Aims. The objectives of this study were to compare postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, inpatient functional rehabilitation, time to hospital discharge, and complications in patients undergoing conventional jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus robotic-arm assisted UKA. Patients and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 146 patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary UKA performed by a single surgeon. This included 73 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based mobile bearing UKA, followed by 73 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted fixed bearing UKA. All surgical procedures were performed using the standard medial parapatellar approach for UKA, and all patients underwent the same postoperative rehabilitation programme. Postoperative pain scores on the numerical rating scale and opiate analgesia consumption were recorded until discharge. Time to attainment of predefined functional rehabilitation outcomes, hospital discharge, and postoperative complications were recorded by independent observers. Results. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with reduced postoperative pain (p < 0.001), decreased opiate analgesia requirements (p < 0.001), shorter time to straight leg raise (p < 0.001), decreased number of physiotherapy sessions (p < 0.001), and increased maximum knee flexion at discharge (p < 0.001) compared with conventional jig-based UKA. Mean time to hospital discharge was reduced in robotic UKA compared with conventional UKA (42.5 hours (. sd 5.9). vs 71.1 hours (. sd. 14.6), respectively; p < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups within 90 days’ follow-up. Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with decreased postoperative pain, reduced opiate analgesia requirements, improved early functional rehabilitation, and shorter time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based UKA

Aims. The purpose of this multicentre observational study was to investigate the association between intraoperative component positioning and soft-tissue balancing on short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Patients and Methods. Between 2013 and 2016, 363 patients (395 knees) underwent robotic-arm assisted UKAs at two centres. Pre- and postoperatively, patients were administered Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Results were stratified as “good” and “bad” if KOOS/FJS-12 were more than or equal to 80. Intraoperative, post-implantation robotic data relative to CT-based components placement were collected and classified. Postoperative complications were recorded. Results. Following exclusions and losses to follow-up, 334 medial robotic-arm assisted UKAs were assessed at a mean follow-up of 30.0 months (8.0 to 54.9). None of the measured parameters were associated with overall KOOS outcome. Correlations were described between specific KOOS subscales and intraoperative, post-implantation robotic data, and between FJS-12 and femoral component sagittal alignment. Three UKAs were revised, resulting in 99.0% survival at two years (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.9 to 100.0). Conclusion. Although little correlation was found between intraoperative robotic data and overall clinical outcome, surgeons should consider information regarding 3D component placement and soft-tissue balancing to improve patient satisfaction. Reproducible and precise placement of components has been confirmed as essential for satisfactory clinical outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:435–442

