to determine the extent of Orthobullets use by orthopaedic residents in academic and clinical settings. We also wanted to determine whether its widespread use is the same in various training programs around the world and so we chose to survey two distinct programs without any academic or institutional ties. An electronic 9 question survey created using SurveyMonkey was sent to residents in two distinct Orthopaedic residency programs, either via text message or by email. The two programs surveyed were the McGill University Orthopaedic Surgery residency program located in Montreal, Canada, and the Oman Medical Specialty Board (OMSB) Orthopaedic Surgery residency program located in Muscat, Oman. A total of 36 residents, 20 from McGill and 16 from OMSB, responded to the survey request. In both programs, 89% of all the residents surveyed claimed they use Orthobullets at least 4 times per week, and greater than 95% of them use it during call shifts to obtain information rapidly. Regarding the use of Orthobullets in the context of operating theatre case preparation, over 50% of residents claim to use it often while only 25% claim to rarely use it for this purpose. The use of Orthobullets during clinics seemed to be the least popular among residents as 47% claimed they rarely use it. Cumulatively in both programs, more than 80% of residents indicated that they always use Orthobullets in preparation for an exam especially among senior residents. Approximately two thirds of residents have said they completely trust the information provided on Orthobullets, with the remainder indicating that they trust Orthobullets more than 75% of the time. The proportion of residents who indicated that they completely trust Orthobullets was greater in the OMSB group (75%) and among senior trainees. Over 85% of residents discovered Orthobullets through friends and colleagues, and the rest through the program and faculty members. Our survey results demonstrate the widespread use of Orthobullets, a popular online orthopaedic resource, among orthopaedic residents of all levels. The settings in which Orthobullets was most used were exam preparation and during call shifts. In addition, with the high amount of confidence residence have Orthobullets, it is questionable as to how many are actually aware that its information is not validated. For the time being however, we do not discourage the use of Orthobullets for exam preparation, however, we recommend that programs warn their residents to abstain from using it in their clinical decision-making until it has demonstrated peer-reviewed approval

Milestone-based outcome oriented training is now an important framework for residency education and program accreditation. Analysing 18 months of Orthopaedic Surgery Patient Care Milestone real-time evaluations via a web platform in a single residency program demonstrated significant variability in the rate of assessment and competency level among Milestones. In 614 evaluations, there was a strong, positive linear relationship between postgraduate year and competency level. Chief residents achieved an average competency level of 4.0, the graduation target, as assessed by faculty in real-time. These data may inform ongoing discussions about potential revisions to the Orthopaedic Surgery Milestones, and highlight one potential model for improving resident feedback. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) now requires the biannual submission of a variety of Milestones by United States residency programs, as part of a move towards competency-based medical training. Our program developed a web-based platform to collect Milestone-based evaluations in real-time, in an effort to improve feedback and facilitate ACGME compliance. After 18 months of use, we assessed how frequently each Milestone is evaluated in real-time, as well as the distribution of competency levels by each Patient Care Milestone and postgraduate year (PGY). These results may inform on relative strengths and weaknesses of a program, or of particular Milestones. At a single academic orthopaedic residency program with 40 residents in total, the use of a web-based trainee-driven evaluation tool (eMTRCS – electronic Milestone Tracking and Competency System) was initiated in 2014. Residents initiate evaluation in real-time, triggering a digital Milestone-based evaluation by a particular faculty member. De-identified data from January 2014 to December 2015 was abstracted. Descriptive statistics on the distribution of evaluations submissions, type of Milestone, faculty evaluation levels, and resident PGY were calculated. As the data was ordinal with evidence of non-normality, nonparametric tests were utilised to analyse differences in the distribution, and assess correlation between planned outcome variables. A total of 614 evaluations were included in the analysis, for an average of 38.4 evaluations per Patient Care Milestone. There was a wide variability in the number of evaluations per Milestone, ranging from only four “Diabetic Foot” submissions to 75 submissions on “Hip and Knee Arthritis” (Figure 1). Faculty-scored competency also varied significantly among the Milestones (Figure 2, p = 0.009 by Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test). Higher levels of competency were seen as resident PGY progressed (mean = 2.1, 2.4, 3.1, 3.7, 4.0 for PGY1–5 respectively, p<0.001). Through 18 months of use and 614 real-time evaluations, a web-based system for assessing Milestone levels showed significant variability in the number of assessments and competency level among the Orthopaedic Surgery Patient Care Milestones. There are multiple possible explanations, ranging from resident and faculty confusion about the Milestones to a lack of clinical volume in specific areas. In contrast to the inter-Milestone variability in assessments and competency levels, the strong stepwise relationship between advancing PGY and increasing levels of competency does provide evidence of validity for Milestone-based evaluations. Graduating residents in this program achieved, on average, the graduation target competency level as assessed by faculty in real-time

Purpose: Despite increasing numbers of women entering surgical fields, orthopaedic surgery residency continues to have the lowest percentage of women (11%) of all primary surgical specialties. In an effort to examine prevailing attitudes, we compared the performance of male and female orthopaedic residents using a variety of measures. We hypothesized that the performance of men and women would not differ significantly. Method: We prospectively gathered data on 81 residents (67 male, 14 female) with graduation years of 1999–2010. Six males and one female dropped out of the program during their training, leaving a group of 74 residents (61 male, 13 female) with data available for analysis. Residents were compared on the basis of their Orthopaedic In-Training Exam (OITE) scores, American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) results, and a comprehensive eight category electronic faculty evaluation measure (E*ValueTM) that rates resident performance in every category on each rotation on a 1–5 scale. Practice profile data was gathered through a survey which looked at fellowship training and current practice patterns. Results: Males and females had no statistically significant differences in their E*ValueTM scores in any of the eight categories measured (medical knowledge, patient care, behaviors, technical, communication, practice-based, systems-based, overall competence). Males and females had no significant difference in their mean OITE scores for year 2 and year 3 of residency; however, men had higher mean scores at year 4 (66.9 vs. 47.0), year 5 (66.8 vs. 45.8) and overall (61.7 vs. 46.5, p < 0.001). All resident graduates that had taken ABOS Parts 1 had passed; however, the percentage of men that took more than one attempt to pass Part 1 was significantly lower statistically than women (7% vs. 43%). No difference was seen in Part 2 pass attempts. For residents that had matched in our program, 9% of males and 7% of females have dropped out due to lifestyle issues (NSD). Conclusion: In our program, male and female residents were seen as equally competent physicians as graded by comprehensive faculty evaluations. However, men outperformed women on both OITE measures and ABOS Part 1 measures. Further study is needed to explain these differences

There has been a widespread adoption of training programs or “boot-camps” targeting new surgical residents prior to entrance to the hospital environment. A plethora of studies have shown positive reactions to implementations of “boot camps”. Reaction surveys, however, lack the ability to provide a deeper level of understanding into how and why “boot camps” are seen as effective. The purpose of this study was to develop a rich perspective on the role “boot camps” are perceived to play in resident education. A constructivist approach to qualitative grounded theory methodology, employing iterative semi-structured, in-person, interviews was used to explore the construct of a “boot camp” through the eyes of key stakeholders, including junior surgical residents (n=10), senior surgical residents (n=5), and faculty members (n=5) at a major academic centre. Interviews were coded and analysed thematically using NVIVO software. Three members of the research team coded data independently and compared themes until consensus was reached. A method of constant comparative analysis was utilised throughout the iterative process. Emerging themes were revisited with stakeholders as a measure of rigor. Axial coding of themes was used to discover the overlying purposes embedded in the “boot camp” construct. The overarching themes resonating from participants were ‘anxiety reduction’, ‘cognitive unloading’ and ‘practical logistics’. Resident anxiety was ameliorated through subthemes of ‘social inclusion’, ‘group formation’, ‘confidence building’ and ‘formalisation of expectations’. A resident commented “the nuances of how things work is more stressful than the actual job.” Residents bonded together to create personal and group identities, “forming the identity of who we are as a group”, that shaped ongoing learning throughout training, “right from the beginning we would be able to call on each other.” Junior residents found themselves cognitively unloaded for higher level learning through ‘expectation setting’ and ‘formalised basic skills’; “I knew how the equipment was going to fit together, it allowed me to focus more on what was happening from the operative perspective.” Stakeholders highlighted the importance of positioning “boot camp” at the beginning of residency training, as it directly influenced the point of transition. This highlights the strength of the “boot camp” construct at targeting the challenges associated with discrete moments of transition in the advancement in practice. While surgical preparatory “boot camps” were initially born out of a competency-based framework focused on technical skill development, our findings demonstrate that the benefits outweigh simple improvement in technical ability. The formation of a learner group identity has downstream effects on resident perceptions of anxiety and confidence, while priming for higher-level learning. “Boot camp” then, is re-imagined as an experience of social professional enculturation

Purpose: Orthopaedic residency training requires intellectual and motor skill development. In this study we aim to develop a model to evaluate junior resident proficiency and efficiency versus senior residents in the placement of a center-center guidewire during fixation of an intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture utilizing a computer-based haptic simulator. We hypothesize the junior residents will utilize more fluoroscopy and require more time to complete the task. Method: Post-graduate year residents (PGY) 3–5s, labeled Group II, placed a single central guide pin into a femoral head utilizing a surgical simulator four times. PGY 1–2s, labeled Group I, completed the same task six times. The residents were then evaluated based on final tip-apex distance (TAD), fluoroscopy time, time to complete the task, total number of distinct attempts at pin placement for each femur construct as well as final three-dimensional location of the pin from the isometric center of the femoral head. This project was approved by the institutional IRB. Conclusion: In this study we displayed that based on our simulator model there was no statistical difference between Group I and II in time to completion, final placement on AP view, and tip-apex distance. There was a statistically significant difference in the anterior/posterior placement of the wire between the two groups, fluoroscopy time, and number of attempts per trial. Our findings suggest a computer based surgical simulator can identify measurable differences in surgical proficiency between junior and senior orthopaedic residents

In March 2020, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The pandemic imposed drastic changes in our social and professional routine. Professionally at all levels our hospital tasks were changed and prioritized. Surgeons and residents were deployed on rotations to fields other than their expertise in orthopaedics. Health-care education received major changes in these challenging times, and students did face difficulties in receiving education, as well as training due to limited clinical and surgical exposure.

In response to the WHO regulations, most of the teaching centres and hospitals worldwide have adopted the web-based teaching and learning model to continue the education and training of orthopaedic residents. These results brought significant changes to the training experience in orthopaedic surgery in combination with the fact that clinical duty hours and case volume were substantially reduced.

In what concerns orthopaedic journal publications, the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a decline in the annual publication rate for the first time in over 20 years. Although not uniform, the reduction was most likely due to multifactorial causes.

Regarding the appraisal at the end of training, at the Orthopaedic European Board Examination we were able to verify that the outcome at the written part 1 exam was good, equivalent to the outcome prior to the pandemic. However the oral viva was much worse, probably due to the fact that residents skipped much of the clinical and surgical teaching and exposure during 2020 and 2021. At the end of training, theoretical/factual knowledge was good but poor from the clinical practical experience.

As residency training programmes around the globe move towards competency-based medical education (CBME), there is a need to review current teaching and assessment practices as they relate to education in orthopaedic trauma. Assessment is the cornerstone of CBME, as it not only helps to determine when a trainee is fit to practice independently, but it also provides feedback on performance and guides the development of competence. Although a standardised core knowledge base for trauma care has been developed by the leading national accreditation bodies and international agencies that teach and perform research in orthopaedic trauma, educators have not yet established optimal methods for assessing trainees’ performance in managing orthopaedic trauma patients. . This review describes the existing knowledge from the literature on assessment in orthopaedic trauma and highlights initiatives that have recently been undertaken towards CBME in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. . In order to support a CBME approach, programmes need to improve the frequency and quality of assessments and improve on current formative and summative feedback techniques in order to enhance resident education in orthopaedic trauma. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1320–5

Introduction

The number of complex revision total hip arthroplasties (THA) is predicted to rise. The identification of acetabular bone defects prior to revision THA has important implications on technique and complexity of acetabular reconstruction. Paprosky et al. proposed a classification system including 3 main types with up to 3 subtypes focused on the integrity of the superior rim of the acetabulum and medial wall. However, the classification system is complex and its reliability has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different radiologic imaging modalities (plain radiographs, 2-D CT, 3-D CT reconstructions) in classifying acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty cases and their value of at different levels of orthopaedic training.

Aims

The aims of this study were to describe the demographic, socioeconomic, and educational factors associated with core surgical trainees (CSTs) who apply to and receive offers for higher surgical training (ST3) posts in Trauma & Orthopaedics (T&O).

Musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders continue to be a major cause of pain and disability worldwide. The mission statement of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) is to “promote excellence in orthopaedic and musculoskeletal health for Canadians,” and orthopaedic surgeons serve as leaders in addressing and improving musculoskeletal health. However, patients with MSK complaints most commonly present first to a primary care physician. According to a survey of family physicians in British Columbia, 13.7-27.8% of patients present with a chief complaint that is MSK-related (Pinney et Regan, 2001). Therefore, providing excellent MSK care to Canadians requires that all physicians, especially those involved in primary care, be adequately trained to diagnose and treat common MSK conditions. To date, there has been no assessment of the total mandatory MSK training Canadian family medicine residents receive. It is also unclear, despite the prevalence of MSK complaints among Canadian patients, if current family physicians are competent or confident in their ability to provide fundamental MSK care. The purpose of this study is to determine the amount of mandatory MSK training Canadian family medicine residents are currently receiving. Web-based research was used to determine how many weeks of mandatory MSK training was incorporated into current Canadian family medicine residency training programs. This information was gathered from either the Canadian Resident Matching Service website (carms.ca) or the residency program's individual website. If this information was not available on a program's website, a program administrator was contacted via email in order to ascertain this information directly. MSK training was considered to be any rotation in orthopaedic surgery, spine surgery, sports medicine, or physiatry. 156 Canadian family medicine residency training sites were identified. Information pertaining to mandatory MSK education was collected for 150 sites (95.5%). Of the 150 training sites, 102(68 %) did not incorporate any mandatory MSK training into their curriculum. Of the 48 programs that did, the average number of weeks of MSK training was 3.37 weeks. 32/48 programs (66.7%) included 4 weeks of MSK training, which represents 3.8% of a 2-year training program. Current Canadian family medicine residents are not receiving sufficient musculoskeletal training when compared to the overall frequency of musculoskeletal presentations in the primary care setting. Understanding current family medicine physicians’ surveyed confidence and measured competence with respect to diagnosing and treating common musculoskeletal disorders could also prove helpful in demonstrating the need for increased musculoskeletal education. Future orthopaedic initiatives could help enhance family medicine MSK training

The 2020-2021 Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) match year was altered on an unprecedented scale. Visiting electives were cancelled at a national level, and the CaRMS interview tour was moved to a virtual model. These changes posed a significant challenge to both prospective students and program directors (PDs), requiring each party to employ alternative strategies to distinguish themselves throughout the match process. For a variety of reasons, including a decline in applicant interest secondary to reduced job prospects, the field of orthopaedic surgery was identified as vulnerable to many of these changes, creating a window of opportunity to evaluate their impacts on students and recruiting residency programs. This longitudinal survey study was disseminated to match-year medical students (3rd and 4th year) with an interest in orthopaedic surgery, as well as orthopaedic surgery program directors. Responses to the survey were collected using an electronic form designed in Qualtrics (Qualtrics, 2021, Provo, Utah, USA). Students were contacted through social media posts, as well as by snowball sampling methods through appropriate medical student leadership intermediates. The survey was disseminated to all 17 orthopedic surgery program directors in Canada. A pre-match and post-match iteration of this survey were designed to identify whether expectations differed from reality regarding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the CaRMS match 2020-2021 process. A similar package was disseminated to Canadian orthopaedic surgery program directors pre-match, with an option to opt-in for a post-match survey follow-up. This survey had a focus on program directors’ opinions of various novel communication, recruitment, and assessment strategies, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Students’ responses to the loss of visiting electives were negative. Despite a reduction in financial stress associated with reduced need to travel (p=0.001), this was identified as a core component of the clerkship experience. In the case of virtual interviews, students’ initial trepidation pre-CaRMS turned into a positive outlook post-CaRMS (significant improvement, p=0.009) indicating an overall satisfaction with the virtual interview format, despite some concerns about a reduction in their capacity to network. Program directors and selection committee faculty also felt positively about the virtual interview format. Both students and program directors were overwhelmingly positive about virtual events put on by both school programs and student-led initiatives to complement the CaRMS tour. CaRMS was initially developed to facilitate the matching process for both students and programs alike. We hope to continue this tradition of student-led and student-informed change by providing three evidence-based recommendations. First, visiting electives should not be discontinued in future iterations of CaRMS if at all possible. Second, virtual interviews should be considered as an alternative approach to the CaRMS interview tour moving forward. And third, ongoing virtual events should be associated with a centralized platform from which programs can easily communicate virtual sessions to their target audience

Three dimensional printing is an emerging new technology in medicine and the current educational value of 3D printed fracture models is unknown. The delayed surgery and need for CT imaging make calcaneal fractures an ideal scenario for preoperative 3D printed (3Dp) fracture models. The goal of this study is to assess if improvements in fracture understanding and surgical planning can be realized by trainees when they are given standard CT imaging and a 3Dp model compared to standard CT imaging and a virtual 3D rendering (3D CT). Ethics approval was granted for a selection of calcaneal fracture imaging studies to be collected through a practice audit of a senior orthopaedic trauma surgeon. 3Dp models were created in house. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files of patient CT scans were obtained from local servers in an anonymized fashion. DICOM files were then converted to .STL models using the Mimics inPrint 2.0 (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) software. Models were converted into a .gcode file through a slicer program (Simplify3D, Blue Ash, OH USA). The .gcode files were printed on a TEVO Little Monster Delta FDM printer (TEVO USA, CO USA) using 1.75mm polylactic acid (PLA) filament. Study participants rotated through 10 workstations viewing CT images and either a digital 3D volume rendering or 3Dp model of the fractured calcaneus. A questionnaire at each workstation assessed fracture classification, proposed method of treatment, confidence with fracture understanding and satisfaction with the accuracy of the 3Dp model or 3D volume rendering. Participants included current orthopaedic surgery trainees and staff surgeons. A total of 16 residents and five staff completed the study. Ten fracture cases were included in the analysis for time, confidence of fracture understanding, perceived model accuracy and treatment method. Eight fracture cases were included for assessment of diagnosis. There were no cases that obtained universal agreement on either Sanders classification or treatment method from staff participants. Residents in their final year of studies had the quickest mean time of assessment (60 +/− 24 sec.) and highest percentage of correct diagnoses (83%) although these did not reach significance compared to the other residency years. There was a significant increase in confidence of fracture understanding with increasing residency year. Also, confidence was improved in cases where a 3Dp model was available compared to conventional CT alone although this improvement diminished with increasing residency year. Perceived accuracy of the cases with 3Dp models was significantly higher than cases without models (7 vs 5.5 p < 0.0001). This is the first study to our knowledge to assess trainee confidence as a primary outcome in the assessment of the educational value of 3Dp models. This study was able to show that a 3Dp model aides in the perceived accuracy of fracture assessment and showed an improvement in trainee confidence, although the effect on confidence seems to diminish with increasing residency year. We propose that 3D printed calcaneal fracture models are a beneficial educational tool for junior level trainees and the role of 3Dp models for other complex orthopaedic presentations should be explored

Advances in orthopaedic surgery have led to minimally invasive techniques to decrease patient morbidity by minimizing surgical exposure, but also limits direct visualization. This has led to the increased use of intraoperative fluoroscopy for fracture management. Unfortunately, these procedures require the operating surgeon to stay in close proximity to the patient, thus being exposed to radiation scatter. The current National Council on Radiation Protection recommends no more than 50 mSv of radiation exposure to avoid ill-effects. Risks associated with radiation exposure include cataracts, skin, breast and thyroid cancer, and leukemia. Despite radiation protection measures, there is overwhelming evidence of radiation-related diseases in orthopaedic surgeons. The risk of developing cancer (e.g. thyroid carcinoma and breast cancer) is approximately eight times higher than in unexposed workers. Despite this knowledge, there is a paucity of evidence on radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgery residents, therefore the goal of this study is to quantify radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgery residents. We hypothesize that orthopaedic surgery residents are exposed to a significant amount of radiation throughout their training. We specifically aim to: 1) quantify the amount of radiation exposure throughout a Canadian orthopaedic residency training program and 2) determine the variability in resident radiation exposure by rotation assignment and year of training. This ongoing prospective cohort study includes all local orthopaedic surgery residents who meet eligibility criteria. Inclusion criteria: 1) adult residents in an orthopaedic surgery residency program. Exclusion criteria: 1) female residents who are pregnant, and 2) residents in a non-surgical year (i.e. leave of absence, research, Masters/PhD). After completion of informed consent, each eligible resident will wear a dosimeter to measure radiation exposure in a standardized fashion. Dosimeters will be worn on standardized lanyards underneath lead protection in their left chest pocket during all surgeries that require radiation protection. Control dosimeters will be worn on the outside of each resident's scrub cap for comparison. Dosimeter readings will then be reported on a monthly and rotational basis. All data will be collected on a pre-developed case report form. All data will be de-identified and stored on a secure electronic database (REDCap). In addition to monthly and rotational dosimeter readings, residents will also report sex, height, level of training, parental status, and age for secondary subgroup analyses. Residents will also report if they have personalized lead or other protective equipment, including lead glasses. Resident compliance with dosimeter use will be measured by self report of >80% use on operative days. Interim analysis will be performed at the 6-month time point and data collection will conclude at the 1 year time point. Data collection began in July 2018 and interim 6-month results will be available for presentation at the CORA annual meeting in June 2019. This is the first prospective study quantifying radiation exposure in Canadian orthopaedic residents and the results will provide valuable information for all Canadian orthopaedic training programs

Surgical reattachment of torn rotator cuff tendons can lead to satisfactory clinical outcome but failures remain common. Ortho-R product is a freeze-dried formulation of chitosan (CS) that is solubilized in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to form injectable implants. The purpose of the current pilot study was to determine Ortho-R implant acute residency, test safety of different implant doses, and assess efficacy over standard of care in a sheep model. The infraspinatus tendon (ISP) was detached and immediately repaired in 22 skeletally mature ewes. Repair was done with four suture anchors in a suture bridge configuration (n = 6 controls). Freeze-dried formulations containing 1% w/v chitosan (number average molar mass 35 kDa and degree of deacetylation 83%) with 1% w/v trehalose (as lyoprotectant) and 42.2 mM calcium chloride (as clot activator) were solubilized with autologous leukocyte-rich PRP and injected at the tendon-bone interface and on top of the repaired site (n = 6 with a 1 mL dose and n = 6 with a 2 mL dose). Acute implant residency was assessed histologically at 1 day (n = 2 with a 1 mL dose and n = 2 with a 2 mL dose). Outcome measures included MRI assessment at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks, histopathology at 12 weeks and clinical pathology. MRI images and histological slides were scored by 2 blinded readers (veterinarian and human radiologist, and veterinarian pathologist) and averaged. The Generalized Linear Model task (SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1 and SAS 9.4) was used to compare the different groups with post-hoc analysis to test for pairwise differences. Ortho-R implants were detected near the enthesis, near the top of the anchors holes and at the surface of ISP tendon and muscle at 1 day. Numerous polymorphonuclear cells were recruited to the implant in the case of ISP tendon and muscle. On MRI, all repair sites were hyperintense compared to normal tendon at 6 weeks and only 1 out 18 repair sites was isointense at 12 weeks. The tendon repair site gap seen on MRI, which is the length of the hyperintense region between the greater tuberosity and tendon with normal signal intensity, was decreased by treatment with the 2 mL dose when compared to control at 12 weeks (p = 0.01). Histologically, none of the repair sites were structurally normal. A trend of improved structural organization of the tendon (p = 0.06) and improved structural appearance of the enthesis (p = 0.1) with 2 mL dose treatment compared to control was seen at 12 weeks. There was no treatment-specific effect on all standard safety outcome measures, which suggests high safety. Ortho-R implants (2 mL dose) modulated the rotator cuff healing processes in this large animal model. The promising MRI and histological findings may translate into improved mechanical performance, which will be assessed in a future study with a larger number of animals. This study provides preliminary evidence on the safety and efficacy of Ortho-R implants in a large animal model that could potentially be translated to a clinical setting

Purpose. Residency programs are continually attempting to predict the performance of both current and potential residents. Previous studies have supported the use of USMLE Step 1 and 2 as predictors of Orthopaedic In-Training Examination and eventual American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery board success, while others show no significant correlation. A strong performance on OITE exams does correlate with strong residency performance, and some believe OITE scores are good predictors of future written board success. The current study was designed to examine potential differences in resident assessment measures and their predictive value for written boards. Method. A retrospective review of resident performance data was performed for the past 10 years. Personalized information was removed by the residency coordinator. USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2, in-training exams (from first to fifth years of training), and written orthopaedic specialty board scores were collected. Subsequently, the residents were separated into two groups, those scoring above the 35th percentile on in-training examinations and those scoring below. Data were analyzed using correlation and regression analyses to compare and contrast the scores across all tests. Results. Significant difference was seen between the groups in regards to USMLE scores for both Step 1 and 2. Also, a significant difference was found between OITE scores for both the second and fifth years. Positive correlations were found for USMLE Step 1, Step 2, OITE 2 and OITE 5 when compared to performance on written boards. One resident initially failed written boards, but passed on the second attempt. This resident consistently scored in the 20th and 30th percentiles on the in-training exams. Conclusion. These results demonstrate that all the written tools of assessment are helpful in defining a residents ability to pass written boards, though they do not directly predict performance, though USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores along with OITE scores are helpful in gauging an orthopaedic residents performance on written boards. Lower USMLE score along with consistently low OITE scores likely define a resident at risk of failing their written boards. Close monitoring of the annual OITE scores is recommended and may be useful to identify struggling residents. Future work involving multiple institutions is warranted and would ensure applicability of our findings to other orthopedic residency programs

Aims. To establish whether there was a consensus among the members of the Hip Society (HS) on the role of direct anterior approach (DAA) contemporary primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. An online survey was sent to all 112 active and senior members of the HS, to which 71 members responded. The survey was constructed to determine whether they believed that evidence-based medicine proves, in modern clinical practice, that the DAA has significant benefits compared to risks when contrasted with other approaches. In addition, they were asked if they currently used the DAA. Results. While only 16.9% (12/71) of respondents had been trained in a generic anterior approach during residency, 49.3% (35/71) had used the DAA in their clinical practice in the past or were using it at the present time. Unexpectedly, 42.9% (15/35) of respondents who had used the DAA in the past had abandoned it by the time of this survey. Only 22.5% (16/71) of all respondents believed that evidence-based medicine proves that the DAA has significant benefits compared to risks in contrast to other approaches. Conclusion. A comprehensive literature review found only three prospective randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing the DAA with another approach with greater than one-year follow-up. Two showed minor benefits within the early postoperative period only, and one of those showed poorer mid-term results. Most of the published comparison studies with short follow-up show longer surgical times and greater blood loss for the DAA, and many three-month comparison studies show higher complication rates for the DAA using a proprietary traction table. The complications included problems with wound healing, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, femoral component loosening, and femoral fractures. Because of the lack of evidence from RCTs showing superiority of the DAA over other approaches and reports of higher complications, the opinion of a large majority (77.5%; 55/71) of HS surgeons was that the DAA lacks sufficient evidence to warrant its use. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):57–61

Ten RCTs published between 2000 and 2013 support treating distal radius buckle fractures and other low-risk distal radius fractures with a removable splint and with no orthopaedic follow-up. Application of this evidence has been shown to be variable and suboptimal resulting in unnecessary costs to a strained healthcare system. The Canadian evidence on this topic has been generated by subspecialist physicians working in paediatric hospitals. It is unclear what factors affect the dissemination of this information. We investigated the association of hospital type and physician type with the application of best-evidence treatment for low-risk distal radius fractures in children with the goal of improving our understanding of evidence diffusion in Ontario for this common injury. We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked health care administrative data. We identified all children aged 2–14 treated in Ontario emergency departments from 2003–2015 with distal radius fractures with no reduction and no operation within a six week period. We excluded refractures and children with comorbidities. We evaluated the followup received – orthopaedic, general practitioner, or none. We examined the data for trends over time. Multivariable log binomial regression was used to quantify associations between hospital and physician type and best-evidence treatment. We adjusted for patient-related variables including age, sex, rural or urban location, and socioeconomic status. 70,801 fractures were analyzed. Best-evidence treatment was more likely to occur in a small (RR 1.86, 95%CI 1.72–2.01), paediatric (RR 1.16, 95%CI 1.07–1.26), or community (RR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20) hospital compared with treatment in a teaching hospital. Best-evidence treatment was more likely if initial management was by a paediatrician with additional emergency medicine training (RR 1.73, 95%CI 1.56–1.92) or paediatrician (RR 1.22, 95%CI 1.11–1.34). Paediatric and teaching hospitals have improved their use of best-evidence over time while other hospital types have stagnated or deteriorated. Paediatricians, paediatricians with additional emergency medicine training, and emergency medicine residency trained physicians have improved their use of best-evidence over time, while other physician types have stagnated or deteriorated. Overall, only 20% of patients received best-evidence treatment and 70% had orthopaedic follow-up. Significant over-utilization of resources for low-risk distal radius fractures continues decades after the first randomized trials showed it to be unnecessary. Physician type and hospital rurality are most strongly associated with best-evidence treatment. Physician types involved in generating, presenting, and publishing best-evidence for this fracture type are successfully implementing it, while others have failed to change their practices. Rural hospitals are excellent resource stewards by necessity, but are deteriorating over time. Our results strongly indicate the need for targeted implementation strategies to explicitly apply clinical evidence in clinical practice Canada-wide, with the goal of providing more cost-effective care for common children's fractures

