Thermal injury to the radial nerve caused by cement leakage is a rare complication after revision elbow arthroplasty. Several reports have described nerve palsy caused by cement leakage after hip arthroplasty. However, little information is available regarding whether radial nerve injury due to cement leakage after humeral stem revision will recover. In a recent study, radial nerve palsy occurred in 2 of 7 patients who had thermal injury from leaked cement during humeral component revisions. These patients did not regain function of the radial nerve after observation. We present a case of functional recovery from a radial nerve palsy caused by cement leakage after immediate nerve decompression in revision elbow arthroplasty[Fig. 1.2]

In combined high median and ulnar nerve injury, transfer of extensor digiti minimi (EDM) and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) nerve branches to restore intrinsic hand function is previously described. A segment of nerve graft is required in this operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the sensory branch of radial nerve (SRN) as an “in situ vascular nerve bridge'” (IVNB) instead of sural nerve graft. Twenty fresh cadavers were dissected. In proximal forearm incision, the feasibility of transferring the EDM/ECU branches to the distal stump of transected SRN was evaluated. In distal forearm incision, the two distal branches of the SRN were transected near the radial styloid process to determine whether transfer of the proximal stumps of these branches to the motor branches of the median (MMN) and ulnar (MUN) nerves is possible. The number of axons in each nerve was determined. The size of the dissected nerves and their location demonstrate that tension free nerve coaptation is easily possible in both proximal and distal incisions. Utilisation of the SRN as an IVNB instead of the conventional sural nerve graft has some advantages. Firstly, the sural nerve graft is a single branch and could be sutured to either the MMN or MUN, whereas the SRN has two terminal branches and can address both of them. Secondly, the IVNB has live Schwann cells and may accelerate the regeneration. Finally, this IVNB does not require leg incision and could be performed under regional anesthesia. The SRN as an IVNB is a viable option which can be used instead of conventional nerve graft in some brachial plexus or high median and ulnar nerve injuries when restoration of intrinsic hand function by transfer of EDM/ECU branches is attempted

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Introduction:. Distal humerus fractures as well as elbow fracture dislocation are often accompanied by soft tissue damage that warrants early fixation with an external fixator. The distal humerus is a hazardous area for placement of an external fixator due to the close proximity of the radial nerve to the humerus in this area. No known safe zone has been identified on the lateral border of the humerus to avoid radial nerve damage. The aim of this study was to record the incidence of radial nerve damage by placing two 4 mm pins into the humerus and to note the relation of the nerve to the pins. Methods:. Two 4 mm pins used to fix an external fixator were drilled into the lateral border of the humerus at points 100 mm and 70 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle of both arms of 39 cadavers. The 30 mm interval between the pins is the interval between the pins in a pinblock of a commonly-used external fixator. The arms were dissected by medical students and the incidence of radial nerve damage was recorded. Statistical analysis was done using a Fischer's exact test to identify the incidence of nerve damage relative to pin insertion. The number of damaged nerves was compared to the number of non-damaged nerves. A design based Chi Square test was carried out to test left and right arms. The proportions of interest were estimated along a 95% confidence interval. Results:. The radial nerve was hit (damaged) by 56.4% of the proximal and 20.5% of the distal pins. The radial nerve ran posterior to the proximal pin in 2.57% of arms and 0% to the distal pin. Conclusion:. Although no clear safe zone could be established, pins should be placed closer than 100 mm from the lateral epicondyle and as posterior on the humerus as possible to minimize the risk for radial nerve damage. Keywords: Radial nerve, external fixation, humerus fractures

Abstract. Background. Reconstruction following resection of sarcomas of the upper extremity with methods described in the prevalent literature may not be possible in few selected cases. We describe Surgical Phocomelia or Phoco-reduction as a method of limb salvage in such cases of extensive sarcomas of the upper limb with its functional and oncological outcomes. Methods. Evaluation of functional and oncological outcomes was performed for 11 patients who underwent surgical phocomelia or phocoreduction for extensive sarcomas of the upper limb between 2010 and 2019. Results. Mean follow-up period in the study was27.8 months. Five patients required a segmental resection including the entire humerus while 6 patients underwent segmental resection around the elbow with a mean resection length of 21.5 cm. Mean MSTS 93 score was 22 depicting a good functional outcome. Mean hand grip strength on the operated side was 62% of the contralateral side with preservation of useful hand function. Mean time to humero-ulnar union was 6.7 months. Radial nerve palsy and implant failure occurred in 1 patient each. No patient developed local recurrence while 3 patients died of metastasis. Conclusion. Surgical phocomelia is a prudent alternative to severely incapacitating amputations in situations where other reconstruction methods are not feasible

