We report a single surgeon series of 33 arthroscopic subtalar fusions performed through a 2-portal sinus tarsi approach on 32 patients between March 2004 and February 2009. Background pathologies included primary arthrosis, post-traumatic arthritis, planovalgus foot,
Data is scant on the critical question of whether patients with endstage ankle arthritis are better served by a fusion or a replacement. The STAR trial, a prospective case control study, comparing safety and efficacy of STAR ankle replacement at 24 months for 158 replacements and 66 fusions:. This FDA trial showed the STAR ankle replacement had better function, equivalent pain relief and a higher rate of complications and secondary procedures as ankles treated with fusion. A separate prospective cohort comparison of 200 ankle replacements vs. 94 ankle fusions performed by the collaborative consortium of Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons (COFAS) suggests similar patient oriented outcomes at 24 months. Patients' self-assessment questionnaires do not show significant differences between the two groups. The main medium/long-term concerns with ankle replacement remain component subsidence (especially talar subsidence) and polyethylene wear. Forces across the ankle are considerable, and the orientation of those forces to the underlying trabecular structure are a concern. Whether 2 or 3 part ankles will provide better bearing wear results remains unknown. With older designs, at 10 years the Swedish registry found approximately 60% survivorship. This registry has also shown better survivorship in patients with
Arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR) is controversial. Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, although is not without its complications, with rates of up to 10% for nonunion, 14% for reoperation and 10% for metatarsalgia. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of a double-stemmed silastic implant (Wright-Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) for patients with end-stage HR. We conducted a retrospective review of 108 consecutive implants in 76 patients, between January 2005 and December 2016, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61.6 years (42 to 84). There were 104 females and four males. Clinical, radiological, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) data, a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction scores were collected.Aims
Methods
Little is known about the long-term outcome of
mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (TAR) in the treatment of end-stage
arthritis of the ankle, and in particular for patients with inflammatory
joint disease. The aim of this study was to assess the minimum ten-year
outcome of TAR in this group of patients. We prospectively followed 76 patients (93 TARs) who underwent
surgery between 1988 and 1999. No patients were lost to follow-up.
At latest follow-up at a mean of 14.8 years (10.7 to 22.8), 30 patients
(39 TARs) had died and the original TAR remained Cite this article: