Introduction. The Rapid Recovery Program (RRP) is a holistic perioperative accelerated discharge process that aims to improve efficiency and quality of care, improve patient education, standardise protocols and pathways and encourage early mobilisation & discharge. Aims. To compare length of stay (LOS) of primary knee arthroplasty patients before and after implementation of the RRP. Method. A retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted for knee arthroplasty was performed between 1. st. May 2007 and 28. th. February 2009. Data were obtained from hospital computer records. LOS of 2 groups compared: Pre-RRP implementation (Pre-RRP) and post-RRP implementation (post-RRP) and analysed using Welch's t- and chi square tests with significant at the p<0.05 level. (Definitions: Day of operation = ‘day 0’, first post-operative day = ‘day 1’, discharge = to the patient's own home). Results. 315 patients identified: 147 Pre-RRP (mean age 72 years; range 48-90) and 168 post-RRP (mean age 71 years; range 38-98). Mean LOS was reduced from 8.5 days (range 2-30) Pre-RRP to 5.9 days (range 2-38) post-RRP (p<0.01). Median LOS was reduced from 6 days (Pre-RRP) to 4 days (post-RRP) (p<0.01). Following RRP implementation, more patients were discharged on day 3 (Pre-RRP 9% vs Post RRP 30%; p<0.001) and less patients stayed more than 5 days (Pre-RRP 60% vs Post RRP 34%; p<0.001). Conclusion. The Rapid Recovery Programme significantly reduced LOS for knee arthroplasty patients, by a mean of 2.6 days. Significantly more patients were discharged by day 3 and significantly less stayed longer than 5 days. As well as cost savings, the patient experience was enhanced and the multidisciplinary team moral increased through centralised team work. Further evaluation of patient outcomes such as complication rates and patient satisfaction must be evaluated

Reduced length of stay (LOS) is logistically, economically and physiologically beneficial. Although a high proportion of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients are suitable for same day admission (SDA), removable barriers persist in many centres. This study aimed to determine factors limiting SDA and quantify the impact of implementing both SDA and a targeted enhanced recovery programme on length of stay. This single-centre retrospective cohort study collected data on elective TJA patients aged <60. Qualitative service reviews identified opportunities for optimisation. Improvements were implemented in 2017, including: obtaining consent at the pre-assessment clinic and robustly assessing suitability for SDA. A targeted rapid recovery program was implemented in June 2018. Data was collected prior to changes in 2017, and following changes in 2018. 106 of 108 screened patients were eligible for inclusion. There were no significant between-year differences in baseline health characteristics. Significantly greater proportions of 2018 patients were consented at their pre-assessment clinic (56% vs 8.9%, p<0.001) and assessed as suitable for SDA (94% vs 57.1%, p<0.001). Pre-operative LOS was significantly reduced in 2018 for both total hip replacements (median [IQR]: 0[0,0] vs 1[1,1], p<0.001) and total knee replacements (median [IQR]: 0[0,0] vs 0[0,1], p=0.002). The departmental mean LOS improved from 4.7 days to 3.7 days following SDA. This was further shortened to 3.2 days after introduction of the rapid recovery program. When a larger proportion of patients were deemed suitable for SDA, this correlated with reduction of LOS. The department now performs above national standards in both of these parameters

Introduction. Rapid recovery protocols (RRP) for joint replacements have been shown to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and minimize adverse outcomes in academic health systems. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if RRP can be safely implemented in a community health system for total knee arthroplasty. Methods. This study used a retrospective cohort of 3,608 patients who underwent primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014. 60 Patients were excluded because data or surgery could not be verified: BMI less than 18.5 or greater than 60 kg/m∘2 or if the surgical time was less than 45 seconds or greater than 180 minutes, and bilateral surgery. Data was obtained from querying the health system's inpatient database containing information for all joint replacements within the system. Patients were compared in two groups: those who received a RRP after surgery versus those who received traditional post-op care. The main outcome measure was all-cause 30-day readmissions. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds for all-cause 30-day readmission for patients who received RRP versus traditional care when controlling for age, gender, race, insurance status (Medicare versus no Medicare), obesity, diabetes, renal disease, tobacco use, and ASA score (less than 3 versus 3 or greater). Results. Patients receiving RRP were readmitted less than those who received traditional care (1.6% versus 3.6%, p<0.001) and had a lower mean length of stay (1.5 versus 3.3 days, p<0.001). When controlling for confounding factors, the odds of 30-day readmission for patients receiving RRP versus traditional care was 0.42 (95% CI 0.26–0.66, p<0.001). Conclusions. Rapid recovery protocols are an effective means of reducing 30-day readmissions and length of stay in patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty in a community setting

