Aim:. To Determine Whether Maximal Rib Prominence Measured On Lateral Radiographs Can Be Used As A Surrogate To Rib Rotation Determined By Surface Tomography (Quantecscanning) In Assessment Of Spinal Rotation. Method:. Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Underwent Plain Lateral Radiographs And Quantec Scans. Maximal Rib Prominence On The Lateral Radiograph Was Defined Pre- And Post-Operatively By Distance From Most Posterior Aspect Of The Rib To The Facet Joint And Instrumented Rod, Respectively. Rib Rotation Was Measured By Surface Tomography Quantec Scan Using The Suzuki Method. This Was Then Repeated At A Later Time And By An Additional Investigator To Assess Intra- Observer And Inter-Observer Variability. The Correlation Between Maximal Rib Prominence And The Suzuki Ratio Was Determined. Results:. 20 Patients, Median Age 15 Years, Were Evaluated. The Correlation Coefficient Between Radiograph Determined Maximal Rib Prominence And Quantec Derived Suzuki Ratio Was 0.68, R2=0.46 (See Figure). Discussion:. There Was A Weak Positive Correlation Between Radiograph Determined Maximal Rib Prominence And Quantec Derived Suzuki Ratio. Further Investigation In A Larger Cohort Is Warranted. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

Aims

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion technique to correct scoliosis. It allows correction of scoliosis through growth modulation (GM) by tethering the convex side to allow concave unrestricted growth similar to the hemiepiphysiodesis concept. The other modality is anterior scoliosis correction (ASC) where the tether is able to perform most of the correction immediately where limited growth is expected.

Purpose and background

Static plain radiographs at the end of uncontrolled bending are the current standard of care for measuring translatory slip in back pain patients. Quantitative fluoroscopy systems (QF) that employ standardised bending protocols have been found to improve precision and reduce dose, but comparative data are lacking. We compared 4 QF methods with static radiographs in a control population, calculating ranges, population variation and measurement errors over 6 weeks.

Aim:. To compare the ability of fulcrum bend and traction radiographs to predict correction of AIS using pedicle screw only constructs and to compare the fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI) with a new measurement: the traction correction index (TCI). Method:. Retrospective radiographic analysis of eighty patients, average age 14 yrs, who underwent posterior correction of scoliosis using pedicle screw only construct. Analysis was carried out on the pre-op and immediate post-op PA radiographs and the pre-op fulcrum bend and traction radiographs. Correction rate, fulcrum flexibility, traction flexibility, FBCI and TCI was calculated. Results:. Preoperative mean Cobb angle of 63.9 degrees was corrected to 25.8 degrees postoperatively. The mean fulcrum bending Cobb angle was 37.6 degrees and traction Cobb angle 26.6 degrees. The mean fulcrum flexibility was 41.1%, traction flexibility 58.4% and correction rate 59.6%. The mean FBCI was 144.9% and TCI was 102.1%. Discussion:. Radiographic correction of scoliosis based on correction rate does not take into consideration the curve flexibility. It has been suggested by Cheung et al, that fulcrum bending radiographs predict curve correction in AIS. Ibrahim et al, have questioned this, and they suggested that traction radiographs are more predictive in a mixed group of patients with hybrid and screw only constructs. Conclusions:. When comparing fulcrum bend and traction radiographs, we found the latter to be more predictive of curve correction in AIS using pedicle screw constructs. The TCI better takes into account the curve flexibility than the FBCI. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

Aims

To benchmark the radiation dose to patients during the course of treatment for a spinal deformity.

