Aim. This study aims to describe our department experience with single stage revision (SSR) for chronic prosthetic-joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 2005 and 2014 and to analyze success rates and morbidity results of patients submitted to SSR for infected THA according to pathogen. Method. We retrospectively reviewed our 10 years of results (2005–2014) of patients submitted to SSR of the hip combined with IV and oral antibiotic therapy for treatment of chronic PJI (at least 4 weeks of symptoms), with a minimum follow-up of four years (n=26). Patients were characterized for demographic data, comorbidities, identified germ and antibiotic therapy applied (empiric and/or targeted). Outcomes analyzed were re-intervention rate (infection-related or aseptic), success rate (clinical and laboratory assessment), length of stay, morbidity and mortality outcomes. Results. In this period, 26 single-stage revisions for chronic PJI of the hip were performed. Patients average age was 72 years (range 44–82). Ten patients were women. The average time of follow up was 69 months (range 4 to 12 years). The most commonly isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (30%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (18%) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (15%). It wasn't possible to identify the germ in 19% of the patients and other 23% were polymicrobial. Targeted antibiotic therapy was administered to 73% of patients and the most used targeted antibiotics were Vancomycin (53%), Linezolid (32%) and Rifampicin (21%). Mean length of stay was 25 days. In the follow-up period, 9 patients (35%) required a re-intervention for infection relapse. Two patients (8%) needed surgery because of persistent instability. During the follow-up period, the infection-free survival was 65% (33% for MRSA; 82% for coagulase-negative Staphylococci) and the surgery-free survival was 62%. Six patients (23%) died during the follow-up, all due to other medical conditions not related to hip infection. Conclusions. Our experience suggests that SSR is associated with good outcomes and low re-intervention rate, except in the case of infection due to MRSA. In this last group, the results were significantly poorer, what leads to suggest that a two-stage revision may be a better option. The potential advantages of a SSR include good rates of infection eradication, a decrease in surgical morbidity and mortality as well as a decrease in healthcare and global economic costs. As such, a one-stage aggressive surgical attitude in addition to targeted antibiotherapy seems to be a suitable solution in selected patients

The recruitment drive, investment and collaboration within Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) sites providing specialist lower limb arthroplasty and trauma service has evolved over last few years with aims to improve patient care and reduce reliance on tertiary referral centres. Through our service-evaluation project, we reviewed the results of treatment provided for periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) presenting to BCUHB sites over last 4 years. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive PPFFs admitted at three BCUHB sites from January’20 to June’23 with mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 13.2 (8–49) months [n=161; Mean age: 82.2 ± 8.5 (59–101) years, Females:107]. Over the review period we noted a 23% increase in service demand for care of PPFFs. Majority were managed surgically [132/161] [38 revision arthroplasties; 94 ORIFs] at BCUHB sites and two patients were referred to tertiary centre. Average time to surgery was 3.5 days. 90% of the PPFFs were managed successfully with 10% (16/159) having orthopaedic complications needing further intervention. 6.3 (10/159) had medical complications and did not need orthopaedic re-intervention. In our series, 12-month re-operation rate was 6.1% (8/132) and 1-month, 3-month and 1-year mortality rate was 6.3%, 11.3% and 21.4% respectively. These results are comparable to the published results of PPFF management at tertiary centres. Potential cost savings compared to transfer to tertiary centre for PPFF management was £2.31 million. Thus, it is possible to successfully provide adequate care for PPFFs at DGHs and efforts should be made to appropriately equip and adequately staff DGHs, to provide service for local PPFF care

Aim. To assess the spread of foot infection and its impact on the outcomes of major amputations of lower extremities in diabetic patients. Method. In a multicentre retrospective and prospective cohort study, we included adult diabetic patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent a major amputation of a lower limb in 5 hospitals between 2000 and 2009, 2012 and 2014. A total of 51 patients were included (of which 27 (52.94%) were men and 24 (47.06%) were women) with the mean age of 65.51 years (SD=16.99). Concomitant section's osseous slice biopsy (BA) and percutaneous bone biopsy of the distal site (BD) were performed during limb amputation. A new surgical set-up and new instruments were used to try and reduce the likelihood of cross-contamination during surgery. A positive culture was defined as the identification of at least 1 species of bacteria not belonging to the skin flora or at least 2 bacteria belonging to the skin flora (CoNS (coagulase negative staphylococci), Corynebacterium spp, Propionibacterium acnes) with the same antibiotic susceptibility profiles. A doubtful culture was defined as the identification of 1 species of bacteria belonging to the skin flora. The patients were followed-up for 1 year. Stump outcomes were assessed on the delay of complete healing, equipment, need of re-intervention and antibiotics. Results. In total, 51 BA were performed during major lower limb amputations (17 above the knee and 34 below the knee) in diabetic patients. Nine (17.65%) bacterial culture results from BA specimens were positive, 7 (13.73%) doubtful and 35 (68.63%) sterile. Before amputation, 23 patients (45.1%) had not received any antibiotics, including 16 (31.37%) with an antibiotic-free interval of 15 days or more. Microorganisms identified in BA were also cultured from the distal site in 33.33% of the cases. Positive BA was associated with prolonged complete stump healing, delay of complete healing (more than 6 months), re-amputation and the need of antibiotics. Conclusions. The microorganisms identified from BA play a role in stump healing in diabetic patients. BA is useful during major limb amputation due to infectious complications and antibiotic therapy could be corrected on the basis of the BA culture results