Introduction. Fully implantable distraction nails are frequently used for lengthening of the lower leg. What are the indications for humerus lengthening and which results can be expected?. Materials and Methods. The humerus as the best healing bone in the human body is suitable for lengthening with a nail as well but the indications are rare in comparison with the lower legs. Especially when driving a car or when working on a tablet length discrepancy of the arms of more than 4–5cm may cause severe hardening of the cervical muscles and induce chronical pain in the upper spine. Results. A distraction nail (FITBONE) was used in 5 cases for humerus lengthening. The nail was inserted in all cases from proximal. The mean age of the patients was 34 years. The mean lengthening amount was 58mm (55–100). In one case the system was exchanged to reach the desired length. There was no infection, no radial nerve irritation and no chronical shoulder pain. The system was removed in 4 cases in an average of 15 months the other nail will be removed soon as well. Conclusions. The preliminary results of our 5 cases demonstrate, that the FITBONE device is advantageous for lengthening the humerus, if the initial length is sufficient for implantation. In comparison with the use of external fixators the functional outcome, the comfort of treatment and the cosmetic result is amazing

Introduction. Treatment for distal third shaft fractures of humerus is very challenging. They are commonly treated with plating. Plating has complications of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. We report our case series of distal third fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral Nail. Materials/Methods. Since 1994 to 2010 we have 576 fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral nail. Of these 45 fractures were distal third of humerus. Average age of patients at the time of surgery was 30.4 years (Range 15–82 years, Median 33 years). Of 45 patients 26 were females and 19 males. Three out of 45 had non union at the time of presentation. All patients were followed until clinical and radiological signs of union. One patient was lost to follow-up. Results. Average time to fracture healing was 13.9 weeks (Range 9–36 weeks). There were two cases of non union, one healed at 9 months with 2. nd. surgery. There was one reported case of infection. Seven patients had nail removal electively. All the patients achieved full range of elbow and shoulder movement. No reported cases of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. Conclusion. Our results of distal third fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral Nail are excellent. It avoids big exposure as needed in plating and complication of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy

Aim. Treatment for distal third shaft fractures of humerus is very challenging especially if its comminuted and bone is osteopenic. They are commonly treated with plating. Plating has complications of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. We report our case series of distal third fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral Nail. Materials and methods. Since 1994 to 2010 we have 576 fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral nail. Of these 45 were distal third extra articular fractures of humerus. Average age of patients at the time of surgery was 30.4 years (Range 15–82 years, Median 33 years). Of 45 patients 26 were females and 19 males.3 out of 45 had non union at the time of presentation. The nail was locked distally with one or two screws and proximally with a screw and tripwire. The entry point of the nail was roof of olecranon fossa (contrary to standard retrograde nails where it is an inch above olecranon fossa) This design of nail allows it be used for even very distal fractures. All patients were followed till clinical and radiological signs of union. 1 patient was lost to follow up. Results. Average time to fracture healing was 13.9 weeks (Range 9–36 weeks). There were 2 cases of non union, one healed at 9 months with 2. nd. surgery. The other non union was asymptomatic and did not agree for further surgery. There was one reported case of infection.7 patients had nail removal electively on request. All the patients achieved full range of elbow and shoulder movement. No reported cases of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. Conclusion. Our results of distal third fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral Nail are excellent. It avoids big exposure as needed in plating and complication of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy

Revision of the humeral component in shoulder arthroplasty is frequently necessary during revision surgery. Newer devices have been developed that allow for easy extraction or conversion at the time of revision preserving bone stock and simplifying the procedure. However, early generation anatomic and reverse humeral stems were frequently cemented into place. Monoblock or fixed collar stems make accessing the canal from above challenging. The cortex of the Humerus is far thinner than the femur and stress shielding has commonly led to osteopenia. Many stem designs have fins that project into the tuberosities putting them at risk for fracture on extraction. Extraction starts with an extended deltopectoral incision from the clavicle to the deltoid insertion. The proximal humerus needs to be freed from adhesions of the deltoid and conjoined tendon. The deltopectoral interval is fully developed. Complete subscapularis and anterior capsular release to the level of the latissimus tendon permits full exposure of the humeral head. After head removal the stem can be assessed for loosening and signs of periprosthetic joint infection. The proximal bone around the fin of the implant should be removed from the canal. If possible, the manufacturer's extractor should be utilised. If not, then a blunt impactor can be placed from below against the collar of the stem to assist in extraction. With luck the stem can be extracted from the cement mantle. If there is no concern for infection, the cement-in-cement technique can be used for revision. Otherwise, attempts should be made to extract all the cement and cement restrictor, if present. The small cement removal tools from the hip set can be used and specialised shoulder tools are available. An ultrasound cement removal device can be very helpful. The surgeon must be particularly careful to avoid perforation of the humeral cortex. This is especially important when near the radial nerve as injury can occur. When a well-fixed stem is encountered, an osteotomy of the proximal humerus is necessary. The surgeon can utilise a linear cut with an oscillating saw along the bicipital groove for the length of the implant. An osteotome is used to crack the cement mantle allowing stem extraction. Alternatively, a window can be created to offer additional access to the cement mantle. In the event the surgeon has required an osteotomy or window, cerclage wires, cables or suture will be needed and when the bone is potentially compromised, allograft bone graft struts (tibial shaft) are used for additional support. Care is needed when passing cerclage wires to avoid injury to the radial nerve which is adjacent to the deltoid insertion. If infection is suspected or confirmed an ALBC spacer is placed. When single stage revision is planned both cemented and uncemented stem options are available. Cement placed around the humeral stem has been suggested to decrease infection incidence. Revision of cemented humeral stems is a continued challenge in revision shoulder surgery. Newer systems and reverse total shoulder options have improved the surgeon's ability to achieve good outcomes when revising prior shoulder arthroplasty

Aim. Infections after total elbow arthroplasty are more frequent than after other joint arthroplasties. Therapeutic management varies depending of the patient status, the time of diagnosis of the infection, the status of the implant as well as the remaining bone stock around the implants. Method. Between 1997 and 2017, 180 total elbow arthroplasties were performed in our department. Eleven (6%) sustained a deep infection and were revised. Infection occurred after prosthesis of first intention in 4 and after a revision procedure in 7. Etiologies were: rheumatoid arthritis in 6, trauma sequela in 4 and osteosarcoma in 1. There were 7 women and 4 men of 59 years on average (22–87). Delay between the prosthesis and the diagnosis of infection was 66 months (0.5–300). The infection was stated as acute (<3week) in one, subacute (between 3 week and 3 months) in 1, and chronic (>3 months) in 9. Isolated bacteria were: Staphylococcus (10), Streptococcus (1), P. acnes (1), and Proteus mirabilis (1). Infection were poly microbial in 2 cases. A simple lavage with debridement was performed in 3 cases (Group 1), a 2-stage revision in 4 (Group 2), and a definitive removal of the prosthesis in 4 (Group 3). Adapted antibiotics were prescribed for all patients during at least 6 weeks. Results. All patients were reviewed with 59 months average follow-up. Eight patients were cured of their infection thanks to the initial therapeutic strategy. For 2 patients of Group 2, infection reccurrency required a new surgical procedure with one simple lavage/debridement for one, and 3 lavage/debridement for the other making it possible to cure the infection. For one patient of Group 1, a failure of lavage/debridement required removal of the implants. The MEPS reached 72 points: 67 points for patients of Group 1, 76 points for patients of Group 2, and 74 points for patients of Group 3. Complication rate was 36% (4): 2 ulnar nerve impairment with dysesthesia, one radial nerve palsy, and one humeral stem loosening. Conclusions. An adapted therapeutic strategy can allow suppression of the responsible bacteria after infection of total elbow arthroplasty. Sometimes, several procedures are necessary to obtain the cure. Better functional results were obtained when the prosthesis could be retained or replaced, but satisfactory results could also be obtained after resection arthroplasty when the humeral columns have been preserved to stabilize the joint

