Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 16S/28S rRNA sequencing with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and synovial fluid analysis in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Patients and Methods. Between September 2015 and August 2016, 214 consecutive patients were enrolled. In the study population, there were 25 patients with a PJI and 189 controls. Of the PJI patients, 14 (56%) were women, and the mean age at the time of diagnosis was 65 years (38 to 83). The ESR and CRP levels were measured, and synovial fluid specimens were collected prospectively. Synovial fluid was subjected to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)/sequence analysis targeting the 16S/28S rRNA, and to conventional culture. Laboratory personnel who were blind to the clinical information performed all tests. The diagnosis of PJI was based on the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Results. A total of 25 patients had a confirmed PJI. In 20 cases of monomicrobial PJI, the PCR products could be perfectly matched with the 16S/28S rRNA genes specific for different species of bacteria provided by sequence analysis. Of the five polymicrobial cases of PJI, 16S/28S rRNA PCR sequence analysis failed to identify the concordant bacteria species. In the 189 control patients, there was one false-positive RT-PCR result. The sensitivity and specificity of the molecular diagnosis method were 100% (95% confidence interval (CI) 85.7 to 100) and 99.5% (95% CI 97.1 to 99.9), respectively, whereas the positive and negative predictive values of PCR were 96.1% (95% CI 79.6 to 99.9) and 100% (95% CI 98.1 to 100), respectively. The PCR results were significantly better than serological diagnostic methods (p = 0.004 and p = 0.010 for ESR and CRP, respectively), the synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count (p = 0.036), and percentage of polymorphonuclear cells (PMN%) (p = 0.014). Conclusion. Stepwise RT-PCR and sequence analysis of the 16S/28S rRNA carried out under stringent laboratory conditions achieved highly sensitive and specific results for the differentiation between aseptic and septic joints undergoing arthroplasty. Sequence analysis successfully identified bacterial strains in monomicrobial infections but failed to identify molecular targets in polymicrobial infections. Further
Histology is widely used for diagnosis of persistent infection during reimplantation in two-stage revision hip and knee arthroplasty, although data on its utility remain scarce. Therefore, this study aims to assess the predictive value of permanent sections at reimplantation in relation to reinfection risk, and to compare results of permanent and frozen sections. We retrospectively collected data from 226 patients (90 hips, 136 knees) with periprosthetic joint infection who underwent two-stage revision between August 2011 and September 2021, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Histology was assessed via the SLIM classification. First, we analyzed whether patients with positive permanent sections at reimplantation had higher reinfection rates than patients with negative histology. Further, we compared permanent and frozen section results, and assessed the influence of anatomical regions (knee versus hip), low- versus high-grade infections, as well as first revision versus multiple prior revisions on the histological result at reimplantation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), chi-squared tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated.Aims
Methods
Prolonged waits for hip and knee arthroplasty have raised questions about the equity of current approaches to waiting list prioritization for those awaiting surgery. We therefore set out to understand key stakeholder (patient and surgeon) preferences for the prioritization of patients awaiting such surgery, in order to guide future waiting list redesign. A combined qualitative/quantitative approach was used. This comprised a Delphi study to first inform which factors patients and surgeons designate as important for prioritization of patients on hip and knee arthroplasty waiting lists, followed by a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to determine how the factors should be weighed against each other. Coefficient values for each included DCE attribute were used to construct a ‘priority score’ (weighted benefit score) that could be used to rank individual patients waiting for surgery based on their respective characteristics.Aims
Methods
Data of high quality are critical for the meaningful interpretation of registry information. The National Joint Registry (NJR) was established in 2002 as the result of an unexpectedly high failure rate of a cemented total hip arthroplasty. The NJR began data collection in 2003. In this study we report on the outcomes following the establishment of a formal data quality (DQ) audit process within the NJR, within which each patient episode entry is validated against the hospital unit’s Patient Administration System and vice-versa. This process enables bidirectional validation of every NJR entry and retrospective correction of any errors in the dataset. In 2014/15 baseline average compliance was 92.6% and this increased year-on-year with repeated audit cycles to 96.0% in 2018/19, with 76.4% of units achieving > 95% compliance. Following the closure of the audit cycle, an overall compliance rate of 97.9% was achieved for the 2018/19 period. An automated system was initiated in 2018 to reduce administrative burden and to integrate the DQ process into standard workflows. Our processes and quality improvement results demonstrate that DQ may be implemented successfully at national level, while minimizing the burden on hospitals. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to perform a cost–utility
analysis of total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR). Arthritis is
a disabling condition that leads to long-term deterioration in quality
of life. Total joint replacement, despite being one of the greatest
advances in medicine of the modern era, has recently come under
scrutiny. The National Health Service (NHS) has competing demands,
and resource allocation is challenging in times of economic restraint. Patients
who underwent THR (n = 348) or TKR (n = 323) between January and
July 2010 in one Scottish region were entered into a prospective
arthroplasty database. A health–utility score was derived from the
EuroQol (EQ-5D) score pre-operatively and at one year, and was combined
with individual life expectancy to derive the quality-adjusted life years
(QALYs) gained. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare
QALYs gained between procedures, while controlling for baseline
differences. The number of QALYs gained was higher after THR than
after TKR (6.5 Cite this article:
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the relative efficacy of regional and general anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. A comprehensive search for relevant studies was performed in PubMed (1966 to April 2008), EMBASE (1969 to April 2008) and the Cochrane Library. Only randomised studies comparing regional and general anaesthesia for total hip or knee replacement were included. We identified 21 independent, randomised clinical trials. A random-effects model was used to calculate all effect sizes. Pooled results from these trials showed that regional anaesthesia reduces the operating time (odds ratio (OR) −0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.33 to −0.05), the need for transfusion (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.94) and the incidence of thromboembolic disease (deep-vein thrombosis OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84; pulmonary embolism OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.80). Regional anaesthesia therefore seems to improve the outcome of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement.