To compare the ability of fulcrum bend and traction radiographs to predict correction of AIS using screw only implants and to assess the fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI) with a new measurement: the traction correction index (TCI). Retrospective radiographic analysis of case series (Level IV). Radiographic correction of scoliosis based on correction rate does not take into consideration the curve flexibility. It has been suggested that fulcrum bending radiographs predict curve correction in AIS [1]. This has been questioned [2] and has been suggested that traction radiographs are more predictive in a mixed group of patients with hybrid and screw only constructs. Twenty three patients average age 15, who underwent posterior correction of scoliosis using pedicle screw only construct. Analysis was carried out on the pre-op and immediate post-op AP radiographs and the pre-op fulcrum bend and traction radiographs. Correction rate, fulcrum flexibility, traction flexibility, FBCI and TCI was calculated. Preoperative mean Cobb angle of 66 degrees was corrected to 25 degrees postoperatively. The mean fulcrum bending Cobb angle was 38 degrees and traction Cobb angle 28 degrees. The mean fulcrum flexibility was 45%, traction flexibility 59% and correction rate 63%. The mean FBCI was 182% and TCI was112%. When comparing fulcrum bend and traction radiographs, we found the latter to be more predictive of curve correction in AIS using pedicle screw constructs. The TCI better takes into account the curve flexibility than the FBCI

Traditionally, spinal surgeons placed radiographs on viewing boxes in a manner (PA) to replicate the view they would have at surgery. The introduction of digital Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) appears to have had marked impact upon this convention. Some Units have the ability to lock digital radiographs such that they are always viewed in the same manner and cannot be reversed.

Following ‘two near misses’ we carried out a survey to confirm the previous practice with radiographs; to ascertain the current practice with PACS and to find out whether the variation in practice could lead to clinical mishaps and harm to patients.

Questionnaires were completed by practicing spinal surgeons.

Previous and current practice of viewing radiographs. Either actual or potential wrong side surgery. Opinions as to whether a single convention was important were recorded.

78 % Spine surgeons used to flip radiographs over prior to introduction of PACS. With PACS, 56 % spine surgeons flip the radiographs over in clinic and 72 % in theatre so to resemble viewing spine from behind. 56% Surgeons had nearly operated on the wrong side of the spine while 94 % have seen or heard of a patient operated on the wrong side. 72 % Spine surgeons agree that the radiographs should be flipped over so as to resemble the spine as viewed intraoperatively.

There is need for a single convention in spine surgery to view radiographs to avoid potential clinical mistakes.

This study aimed to verify the accuracy of the DIERS Formetric Scan when assessing vertebral rotation of the apical vertebrae in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (A.I.S) patients, to determine whether the DIERS Formetric Scans can be used instead of or alongside radiographs when assessing A.I.S patients.

Both the radiographs and the DIERS Formetric Scans of 60 Preoperative A.I.S patients. All patients included in our study had predominant thoracic curves using the Lenke classification method, Cobb angle range 33° – 85°. Each radiograph was categorised into groups according to the severity of Nash-Moe rotation score of the apical vertebrae. Three groups were formed Nash-Moe +1 (20 patients), Nash-Moe +2 (27 patients), Nash-Moe +3 (13 patients). Each result was then compared to the maximal rotation analysed by the DIERS Formetric Scan, which took place on the same day as the radiographs. The results were then assessed using a Pearson Correlation Coefficient and a One-Way ANOVA with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD Analysis.

The Nash-Moe +1 Group scored a mean maximal rotation of 14.65° ±6.56 (11.82 – 17.48) (95% Confidence Interval), Nash-Moe +2 mean maximal rotation was 19.6° ±7.1 (16.92 – 22.28) and Nash-Moe +3 scored 21.53° ±8.9 (16.99 – 26.37). The Pearson Correlation Coefficient of this assessment was +0.342 (p value 0.07) demonstrating a weak positive correlation. The One-Way ANOVA analysis with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD analysis. The results of this analysis was an F value score of +4.115 (p Value 0.021) for the overall One-Way ANOVA test. The Post-Hoc Tukey HSD tests demonstrate that there is a statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 3 (p value 0.030) but there is no statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (p value 0.068) as well as no statistical difference between Group 2 and Group 3 (p value 0.716).