A prospective case control study analysed clinical and radiographic results in patients operated on with the periosteum autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) due to cartilage lesions on the femoral condyles over 10 years ago. 31 out of the 45 patients (3 failures, 9 non-responders, 2 others) were available for a continuous clinical (Lyshom/Tegner, IKDC, KOOS) and radiographic (Kellgren-Lawrence) follow-up at 0, 2, 5, and 10 years after the ACI procedure. The patients were sub-grouped into focal cartilage lesions (FL) – 10, osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) – 12, and cartilage lesions with simultaneous ACL reconstruction (ACL) – 9 subgroups. Lysholm, Tegner, and IKCD subjective scores revealed stable results over the period from 2 to 10 years with a significant improvement toward the pre-operative levels, but the patients had not reached their pre-injury Tegner levels. KOOS profile at 10 years was: Pain 78.6, Symptoms 78.1, Activities of daily living 82.5, Sports 56.9, and Quality of life 55.1. A 10-year IKDC knee examination classified operated knees as: 14 normal, 10 nearly normal, 5 abnormal and 2 severely abnormal. Kellgren-Lawrence scores of 2 and above were found in 10 patients (FL 5, OCD 0, and ACL 5). Seven patients in the group required an arthroscopic re-intervention (3 ACI related, 4 ACI unrelated). ACI provided safe and stable performance of operated knees over ten years. High incidence of knee osteoarthritis in FL and ACL subgroups, and low incidence in OCD patients indicate that best long performance is expected in localised low-impact cartilage lesions of young patients

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent nosocomial infections and depends on many factors: patient, microorganism, antiseptic solution use, antibiotic prophylaxis, hand scrubbing, wound care or hospital stay lenght. With the present paper the authors aim to study the SSI incidence after Total Knee (TKA) or Hip Arthroplasty (THA). All patients who underwent primary TKA or THA between January 2011 and May 2012 at our institution were considered. Patients who died within 1 year after the procedure of unrelated causes were excluded. Data collected included ASA classification, type of procedure, total and post-operative hospital stay, type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Data were collected from the consultation at 1 month and 1 year post-operative, clinical registries and telephone interview. SSI was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Suspected cases of SSI included antibiotic administration longer than 5 days or absence of antibiotic prescription, hospital stay after the procedure longer than 9 days, patient referring infection symptoms, and clinical data reports of infection or re-intervention. During the studied period and after exclusion of 5 cases, a total of 251 surgeries (104 TKA, 147 THA) were performed, of which 2 were urgent. For both TKA and THA, the average total hospital stay was 9 days (8 days post-operative). The majority were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 2 and 3. There were 4 SSI (1,60%), 2 TKA (1,92%) and 2 THA (1,36%), all of them after discharge. Their average total hospital stay was 10,5 days. Antibiotic prophylaxis was used in 93% of the patients (97,4% a cephalosporin), with an average length of 5,7 days. Recommended hospital stay after a TKA or THA is about 5 days. On HELICS-CIRURGIA 2006–2010 report it was 10 days, similar to ours. In infected patients, our total hospital stay was lower (10,5 vs 26). Recommended duration of antibiotic prophylaxis is 24h. On HELICS-CIRURGIA more than 50% had it for more than 24h, which also happened with us; our antibiotic coverage was similar. Comparing to HELICS-CIRURGIA, the predominance of ASA 2 and 3 classifications was similar, but the overall SSI rate was lower (1,6% vs 2,24%). We conclude we must reduce hospital stay and antibiotic duration and keep the surveillance of SSI after TKA or THA

Aims

Disorders of bone integrity carry a high global disease burden, frequently requiring intervention, but there is a paucity of methods capable of noninvasive real-time assessment. Here we show that miniaturized handheld near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) scans, operated via a smartphone, can assess structural human bone properties in under three seconds.

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) has shown to be a general stimulation for repair and 1 year results showed promising success percentages. To determine the effectiveness of PRP compared with corticosteroid injections in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis with a two-year follow-up. A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 2006 and January 2008. The trial was conducted in two Dutch teaching hospitals. 100 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis were randomly assigned to a leucocyte-enriched PRP group (n=51) or in the corticosteroid group (n=49). Randomization and allocation to the trial group were carried out by a central computer system. Patients received either a corticosteroid injection or an autologous platelet concentrate injection through a peppering needling technique. The primary analysis included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome (DASH) scores. The PRP group was more often successfully treated than the corticosteroid group (p<.0001). Success was defined as a reduction of 25% on VAS or DASH scores without a re-intervention after 2 years. When baseline VAS and DASH scores were compared with the scores at 2 years follow-up, both groups significantly improved across time (intention-to-treat principle). However, the DASH scores of the corticosteroid group returned back to baseline levels, while the PRP significantly improved (as-treated principle). There were no complications related to the use of PRP. Treatment of patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis with PRP reduces pain and increases function significantly, exceeding the effect of corticosteroid injection even after a follow-up of two years. Future decisions for application of PRP for lateral epicondylitis should be confirmed by further follow-up from this trial and should take into account possible costs and harms as well as benefits