There are about 63,000 primary total knee replacements done annually in England and Wales. One of the biggest challenges of modern NHS is to ensure high quality care for the patients. A reduced length of stay in the hospital following primary total knee replacements could be the key factor in significant cost reduction. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of our rapid recovery programme following total knee replacements in terms of reducing length of stay, morbidity, complications, and readmissions rates. A prospective study of 252 patients who underwent primary total knee replacement for a period of one year between October 2006 to 2007 were included in the programme. There were 123 (49%) males and 129 (51%)females. The average age was 71 (range-53 to 86). The average BMI was 30 (range-22 to 46). The median ASA grade was 2 (range-1 to 4). There were no exclusion criteria. The programme included pre-operative education of patient and relatives, standardised operation protocols, infection control, pain management, continuous motivation by nursing staff and physiotherapists in the ward as well as intensive rehabilitation by a community based physiotherapy team in patient’s own environment. The patients were discharged when they had achieved the ward physiotherapy requirements. The average length of stay was 5.2 days. The complications encountered during inpatient stay was wound discharge(43), surgical site infection(1), DVT (1), pneumonia(1).12 patients needed post operative blood transfusion. The readmissions rate was 4%. Deep infection was noted in 4 patients, DVT(1), pulmonary embolism(1)and 3 patients had medical complications. In conclusion the rapid recovery programme following total knee replacement is an efficient method of speeding the recovery and reducing the length of hospital stay after primary knee replacements. It is useful for the modern NHS to achieve a balance between financial savings and a consistent, responsive and high-quality care for patients

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to achieve early recovery for patients undergoing major surgery. ERAS allows for the incorporation of evidence based practices and incorporated a comprehensive assessment of the patient's journey through the surgical process from pre-operative screening through to post-operative care. The purpose of this study was to determine if optimisation of ERAS protocol with pre-operative screening and incorporating patient-specific factors into their post operative care would improve length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a Canadian community hospital setting.

The study collected clinical, demographic data and the physical status perioperative using the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification on 508 patients who underwent TJA between January and August 2015 and compared similar data from the same time frame in the previous calendar year prior to implementation of the pathway. Cohorts were analysed for length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, Pre-operative assessments (completed by anaesthesia, nursing and pharmacy), relevant labs, patient history (surgery, medical, social), and patient values were all considered when developing a specific patient plan for care post-operatively. A post-operative management tool was used to optimise pain control, post-operative nausea and vomiting, bowel management, diabetes blood glucose control, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, as well as monitoring parameters specific to patient medical history (e.g. respiratory, cardiac). While in hospital, physiotherapy and nursing were consulted by the pharmacist to assess whether patient's post op management needed to be altered to optimise mobilisation and recovery in hospital. The average patient's LOS and readmission rates in 30 days was analysed to assess the change after implementation of the post-operative management tool based on patient specific factors.

A total of 508 patients (mean age: 66 years), ASA classification was 3 or greater for 430 patients. The patients were assessed for LOS, readmission rates in 30 days. The mean LOS decreased from 3.6 to 3.3 days after optimisation of the ERAS protocol (student t test p=0.021). The 30-day readmission rate decreased from 2.9% to 1.4% post intervention (z test p=0.087) when compared to the same time period in the previous calendar year prior to protocol implementation. Overall, the cost savings to optimising the ERAS protocol for the hospital is substantial; with approximately $238 saved per patient.

Pre-operative screening and incorporating patient-specific factors into an individualised care plan to optimise the ERAS protocol for TJA reduced mean length of stay without a concomitant increase in readmission rates with significant cost saving.