DIERS Formetric Scan assessment of vertebral rotation shows a positive correlation with the Nash-Moe method. This allows us to rely on the Formetric scans and thus a possible reduction in radiographs when assessing A.I.S, this reduces the exposure to ionising radiation in A.I.S patients.

Introduction

Both intra- and post-operative radiographs are traditionally obtained after instrumented lumbar spinal surgery; however the clinical advantage of routine post operative images has not been demonstrated.

Introduction. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are increasingly recognized as a common anatomical variant and is the most common congenital anomaly of the lumbosacral spine. Patients can have symptomatic LSTV, known as Bertolotti's Syndrome, where transitional anatomy can cause back, L5 distribution leg, hip, and groin pain. We propose an outline for diagnosis and treatment of Bertolotti's Syndrome. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed over 500 patients presenting to the primary author with low back, buttock, hip, groin and/or leg pain from April 2009 through April 2024. Patients with radiographic findings of an LSTV and clinical presentation underwent diagnostic injections to confirm diagnosis of Bertolotti's syndrome. Treatment was determined based on patient's LSTV classification. 157 patients with confirmed Bertolotti's syndrome underwent surgical treatment. Results. Over 500 patients presented with an appropriate clinical presentation and radiographic findings of an LSTV. Diagnostic injections were targeted into the transitional anatomy confirming the LSTV as the primary pain generator to make the diagnosis of Bertolotti's syndrome. The decision in the type of surgical intervention, resection or fusion, was made based on patient's LSTV anatomy. 157 patients with confirmed Bertolotti's Syndrome underwent surgical treatment (121 fusions (77%), 36 resections (23%)). The classification system and surgical outcomes, in part, have been previously published in World Neurosurgery. Conclusion. We have outlined the best practice of diagnosis and treatment selection for Bertolotti's syndrome. We have shown significant improvement in outcomes based on this method. We hope to aid in both patient education and provide an outline on how clinicians can become knowledgeable on Bertolotti's syndrome. Conflicts of interest. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding. No funding obtained

Background. It has become increasingly important to conduct studies assessing clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, and revision rates to better define the indications and efficacy of lumbar spinal procedures and its association with symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (sASD). Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is defined as the radiographic change in the intervertebral discs adjacent to the surgically treated spinal level. SASD represents adjacent segment degeneration which causes pain or numbness due to post-operative spinal instability or nerve compression at the same level. The most common reason for early reoperation and late operation is sASD, therefore is in our best interest to understand the causes of ASD and make steps to limit the occurrence. Method. A comprehensive literature search was performed selecting Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or prospective studies published up to December 2023. Meta-analysis was performed on 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria and included data of clinical outcomes of patients who had degenerative disc disease, disc herniation, radiculopathy, and spondylolisthesis and underwent lumbar fusion or motion-preservation device surgery; and reported on the prevalence of ASD, sASD, reoperation rate, visual analogue score (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) improvement. Results. When compared to fusion surgery, a significant reduction of ASD, sASD and reoperation was observed in the cohort of patients that underwent motion-preserving surgery. Conclusion. Dynamic fusion constructs are treatment options that may help to prevent sASD. Conflicts of interest. This research was funded by Paradigm Spine. Sources of funding. Paradigm Spine

