Aims. In the UK, the NHS generates an estimated 25 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (4% to 5% of the nation’s total carbon emissions) and produces over 500,000 tonnes of waste annually. There is limited evidence demonstrating the principles of sustainability and its benefits within orthopaedic surgery. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the environmental impact of orthopaedic surgery and the environmentally sustainable initiatives undertaken to address this. The secondary aim of this study was to describe the barriers to making sustainable changes within orthopaedic surgery. Methods. A literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines through EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed libraries using two domains of terms: “orthopaedic surgery” and “environmental sustainability”. Results. A total of 13 studies were included in the final analysis. All papers studied the environmental impact of orthopaedic surgery in one of three areas: waste management, resource consumption, and carbon emissions. Waste segregation was a prevalent issue and described by nine studies, with up to 74.4% of hazardous waste being generated. Of this, six studies reported recycling waste and up to 43.9% of waste per procedure was recyclable. Large joint arthroplasties generated the highest amount of recyclable waste per procedure. Three studies investigated carbon emissions from intraoperative consumables, sterilization methods, and through the use of telemedicine. One study investigated water wastage and demonstrated that simple changes to practice can reduce water consumption by up to 63%. The two most common barriers to implementing environmentally sustainable changes identified across the studies was a lack of appropriate infrastructure and lack of education and training. Conclusion. Environmental sustainability in orthopaedic surgery is a growing area with a wide potential for meaningful change. Further research to cumulatively study the carbon footprint of orthopaedic surgery and the wider impact of environmentally sustainable changes is necessary. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):628–640

The increased demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is having a significant impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased interest in outpatient care pathways to reduce resource consumption. This study compared costs between patients who underwent outpatient THA using a Direct Anterior (DA) approach compared to a Direct Lateral (DL) approach to understand the effect of surgical approach on resource use. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial for DA patients undergoing primary THA. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the trial to a prospective cohort of outpatient DL approach THAs. We recorded all costs including: equipment, length of stay in hospital, and laboratory or other medical tests. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary recording resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, use of pain medications, informal care, productivity losses and out of pocket expenditures. We report costs from both Canadian public health care payer (HCP) and a societal perspective. The HCP perspective includes any direct health costs covered by the publicly funded system. In addition to the health care system costs, the societal perspective also includes additional costs to the patient (e.g. physiotherapy, medication, or assistive devices), as well as any indirect costs such as time off paid employment for patients or caregivers. We included 127 patients in the DA group (66.6 years old) and 51 patients in the DL group (59.4 years old) (p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from both the healthcare payer (DA= 7910.19, DL= 7847.17, p=0.80) and societal perspectives (DA= 14657.21, DL= 14581.21, p=0.96). In patients undergoing a successful outpatient hip replacement, surgical approach does not have an effect on cost from in hospital or societal perspectives

We compare two applications of minimally invasive hip arthroplasty (MISTHA) with regards to early complication rate and consumption of health care resources. Complications are associated with both manifestations of MIS surgical technique. Two- incision MIS THA is associated with fewer days in hospital in comparison with one incision MIS THA, however requires a greater amount of operating room resources. This paper is among the first to compare two- incision with one incision MISTHA. Two- incision MISTHA may benefit efforts to reduce health resource utilization associated with hip arthroplasty procedures providing that operating room resource consumption and complication rates are not excessive. A comparative cohort study to evaluate two-incision versus single-incision minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: assessment of early complication rate and health care resource utilization. To evaluate and compare two applications of minimally invasive hip arthroplasty (MISTHA) with regards to early complication rate and consumption of health care resources. One hundred and sixty-five patients received MISTHA from 2002–2004 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients received two incision (sixty-six patients) or one incision surgery (ninety-nine patients) which was performed according to standard technique. T-test, chi square, fisher’s exact test were used to compare cohorts of MISTHA patients with regards to early complications and consumption of health care resources while in hospital. At baseline the two cohorts were not different with regards to age, gender, comorbid status, BMI, and pre-operative WOMAC, Oxford-12, SF-12 (p> .05). Major and minor complication rates were similar in the two cohorts (p> .05). Utilization of operating room resources was greater with the two incision group (mean twentyfive minutes more OR time) however length of stay (mean two days less in hospital) and post-operative analgesic use was significantly reduced (p< .05). Complications and operating room resource consumption were highest early in the surgeons’ experience with these procedures. Complications are associated with both manifestations of MIS surgical technique. Two- incision MISTHA is associated with fewer days in hospital, however requires a greater amount of operating room resources. This paper is among the first to compare two- incision with one incision MISTHA. Two- incision MISTHA may benefit efforts to reduce health resource utilization associated with hip arthroplasty procedures providing that operating room resource consumption and complication rates are not excessive