Direct anterior approaches to the hip have gained popularity as a minimally invasive method when performing primary total hip replacement (THR). A retrospective review of a single institution joint registry was performed in order to compare patient outcomes after THR using the Anterior Supine Intermuscular (ASI) approach versus a more conventional direct lateral approach. An electronic database identified 1511 patients treated with 1690 primary THRs between January 2006 and December 2010. Our results represent a summary of findings from our previously published work. We found that patients that underwent an ASI approach had faster functional recovery and higher Harris hip scores in the early post-operative period when compared with patients who had a direct lateral approach The overall complication rate in our ASI group was relatively low (1.7%) compared with other series using the same approach. The most frequent complication was early periprosthetic femoral fractures (0.9%). The dislocation rate in our series was 0.4% and the prosthetic joint infection rate was 0.1%. We suggest that the ASI approach is acceptable and safe when performing THR and encourages early functional recovery of our patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96- B(11 Suppl A):32–5.

Recently, there is ongoing evidence regarding rapid recovery after orthopaedic surgery, with advantages for the patient relative to post operative pain, complications and functional recovery. The aim of this study is to present our experience in rapid recovery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the last 2 years. Retrospective study of 36 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, (age range 11 to 18 years) treated with spinal thoraco-lumbar posterior fusion with rapid post-operative recovery, compared with a similar group, treated with traditional protocol. We found a statistically significant difference in terms of length-of-stay, patient-controlled-analgesia and use of oppioid and post operative blood transfusions. There was no difference in post operative infection rate. Our experience shows better functional recovery, satisfactory controlled analgesia and reduction in costs of hospitalization with the use of ERAS protocols

The development and implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are of particular interest in elective orthopaedics due to clinical benefits and cost effectiveness. The Wycombe Arthroplasty Rapid-Recovery Pathway (WARP) was designed to streamline hip and knee joint arthroplasty to reduce time spent in hospital whilst optimising outcomes in an NHS District General Hospital. 966 patients were admitted to Wycombe General Hospital for primary elective joint replacement (60 UKR, 446 THR, 460 TKR) during the period 1st September 2020 to 31st September 2022. The WARP pathway was used for 357 (37%) patients (32 UKR, 155 THR, 170 TKR) and the standard “non-WARP” pathway was used for 609 (63%) patients (28 UKR 291 THR, 290 TKR). Data was collected on length of stay, time of mobilisation, number of physiotherapy sessions, and inpatient morbidity. Average length of stay following UKR was 0.75 days for WARP vs 2.96 for non-WARP patients, following THR was 2.17 days for WARP vs 4.17 for non-WARP patients, following TKR was 3.4 days for WARP vs 3.92 for non-WARP patients. Day-0 mobilisation after UKR was achieved in 97% of WARP vs 12% of non-WARP patients, after THR in 43% of WARP vs 14% of non-WARP patients, after TKR in 33% of WARP vs 11% of non-WARP patients. Same-day discharge was achieved in the WARP cohort in 63% of UKR, 10% of THR, 2% of TKR patients. There were no same-day discharges in the non-WARP cohort. Complications delaying mobilisation (pain, nausea/vomiting, dizziness/low BP) were identified in 8.4% of WARP vs 25% of non-WARP patients. Our cohort study shows that the initiation of WARP Rapid Recovery pathway for joint arthroplasty decreased the average length of stay after UKR by 2.21 days, after THR by 2 days, after TKR by 0.52 days. Time to first mobilisation was decreased significantly by increased rates of same-day mobilisation and reduced rates of postoperative anaesthetic-related complications

Introduction. Rapid recovery protocols after joint replacement have been implemented widely to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS). Minimally-invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS-TKA) may facilitate rapid recovery for patients. Increased complications and LOS have been documented in morbidly obese TKA patients. The objective of the current study was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of morbid obesity on MIS-TKA patients. Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review on patients that underwent MISTKA at a high volume orthopedic center between August 2012 and September 2015 (N = 4173). All surgeries were performed by one of six fellowship trained surgeons utilizing the same implant. MISTKA was performed utilizing a mid-vastus approach under tourniquet. All patients experienced rapid recovery protocols utilizing multi-modal pain management pathways, same day physical therapy, and absence of CPM machines. We evaluated patient age, gender, operative time, LOS, and 90-day readmission for morbidly obese (BMI≥40; n = 597), and non-morbidly obese (BMI<40; n = 3576) patients. Statistical analysis was conducted using Minitab 16 Statistical Software. Results. Morbidly obese patients had significantly higher mean LOS (1.74 days) compared to non-morbidly obese patients (1.62 days, p=0.035), and significantly higher 90-day readmissions (12.45% and 6.65% respectively, p= 0.001). In patients over the age of 65, with BMI under 40, females had significantly higher mean LOS than males (1.70 and 1.47 days respectively, p< 0.001). And in non-morbidly obese patients under the age of 65, females still experienced significantly higher mean LOS compared to males (1.35 and 1.11 days respectively, p<0.001). Conclusions. Our findings indicate that despite implementation of rapid recovery protocols, morbidly obese patients experienced significantly higher LOS than non-morbidly obese patients. Compared to their male counterparts, non-morbidly obese female patients had significantly higher LOS