Introduction. Robotic technology has been applied to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in order to improve surgical precision in prosthetic component placement, restore knee anatomic surfaces, and provide a more physiologic ligament tensioning throughout the knee range of motion. Recent literature has demonstrated high reliability of robotic-arm assisted UKA in component placement and executing a soft-tissue tensioning plan, with excellent short-term survivorship. Few studies have investigated survivorship and patients' satisfaction at longer follow-ups. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine the survivorship, clinical results and patients' satisfaction of robotic-arm assisted UKAs at a mid-term follow-up, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Methods. The present retrospective study includes 252 patients (260 knees) who underwent robotic-arm assisted fixed bearing metal backed UKAs at a single centre between April 2011 and July 2013. The mean age at surgery was 66.2 years (SD 8.6). Post-operatively, patients were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS) and asked about their satisfaction level after knee surgery (grade from 1 to 5). Post-operative complications were recorded. Failure mechanisms, revisions and reoperations were also assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated, considering reoperation for all causes and revision as the events of interest. Results. A total of 223 patients (231 robotic-arm assisted UKAs) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years post-operatively (88.5% follow-up rate, min. 60 months, max. 87 months). In 219 cases, a medial robotic-arm assisted UKA was implanted, in 12 cases a lateral implant was performed. Five medial robotic-arm assisted UKAs were revised, resulting in a survivorship of 98% (C.I. 96.0%–99.1%). One case underwent revision for prosthetic joint infection, one for tibial aseptic loosening, one for post-traumatic tibial plateau fracture, and two for unexplained pain. No lateral robotic-arm assisted UKAs were revised, resulting in a survivorship of 100%. On average, the FJS and the satisfaction level resulted 75.6 (SD 26.1) and 4.2 (SD 1.0) in medial UKAs, and 81.7 (SD 15.3) and 4.4 (SD 0.8) in lateral UKAs, respectively. In medial UKAs 83% of the examined cohort reported good/excellent FJS outcomes, while 92% of the lateral UKA patients had good/excellent FJS results. In medial UKAs, male patients resulted to have better FJS (p<0.01) and higher satisfaction level (p<0.03) compared to female patients, while no outcome differences were reported in patients with BMI>30 and among different age groups. Given the small number of lateral UKAs included in the present patients' cohort, no statistical analysis was performed on this group. Conclusion. In the present study, survivorship and clinical outcomes of a large cohort of 223 patients undergoing medial and lateral robotic-arm assisted UKAs were assessed at a mean of 5.8 years of follow-up. The overall survivorship was found to be 98%, with unexplained knee pain as the most common reason for UKA revision. The present study shows that robotic-arm assisted UKA patients had lower revision rates for aseptic loosening and osteoarthritis progression compared to conventional UKA at mid-term follow-up, as reported in the literature. The good post-operative clinical scores highlight the efficacy of robotic-arm assisted UKA in restoring knee function and relieving pain. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aims. The objective of this study was to compare early postoperative functional outcomes and time to hospital discharge between conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and robotic-arm assisted TKA. Patients and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 40 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based TKA followed by 40 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted TKA. All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the medial parapatellar approach with identical implant designs and standardized postoperative inpatient rehabilitation. Inpatient functional outcomes and time to hospital discharge were collected in all study patients. Results. There were no systematic differences in baseline characteristics between the conventional jig-based TKA and robotic-arm assisted TKA treatment groups with respect to age (p = 0.32), gender (p = 0.50), body mass index (p = 0.17), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.88), and preoperative haemoglobin level (p = 0.82). Robotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with reduced postoperative pain (p < 0.001), decreased analgesia requirements (p < 0.001), decreased reduction in postoperative haemoglobin levels (p < 0.001), shorter time to straight leg raise (p < 0.001), decreased number of physiotherapy sessions (p < 0.001) and improved maximum knee flexion at discharge (p < 0.001) compared with conventional jig-based TKA. Median time to hospital discharge in robotic-arm assisted TKA was 77 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 74 to 81) compared with 105 hours (IQR 98 to 126) in conventional jig-based TKA (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with decreased pain, improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:930–7

Aims. Limited evidence is available on mid-term outcomes of robotic-arm assisted (RA) partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term survivorship, modes of failure, and patient-reported outcomes of RA PKA. Methods. A retrospective review of patients who underwent RA PKA between June 2007 and August 2016 was performed. Patients received a fixed-bearing medial or lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA; PFA plus medial UKA). All patients completed a questionnaire regarding revision surgery, reoperations, and level of satisfaction. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were assessed using the KOOS for Joint Replacement Junior survey. Results. Mean follow-up was 4.7 years (2.0 to 10.8). Five-year survivorship of medial UKA (n = 802), lateral UKA (n = 171), and PFA/BiKA (n = 35/10) was 97.8%, 97.7%, and 93.3%, respectively. Component loosening and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were the most common reasons for revision. Mean KOOS scores after medial UKA, lateral UKA, and PFA/BiKA were 84.3 (SD 15.9), 85.6 (SD 14.3), and 78.2 (SD 14.2), respectively. The vast majority of the patients reported high satisfaction levels after RA PKA. Subgroup analyses suggested tibial component design, body mass index (BMI), and age affects RA PKA outcomes. Five-year survivorship was 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.2 to 99.5) for onlay medial UKA (n = 742) and 99.1% (95% CI 97.9 to 100) for onlay medial UKA in patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m. 2. (n = 479). Conclusion. This large single-surgeon study showed high mid-term survivorship, satisfaction levels, and functional outcomes in RA UKA using metal-backed tibial onlay components. In addition, favourable results were reported in RA PFA and BiKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):108–116

