001). No significant differences in PSA were found between Maori and NZ European children. If a PSA of 14° was used as an indication for prophylactic fixation in this population 35/42 [83.3%] of contralateral slips would have been prevented. 19/90 hips would have been pinned unnecessarily. The number needed to treat demonstrates that 1.79 hips are prophylactically pinned to prevent one slip in this population. This large retrospective cohort study demonstrates that a PSA of 14° in an unaffected hip after one sided SUFE could warrant prophylactic pinning in an unaffected hip to prevent subsequent slip and the complications associated with this, potentially protecting a population that can be difficult to follow up


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Jul 2014
Dorman S Maheshwari R George H Davies R James L
Full Access

We report our early experience with distracting external fixation used to offload the hip after avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head secondary to severe slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). A case series of five patients treated in a tertiary centre is reported. Electronic case records and radiographs were reviewed. Data recorded included demographics, initial presentation, timing of head collapse, timing and duration of distraction and outcome including referral to adult arthoplasty services. Mean age at presentation was 12 years (range 12–15). 4 were females. Initial treatment in 4 cases was a delayed cuneiform osteotomy and pinning, one patient underwent serendipitous reduction and percutaneous pinning. Mean duration to initial surgery was 10 days (range 5–16). All patients had femoral head collapse at a mean of 148 days from time of presentation. 2 patients required backing out of screws due to intra-articular protrusion. All patients underwent distraction at a mean 193 days from presentation. Average distraction achieved was 10 mm and duration of application was 125 days (range 91–139). All patients experienced improvement or resolution of pain but persistence of poor function, characterised by fixed adduction and limb length discrepancy. 3 patients were referred to adult arthroplasty services. This may be an effective treatment option for pain associated with AVN post SUFE. However, in our experience normal anatomy and function of the hip is not restored if performed after collapse of the femoral head. Consideration should be given to application of the distractor either at the time of initial fixation or prior to femoral head collapse. Authors believe that timing of the application of the distractor is critical for a successful outcome and recommend a prospective study with large numbers


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 75 - 75
1 Feb 2012
Marlow D Gaffey A
Full Access

Background. Paediatric pelvic corrective surgery for developmentally dysplastic hips requires that the acetabular roof is angulated to improve stability and reduce morbidity. Accurate bony positioning is vital in a weight-bearing joint as is appropriate placement of metalwork without intrusion into the joint. This can often be difficult to visualise using conventional image intensifier equipment in a 2D plane. Methods. The ARCADIS Orbic 3D image intensifier produces CT-quality multi-axial images which can be manipulated intra-operatively to give immediate feedback of positioning of internal fixation. The reported radiation dose is 1/5 and 1/30 of a standard spiral CT in high and low quality modes, respectively. Results. We present 15 elective cases of paediatric pelvic osteotomy and fixation of SUFE, with use of the ARCADIS Orbic 3D image intensifier. Images were taken intra-operatively in order to confirm satisfactory fracture reduction and appropriate positioning of fixation devices avoiding joint spaces. This was achieved by 3D reconstruction and review of the surgical field in theatre. In all of the cases appropriate bony placement and position of fixation devices was demonstrated in the multi-axial images and 3D reconstruction. Conclusions. The use of 3D image intensification is a novelty in the UK. Our results suggest that the 3D image intensifier is a valuable aid in the field of paediatric surgery. Accurate positioning of internal fixation devices can be confidently confirmed ‘on-table’. The radiation dose is also significantly less than a standard spiral CT


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 110 - 110
1 Jan 2013
Bali N Harrison J McBride T Bache E
Full Access

Introduction. We present a single surgeon series of 20 modified Dunn osteotomies without surgical dislocation of the femoral head for slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). Method. All patients from 2007 to 2011 who had a Dunn osteotomy for SUFE had their notes reviewed and we obtained an updated Non Arthritic Hip Score. Results. 20 patients were identified, of which 5 were female, with a combined average age of 14. The average duration of symptoms prior to the procedure was 10.2 weeks (range, 4–78). Classifications divided the cases into 7 chronic slips, 7 acute-on-chronic, and 5 acute., and 7 of the cases were unstable slips with an average slip angle of 71 degrees (range 65–85). All slips were grade 3. Average follow up was 26.2 months (range, 2–62). 3 developed avasular necrosis (2 unstable, 1 stable) and 2 patients had symptomatic leg length discrepancy. Preoperative MRI scans were performed in 4 patients and showed vascular compromise, but this did not always correlate with intraoperative findings of avascularity when the head was drilled. The average Nonarthritic hip score was 71.6 (range, 60–80). Summary. Dunn osteotomies are safe in patients with chronic slips, and have a low incidence of AVN. Overall function was good, even in those patients with segmental AVN scoring highly on their hip scores. Keeping the ligamentum teres intact and not dislocating the femoral head may improve vascularity of the head. Vascularity may also be assessed by preoperative MRI scans, although radiological suggestion of an avascular head which contradicted clinical findings and postoperative outcome may be due to transient vessel spasm


