High energy pelvic injury poses a challenging setting for the treating surgeon. Often multiple injuries are associated, which makes the measurement of short- and long-term functional outcomes a difficult task. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of pelvic dysfunction and late impacts of high energy pelvic ring fractures on pelvic floor function in women, with respect to urinary, sexual and musculoskeletal function. This was compared to a similar cohort of women with lower limb fractures without pelvis involvement. The data in our study was prospectively gathered between 2010 and 2013 on 229 adult females who sustained injury between 1998 and 2012. Besides demographic and operative variables, the scores of three validated health assessment tools were tabulated: King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). A multivariate regression analysis was done to compare groups. The incidence of sexual dysfunction was 80.8% in the pelvis and 59.4% in the lower extremity group. A Wilcoxon rank sum test showed a significant difference in KHQ-score (p<0.01) with the pelvis group being worse. When adjusting for age, follow-up and Injury Severity Score this difference was not significant (p=0.28), as was for FSFI and SMFA score. The mean FSFI scores of both groups met the criteria for female sexual dysfunction (<26). Patients with a Tile C fracture have better FSFI scores (16.98) compared to Tile B fractures (10.12; p=0.02). Logistic regression predicting FSFI larger than 26.5 showed that older age and pelvic fractures have a higher likelihood having a form of sexual dysfunction. Sexual dysfunction after lower extremity trauma is found in patients regardless of pelvic ring involvement. Urinary function is more impaired after pelvic injuries, but more data is needed to confirm this. Older age and pelvic fracture are predictors for sexual dysfunction in women. This study is important as it could help counsel patients on the likelihood of sexual dysfunction, something that is probably under-reported and recognized during our patient follow up

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Purpose. Our hypothesis was that closed tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nails are impacted by surgeon and center volumes. Method. Data from 813 patients with closed tibia fractures were obtained from the SPRINT study. Using multiple regression, we examined the effect of center and surgeon volume (categorized as high, moderate, or low), and geographic differences by country (Canada, USA, and the Netherlands) on health-related quality-of-life and revision surgeries to gain union at one year. Our measures of quality-of-life were the Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36 PCS) and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Results. Patients treated by moderate volume surgeons had a reduced risk of reoperation versus patients treated by low volume surgeons (odds ratio =0.54, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.89, p=0.02). No effects of surgeon volume were seen for the other outcomes. Patients treated at moderate volume centers had poorer quality of life at one year than patients treated at low volume centers, based on the SMFA Bother score (difference = 7.33, 95% CI = 2.65 to 12.01). This effect was not seen with the other outcomes. Patients with isolated fractures have better quality-of-life at one year, based on all three measures, p<0.001. Older patients have poorer SMFA scores at one year than younger patients, p<0.001. There were no significant differences by country. Conclusion. The traditional volume versus outcome relationship for closed tibial fractures within intramedullary nailing does not hold. Further analyses in other areas of orthopaedic trauma surgery are advisable

Purpose. The objective of this study was to compare items from musculoskeletal outcome questionnaires with items generated by pre- and post-operative ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty patients (patient-selected portion of the Patient-Specific Index (PASI-P)) to determine if existing questionnaires address patients' concerns. Materials/Methods. Patients (n=142) completed the PASI-P. Items from 6 standardised questionnaires (AAOS, patient-reported portion of AOFAS, FFI, LEFS, SMFA, WOMAC) and PASI-P were matched by 3 reviewers to corresponding categories in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The ICF classification hierarchy codes broad first categories and increasingly detailed second, third, and fourth categories. The standardised questionnaires were then compared to the ‘gold standard’ of PASI-P. Results. 690 concepts were identified in the patients' responses, which corresponded to 45 ICF categories. Most PASI-P concepts fell into Activities and Participation (60.3%) and Body Functions and Body Structures (35.2%), including the second level categories ‘walking’ (21.6%), ‘pain’ (18.7%), and ‘recreation and leisure’ (17.4%). A total of 237 concepts was identified in the 6 questionnaires and linked to 39 second level ICF categories. Overall, SMFA addressed the most second level categories and had the closest proportion of Activities and Participation (68.9%) and Body Functions (23.0%) concepts compared to the patient-generated responses. The patient-reported portion of AOFAS addressed the fewest categories. LEFS only contained items from Activities and Participation. AAOS was the only questionnaire to address the issue of ‘swelling’, though it represented 5.6% of all patient-generated responses. The concepts of ‘swelling’, ‘recreation and leisure’, and ‘sports’ were seldom included in the questionnaires. Conclusion. No single questionnaire captured all concerns identified by patients, and the standardised questionnaires differed largely in content. Clinicians should recognise patient concerns relevant to the ankle currently not included in available questionnaires. This analysis will guide the development of a more comprehensive instrument for evaluating ankle outcomes