The current study aims to find the role of Enhance Recovery Pathway (ERP) as a multidisciplinary approach aimed to expedite rapid recovery, reduce LOS, and minimize morbidity associated with Non Fusion Anterior Scoliosis Correction (NFASC) surgery. A retrospective analysis of 35 AIS patients who underwent NFASC with Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 curves with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up was done. Patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative analgesia, mobilization, length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction survey score with respect to information and care, and 90 days complications were collected. The cohort included 34 females and 1 male with a mean age of 15.2 years at the time of surgery. There were 16 Lenke 1 and 19 Lenke 5 in the study. Mean preoperative major thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb's angle were 52˚±7.6˚ and 51˚±4.5˚ respectively. Average blood loss and surgical time were 102 ±6.4 ml and 168 ± 10.2 mins respectively. Average time to commencing solid food was 6.5±1.5 hrs. Average time to mobilization following surgery was 15.5± 4.3 hrs. The average duration to the stopping of the epidural was 42.5±3.5 hrs. The average dose of opioid consumption intraoperatively was 600.5±100.5 mcg of fentanyl i.v. and 12.5±4.5 mg morphine i.v. Postoperatively opioids were administered via an epidural catheter at a dose of 2 mg of morphine every 24 hours up to 2 days and an infusion of 2mcg/hr of fentanyl along with 0.12-0.15% ropivacaine. The average duration to transition to oral analgesia was 55.5±8.5 hrs .20 patients had urinary catheter and the average time to removal of the catheter was 17.5±1.4 hrs. 25 patients had a chest tube and the average time to remove of chest tube was 25.5±3.2 hrs. The average length of hospital stay was 3.1±0.5 days. No patient had postoperative ileus or requirement of blood transfusion or any other complications. No correlation was found between LOS and initial cobb angle. The application of ERP in AIS patients undergoing NFASC results in reduced LOS and indirectly the cost, reduced post-operative opioid use, and overall improve patient satisfaction score

Over the past fifteen years, the average length of stay for total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gradually decreased from several days to overnight. The most logical and safest next step is outpatient arthroplasty. Through the era of so-called minimally invasive surgery, perhaps the most intriguing advancements are not related to the surgery itself, but instead the areas of rapid recovery techniques and peri-operative protocols. Rapid recovery techniques and peri-operative protocols have been refined to allow for same-day discharge with improved outcomes. In addition to Rapid Recovery techniques for the clinical care of the outpatient, one critical component to same-day total knee arthroplasty is the efficient performance and simplicity of the procedure itself. Simplified instrumentation and elimination of modularity can provide that efficiency and simplicity. All polyethylene tibial components have been mostly supplanted by modular metal-backed designs in recent years. However, mounting evidence suggests that survivorship of TKA with an all-poly tibia is superior to TKA with metal-backed, modular designs in all age groups except younger than 55, in which survival is equal to a modular design. Furthermore, this survival advantage was unaffected by obesity. Combining these excellent clinical results with the efficiency of a non-modular component can add to the efficiency and simplicity of the surgical technique. Therefore, in outpatient total knee arthroplasty, the all-poly tibia truly represents the less is more mentality

Aims. The volume of ambulatory total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures is increasing due to the emphasis on value-based care. The purpose of the study is to identify the causes for failed same-day discharge (SDD) and perioperative factors leading to failed SDD. Methods. This retrospective cohort study followed pre-selected patients for SDD THA from 1 August 2018 to 31 December 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing unilateral THA with appropriate social support, age 18 to 75 years, and BMI < 37 kg/m. 2. Patients with opioid dependence, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were collected from the electronic medical records. Possible risk factors for failed SDD were identified using multivariate logistic regression. Results. In all, 278 patients were identified with a mean age of 57.1 years (SD 8.1) and a mean BMI of 27.3 kg/m. 2. (SD 4.5). A total of 96 patients failed SDD, with the most common reasons being failure to clear physical therapy (26%), dizziness (22%), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (11%). Risk factors associated with failed SDD included smokers (odds ratio (OR) 6.24; p = 0.009), a maximum postoperative pain score > 8 (OR 4.76; p = 0.004), and procedures starting after 11 am (OR 2.28; p = 0.015). A higher postoperative tolerable pain goal (numerical rating scale 4 to 10) was found to be associated with successful SDD (OR 2.7; p = 0.001). Age, BMI, surgical approach, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and anaesthesia type were not associated with failed SDD. Conclusion. SDD is a safe and viable option for pre-selected patients interested in rapid recovery THA. The most common causes for failure to launch were failing to clear physical thereapy and patient symptomatology. Risk factors associated with failed SSD highlight the importance of preoperative counselling regarding smoking cessation and postoperative pain to set reasonable expectations. Future interventions should aim to improve patient postoperative mobilization, pain control, and decrease symptomatology. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):684–691

Aims. This paper aims to review the evidence for patient-related factors associated with less favourable outcomes following hip arthroscopy. Methods. Literature reporting on preoperative patient-related risk factors and outcomes following hip arthroscopy were systematically identified from a computer-assisted literature search of Pubmed (Medline), Embase, and Cochrane Library using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a scoping review. Results. Assessment of these texts yielded 101 final articles involving 90,315 hips for qualitative analysis. The most frequently reported risk factor related to a less favourable outcome after hip arthroscopy was older age and preoperative osteoarthritis of the hip. This was followed by female sex and patients who have low preoperative clinical scores, severe hip dysplasia, altered hip morphology (excess acetabular retroversion or excess femoral anteversion or retroversion), or a large cam deformity. Patients receiving workers’ compensation or with rheumatoid arthritis were also more likely to have a less favourable outcome after hip arthroscopy. There is evidence that obesity, smoking, drinking alcohol, and a history of mental illness may be associated with marginally less favourable outcomes after hip arthroscopy. Athletes (except for ice hockey players) enjoy a more rapid recovery after hip arthroscopy than non-athletes. Finally, patients who have a favourable response to local anaesthetic are more likely to have a favourable outcome after hip arthroscopy. Conclusion. Certain patient-related risk factors are associated with less favourable outcomes following hip arthroscopy. Understanding these risk factors will allow the appropriate surgical indications for hip arthroscopy to be further refined and help patients to comprehend their individual risk profile. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):822–831

Aims. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is the preferred treatment for anterior medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) owing to the rapid postoperative recovery. However, the risk factors for UKA failure remain controversial. Methods. The clinical data of Oxford mobile-bearing UKAs performed between 2011 and 2017 with a minimum follow-up of five years were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, surgical, and follow-up data were collected. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the risk factors that contribute to UKA failure. Kaplan-Meier survival was used to compare the effect of the prosthesis position on UKA survival. Results. A total of 407 patients who underwent UKA were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 61.8 years, and the mean follow-up period of the patients was 91.7 months. The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) preoperatively and at the last follow-up were 64.2 and 89.7, respectively (p = 0.001). Overall, 28 patients (6.9%) with UKA underwent revision due to prosthesis loosening (16 patients), dislocation (eight patients), and persistent pain (four patients). Cox proportional hazards model analysis identified malposition of the prostheses as a high-risk factor for UKA failure (p = 0.007). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the five-year survival rate of the group with malposition was 85.1%, which was significantly lower than that of the group with normal position (96.2%; p < 0.001). Conclusion. UKA constitutes an effective method for treating anteromedial knee OA, with an excellent five-year survival rate. Aseptic loosening caused by prosthesis malposition was identified as the main cause of UKA failure. Surgeons should pay close attention to prevent the potential occurrence of this problem. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):914–922

Over the past fifteen years, the average length of stay for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gradually decreased from several days to overnight. The most logical and safest next step is outpatient arthroplasty. Through the era of so-called minimally invasive surgery, perhaps the most intriguing advancements are not related to the surgery itself, but instead the areas of rapid recovery techniques and perioperative protocols. Rapid recovery techniques and perioperative protocols have been refined to allow for same-day discharge with improved outcomes. As mentioned, the single most important outcome from the minimally invasive movement has been the multi-modal approach to pain management of patients undergoing arthroplasty. Along with blood loss management, using tranexamic acid and hypotensive anesthetic techniques, this multi-modal program is the most important variable in reducing or avoiding side-effects. In any arthroplasty procedure, side-effects that need to be addressed include the negative effects of narcotics and blood loss. Anesthetic techniques, utilizing local nerve blocks, such as the adductor canal block and sciatic blocks for knee arthroplasty augment intraoperative anesthesia and provide postoperative pain relief and quicker mobilization. Additionally, pericapsular injection with a cocktail of local anesthetic helps significantly with pain relief and recovery reducing the amount of oral narcotic utilised in the early postoperative period. Many have utilised liposomal bupivacaine in these cocktails to successfully increase the period of pain relief. The use of multi-modal perioperative protocols can help avoid narcotics and helps avoid the side-effects of nausea. We also utilise an aggressive prophylactic antiemetic program with dexamethasone, ondansetron and a scopolamine patch. Patients without any significant cardiovascular history are given celecoxib preoperatively, which is continued for approximately two weeks postoperatively. Immediately postoperative, acetaminophen and additional dexamethasone are administered intravenously. The multi-modal protocols to address fear, risk, and side-effects will increase the eligibility for outpatient surgery and decrease the need for overnight hospitalization. By focusing on the patient and avoiding over-treatment, outpatient arthroplasty is quickly becoming the standard of care for total hip replacement in the same way other procedures transitioned from hospital in-patient surgeries to ambulatory procedures

Introduction. There is no consensus on the ideal pain management strategy following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study sought to identify immediate changes in the hospital course of patients undergoing primary THA following implementation of a rapid recovery anesthesia and multimodal management of pain (RAMP) protocol. For this study, rapid recovery anesthesia describes the use of preoperative non-narcotic medication in conjunction with neuraxial anesthesia techniques confined to the operating room only. The multimodal pain regimen consists of pre- and post-operative high dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs), gabapentin, and antiemetics with or without intraoperative periarticular anesthetic injection. We hypothesized that the implementation of a RAMP protocol would lead to decreased reported pain scores, decreased narcotic use, and a shorter hospital stay in patients undergoing primary THA. Methods. This retrospective cohort study performed at a multi-surgeon high-volume institution reviewed the records of 81 consecutive patients who underwent primary THA utilizing traditional anesthesia and an opioid-dependentpain management techniques between June to September 2014 compared to 78 patients who underwent primary THA after implementation of the RAMP protocol between November 2014 to February 2015. The length of stay (LOS), pain scores, narcotic use, and other clinical data were recorded for each study group. Equality of variance was confirmed prior to statistical analysis using t-test for equality of means. Results. There was no significant difference in the demographics, body mass index, ASA classification, or Charleson Comorbidity Index between the two cohorts. The average LOS was significantly shorter after implementation of the RAMP protocol with a mean of 2.10 ± 1.1 days versus 2.89 ± 1.0 days. Total amount of narcotics used was significantly less with the RAMP protocol (Fig 1). Patient reported pain scores were improved throughout the hospital stay with patients receiving the RAMP protocol reporting significantly less pain beginning the morning of POD 1 (Fig 2). No significant decrease in kidney function was seen following the use of high dose NSAIDs (p=0.18). Conclusions. The implementation of a RAMP protocol in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty has resulted in an immediate shorter length of stay with less narcotics use and improved reported pain scores. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating a statistically significantly shorter length of stay associated with a multimodal pain protocol. This study supports the benefits of broad implementation a RAMP protocol for total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND. As the climate of medicine continues to change, physicians and healthcare administrations seek to improve both the quality of the care we provide patients, as well as reducing the cost at which we provide that care. Delivering value based care is of the utmost importance. The Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) model is a multidisciplinary team approach to care that has shown success in reducing cost, length of stay, and admission to after care facilities. We sought to compare the results of total knee arthroplasty patients managed in the PSH rapid recovery model, to patients managed in a more traditional fashion. METHODS. We compared 451 patients managed in the PSH model from January 1 to December 31, 2015 to 453 patients managed in a more traditional fashion from January 1 to December 31, 2014. Preoperative. Once identified as potential candidates for total knee arthroplasty, a thorough triage process to optimize patients' medical co-morbidities, educate, and set expectations begins with an evaluation by the preoperative staff and mandatory attendance at a total joint class. Patients were sent for pre-operative physical therapy. Intraoperative. Neuraxial anesthesia was the anesthetic of choice, and perineural analgesia in the form of an adductor canal catheter and single shot posterior capsular injection were used to minimize pain and narcotic usage while maintaining the patient's ability to ambulate with physical therapy early in the post operative course. Additionally, multimodal analgesia was achieved with non- opioid analgesics (acetaminophen, NSAIDS, and gabapentanoids) and limited opioids. Aggressive fluid management and administration of steroids and ketamine also took place intraoperatively. Postoperatively. A multi-disciplinary team led by an orthopaedic surgeon and an anesthesiologist managed the patients throughout their stay. Multimodal analgesia was continued, and there was a rapid de-escalation of care. Physical therapy was initiated in PACU and continued at a minimum of BID thereafter. Patients were eligible for discharge on POD 1 after meeting physical therapy criteria. RESULTS. Average Length of Stay (LOS): 2.86 days in 2014 down to 2.1 in 2015 for an over 25% reduction. Discharge Mix: 71% to home independently or with home health in 2014 increased to 80% in 2015, with a reduction in discharges to a Skilled Nursing Facility from 24% to 16% respectively. 30 Day Readmissions: remained constant at 8 per year. Hospital Cost: $11,126.00 in 2014 vs $10,703.00 in 2015. CONCLUSION. As bundled payments began to change the financial climate of joint replacement surgery it is important to minimize costs and length of stay while continuing to improve care and outcomes. The PSH rapid recovery model delivers value based care that is well suited for this environment