Introduction. Degenerative spondylosis (DS) represents a challenging condition to diagnose and treat. There are multiple modalities to investigate DS including X-ray, MRI and CT, but symptoms may not be equivocal to DS to support the clinical findings. The investigation of metastases commonly utilises SPECT/CT for identification of areas of increased osteoblastic activity to denote disease. The aim of the study was to analyse the prevalence of asymptomatic DS in a consecutive hospital cohort of oncology patients who had SPECT/CT for investigation of metastases. Methods. Oncology patients who underwent SPECT/CT at St. George's Hospital were analysed between 2015–2019. Exclusion criteria: back pain, inflammatory disorders, metastases, trauma, infection. Radiology reports were examined for DS and anatomical distribution of tracer uptake. Results. A total of 1182 patients had a Whole-Body SPECT CT used for the spinal analysis. After exclusions (age >80 [n=260], non-cancer [n=318], back pain [n=72]), 522 reports with cancer were utilised. Mean age was 65 (4–80). Age and distribution of DS are given in the table. Conclusion. The prevalence of radiological asymptomatic DS is prevalent in large proportions of patients without back pain, and its incidence increases with age. Approximately 60% of 60 year old and 70% of 70 years old patients have asymptomatic DS in the lumbosarcal region. We conclude that SPECT/CT will detect radiographic degenerative spondylosis in an asymptomatic hospital cohort and this prevalence increase with age. Therefore, this modality of imaging must be utilised with caution when investigating potential pain generators. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion technique to correct scoliosis. It allows correction of scoliosis through Growth Modulation (GM) by tethering the convex side to allow concave unrestricted growth similar to the hemi-epiphysiodesis concept. The other modality is Anterior Scoliosis Correction (ASC) where the tether is able to perform most of the correction immediately where limited growth is expected. Methods. Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic data of 20 patients between 2014 to 2016 with a mean 5 year follow (range 4–6). Results. There were 10 patients in each group with a total of 23 curves operated on. VBT-GM mean age was 12.5y with mean Risser 0.63 and VBT-ASC was14.9y with a Risser of 3.66. Mean preop VBT-GM Cobb was 46° with a Fulcrum unbend of 13.6° compared to VBT-ASC 56.9° with 32.2° unbend. Postop VBT-GM was 21° and VBT-ASC Cobb was 10.8°. The early postop Correction Rate was 54.3% vs 81% whereas FBCI was 77.1% vs 186.6%. The last XR at mean 5y was 22.2° (VBT-GM) and 16.9° (VBT-ASC) 95% avoided fusion. Open TRC group had 3 over corrections. 1 patient alone had overcorrection, unplanned second stage and conversion to fusion. Discussion and Conclusion. We show a high success rate (95%) in helping children avoid fusion. Vertebral body tethering is a safe technique for correction of scoliosis in the skeletally immature patient. This is the first report at 5 years that shows two modalities of VBT can be employed depending on the skeletal maturity of the patient: Growth Modulation and Anterior Scoliosis Correction

Background. Partial facetectomies with pedicle screw instrumentation is widespread and a well described technique for achieving posterior correction of scoliosis. Newton et al. first described the use of the UBS in the posterior correction of AIS in 2014. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the UBSPO in achieving posterior correction in Type1 AIS as compared to the traditional partial facetectomies. Aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of USBPO in achieving posterior correction in Type 1 AIS as compared to partial facetectomies. Methods. A retrospective review of 40 patients with type 1 AIS who had undergone a posterior correction of scoliosis between 2010 and 2016 was performed. Group A (n=20) consisted of consecutive patients that had partial facetectomies while Group B (n=20) consisted of consecutive patients having UBSPO. Both groups were matched for demographic parameters. Pre and post-operative radiographic parameters and operative data in both groups were compared. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. Results. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, magnitude of curves, apical rotation and flexibility on the preop imaging. There was a significant difference between the mean postop Cobb angle (21.9° vs 9.8°, p<0.0005), correction (63.04% vs 84.3%, p<0.0005) and postop apical rotation (p = 0.008) in favour of the UBSPO group. At 2-year follow-up there was a statistically significant increase in the cobb angle in the facetectomy group (21.89° (immediate post op) Vs 24.64° P=0.033) and no such difference in the UBSPO group. There was no significant difference between surgical time (p = 0.536) and blood loss (p = 0.380). Conclusion. The use of the UBSPO for posterior release provides more effective correction in the coronal and axial planes than traditional partial facetectomies in type 1 AIS