Cigarette smoking has a negative impact on the skeletal system by reducing bone mass and increasing the risk of fractures through its direct or indirect effects on bone remodeling. Recent evidence shows that smoking causes an imbalance in bone turnover, making bone vulnerable to osteoporosis and fragility fractures. In addition, cigarette smoking is known to have deleterious effects on fracture healing, as a positive correlation has been shown between the daily number of cigarettes smoked and years of exposure to smoking, although the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Smoking is also known to cause several medical and surgical complications responsible for longer hospital stays and a consequent increase in resource consumption. Smoking cessation is, therefore, highly advisable to prevent the onset of metabolic bone disease. However, some of the consequences appear to continue for decades. Based on this evidence, the aim of our work was to assess the impact of smoking on the skeletal system, particularly bone fractures, and to identify the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the impairment of fracture healing. Because smoking represents a major public health problem, understanding the association between cigarette smoking and the occurrence of bone disease is necessary in order to identify potential new targets for intervention

Infection of the musculoskeletal (MSK) system is a dreaded complication that seems to be on the rise. Many factors, such as resistant bacteria or poor host factors, may influence such rise. This increase leads to greater resource consumption, especially due to antibiotic (ATB) prescription. Strategies must be created to detect patients at risk and prevent such infections. Hospital administrators should be made aware of the costs and impact of MSK infections in order to understand the need to prevent such complications. Therefore, our goal is to characterize the infected orthopaedic patient and evaluate the cost associated with ATB prescription in such cases. This is a retrospective and descriptive study, based on patient record analysis of all patients treated at our department, from January 2013 to March 2015. We identified 177 patients with a MSK infection and an isolated infectious agent. There was no predominance of either sex. Approximately 50% of patients were aged between 66 and 85 years old. Most frequent agents were MSSA (30,2%) and MRSA (21,8%), followed by Streptococcus species (8,9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosas (7,1%). Although most patients were infected by a single agent, 18,6% had two or more causative agents isolated in cultures. Of those, 69,7% had either MSSA or MRSA as one of the isolated agents. Most commonly affected area was the hip (39,5%), followed by the knee (23,2%) and ankle (21,5%). Nearly all patients had had prior surgery, with arthroplasty and osteosynthesis as the most common procedures (52,4% and 33,3%, respectively). Infection related admission was responsible for a total of 6.116 hospital bed-days, with the majority of patients staying in hospital for up to 30 days (77,3%). Total cost of hospital ATB administration was 61.365,61€, with approximately 346,7€ spent in each patient. This corresponds to 42,6% of the total cost of medication during hospital stay (144.146,1€ of total cost, with 814,4€ per patient). The typical infected orthopaedic patient is aged 66 to 85 years old, was operated to his hip or knee, and either an arthroplasty or osteosynthesis was performed. Staphylococcus aureus remains the most common agent. MSK infections have significant costs associated with their treatment, and clinical departments should periodically re-evaluate discharged patients in order to understand what groups are at risk of developing such a complication. Only a correct identification of all these factors makes it possible to create a targeted preventive strategy, in order to reduce costs to the institution

Deep infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating complication for the patient and a costly one for patients, surgeons, hospitals and payers. The aim of this study is to compare revision TKA for infection, revision TKA for aseptic loosening and primary TKA with respect to their impact on hospital and surgeon resource utilisation. The evaluation of hospital cost was carried out on a microeconomic basis in order to best evaluate the true cost. Demographic, clinical and economic data were obtained for 25 consecutive patients with an infection after TKA who underwent a two-stage revision arthroplasty (Group 1), 25 consecutive patients who underwent revision of both components because of aseptic loosening (Group 2) and 25 consecutive patients who underwent a primary TKA (Group 3), all of which where admitted at our institution between January 2000 and December 2005. The economic evaluation included both surgical treatment and hospitalisation cost. Because fixed charges do not depict accurately real resource consumption, total cost was calculated through direct cost analysis. All direct health sector costs such as medical supplies, drugs, implants, laboratory and radiology tests, salaries and wages and overhead expenses, including equipment and plant depreciation were calculated. All patients were followed up for a twelve-month period. Revision procedures for infection were associated with longer operative time, more blood loss and a higher total number of operations compared with both revisions for aseptic loosening and primary TKA. Furthermore, revisions for infection compared to revisions due to aseptic loosening and primary TKAs were associated with twofold and 2.6 times higher total number of hospitalisations, 2.5 and 5.6 times higher total number of inpatient days, 10.2 and 53.8 times higher cost of inpatient drugs and 1.2 and 2.37 times higher cost of implants, respectively. The costing evaluation of the three operative techniques is still on progress. Patients’ treatment with an infection after TKA is associated with significantly greater hospital and physician resource utilisation compared with that used for patients with a revision due to aseptic loosening or a primary TKA