Background. The Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) is a multi-disciplinary rapid recovery pathway aimed at transforming surgical care by delivering value and improving outcomes and patient satisfaction. Our institution developed a PSH pathway for total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients in March 2014. The Orthopaedic and Anesthesia Services co-managed the patients throughout the entire surgical process. Weekly meetings were held to discuss medical and social requirements for upcoming patients including disposition planning. All patients received day of surgery physical therapy, and anesthesia post-surgical pain control and medical co-management. We hypothesized that the PSH would provide enhanced care for THA patients. To our knowledge this is the first report on the PSH in a total joint population. Methods. We prospectively followed 180 THA patients from the PSH group (SH) and compared them to a group matched for age, body mass index (BMI), American society of anesthesiologist score (ASA), and Charleson comorbidity index score (CCI) that were not involved in the PSH (NSH). We used Wilcoxon, Chi square, and multivariate analysis to compare the groups for length of stay (LOS), total direct cost (TDC), complications, readmissions at 30 days, and discharge disposition location. Results. No significant difference was found between the two cohorts with respect to age, BMI, ASA, or CCI. The average age, BMI, ASA and CCI were 64, 30, 2.5, and 3.6. The average LOS of the SH cohort was 2.1 days which was significantly lower than the NSH cohort at 3.6 days (P<0.001). Significantly more patients were discharged to home in the SH group, 83% versus 71% in the NSH group (P=0.006) regardless of age (P=0.003) and ASA (P=0.048). No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to complications (P=0.346), TDC (P=0.883), or readmissions at 30 days (P=0.637). Discussion. The implementation of the PSH led to decreased length of stay and allowed more patients to be discharged to home, without an increase in complications or readmissions. We were able to accomplish this in patients with higher ASA and CCI scores which has not been the case in other rapid recovery programs. Effective care pathways require contribution and cooperation by multiple healthcare personnel throughout the phases of patient care. We feel that key factors contributing to the success of the PSH include post-surgical co-management by anesthesia, early physical therapy, and weekly meetings to discuss patients’ individual needs for disposition