Lumbar fusion remains the gold standard for the treatment of discogenic back pain. Total disc replacement has fallen out of favor in many institutions. Other motion preservation alternatives, such as nucleus replacement, have had limited success and none are commercially available at this time. Two prospective, nonrandomized multicenter studies of lumbar disc nucleus replacement using the PerQdisc 2.0 nucleus replacement device in patients with lumbar discogenic back pain. Early clinical results are presented. A total of 16 patients from 4 international sites (Germany, Paraguay, Canada and Belgium) were enrolled in the trial between May 2019 and February 2021. Data collection points include baseline and postoperatively at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcome measures were obtained from the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-12V2, Analgesic Score (AS), and radiographic assessments. Prospectively gathered data on patient reported outcomes, neurological outcome, surgical results, radiological analysis, and any adverse events. 16 patients had successful implantation of the device. There have been no expulsions of the device. Early postoperative results are available in 13/16 patients at 6 months and 11/16 patients at 12 months. There have been 4 (25%) revision surgeries 3–12 months post implantation between the two trials. 12 of 13 (92%) patients had Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in ODI at 6 months and 10 of 11 (91%) at 12 months. Mean decrease in ODI from baseline to 12 months was 44.8. At 12 months 8 (73%) patients are not taking pain medication, 1 (9%) patient is taking a narcotic for pain management. 73% of patients are working without restrictions at 12 months post implant. Early clinical and technical results are encouraging. Long term follow up is essential and is forthcoming. Additional patient recruitment and data points are ongoing. FDA/Drug Status Investigational/Not approved

Aims

A variety of surgical methods and strategies have been demonstrated for Andersson lesion (AL) therapy. In 2011, we proposed and identified the feasibility of stabilizing the spine without curettaging the vertebral or discovertebral lesion to cure non-kyphotic AL. Additionally, due to the excellent reunion ability of ankylosing spondylitis, we further came up with minimally invasive spinal surgery (MIS) to avoid the need for both bone graft and lesion curettage in AL surgery. However, there is a paucity of research into the comparison between open spinal fusion (OSF) and early MIS in the treatment of AL. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical outcomes and radiological evaluation of our early MIS approach and OSF for AL.

Aims

To determine whether side-bending films in scoliosis are assessed for adequacy in clinical practice; and to introduce a novel method for doing so.

Aims

Only a few studies have investigated the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with an idiopathic scoliosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the overall HRQoL and employment status of patients with an idiopathic scoliosis 40 years after diagnosis, to compare it with that of the normal population, and to identify possible predictors for a better long-term HRQoL.

Aims

The prevalence of scoliosis is not known in patients with idiopathic short stature, and the impact of treatment with recombinant human growth hormone on those with scoliosis remains controversial. We investigated the prevalence of scoliosis radiologically in children with idiopathic short stature, and the impact of treatment with growth hormone in a cross-sectional and retrospective cohort study.

Background. Routine imaging (radiography, CT, MRI) provides no health benefits for low back pain (LBP) patients and is not recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Whether imaging leads to increased costs, healthcare utilization or absence from work is unclear. Purpose. To systematically review if imaging in patients with LBP increases costs, leads to higher health care utilization or increases absence from work. METHODS. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs), comparing imaging versus no imaging on targeted outcomes were extracted from medical databases until October 2017. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of the body of evidence was determined using GRADE methodology. Results. Moderate quality evidence (1 RCT; n=421) supports that direct costs increase for patients undergoing radiography. Low quality evidence (3 OSs; n=9535) supports that early MRI leads to a large increase in costs. Moderate quality evidence (2 RCTs, 6 OSs; n=19392) supports that performing MRI, radiography or CT is associated with increased healthcare utilization. Two RCTs (n=667) showed no significant differences between radiography or MRI groups compared with no imaging groups on absence from work. However, the results of two observational studies (n=7765) did show significantly greater absence from work in the imaging groups compared to the no imaging-groups. Conclusions. Imaging in LBP is associated with higher medical costs and increased healthcare utilisation. There are indications that it also leads to higher absence from work. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained