We have evaluated the clinical effectiveness of a metal resurfacing inlay implant for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome after failed previous surgical treatment. We prospectively studied 20 consecutive patients with a mean age of 38 years (20 to 60), for a mean of three years (2 to 5) post-surgery. There was statistically significant reduction of pain in each of four situations (i.e., rest, walking, stair climbing and running; p ≤ 0.01). The median American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score improved from 62 (interquartile range (IQR) 46 to 72) pre-operatively to 87 (IQR 75 to 95) at final follow-up (p < 0.001). The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score improved on all subscales (p ≤ 0.03). The mean Short-Form 36 physical component scale improved from 36 (23 to 50) pre-operatively to 45 (29 to 55) at final follow-up (p = 0.001); the mental component scale did not change significantly. On radiographs, progressive degenerative changes of the opposing tibial plafond were observed in two patients. One patient required additional surgery for the osteochondral defect. This study shows that a metal implant is a promising treatment for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome after failed previous surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1650–5.

Introduction

The literature remains controversial on treatment of advanced stages of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthritis and frequently favors arthrodesis. However, complications and suboptimal outcomes in active patients still remain with fusion of the first MTP joint. This study reports results of patients who underwent metallic resurfacing of the metatarsal side of the MTP joint.

Fusion remains the standard of care and is associated with a high satisfaction rate. But.… fusion generally requires 6 weeks of restricted weight bearing or immobilization. Potential problems include 1) nonunion, 2) malunion, 3) sesamoid pain (from DJD), 4) late onset IP1 DJD. Complete joint replacement has been performed with a number of different designs since the early 1970's. The metal and poly designed implants are associated with a high failure rate, presumably from high shear loads, eccentric axial loads, poor fixation and bone stock problems. Resurfacing of both sides of the joint with a one piece silicone based crosslinked rubber {“silastic”} in rheumatoid patients appears to function better with use of metal grommets to reduce generation of particle debris and foreign body reaction. These silastic implants are still used by surgeons in select low-demand rheumatoid patients. Salvage after failure of any of these total joint replacements can be challenging because of loss of bone stock. 3 other methods are used to resurface the joint in severe OA: 1) resurfacing the proximal phalangeal side only, 2) resurfacing the metatarsal head only and 3) resurfacing the joint with and interposition arthroplasty. 1) advantage of the proximal phalangeal side resurfacing is simplicity of geometry; the disadvantage is disruption of the FHB attachment and the relative scarcity of severe cartilage damage at that side of the joint. 2) Advantage of the metatarsal head side for resurfacing is that is the typical location of the arthritic change; the disadvantage is potential interference with the sesamoid complex and bulkiness of fixation could lead to a more difficult salvage. 3) The advantage of interposition arthroplasty is the maintenance of bone stock; disadvantages include inconsistent local tissue and somewhat less predictable outcomes. In this talk I will focus primarily on the technique and results of a proximal phalangeal resurfacing approach for OA of the MTP1 joint