BACKGROUND. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) commonly recognized as cementless hemi-spherical acetabular component combined with cemented femoral stem. We have done so called “reverse” hybrid THA with cemented socket and cementless stem and compared with all-cemented THAs. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We have been collecting data on total hip arthroplasty since November, 1993. Reverse hybrid hip replacements were used mainly from February, 2001. We evaluated data on 272 reverse hybrid THAs (223 patients) from this year onward until May, 2010, and compared the results with those from 283 all-cemented THAs (237 patients) between 1993 and May, 2010. Eighty percent or more of patients had diagnosed as secondary osteoarthritis of the hip joint due to dysplasia in our hospitals. Highly cross linked ultrahigh molecular polyethylene (CLP) socket was introduced in October, 1999. We used conventional (not cross linked polyethylene) socket for 82 hips (cemented group-1) operated before October, 1999 and CLP socket for 201 hips (cemented group-2) in all-cemented cases. We used the Kaplan-Meier method for estimation of prosthesis survival and relative risk of revision. The endpoint was radiological loosening or revision. Socket linear wear rates were also assessed in radiographically. Clinical assessment was performed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and Merle d'Aubigne & Postel scores. RESULTS. We have 12 hips (11 sockets and 1 stem) with radiological loosening in all cemented series and no hips in reverse hybrid series. A case with stem loosening in all cemented THAs had fractured stem without bony support due to massive osteolysis caused by heavy polyethylene wear. All of the loosening cases had conventional polyethylene socket and six of them were revised. Socket linear wear rates were calculated as 0.171 +/− 0.069, 0.030+/− 0.027, and 0.035+/− 0.026 mm per year for cemented group-1, group-2 and reverse hybrid cases, respectively. Clinical scores were significantly improved those at the time of final follow up compared with those of preoperative assessment. There were significant differences between conventional and cross linked polyethylene cases. We found no significant difference survival to that from cemented THR at 12 years (all cemented: 96.1% (95% CI: 92.7–99.1); reverse hybrid: 100%) (Figure 1). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. With a follow-up of up to 12 years, reverse hybrid THAs performed well, and similarly to all-cemented THRs from the same time period. The reason for loosening was mainly bone loss and osteolysis due to polyethylene socket wear. It is no problem if the stem was installed by cemented or cementless fixation, because the rates of stem loosening were very low in the current study. The reverse hybrid method might therefore be an alternative to all-cemented THR. Longer follow-up time is needed to evaluate whether reverse hybrid hip arthroplasty has any advantages over all-cemented THA

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for a highly dislocated hip can be problematic and technically challenging. Our previous study on cemented THA with subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy revealed a high incidence (20%) of non-union. Therefore, in 2008, we introduced reverse hybrid THA using S-ROM stem for the treatment of a highly dislocated hip. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term clinical outcomes of this new method. Patients and methods. Between 2008 and 2014, 13 consecutive reverse hybrid THAs were performed on nine female patients with highly dislocated hips. The average age at the time of operation was 66 years (range, 55–85 years). The acetabular component was fixed in the true acetabulum with bone cement. Transverse osteotomy was performed below the lesser trochanter to shorten the femur and to prevent over-lengthening. The proximal sleeve of the S-ROM stem was then fixed within the proximal fragment, and the distal fin provided rotational stability of the distal fragment. Thus, the two fragments were fixed to each other with the S-ROM stem, and the resected segment was longitudinally cut for grafting at the junction. The postoperative follow-up period was an average of 4 years (range, 1–7 years), and no patients were lost. Preoperative and final Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score, operation time, bleeding amount, intraoperative and postoperative complications, bone healing at the osteotomy site, implant loosening, and revision surgery were retrospectively investigated. Results. The mean JOA hip score improved from 56 points preoperatively to 82 points postoperatively. The operation time and amount of bleeding were an average of 208 min and 643 g, respectively. The mean length of femoral resection was 4 cm (range, 2–6 cm), and the tip of the greater trochanter migrated an average distance of 7 cm (range, 5–9 cm) distally. The calculated limb lengthening was an average of 3 cm (range, 2–4 cm). Intraoperative fracture was seen in two patients, but no repeat operation was required. Two patients experienced postoperative dislocation in their hips, but additional surgery was not necessary. Postoperative nerve palsy did not occur in any patient, and all the osteotomy sites showed complete bone union. There was no implant loosening seen in any patient, and there was also no need for revision surgery. Discussion and conclusions. To achieve satisfactory outcomes with this method, resection of necessary and sufficient length of femur and accomplishment of adequate fixation between the proximal and distal fragments are necessary. In this study, dislocation occurred in two patients, and no nerve palsy was seen. Larger femoral heads may be recommended to eradicate dislocations. In cases where metaphysis of the femur is hypoplastic or the medullary canal is wide, reaming and stem insertion should be carefully performed. In this series, no additional surgery was required for the intra- and post-operative complications, and the osteotomy sites achieved bone union in all patients. Therefore, we recommend the use of this method, although longer follow-up periods are necessary

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in teenagers is uncommon and previously associated with poor survival rates. However it is sometimes the only option remaining to relieve pain and improve function in patients with advanced hip disease. We report on the clinical and radiological outcomes of THA in teenage patients. Medical records and radiographs of all consecutive teenage patients undergoing THA at a tertiary referral centre between 2006–2011 were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 3.4 years (range 0.6–6.8) with 9 patients having at least 5 years follow-up. Post-operative Harris hip, Oxford hip (OHS) and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores were recorded. 51 THAs were performed in 43 patients (21 male, 22 female) with a mean age of 17 years (range 12–19). The 5 most common indications were slipped upper femoral epiphysis osteonecrosis 15 (29.4%), developmental hip dysplasia osteonecrosis 5 (9.8%), multiple/spondylo-epiphyseal dysplasia 5 (9.8%), chemotherapy-induced osteonecrosis 4 (7.8%) and idiopathic osteonecrosis 4 (8.2%). 46 (90%) were uncemented THAs and 5 (10%) were reverse hybrid THAs with 7 computer assisted design/manufacture (CADCAM) femoral implants. Articular bearings were ceramic/ceramic in 40 (78.4%), metal/metal 6 (11.8%), metal/polyethylene 3 (5.9%) and ceramic/polyethylene 2 (3.9%). The survival rate was 96% with 2 acute head revisions for 1 sciatic nerve palsy and 1 instability. Other complications (8.2%) included 1 dislocation, 1 sciatic nerve palsy that resolved, 1 surgical site infection and 1 unexplained pain. At latest follow-up, the mean Harris hip score was 90 (68–99), OHS was 42 (32–48) and UCLA activity score was 6 (4–9). Radiological analysis showed 2 patients with lucent lines around the acetabular component, but no signs of osteolysis or wear. As one of the largest studies on teenagers undergoing THA, we report good clinical and radiological outcomes at short to intermediate term follow-up