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to compare the postoperative systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (conventional TKA) versus robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (robotic TKA). Secondary aims were to compare the macroscopic soft tissue injury, femoral and tibial bone trauma, localized thermal response, and the accuracy of component positioning between the two treatment groups. Methods. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 30 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee undergoing conventional TKA versus robotic TKA. Predefined serum markers of inflammation and localized knee temperature were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at six hours, day 1, day 2, day 7, and day 28 following TKA. Blinded observers used the Macroscopic Soft Tissue Injury (MASTI) classification system to grade intraoperative periarticular soft tissue injury and bone trauma. Plain radiographs were used to assess the accuracy of achieving the planned postioning of the components in both groups. Results. Patients undergoing conventional TKA and robotic TKA had comparable changes in the postoperative systemic inflammatory and localized thermal response at six hours, day 1, day 2, and day 28 after surgery. Robotic TKA had significantly reduced levels of interleukin-6 (p < 0.001), tumour necrosis factor-α (p = 0.021), ESR (p = 0.001), CRP (p = 0.004), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.007), and creatine kinase (p = 0.004) at day 7 after surgery compared with conventional TKA. Robotic TKA was associated with significantly improved preservation of the periarticular soft tissue envelope (p < 0.001), and reduced femoral (p = 0.012) and tibial (p = 0.023) bone trauma compared with conventional TKA. Robotic TKA significantly improved the accuracy of achieving the planned limb alignment (p < 0.001), femoral component positioning (p < 0.001), and tibial component positioning (p < 0.001) compared with conventional TKA. Conclusion. Robotic TKA was associated with a transient reduction in the early (day 7) postoperative inflammatory response but there was no difference in the immediate (< 48 hours) or late (day 28) postoperative systemic inflammatory response compared with conventional TKA. Robotic TKA was associated with decreased iatrogenic periarticular soft tissue injury, reduced femoral and tibial bone trauma, and improved accuracy of component positioning compared with conventional TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):113–122

Introduction. Robotic-arm total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) was developed to potentially improve accuracy of bone cuts, component alignment, soft tissue balance, and patient outcomes. There is a paucity of data demonstrating that RTKA is superior to conventional total knee arthroplasty (CTKA) in terms of any of these metrics. This prospective comparative multicenter study was designed with these purposes in mind. Methods. Patients were enrolled between June 1st, 2016 and March 31st, 2018 in a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, consecutive comparative cohort study comparing RTKA and CTKA. Only patients who satisfied the following inclusion criteria were included: body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40kg/m2, primary unilateral TKA procedure, at least 18 years of age, and no joint infection. The following data were collected for analysis:. Preoperative data on component size prediction from CT scans. Intraoperative data on bone resection levels and joint line maintenance. Functional activity scores, patient-reported symptoms, satisfaction and expectation scores using The New Knee Society Scoring System. Radiographic results, specifically coronal alignment. Results. For femoral components implanted, 82% were the exact size as predicted by the robotic-software and the remaining 18% were within 1 size (100% within 1 size). For tibial implants, 69% were the exact size of what the robotic-software predicted and 29% were within 1 size (98% within 1 size). RTKAs had significantly less distal lateral femoral resection (5.55 vs. 7.11 mm), distal medial femoral resection (6.89 vs. 7.97 mm), lateral tibial resection (7.76 vs. 8.54 mm), and medial tibial resection (4.11 vs. 5.56 mm, p<0.05) compared to CTKA. Joint line restoration was comparable between RTKA and CTKA, but required less tibial bone removal when using robotic techniques. Pre-operatively, all demographic, functional, symptom, satisfaction, and expectation measures were similar between treatment groups (all p<0.05, Tables 1–5). Those who underwent RTKA had significantly higher mean functional activity walking and standing score improvements from baseline to 4–6 weeks (1.4 vs. −1.2 points; p=0.019) and to 6 months (9.6 vs. 6.9 points; p=0.017) after surgery compared to CTKA. The mean overall functional activity score improvement from baseline to 1-year post-surgery was also higher for RTKA compared to CTKA (36.8 vs. 15.0 points; p=0.020). For all other parameters (standard activities, advanced activities, pain with walking, pain with stairs, satisfaction and expectation scores), score changes from baseline were not significantly different between groups, though many trended slightly higher for RTKA. Radiographic evaluation of RTKA demonstrated that varus deformity was corrected to neutral in 96% of cases and valgus deformity was corrected in 100%. Conclusion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to prospectively evaluate outcomes of RTKA patients compared to CTKA. A number of positive early effects were seen with RTKA. This patient cohort will continue to be followed, and these findings may translate into longer-term patient reported outcomes improvement, longer component survivorship and cost savings. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aims

Robotic arm-assisted surgery offers accurate and reproducible guidance in component positioning and assessment of soft-tissue tensioning during knee arthroplasty, but the feasibility and early outcomes when using this technology for revision surgery remain unknown. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic arm-assisted revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus primary robotic arm-assisted TKA at short-term follow-up.

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to determine the surgical team’s learning curve for introducing robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) into routine surgical practice. The secondary objective was to compare accuracy of implant positioning in conventional jig-based UKA versus robotic-arm assisted UKA. Patients and Methods. This prospective single-surgeon cohort study included 60 consecutive conventional jig-based UKAs compared with 60 consecutive robotic-arm assisted UKAs for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Patients undergoing conventional UKA and robotic-arm assisted UKA were well-matched for baseline characteristics including a mean age of 65.5 years (. sd. 6.8) vs 64.1 years (. sd. 8.7), (p = 0.31); a mean body mass index of 27.2 kg.m2 (. sd. 2.7) vs 28.1 kg.m2 (. sd. 4.5), (p = 0.25); and gender (27 males: 33 females vs 26 males: 34 females, p = 0.85). Surrogate measures of the learning curve were prospectively collected. These included operative times, the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire to assess preoperative stress levels amongst the surgical team, accuracy of implant positioning, limb alignment, and postoperative complications. Results. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with a learning curve of six cases for operating time (p < 0.001) and surgical team confidence levels (p < 0.001). Cumulative robotic experience did not affect accuracy of implant positioning (p = 0.52), posterior condylar offset ratio (p = 0.71), posterior tibial slope (p = 0.68), native joint line preservation (p = 0.55), and postoperative limb alignment (p = 0.65). Robotic-arm assisted UKA improved accuracy of femoral (p < 0.001) and tibial (p < 0.001) implant positioning with no additional risk of postoperative complications compared to conventional jig-based UKA. Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with a learning curve of six cases for operating time and surgical team confidence levels but no learning curve for accuracy of implant positioning. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1033–42

Abstract. Introduction. The postoperative inflammatory response may be implicated in the aetiology of patient dissatisfaction following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Robotic-arm assisted TKA has been associated with reduced bone and soft tissue trauma. The objective of this Randomised Controlled Trial was to compare the inflammatory response in conventional Jig-based versus robotic arm-assisted TKA and examine the relationship with patient reported outcome measures and functional outcomes. Methodology. 30 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomised to either conventional or robotic-arm assisted TKA. Blood samples were collected for up to 28 days post-operatively and intraarticular drain samples at 6 and 24 hours, to ascertain the systemic and local inflammatory responses. The Spearman's correlation was utilised to evaluate the relationship with PROMs and functional outcomes. Results. Reduced IL-6 drain fluid levels were noted at 6 hours [798.54 vs. 5699.2, p=0.026] and 24 hours and IL-8 at 6 hours. Patients in the robotic group had lower pain scores on post-operative day 1, 2 and 7. PROM scores were comparable at 2 years. Statistically significant correlations were evident between all serum markers except IL-1b on the 7th postoperative day and self-reported pain; between drain IL-8 levels and self-reported pain; between drain IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-a levels (6-hours) and knee flexion and extension. Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with a reduced postoperative local and systemic inflammatory responses. A moderate correlation with self-reported pain, knee flexion and extension was also demonstrated. Longer-term data and further validation on a larger scale, will be key to developing the optimal TKA procedure

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to determine if better outcomes occur with use of robotic-arm assistance by comparing consecutive series of non-robotic assisted (NR-TKA) and robotic-arm assisted (NR-TKA) total knee arthroplasties with the same implant. Methods. 80 NR-TKAs and then 101 RA-TKAs were performed consecutively. 70 knees in each group that had a minimum two-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Range of motion, Knee Society (KS) scores, and forgotten joint scores (FJS) were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Tourniquets, used for all cases, had their inflation time recorded. Component realignment to minimize soft tissue releases was used in both groups with the goal to stay within a mechanical alignment of 3° of varus to 2° of valgus. The use of soft tissue releases for balance were compared. Results. There were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics including pre-operative Knee Society scores between cohorts. The two-year NR-TKA and RA-TKA median KS knee and functional scores were 99.0 and 90.0 and 100.0 and 100.0 respectively. Mann-Whitney U test indicated a statistically significant difference in KS-KS (p<.00001) and near statistically significant difference in KS-FS (p=0.075). The 10-point higher KS-FS is considered a minimal clinically important difference. The median FJS at two years for the NR-TKA was 61.5 and the RA-TKA was 75.0. Although not statistically significant (p=0.1556), the 13.5-point increase in the RA-TKA cohort also represents a minimal clinically important difference. RA-TKA patients had statistically significant 5° higher knee flexion (p<.00001). Desired post-operative coronal alignment was present in 92.9% of NR-TKAs and 94.3% of RA-TKAs. 28.6% more of the RA-TKA cases were able to be balanced without a soft tissue release. Median tourniquet time was only 3.9 minutes longer for the robotic-arm assisted cohort. Conclusion. This comparison study demonstrates potential benefits in use of robotic-arm assistance over manual instrumentation in TKA

