Metal on metal hip resurfacing (MMHR) has been advocated for the younger patient for several reasons including for the preservation of bone stock and ease of revision to total hip replacement (THR), thus ‘buying an additional operation’ for the patient. This rationale however assumes a good functional outcome after the revision to a THR and that the results of the ‘revision primary’ will not be compromised by the resurfacing which preceded it. We present our data on a consecutive series of 68 revised MMHRs. Between September 1997 and September 2009, 927 consecutive patients underwent a hip resurfacing procedure performed by one of three senior surgeons at our institution. The Cormet resurfacing system was used for all patients. Sixty-eight of these patients had their resurfacing revised. Oxford hip score (OHS) obtained at a minimum of 12 months follow-up was used as the primary outcome measure.Introduction
Methods
It was the purpose to evaluate the biomechanical changes that occur after optimal and non-optimal component placement of a hip resurfacing (SRA) by using a subject specific musculoskeletal model based on CT-scan data. Nineteen hips from 11 cadavers were resurfaced with a BHR using a femoral navigation system. CT images were acquired before and after surgery. Grey-value segmentation in Mimics produced contours representing the bone geometry and identifying the outlines of the 3 parts of the gluteus medius. The anatomical changes induced by the procedure were characterised by the translation of the hip joint center (HJCR) with respect to the pelvic and femoral bone. The contact forces during normal gait with ‘optimal’ component placement were calculated for a cement mantle of 3 mm, a socket inclination of 45° and anteversion of 15°. The biomechanical effect of ‘non-optimal placement’ was simulated by varying the positioning of the components.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is an established and effective intervention for osteoarthritis of the hip in the young active patient, relying on the principle of femoral bone-stock preservation. A recognised mode of failure is neck thinning leading to radiological evidence of neck collapse and clinical failure. We report on a series of these slow-neck-failure patients and highlight the increased incidence of this phenomenon in post-menopausal female patients. This is a single operator, single implant series; 172 cases were identified from databases at our institution. 76 were female, mean (SD) age 52 (7) years. 96 were male, mean (SD) age 51(12) years. 15 (8.7%) patients required revision. 12 (80%) were female, 9 (75%) of these were due to slow neck failure. In the men one patient developed ALVAL requiring removal of his bilateral hip resurfacings, the other failure mode was early femoral neck failure. Mean time to failure was 6 months in men and 37 months in women. This difference in failure rates is also seen in the NJR figures. This review confirms the relatively high incidence of premature failure in post-menopausal females. NICE guidance in 2003, currently under review, stated that resurfacing is indicated in male patients up to 65 and female patients up to 60. As a result of this study we are currently advising post-menopausal patients that this risk of early failure may make total hip replacement a preferable option to resurfacing arthroplasty.
INTRODUCTION. Femoral neck narrowing (NN) following Metal-on-Metal Hip
