Introduction. Growing evidence in the literature suggests better clinical and functional outcomes and lower re-rupture rates with repair compared to non-operative treatment of ruptured Achilles tendon. There are however, concerns of wound infection, nerve injury and scar tenderness with the standard open and percutaneous techniques of repair. We aim to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes and complications in patients treated with minimally invasive Achillon device. Materials and Methods. Prospectively collected clinical data was reviewed of all consecutive patients who underwent repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon using the Achillon device. Patients were contacted using a postal questionnaire for assessment of their functional status using the validated Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and compared with their uninjured side. The outcomes were compared to the published results. Results. We present patient demographics; and clinical and functional outcomes of 140 consecutive patients who underwent repair of ruptured Achilles tendon using the minimally invasive technique between June 2007 to August 2010. Our complication rate was of two-three percent each of proximal DVT, scar sensitivity, superficial wound infection and no re-rupture after a minimum of 6 months. There was no case of nerve injury leading to permanent neurological deficit. Discussion. This study demonstrates good clinical and functional outcomes from using the Achillon device in repair of ruptured Achilles tendon with a low complication rate comparable to other published series. We recommend Achillon device as a safe minimally invasive technique for repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon

The Achilles tendon is the strongest and largest tendon in the body. Rupture of this tendon usually occurs in the third and fourth decade and can be significantly debilitating. Repair of neglected ruptures of Achilles tendon pose a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon due to the retraction and atrophy of the ends of the tendon. Various surgical procedures have been described which include VY plasty, fascia lata, peroneus brevis, plantaris tendon, flexor digitorum longus, flexor hallucis longus, allograft, and synthetic materials. We carried out a prospective study to compare the results of peroneus brevis transfer with flexor hallucis longus transfer in the management of neglected ruptures of Achilles tendon. Forty-seven patients who had neglected ruptures of Achilles tendon were included in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups; the first group underwent peroneus brevis transfer (24 patients) and the second group had flexor hallucis longus transfer (23 patients). Patients were assessed using the Quigley's scoring system. We conclude that Flexor hallucis longus transfer is better than peroneus brevis transfer as it is a long, durable tendon which is much stronger when compared to other tendon transfers. Flexor hallucis longus acts in the same axis as the Achilles tendon, is in the same gait phase and is in close proximity, making harvesting of the tendon easy