Abstract. Introduction. Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification utilises the native arithmetic hip-knee alignment to calculate the constitutional limb alignment and joint line obliquity which is important in pre-operative planning. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of measuring the lower limb constitutional alignment with the traditional long leg radiographs versus computed tomography (CT) used for pre-operative planning in robotic-arm assisted TKA. Methods. Digital long leg radiographs and pre-operative CT scan plans of 42 patients (46 knees) with osteoarthritis undergoing robotic-arm assisted total knee replacement were analysed. The constitutional alignment was established by measuring the medial proximal tibial angle (mPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), weight bearing hip knee alignment (WBHKA), arithmetic hip knee alignment (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO). Furthermore, the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification was utilised to classify the patients based on their coronal knee alignment phenotype. Results. Mean age of the patients was 66 years (SD 9) and mean BMI 31.2 (SD 3.9). There were 27 left and 19 right sided surgeries. The Pearson's corelation coefficient was 0.722 (p=0.008) for WBHKA; 0.729 (p<0.001) for MPTA; 0.618 (p=0.14) for aHKA; 0.502 (p= 0.04) for LDFA and 0.305 (p=0.234) for JLO. CPAK classification was concordant for 53% study participants between the two groups. Conclusion. Three-dimensional CT-based modelling with computer software more accurately predicts constitutional limb alignment and JLO as defined by the CPAK classification compared to plain long-leg radiographs in pre-operative planning of total knee arthroplasty

Aims. The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) resection on flexion-extension gaps, mediolateral soft tissue laxity, maximum knee extension, and limb alignment during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. This prospective study included 140 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary robotic-arm assisted TKA. All operative procedures were performed by a single surgeon using a standard medial parapatellar approach. Optical motion capture technology with fixed femoral and tibial registration pins was used to assess study outcomes pre- and post-ACL resection with knee extension and 90° knee flexion. This study included 76 males (54.3%) and 64 females (45.7%) with a mean age of 64.1 years (SD 6.8) at time of surgery. Mean preoperative hip-knee-ankle deformity was 6.1° varus (SD 4.6° varus). Results. ACL resection increased the mean extension gap significantly more than the flexion gap in the medial (mean 1.2 mm (SD 1.0) versus mean 0.2 mm (SD 0.7) respectively; p < 0.001) and lateral (mean 1.1 mm (SD 0.9) versus mean 0.2 mm (SD 0.6) respectively; p < 0.001) compartments. The mean gap differences following ACL resection did not create any significant mediolateral soft tissue laxity in extension (gap difference: mean 0.1 mm (SD 2.4); p = 0.89) or flexion (gap difference: mean 0.2 mm (SD 3.1); p = 0.40). ACL resection did not significantly affect maximum knee extension (change in maximum knee extension = mean 0.2° (SD 0.7°); p = 0.23) or fixed flexion deformity (mean 4.2° (SD 3.2°) pre-ACL release versus mean 3.9° (SD 3.7°) post-ACL release; p = 0.61). ACL resection did not significantly affect overall limb alignment (change in alignment = mean 0.2° valgus (SD 1.0° valgus; p = 0.11). Conclusion. ACL resection creates flexion-extension mismatch by increasing the extension gap more than the flexion gap. However, gap differences following ACL resection do not create any mediolateral soft tissue laxity in extension or flexion. ACL resection does not affect maximum knee extension or overall limb alignment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):442–448

