Background. Forefoot surgery is often performed under regional anaesthesia (ankle block) in awake patients, using tourniquet or esmarch bandage to obtain bloodless field. The purpose of this study was to examine the value and need for local tourniquet pain control using local subcutaneous analgesic mixture in patients undergoing forefoot surgery under regional anaesthesia. We prospectively randomized 56 patients who underwent forefoot surgery under ankle block to receive subcutaneous local anaesthetic mixture under the tourniquet. We checked for local tourniquet pain score (VAS 0–100) and skin condition during and after the procedure. Results. Tourniquet was quite tolerable in both groups, with an average VAS score of 7–21. No difference was observed between groups throughout most of the procedure. No correlation between VAS scores and procedure length or patient's age or gender. Conclusion. Ankle tourniquet is well tolerated by patients without need for local anaesthetics

Method. A questionnaire was given to delegates at the British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS) annual scientific meeting 3rd–5th November 2010. A total of 75 questionnaires were included within the analysis. The questionnaire asked delegates for their most commonly performed procedure for a variety of common foot and ankle conditions. Results. Which procedure do you most commonly perform?. Hallux valgus mild;. Chevron 60.0%. Scarf 28.0%. Hallux Valgus Moderate;. Scarf 85.3%. Chevron 12.0%. Hallux Valgus Severe;. Scarf 65.3%. Basal Osteotomy 29.3%. 1st MTPJ OA Fusion;. crossed screws 54.7%. Plate 26.7%. Lesser toe Metatarsalgia;. Weil 48.6%. BRT 22.8%. Hammer second toe;. PIPJ Fusion 62.7%. Oxford Procedure 15%. Tib Post stage 1;. Debridement 60.0%. Conservative 24.0%. Tib Post stage 2;. FDL Transfer 76.0%. Calc. osteotomy 78.7%. Achilles tendon rupture. Open Repair 61.5%. Percutaneous 13.8%. In delegates' normal practice they would fuse an osteoarthritic ankle 90% and perform a Total Ankle replacement 10% of the time. The method of fusion is split 50/50 between arthroscopic and open. Regarding the anaesthetic used for forefoot surgery most are using GA + Regional Block (mean 60%) only occasionally using regional anaesthesia alone (mean 8%). Only 12.3% of delegates have tried minimally invasive [forefoot] surgery (MIS), 17.3% of delegates think they will do more MIS in the future. The practice of British orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons is broadly in line with an evidence-based approach. Knowledge of current practice may help trainees make sense of the myriad foot and ankle operations described in the literature

Regional anaesthetic for foot surgery has been discussed as a method of post operative analgesia. Ankle block as the sole anaesthetic for foot surgery has not been extensively reviewed in the literature. Aim. To describe our experience of forefoot surgery under ankle block. Methods. 71 consecutive forefoot procedures (65 patients) were carried out under ankle block. A mixture of 10ml 2% Lidocaine with 10ml 0.5 % Bupivacine was administered to the superficial peroneal, deep peroneal, sural and saphenous nerves. Ankle tourniquet was employed in all procedures. Patients were contacted post operatively and completed a standardised questionnaire including an incremented pain assessment ranging from 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 severe pain). Results. 61 female and 4 male patients were contacted (age range 33-67y). Procedures included 48 first metatarsal osteotomies, 15 cheilectomies, 2 first MTP joint replacements, and 6 fusions. 17 patients (26 %) reported some discomfort during the block procedure (average pain score 1.2). No patients reported any pain during their operation(s). 14 patients (22%) required supplementation of the block. Average pain score at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours following surgery were 0.66, 2.9, 2.4 and 1.3 respectively. All patients were discharged home and walking on the same day. None complained of nausea or required parentral analgesia. There were no readmissions. Each patient confirmed they would have surgery under regional block rather than general anaesthesia and would recommend this technique to family and friends. Discussion. There are many advantages in being able to perform these small procedures under regional anaesthesia. Our initial observational study suggests forefoot surgery under ankle block alone may be safe and effective. Anaesthesia obtained permits the majority of forefoot procedures and provides lasting post-operative analgesia. Combined with intra-operative sedation, use of ankle tourniquet and same day discharge it has very high patient acceptance and satisfaction

Aims

The primary objective was to determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery during the global pandemic. Secondary objectives were to determine if there was a change in infection and complication profile with changes introduced in practice.

Aims

The aim of this study was to report a single surgeon series of consecutive patients with moderate hallux valgus managed with a percutaneous extra-articular reverse-L chevron (PERC) osteotomy.

There are few reports of the surgical treatment for late stage Freiburg’s disease with flattening of the metatarsal head and osteoarthritis. We describe the results of the surgical treatment of ten consecutive patients with advanced stage Freiburg’s disease (Smillie’s stage V), using a technique that has not been published previously.