Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 7 | Pages 950 - 955
1 Jul 2012
Helenius I Serlo J Pajulo O

We report the results of vertebral column resection (VCR) for paediatric patients with spinal deformity. A total of 49 VCRs in paediatric patients from four university hospitals between 2005 and 2009 with a minimum two-year follow-up were retrospectively identified. After excluding single hemivertebral resections (n = 25) and VCRs performed for patients with myelomeningocele (n = 6), as well as spondylectomies performed for tumour (n = 4), there were 14 patients who had undergone full VCR at a mean age of 12.3 years (6.5 to 17.9). The aetiology was congenital scoliosis in five, neuromuscular scoliosis in three, congenital kyphosis in two, global kyphosis in two, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in one and secondary scoliosis in one. A total of seven anteroposterior and seven posterolateral approaches were used.

The mean major curve deformity was 86° (67° to 120°) pre-operatively and 37° (17° to 80°) at the two-year follow-up; correction was a mean of 54% (18% to 86%) in the anteroposterior and 60% (41% to 70%) in the posterolateral group at the two-year follow-up (p = 0.53). The mean Scoliosis Research Society-24 total scores were 100 (92 to 108) for the anteroposterior and 102 (95 to 105) for the posterolateral group. There was one paraparesis in the anteroposterior group necessitating urgent re-decompression, with a full recovery.

Patients undergoing VCR are highly satisfied after a successful procedure.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 450 - 450
1 Aug 2008
Charosky S Harding IJ Vialle R Chopin D
Full Access

Purpose: To evaluate the indications, outcome, risk factors and complications of transpedicular osteotomy (TPO) in revision scoliosis surgery. Methods: We evaluated patients undergoing TPO for revision scoliosis surgery at our institution between 1989 and 2004 with a minimum follow up of 18 months. Demographic data, anaesthetic risk factors, peri-operative data and complications were recorded. Radiographs pre-operatively, post-operatively and at last follow up recorded sagittal balance, coronal balance, lumbar lordosis and pelvic parameters. Functional outcome was measured using the Whitecloud score. Results: 21 patients (24 TPO’s) mean age 48.7 years with mean follow up 4.4 years fulfilled criteria for study. All cases had fixed sagittal imbalance pre-operatively. Mean operative time was 4.6 hours and mean transfusion requirement was 2.3. units. A significant improvement (p< 0.03) in sagittal imbalance was gained (although in 3 cases of pseudarthroses this was partially lost) and the post-operative lumbar lordosis correlated closely significantly pelvic incidence (p< 0.03). Functional outcome was good/excellent in 67% cases. We report 28 complications. 22 early included 4 dural tears, cardiac decompensation with reduction, 5 neurological deficits including a parpaplegia secondary to haematoma which was evacuated and the patient made a good recovery at 6 months, 2 UTIs, IVI infection, superficial wound infection and extension of metalwork due to early proximal decompensation. Late complications included infection (8 years), removal of prominent metalwork, radiculopathy due to screw (6 months) and 3 pseudarthroses. There was no statistically significant correlation of complication with weight, ASA grade or smoking. Conclusion: TPO in revision scoliosis is an effective method of correcting both coronal and sagittal imbalance but is not without complication, although good functional outcome is achieved in most patients. It is important to consider pelvic parameters pre-operatively to plan the level and magnitude of TPO required