Introduction. To introduce a new classification method and analyze related risk factor about lateral wall perforation associated with lower cervical pedicle screw and free-hand insertion technique. Methods. A Retrospective study was made to analyze 214 patients (1024 screws) with various cervical spine disorders, involved in pedicle screw instrumentation at C3-7 from July 2004 to July 2009. Researchers assessed the position of the screws in the pedicle by carefully probing intraoperatively and studying postoperative thin-slice computed tomography scan. Perforation of lateral wall was classified into two phases. Phase I refers to the burst of the pedicle by screw, which means that the length of screw threads penetrating the external cortex of pedicles on CT scan is 2 mm, whereas in Phase, the length is >2 mm. The Penetrated screws and related factors were analyzed though Backward Stepwise (Wald) Logistic regression. Results. During the follow-up, 2 screws were reported to be broken and 1 screw loosened. Of the screws inserted, total of 129 screws 12.60% have shown violated of lateral pedicle walls, included 101 screws (9.86%) causative of Phase I and 28 screws (2.73%) of Phase II. Two variance were deduced in the regression analysis, which concerned to ratio variance between inner and lateral walls, PRC 0.695, OR value = 2.003and angle difference variance between screws implanted and measurements preoperativePRC −1.542, OR value = 0.214). Conclusions. Free-hand lower cervical pedicle screw insertion in this series was comparatively safety. Phase I Penetration was believed to be safe of vertebral artery and Phase II faced to higher risk of artery damage. The main risk factor of lateral wall perforation was the ratio variance between inner and lateral wall, while the main protection factor was the angle difference variance between screws implanted and CT measurements

Aims. Pin-site infection remains a significant problem for patients treated by external fixation. A randomized trial was undertaken to compare the weekly use of alcoholic chlorhexidine (CHX) for pin-site care with an emollient skin preparation in patients with a tibial fracture treated with a circular frame. Methods. Patients were randomized to use either 0.5% CHX or Dermol (DML) 500 emollient pin-site care. A skin biopsy was taken from the tibia during surgery to measure the dermal and epidermal thickness and capillary, macrophage, and T-cell counts per high-powered field. The pH and hydration of the skin were measured preoperatively, at follow-up, and if pin-site infection occurred. Pin-site infection was defined using a validated clinical system. Results. Out of 116 patients who were enrolled in the study, 23 patients (40%) in the CHX group and 26 (44%) in the DML group had at least one bad or ugly pin-site infection. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.71). There was no significant relationship between pH or hydration of the skin and pin-site infection. The epidermal thickness was found to be significantly greater in patients who had a pin-site infection compared with those who did not (p = 0.01). Skin irritation requiring a change of treatment occurred in four patients (7%) using CHX, and none using DML. Conclusion. We found no significant difference in the incidence of pin-site infection between the CHX and DML treatment groups. Dermol appeared to offer a small but significant advantage in terms of tolerability. We did not find a significant association between patient or treatment related factors and pin-site infection. It is therefore difficult to make specific recommendations based upon these results. The use of either cleaning agent appears to be appropriate. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):279–285

Aims

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow trauma and can cause severe upper limb disability. Although multiple prognostic factors have been reported to be associated with the development of post-traumatic HO, no model has yet been able to combine these predictors more succinctly to convey prognostic information and medical measures to patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic factors leading to the formation of HO after surgery for elbow trauma, and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of HO formation in such particular injuries.

INTRODUCTION. Hip wear simulator test results could be affected by many non-bearing related factors such as fixation surface conditions, equipment calibration and component set-up. In an effort to improve the accuracy, reliability and repeatability of hip simulator test, a quality management system has been established at the IDC hip tribology laboratory, which has been accredited by UKAS (United Kingdom Accreditation Service) in accordance with the recognised international standard ISO17025. This study demonstrates that under well-controlled laboratory and testing conditions, satisfactory repeatability can be achieved during hip simulator studies. METHODS. Between 2008 to 2010, ten 50 mm Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) devices were tested by the IDC tribology laboratory using two ProSim hip wear simulators in three different tests (T1, T2 and T3). All tests were performed following the same IDC testing protocols at 1 Hz frequency for 5 million cycles (Mc) or until after a steady state was reached. Paul type stance phase loadings with a maximum load of 3 kN and a swing phase load of 0.3 kN was used. The flexion and extension angles were 30 and 15 degree. The internal/external rotation angel was ±10 degree. Wear was measured gravimetrically using an analytical balance (Mettler, Toledo xp504) with an accuracy of 0.1 mg. RESULTS. Results showed that wear of all the components tested followed the typical biphasic trend of wear for MoM hip joint device with a high “running-in” wear during the initial stage followed by a low “steady state” wear in the later stage. The data points scattered in a narrow range following the same trend line throughout the tests. The maximum difference in accumulated volume loss between any two tests at any given cycle was less in 0.2 mm3. The average running-in wear rates (±SD) were 0.72 ±0.17, 0.86 ±0.01 and 0.71 ±0.19 mm3/Mc respectively for test T1, T2 and T3. The running-in wear rates for test T1 and T3 were identical, whilst that for T2 was slightly higher. In spite of this, the wear rates for the bearings tested in T2 were still in the same range as those tested in T1 and T3 during the running-in stage. The steady state (>1.0Mc) wear rate of three different tests was practically the same, being 0.18 ±0.02, 0.18 ±0.06 and 0.16 ±0.04 mm3/Mc respectively for test T1, T2 and T3. Overall, the mean running-in wear rate was 0.74 ±0.16 mm3/Mc, and the steady state wear rate was 0.17 ±0.04 mm3/Mc for the 10 BHR devices tested in three different studies. DISCUSSIONS. This study shows that satisfactory repeatability can be achieved during hip simulator test of metal on metal hip joint devices. Well controlled test procedures including calibration of testing and measurement equipment, correct and consistence test set-up and attention to non-bearing surfaces are some of the most important prerequisites for reliable and accurate hip simulator test results

Aims

Echocardiography is commonly used in hip fracture patients to evaluate perioperative cardiac risk. However, echocardiography that delays surgical repair may be harmful. The objective of this study was to compare surgical wait times, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare costs for similar hip fracture patients evaluated with and without preoperative echocardiograms.