Purpose: Uncertainty around back pain management results in large volumes of patients with back related complaints being referred to orthopaedic surgeons for direction. The vast majority of these referrals are non surgical leading to unacceptable wait times (T1) across Canada. This reservoir delays not only those who are disabled with problems requiring a surgical remedy but also those who only require direction to appropriate conservative care. Physiotherapists with advanced training in orthopaedics possess skills in musculoskeletal interview, exam and Orthopaedic residents on the other hand must acquire spine specific skills in interview and exam, interpretation of radiographic exams, surgical decision making as well as surgical technique in a 2–3 month residency rotation. Our question was „Can an Experienced Physiotherapist Become Proficient in Triaging for Surgically Appropriate Patients After a 2–3 month „Residency „. Method: Following a 3 month clinical residency an experienced physiotherapist and a spine surgeon independently interviewed, physically examined and reviewed diagnostic imaging of 31 patients. It was then independently concluded whether the patients were candidates for surgical treatment, required conservative management or whether further investigations were necessary to make the final determination. The level of agreement was calculated using Chance Corrected Agreement or Kappa values. Operational definitions were reviewed and a second group of 29 patients were assessed. Results: The initial Kappa score was .68 (considered good clinical agreement) and the final Kappa score was 0.84 (considered virtually interchangeable). Conclusion: A 3 month period can prepare an experienced orthopaedic physiotherapist to triage a waiting list for surgical candidates. The therapist can add value through being better prepared to direct conservative options. Expediting triage will facilitate the right person getting to the right intervention within a reasonable time frame. Addressing the backlog of referrals will also help identify the magnitude of surgical need

Introduction. The direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is now widely used. A recent unpublished survey of 1000 AAHKS members found that over half currently used a DAA technique and that most users felt the DAA was financially beneficial to their practice. Conversely, non-DAA users felt that their surgical volume had decreased. An online survey of Hip Society (HS) members was done to determine member's preference for a surgical approach and opinions regarding the DAA. Methods. 71 of 112 active and senior HS members (63%) responded to this 20-question survey. Results. The survey found that only 17% of respondents had trained in an anterior approach during residency, but that half (35 respondents) had used this approach in practice at one time. Subsequently, 43% of those 35 DAA users had abandoned it. The DAA learning curve was estimated at over 50 cases by 47% of respondents. Only 23% of 71 respondents answered “yes” to the statement “Do you believe that evidence-based medicine proves significant benefits over risks of the DAA THA versus other approaches?” Financial factors were common reasons for beginning to use the technique including accommodating patient requests and preventing the loss of patients to other DAA surgeons. Conclusion. 15 years after the emergence of “minimally invasive” DAA THA, a literature review finds that only one small (44 patient) clinical trial with >1-year follow-up showed small early functional benefits but with longer average surgical times and higher blood loss. If the DAA procedure has minimal benefits, is more difficult to perform with a high complication rate (LFCN injury, femoral fracture and loosening) in the hands of non-specialists and has a long learning curve (that caused a significant percentage of HS DAA users to abandon it), then financial factors must be the main reasons for its popularity. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Trainees experience significant stress in the operating room, with potentially adverse effects on performance and learning. Psychological resilience explains why some individuals excel despite significant stress, meeting challenges with optimism and flexibility. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between trainee resilience, intraoperative stress, and desire to leave residency training. Qualitative focus groups and a literature review were used to develop a new instrument to assess Surgical TRainee Experiences of StresS in the Operating Room (STRESSOR). STRESSOR was used in a survey of Canadian surgical residents to assess trainee stress. Resiliency was measured using the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale (CD-RISC-10). The survey was distributed nationally and 171 responses were collected for a 36% response rate. The greatest sources of intraoperative stress were time pressure, attending temperament, and being interrupted by a pager. The STRESSOR instrument had strong reliability (Cronbach's α=0.92) and demonstrated good construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis. The mean CD-RISC-10 score was 28.8, which is similar to that of Canadian medical students. Resilience was protective against intraoperative stress (R2=0.16, p<0.001). Residents with higher stress or lower resilience were more likely to have seriously considered leaving their training program (Spearman's rho = 0.42, p<0.001). Screening for resilience may assist in selecting trainees who are better able to manage stress during surgery and reduce resident attrition. Resiliency training may help learners manage the high stress environment of the operating room, potentially improving surgical performance and learning in the next generation of surgeons