Eliminating pain and restoring physical activity are the main goals of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite the high relevance of activity as a rehabilitation goal of and criterion for discharge, in-hospital activity between operation and discharge has hardly been investigated in orthopaedic patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to a) measure for reference the level of in-hospital physical activity in patient undergoing a current rapid discharge protocol, b) compare these values to a conventional discharge protocol and c) test correlations with pre-operative activities and self-reported outcomes for possible predictors for rapid recovery and discharge. Patients (n=19, M:F: 5:14, age 65 ±5.7 years) with osteoarthritis treated with an elective primary THA underwent a rapid recovery protocol with discharge on day 3 after surgery (day 0). Physical activity was measured using a 3D accelerometer (64×25×13mm, 18g) worn on laterally on the unaffected upper leg. The signal was analysed using self-developed, validated algorithms (Matlab) calculating: Time on Feet (ToF), steps, sit-stand-transfers (SST), mean cadence (steps/min), walking bouts, longest walk (steps). For the in-hospital period (am: ca. 8–13h; pm: ca. 13–20h) activity was calculated for day 1 (D1) and 2 (D2). Pre-operative activity at home was reported as the daily averages of a 4-day period. Patient self-report included the HOOS, SQUASH (activity) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) questionnaires. In-hospital activity of this protocol was compared to previously collected data of an older (2011), standard conventional discharge protocol (day 4/5, n=40, age 71 ±7 years, M:F 16:24). All activity parameters increased continuously between in-hospital days and subsequent am and pm periods. E.g. Time-on-feet increased most steeply and tripled from 21.6 ±14.4min at D1am to 62.6 ±33.4min at D2pm. Mean Steps increased almost as steep from 252 to 655 respectively. SST doubled from 4.9 to 10.5. All these values were sign. higher (+63 to 649%) than the conventional protocol data. Cadence as a qualitative measure only increased slowly (+22%) (34.8 to 42.3steps/min) equalling conventional protocol values. The longest walking bout did not increase during the in-hospital period. Gender, age and BMI had no influence on in-hospital activity. High pre-op activity (ToF, steps) was a predictor for high in-hospital activity for steps and SST's at D2pm (R=0.508 to R=0.723). Pre-op self-report was no predictor for any activity parameter. In-hospital recovery of activity is steep following a cascade of easy (ToF) to demanding (SST) tasks to quality (cadence). High standard deviations show that recovering activity is highly individual possibly demanding personalised support or goals (feedback). Quantitative parameters were all higher in the rapid versus the conventional discharge protocol indicating that fast activation is possible and safe. Equal cadence for both protocols shows that functional capacity cannot be easily accelerated. Pre-op activity is only a weak predictor of in-hospital recovery, indicating that surgical trauma affects patients similarly, but subjects may be identified for personalized physiotherapy or faster discharge. Reference values and correlations from this study can be used to optimize or shorten in-hospital rehabilitation via personalization, pre-hab, fast-track surgery or biofeedback

Purpose: Implantation of a unicompartmental knee pros-thesis (UKP) via a short incisiosn was proposed to improve rapid postoperative recovery. But it is known that long-term survival is highly dependent on implantation quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of implantation quality assessed radiographically and that of rapid recovery after unicompartmental arthroplasty using the conventional or minimally invasive approach. Material and methods: A continuous series of the first 25 cases of UKP implanted using the minimally invasive approach (group 1) was compared with a homogeneous group of matched knees in a series of 145 UKP implanted with the same approach as used for total knee arthroplasty (group 2). The groups were comparable for age, gender, weight, and height. The same medial cemented UKP with a metallic tibial base plate was implanted in both groups. Postoperative radiographic measures included the overall mechanical axis, the femoral and tibial implantation orientations, and the posterior tibial slope. Results: There was no significantly different between groups 1 and 2 for mechanical axis (3.6° and 4.7° respectively), tibial implantation angle (87° and 88°), or posterior tibial slope (2.6° and 2°). The femoral implantation angle was also comparable (2.3° and 2.9°) with the exception of one knee (9°) in group 1. Hospital stay, use of crutches and resumed activity were significantly shorter in group 1. Blood loss (222 and 244 ml respectively), postoperative pain (visual analogue scale), and full flexion at one year were comparable between the groups. Discussion: The basic difference between the two approaches is the absence of patellar eversion and rupture of the extensor system with the minimally invasive method. This probably explains the more rapid recovery of function and activity in this group. The one case of significant femoral deviation noted in this group points out the need for greater care in positioning the specific guides for the short incision approach. To evaluate the long-term results of UKP implanted with the minimally invasive approach, the same criteria for patient selection and prosthetic implantation should be used