Aim. There has been a significant reduction in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures recorded in Australia. This follows several national joint registry studies documenting high UKA revision rates when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the recent introduction of robotically assisted UKA procedures, it is hoped that outcomes improve. This study examines the cumulative revision rate of UKA procedures implanted with a newly introduced robotic system and compares the results to one of the best performing non-robotically assisted UKA prostheses, as well as all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures. Methods. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR) for all UKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis (OA) between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. Procedures using the Restoris MCK UKA prosthesis implanted using the Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted System were compared to non-robotically assisted Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System (ZUK) UKA, a commonly used UKA with previously reported good outcomes and to all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship. Results. There was no difference in the rate of revision when the Mako-assisted Restoris UKA was compared to the ZUK UKA (zero to nine months: HR 1.14 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.83; p = 0.596) vs nine months and over: HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.02; p = 0.058)). The Mako-assisted Restoris had a significantly lower overall revision rate compared to the other types of non-robotically assisted procedures (HR 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.79); p < 0.001) at three years. Revision for aseptic loosening was lower for the Mako-assisted Restoris compared to all other non-robotically assisted UKA (entire period: HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.65); p = 0.001), but not the ZUK prosthesis. However, revision for infection was significantly higher for the Mako-assisted Restoris compared to the two comparator groups (ZUK: entire period: HR 2.91 (95% CI 1.22 to 6.98; p = 0.016); other non-robotically assisted UKA: zero to three months: HR 5.57 (95% CI 2.17 to 14.31; p < 0.001)). Conclusion. This study reports comparable short-term survivorship for the Mako robotically assisted UKA compared to the ZUK UKA and improved survivorship compared to all other non-robotic UKA. These results justify the continued use and investigation of this procedure. However, the higher rate of early revision for infection for robotically assisted UKA requires further investigation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):319–328

Introduction. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of PCL resection on flexion-extension gaps, mediolateral soft tissue laxity, fixed flexion deformity (FFD), and limb alignment during posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. This prospective study included 110 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary robotic-arm assisted posterior-stabilised TKA. All operative procedures were performed by a single surgeon using a standard medial parapatellar approach. Optical motion capture technology with fixed femoral and tibial registration pins was used to assess gaps pre- and post-PCL resection in knee extension and 90 degrees knee flexion. This study included 54 males (49.1%) and 56 females (50.9%) with a mean age of 68 ± 6.2 years at time of surgery. Mean preoperative hip-knee-ankle deformity was 6.1 ± 4.4 degrees varus. Results. PCL resection increased the flexion gap more than the extension gap in the medial (2.4 ± 1.5mm vs 1.3 ± 1.0mm respectively, p<0.001) and lateral (3.3 ± 1.6mm vs 1.2 ± 0.9mm respectively, p<0.01) compartments. The gap differences following PCL resection created mediolateral laxity in flexion (gap difference: 1.1 ± 2.5mm, p<0.001) but not in extension (gap difference: 0.1 ± 2.1mm, p=0.51). PCL resection improved overall FFD (6.3 ± 4.4° preoperatively vs 3.1 ± 1.5° postoperatively, p<0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between preoperative FFD and change in FFD following PCL release (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.81, p<0.001). PCL resection did not affect overall limb alignment (change in alignment: 0.2 ± 1.2 degrees valgus, p=0.60). Conclusion. PCL resection creates flexion-extension mismatch by increasing the flexion gap proportionally more than the extension gap. The increase in the lateral flexion gap is greater than the increase in medial flexion gap, which creates mediolateral laxity in flexion. Improvements in FFD following PCL resection are dependent on the degree of deformity prior to PCL resection. Bone resection, implant positioning, and periarticular soft tissue balancing should account for these changes in flexion-extension gaps, mediolateral laxity, and fixed flexion deformity following PCL resection in PS TKA. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aims

While residual fixed flexion deformity (FFD) in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been associated with worse functional outcomes, limited evidence exists regarding FFD changes. The objective of this study was to quantify FFD changes in patients with medial unicompartmental knee arthritis undergoing UKA, and investigate any correlation with clinical outcomes.

Aims

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using functional alignment aims to implant the components with minimal compromise of the soft-tissue envelope by restoring the plane and obliquity of the non-arthritic joint. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of TKA with functional alignment on mediolateral soft-tissue balance as assessed using intraoperative sensor-guided technology.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during the first six weeks and at one year postoperatively.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery.

Aims

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone-preserving treatment option for osteoarthritis localized to a single compartment in the knee. The success of the procedure is sensitive to patient selection and alignment errors. Robotic arm-assisted UKA provides technological assistance to intraoperative bony resection accuracy, which is thought to improve ligament balancing. This paper presents the five-year outcomes of a comparison between manual and robotically assisted UKAs.