There is no consensus regarding optimum timing and frequency of ultrasound (US) for monitoring response to Pavlik harness (PH) treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The purpose of our study was to determine if a limited-frequency hip US assessment had an adverse effect on treatment outcomes compared to traditional comprehensive US monitoring. This study was a single-centre noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Infants aged under six months whose hips were reduced and centred in the harness at initiation of treatment (stable dysplastic or subluxable), or initially decentred (subluxated or dislocated) but reduced and centred within four weeks of PH treatment, were randomized to our current standard US monitoring protocol (every clinic visit) or to a limited-frequency US protocol (US only at end of treatment). Groups were compared based on α angle and femoral head coverage at the end of PH treatment, acetabular indices, and International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade on one-year follow-up radiographs.Aims
Methods
A randomised clinical trial was undertaken to find out if treatment time and failure rate in children treated by the Ponseti method differed between below-knee vs above-knee cast groups. Eligible children with idiopathic clubfoot, treated using the Ponseti method, were randomised to either below knee or above knee plaster of Paris casting. Outcome measures were total treatment time and the occurrence of failure, defined as two slippages or a treatment time above eight weeks. Twenty-six children (33 feet) were entered into the trial, with a mean age of 17 days (range 1–40) in the above knee and 11 days (range 5–20) in the below knee group. Because of six failures in the below knee group (38%), the trial was stopped early for ethical reasons. Failure rate was significantly higher in the below-knee group (P 0.039). The median treatment times of six weeks in the below knee and four weeks in the above knee group differed significantly (P 0.01).Statement of purpose:
Methods and Results:
The aim of this study was to explore clinicians’ experience of a paediatric randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing surgical reduction with non-surgical casting for displaced distal radius fractures. Overall, 22 staff from 15 hospitals who participated in the RCT took part in an interview. Interviews were informed by phenomenology and analyzed using thematic analysis.Aims
Methods
