Introduction. Alternative bearings – metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have been introduced in the last decade with the aim to diminish wear and, subsequently, aseptic loosening and osteolysis. These bearings were aimed for younger, more active patients. Clinical results which would compare the performance of various alternative and traditional bearings are scarce. Methods. Between January 2000 and December 2002, we performed 487 total hip replacements in 474 patients using three types of bearings: metal-on-metal (MOM), metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC). All patients received the same type of acetabular cup (Bicon-Plus, Plus Orthopedics) and same type of femoral component (SL-Plus, Plus Orthopedics). We used the hospital computer database for the evaluation of patient data and data on revision operations. Results. At a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (range, 6.8 to 9.9 years), eighteen hips were revised. Seventeen revisions were aseptic, and one was septic. The percentage of revision in the whole group was 3.7%. The percentage of revisions for individual groups of bearings varied and ranged from 1.5% in the MOP group, 4.1% in the COC group to 8.7% in the MOM group. Reasons for revisions were analyzed in details. We noticed that the percentage of aseptic loosening differed among the groups, with the MOM group having the highest percentage of revisions due to aseptic loosening. Conclusions. The results obtained for this large series of THRs with the same type of acetabular and femoral components, and differing only in the type of bearing, indicate that the combination of material of acetabular cup and femoral head affect the performance of the hip prosthesis

Current evidence suggests that we should be moving away from Thompson's hemiarthroplasties for patients with intracapsular hip fractures. Furthermore, the use of cement when inserting these prostheses is controversial. We aim to show the Inverness experience. We performed a retrospective review of all NHS Highland patients who underwent a hemiarthroplasty for an intracapsular neck of femur fracture over the last 15 years. Demographics and the use of cement were documented. Further analysis of this group was performed to identify any of these patients who required revision. Patients requiring revision had their case-notes reviewed to identify the cause for further surgery. 2221 patients from the Highland area had a hemiarthroplasty for an intracapsular neck of femur fracture since 1996. 1708 female (77%) and 513 male (23%). Ages ranged from 28 years to 104 years (mean 80). 2180 of this group had their operations in Raigmore with the remaining 41 at various centres throughout Scotland. 623 (28%)had a cemented hemiarthroplasty, with the remaining 1578 (72%) having an uncemented Thompson's hemiarthroplasty. The revision rate for the cemented group was 2% (13 of 623 patients). In the uncemented group it was 0.4% (6 of 1578). Reasons from revision included dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, infection and pain. Current evidence from some joint registers regarding the use of Thompson's hemiarthroplasty in the elderly is discouraging. The use of bone cement in this group with multiple co-morbidities is not without it's risks. Our data suggests that uncemented Thompson's hemiarthroplasties in low demand elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities can yield excellent results with less risk to the patients

Aims

Despite multiple trials and case series on hip hemiarthroplasty designs, guidance is still lacking on which implant to use. One particularly deficient area is long-term outcomes. We present over 1,000 consecutive cemented Thompson’s hemiarthroplasties over a ten-year period, recording all accessible patient and implant outcomes.