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 146 - 146
1 Jan 2013
Ul Islam S Henry A Khan T Davis N Zenios M
Full Access

Introduction. Through the paediatric LCP Hip plating system, the highly successful technique of the locking compression plate used in adult surgery, has been incorporated in a system dedicated to paediatrics. The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of the paediatric LCP Hip plate use in children, both with and without neuromuscular disease, for fixation of proximal femoral osteotomy for a variety of indications. Materials and methods. We retrospectively reviewed the notes and radiographs of all those children who have had Paediatric LCP Hip Plate for the fixation of proximal femoral osteotomy and proximal femur fractures in our institution, between October 2007 and July 2010, for their clinical progress, mobilization status, radiological healing and any complications. Results. Forty-three Paediatric LCP hip plates were used in forty patients for the fixation of proximal femoral osteotomies (n=40) and proximal femur fractures (n=3). The osteotomies were performed for a variety of indications including Perthes disease, DDH, Cerebral Palsy, Down's syndrome, coxa vara, Leg length discrepancy and previous failed treatment of SUFE. Twenty-five children were allowed touch to full weight bearing post operatively. Two were kept non-weight bearing for 6 weeks. The remaining 13 children were treated in hip spica due to simultaneous pelvic osteotomy or multilevel surgery for cerebral palsy. All osteotomies and fractures radiologically healed within 6 months (majority [n=40] within 3 months). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.45) in the neck shaft angle between the immediately postoperative and final x-rays after completion of bone healing. There were no implant related complications. Conclusion. The Paediatric LCP Hip Plate provides a stable and reliable fixation of the proximal femoral osteotomy performed for a variety of paediatric hip conditions in children with and without neuromuscular disease


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XL | Pages 52 - 52
1 Sep 2012
Faensen M Meyer O
Full Access

Bone preserving hip arthroplasty devices are appealingfor use in young patients because their high-demand activities and extended lifetimes makes the prospect of multiple revisions a reality. Therefore prostheses which ensure a straightforward revision with a low complication rate and good clinical outcome are favourable for young and active patients. Modern hip resurfacing serves these conditions and shows very good mid-term and now longer term (10 and 13 years) results especially in osteoarthritis. With other diagnoses like avascular necrosis, deformities of the femoral head in m. Perthes or slipped femoral epiphysis (SUFE), or in large bone cysts and erosive arthritis the bone stock of the femoral head gives insufficient support to the femoral component. In these conditions the alternative to a resurfacing procedure had been a stemmed total hip arthroplasty (THA). The Birmingham Mid Head Resection device (BMHR; Smith&Nephew Orthopaedics) is an alternative to resurfacing and to a stemmed THA. The BMHR device consists of an uncemented short stem made of titanium alloy and a large diameter cobalt-chrome head. The stem does not enter the femoral canal thus facilitating future revisions. The metal-on-metal bearing is the same as in resurfacing. The instrumentation allows switching from a planned BHR to the BMHR. The BMHR uses the unique anatomy of the head neck junction to prepare internally a cone that matches the frustoconical section of the BMHR stem. Thus a cement free press fit can be achieved. This maintains anatomical load transmission and avoids osteopenia of the proximal fenur. Since 2006 we have performed 662 BMHR implantations. The indications were osteoarthritis in about 70%, dysplasia in 20%, AVN 5,5%, posttraumatic OA in 3%, SUFE and m. Perthes in 1%. Complications occured in 3,2%. Fractures of the femoral neck occured in 8 patients, 4 of them caused by technical errors in the beginning, 3 because of higher risk indication. All revisions were performed successfully and the cup was retained. Low grade infections in 2 cases with one stage revision and 3 unstable cups needed to be reinserted. All revisions were successful. One early dislocation was treated by closed reduction, another remained unstable and was treated by THA. In conclusion we continue to use the BMHR to bridge the gap between resurfacing and stemmed THA because the complications we experienced are not inevitable and had become very rare with our growing experience


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1591 - 1594
1 Dec 2012
Cousins GR Obolensky L McAllen C Acharya V Beebeejaun A

We report the results of six trauma and orthopaedic projects to Kenya in the last three years. The aims are to deliver both a trauma service and teaching within two hospitals; one a district hospital near Mount Kenya in Nanyuki, the other the largest public hospital in Kenya in Mombasa. The Kenya Orthopaedic Project team consists of a wide range of multidisciplinary professionals that allows the experience to be shared across those specialties. A follow-up clinic is held three months after each mission to review the patients. To our knowledge there are no reported outcomes in the literature for similar projects.

A total of 211 operations have been performed and 400 patients seen during the projects. Most cases were fractures of the lower limb; we have been able to follow up 163 patients (77%) who underwent surgical treatment. We reflect on the results so far and discuss potential improvements for future missions.