The rate of arterial injury in trauma patients with pelvic ring fractures has been cited as high as 15%. Addressing this source of hemorrhage is essential in the management of these patients as mortality rates are reported as 50%. Percutaneous techniques to control arterial bleeding, such as embolization and REBOA, are being employed with increasing frequency due to their assumed lower morbidity and invasiveness than open exploration or cross clamping of the aorta. There are promising results with regards to the mortality benefits of angioembolization. However, there are concerns with regards to morbidity associated with embolization of the internal iliac vessels and its branches including surgical wound infection, gluteal muscle necrosis, nerve injury, bowel infarction, and thigh / buttock claudication. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether pelvic arterial embolization is associated with surgical site infection (SSI) in trauma patients undergoing pelvic ring fixation. This observational cohort study was conducted using US trauma registry data from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Trauma Database for the year of 2018. Patients over the age of 18 who were transported through emergency health services to an ACS Level 1 or 2 trauma hospital and sustained a pelvic ring fracture treated with surgical fixation were included. Patients who were transferred between facilities, presented to the emergency department with no signs of life, presented with isolated penetrating trauma, and pregnant patients were excluded from the study. The primary study outcome was surgical site infection. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate treatment effects of angioembolization of pelvic vessels on surgical site infection, adjusting for known risk factors for infection. Study analysis included 6562 trauma patients, of which 508 (7.7%) of patients underwent pelvic angioembolization. Overall, 148 (2.2%) of patients had a surgical site infection, with a higher risk (7.1%) in patients undergoing angioembolization (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.0; 95% CI 2.7, 6.0; p < 0 .0001). Controlling for potential confounding, including patient demographics, vitals on hospital arrival, open fracture, ISS, and select patient comorbidities, pelvic angioembolization was still significantly associated with increased odds for surgical site infection (adjusted OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3, 3.2; p=0.003). This study demonstrates that trauma patients who undergo pelvic angioembolization and operative fixation of pelvic ring injuries have a higher surgical site infection risk. As the use of percutaneous hemorrhage control techniques increase, it is important to remain judicious in patient selection

Introduction. Temporary spanning fixation aims to provide bony stability whilst allowing access and resuscitation of traumatised soft-tissues. Conventional monolateral fixators are prone to half-pin morbidity in feet, variation in construct stability and limited weight-bearing potential. This study compares traditional delta-frame fixators to a circular trauma frame; a virtual tibial ring block spanned onto a fine-wire foot ring fixation. Materials and Methods. The two cohorts were compared for demographics and fracture patterns. The quality of initial reduction and the maintenance of reduction until definitive surgery was assessed by two authors and categorised into four domains. Secondary measures included fixator costs, time to definitive surgery and complications. Results. Fifty-six delta-frames and 48 circular fixators were statistically matched for demographics and fracture pattern. Good or excellent initial reduction was achieved in 51 (91%) delta-frames and 48 (100%) circular fixators (p=0.022). Loss of reduction was observed in 15 (27%) delta-frames and 3 (6%) circular fixators (p<0.001). Post-fixator dislocation occurred in five (9%) delta-frames and one (2%) circular fixator (p=0.147). Duration in spanned fixation was equivalent (11.5 and 11.6 days respectively, p=0.211). Three (5%) delta-frames and 12 (25%) circular fixators were used as definitive fixation. The mean hardware cost was £3,116 for delta-frames and £2,712 for circular fixators. Conclusions. Temporary circular fixation offers statistically superior intra-operative reduction and maintenance of reduction, facilitates weight-bearing and provides more opportunity as the definitive fixation. Circular fixation hardware proved to be less expensive and protected against further scheduled and unscheduled operations

Introduction. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is an hexapod external ring fixation system that can move with six degrees of freedom to correct complex limb deformities. The lengths of the struts between the rings are independently adjusted to correct the deformity. The struts form an acute and obtuse “ring-strut” angle with the ring with the sum of these angles totalling 180°. In the course of a correction schedule a strut may need to be exchanged for one of longer or shorter length. The manufacturer's instructions direct that a temporary seventh strut can be placed in any orientation to ensure stability during the exchange. We have noted several episodes of temporary frame instability during this procedure resulting in discomfort. The aim of this study was to investigate which temporary strut positions gave maximal stability. Methods. A TSF frame was constructed in a neutral alignment with a neutral strut height of 130mm. Strut 1 (red) was identified for exchange. There were 169 theoretical placement options for the temporary strut that were sequentially tested. Fast-FX™ struts were used. Strut 1 was released and the shortening that occurred was recorded using the strut length gauge. Shortening of over 10mm was considered grossly unstable. Results. There were 21 stable configurations and 11 unstable configurations. There were 68 mechanically impossible positions. The most important factors for frame stability were the avoidance of temporary strut crossing the strut being exchanged, and matching acute/obtuse “ring-strut” angle orientation of the temporary strut. Conclusions. This study identifies a positioning rule that ensures maximum stability of a neutral frame during strut changes. It further identifies grossly unstable positions that may result in pain during a change

We present a retrospective review of a single-surgeon series of 30 consecutive lengthenings in 27 patients with congenital short femur using the Ilizarov technique performed between 1994 and 2005.

The mean increase in length was 5.8 cm/18.65% (3.3 to 10.4, 9.7% to 48.8%), with a mean time in the frame of 223 days (75 to 363). By changing from a distal to a proximal osteotomy for lengthening, the mean range of knee movement was significantly increased from 98.1° to 124.2° (p = 0.041) and there was a trend towards a reduced requirement for quadricepsplasty, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). The overall incidence of regenerate deformation or fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixation was similar in the distal and proximal osteotomy groups (56.7% and 53.8%, respectively). However, in the proximal osteotomy group, pre-placement of a Rush nail reduced this rate from 100% without a nail to 0% with a nail (p < 0.001). When comparing a distal osteotomy with a proximal one over a Rush nail for lengthening, there was a significant decrease in fracture rate from 58.8% to 0% (p = 0.043).

We recommend that in this group of patients lengthening of the femur with an Ilizarov construct be carried out through a proximal osteotomy over a Rush nail. Lengthening should also be limited to a maximum of 6 cm during one treatment, or 20% of the original length of the femur, in order to reduce the risk of complications.