Purpose. Identifying optimal treatment strategies for inpatients with traumatic foot and ankle injuries has been hampered by a wide variety of outcome measures with unproven reliability and validity. It remains plausible that the choice of functional outcome measures may influence measurement of treatment effects. This prospective observational study aims to measure the correlation and agreement across six functional outcome measures in patients with traumatic foot and ankle injuries. Methods. Patients 18 years of age or older with a traumatic foot or ankle injury completed the Short Form-12 (SF-12), Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), Foot Function Index (FFI), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot and Ankle Questionnaire and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale at a single follow-up visit. Raw scores were calculated and transformed to a functional level of excellent, very good, good, fair or poor. Pearson correlation co-efficients providing measures of correlation and agreement between functional levels were assessed. Results. Fifty-two patients were enrolled at a mean follow-up of 15.5 months. Moderate to strong correlations were found for most pair-wise comparisons of raw scores and functional levels (?=0.43-0.92, p< 0.002). The strongest correlations were found between the SMFA, FFI, FAAM and AAOS Foot and Ankle Questionnaire. Despite significant correlation between scores, considerable disagreement between functional levels was observed. None of the 52 subjects attained the same functional level on all 6 outcome measures. Conclusion. High correlations between scores and functional level suggest it is unnecessary to use more than one outcome measure when examining functional outcome in patients with foot and ankle trauma. However, inconsistencies between functional levels attained with the different instruments suggest a need for further validation and scrutiny

Introduction. Acetabular fractures are a challenging problem. It has been published that outcome is dependent upon the type of fracture, the reduction of the fracture and concomitant injuries. The end-points of poor outcome include avascular necrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis. However, we lack definitive statistics and so counselling patients on prognosis could be improved. In order to achieve this, more outcome studies from tertiary referral centres are required. We present the first long term follow up from a large tertiary referral Centre in Ireland. Methods. We identified all patients who were ten years following open reduction and internal fixation of an acetbular fracture in our centre. We invited all of these patients to attend the hospital for clinical and radiographic follow-up. As part of this, three scoring systems were completed for each patient; the Short-form 36 health survey (SF36), the Merle d'Aubigné score and the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). Results. The data represents one years activity at a new tertiary referral unit. We idenfied a total of 44 patients who were ten years following ORIF of acetabular fractures in our unit. 21 patients (48%) replied to written invitation and attended the hospital for clinical and radiographic follow-up. A further 7 patients were contacted by telephone and interviewed to guage their rehabilitation. 3 patients had passed away. The remaining 13 patients were not contactable. Of those who attended in person for follow-up; 18 were male and 3 were female. The mean age at follow-up was 40.5 years (Range 27-60). In terms of fracture pattern epidemiology, 43% of patients sustained posterior column and wall fractures, 29% posterior wall, 14% posterior column alone, 9.5% transverse with posterior wall and 9.5% bicolumnar. 2 patients in the follow-up group had total hip replacements. Of the remaining patients the overall mean SF36 score was 78.8% (SD 16.4). The mean SMFA was 14.1% (SD 5). The mean Merle d'Aubigné score was 14.9 (SD 3.2) with 63% graded as good or excellent. Comparison of outcome between sub-groups according to fracture clasification showed no significant difference. Traumatic sciatic nerve injury was sustained by four patients in the follow-up group and all patients continued to complain of ongoing weakness. Of the patients who were contacted via telephone, 2 had total hip replacements. The remaining 5 reported no significant problems with their hips and cited this as the reason for not attending follow-up. Conclusion. Overall the outcome of the patients was more favourable than expected. This was supported by the results of the clinical scoring systems. In some patients this also appeared to be despite poor radiographic findings. Our observations suggest that concomitant injuries, especially sciatic nerve injury have a profound negative influence on the patients' ability to fully rehabilitate. These data provide a valuable tool for the trauma surgeon in providing the patient with an educated prognosis

Aims

Bone demonstrates good healing capacity, with a variety of strategies being utilized to enhance this healing. One potential strategy that has been suggested is the use of stem cells to accelerate healing.