The price per total knee replacement (TKR) performed is fixed but the subsequent length of hospital stay (LOS) is variable. The current national average for LOS following TKR is six days. LOS is an important marker of resource consumption, has implications in patient satisfaction, and is used as a marker of hospital quality. The aim of this study was to describe the temporal change in demographics between 2004 and 2009, and to identify intra-operative factors and patient characteristics associated with a prolonged LOS that could be addressed to improve clinical practice. We performed a retrospective cohort review of 184 patients (2004 n=88, 2009 n=96) who underwent primary TKRs at Chorley District General Hospital. The median LOS in 2009 was eight days compared to ten days in 2004, an average of 3.5 days less (p < 0.001). Patients were significantly younger (p < 0.001) in 2009 (median 66 years) compared to 2004 (median 74 years), with both years having a similar female predominance. There was no significant change in the BMI or American Society of Anesthesiologists score between 2004 and 2009. This data suggests that block contracts with the private sector has not influenced the demographics of patients being treated in the NHS. Intra-operative factors including the use of a peripheral nerve block, the surgeon grade, the day of the week the operation was performed, the operation length, and the change in pre- to post-operative haemoglobin were not found to significantly increase the LOS (p = 0.058, p = 0.40, p = 0.092, p = 0.50, p = 0.43 respectively). Cemented TKRs had a median LOS of nine days compared to eight for uncemented implants (p = 0.015). However, patients with a cemented implant were on average 6.2 years older than patients with an uncemented implant (p < 0.001). Using Cox proportional hazard regression modelling, the occurrence of a post-operative complication (p < 0.001), female sex (p = 0.024), advancing age (p = 0.036), and the need for a blood transfusion (p = 0.0056) were the most significant factors for prolonging the LOS. Patients who were given a transfusion stayed a median of 13 days compared to nine for those who did not (p < 0.001). The median pre-operative haemoglobin for those who required a transfusion was 11.85g/dl compared to 13.6g/dl for those who did not (p < 0.001). Being obese or morbidly obese did not significantly prolong the LOS (p = 0.95). In conclusion, this study highlights significant patient characteristics which are associated with a prolonged LOS following TKR. The relatively low pre-operative haemoglobin in patients requiring a blood transfusion is a potential target for reducing the LOS

Aims

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is useful in the diagnosis of infectious disease. However, while it is highly sensitive at identifying bacteria, it does not provide information on the sensitivity of the organisms to antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the results of mNGS can be used to guide optimization of culture methods to improve the sensitivity of culture from intraoperative samples.

Aims

As the population ages, there is projected to be an increase in the level of demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in octogenarians. We aimed to explore whether those aged ≥ 80 years achieved similar improvements in physical function to younger patients while also comparing the rates of length of stay (LOS), discharge to rehabilitation, postoperative complications, and mortality following TKA in older and younger patients.

In this study we randomised 140 patients who were due to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to have the procedure performed using either patient-specific cutting guides (PSCG) or conventional instrumentation (CI).

The primary outcome measure was the mechanical axis, as measured at three months on a standing long-leg radiograph by the hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle. This was undertaken by an independent observer who was blinded to the instrumentation. Secondary outcome measures were component positioning, operating time, Knee Society and Oxford knee scores, blood loss and length of hospital stay.

A total of 126 patients (67 in the CI group and 59 in the PSCG group) had complete clinical and radiological data. There were 88 females and 52 males with a mean age of 69.3 years (47 to 84) and a mean BMI of 28.6 kg/m² (20.2 to 40.8). The mean HKA angle was 178.9° (172.5 to 183.4) in the CI group and 178.2° (172.4 to 183.4) in the PSCG group (p = 0.34). Outliers were identified in 22 of 67 knees (32.8%) in the CI group and 19 of 59 knees (32.2%) in the PSCG group (p = 0.99). There was no significant difference in the clinical results (p = 0.95 and 0.59, respectively). Operating time, blood loss and length of hospital stay were not significantly reduced (p = 0.09, 0.58 and 0.50, respectively) when using PSCG.

The use of PSCG in primary TKA did not reduce the proportion of outliers as measured by post-operative coronal alignment.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:56–63.