Cement-induced thermal osteonecrosis is well documented, as is the potential for nerve injury from thermal energy. Cement is often used to augment fixation following excision of humeral metastases. Porcine femurs were used as a model. We sought to find out the maximum temperatures that would be reached in various parts of the bone during the cement setting process, to explore what negative effects this might have on neighbouring bone and nerve. A 12mm by 12mm window was cut from 12 porcine femoral shafts, and Palacos R+D cement injected into the defect. As cement set, bone surface temperature was measured using infra-red thermal imaging and thermocouples used to measure temperatures at the bone-cement interface, 5mm from the cement bolus, 10mm from cement bolus and an area running around the shaft replicating radial nerve. Bone surface temperature rose to a maximum of 34.0 C (on average), and 32.9 C in the ‘radial nerve’ thermocouple. Notably, in two bones there were fractures during specimen preparation, and maximum temperatures in these two areas exceeded 41 degrees C. Average maximum temperatures were 58.1 C, 36.5 C and 30.1 C at the bone cement interface, 5mm and 10mm from the cement bolus respectively

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been shown to be a treatment option for elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures and osteoporotic bone. The published results have often included rheumatoid patients who traditionally would be expected to do well from elbow arthroplasty. Only short-term results have been published using this technique in non-rheumatoid patients. The current study contains the largest number and longest follow-up of non-rheumatoid patients whose fractures have been treated with a non-custom TEA. In total there were 26 patients, mean age 72 years, 22 female and 4 male, 25% dominant arm. The mean follow-up was of 5 years. There was 1 case of loosening, 1 radial nerve palsy and 2 cases of heterotrophic ossification. At final review the mean range of flexion/extension was 97.5 degrees and the mean range of pronation/supination was 151.75 degrees. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance score was 92. We would suggest that TEA provides a very satisfactory outcome in elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures, the benefit of which can be observed at a mean of 5 years

Introduction. Management of painful scarring of a nerve after surgery or trauma is challenging. Wrapping with a vein or adhesion barriers such as silicone have been reported with some success. This is a retrospective review of application of a xenograft collagen wrap around a peripheral nerve following neurolysis. There is no report in English literature of use of a collagen wrap for this purpose. Materials/Methods. 12 patients underwent use of the Neuragen™ bovine collagen nerve conduit or NeuraWrap™ (Integra Life Sciences, Plainsboro, NJ) over a 6 year period. The causes were, scarring after carpal tunnel (n=5) or cubital tunnel release (n=3) or partial nerve injury (n=4, radial, median, dorsal ulnar, digital nerves). Follow up ranged from 6–12 months. Outcome was assessed by VAS or functional improvement. Results. No patient developed adverse reaction to the xenograft conduit. All 10 patients with painful scarring reported improvement of pain with reduction in mean VAS from 7 to 2 at final follow-up. The patient with radial palsy with scarring of the nerve had full recovery of radial nerve function by 6 months. The partially injured sensory branch of median nerve and digital nerve regained normal 2PD. The patients with scarring after decompression surgery had improvement in pain and range of motion of adjacent joints but did not show any change in clinical neurological status. Conclusions. A collagen conduit wrapped around a partially injured or scarred nerve is safe and associated with clinical improvement in pain and nerve function

The aim of this study is to compare functional, clinical and radiological outcomes in K-wire fixation versus volar fixed-angle plate fixation in unstable, dorsally angulated distal radius fractures. Fifty-four adult patients with an isolated closed, unilateral, unstable, distal radius fracture were recruited to participate in the study. Only dorsally displaced fractures with no articular comminution were included. Patients were randomised to have their fracture treated with either closed reduction and K-wire fixation (3 wires) or fixed-angle volar plating. Both groups were immobilised in a below elbow cast for six weeks. The wires removed in the outpatients at six weeks and both groups were referred for physiotherapy. Independent clinical review was performed at three and six months post injury. Functional scoring was performed using the DASH and Gartland and Werley scoring systems. Radiographs were evaluated by an independent orthopaedic surgeon. Twenty-five patients were treated with a plate and twenty-nine with wires. There were no complications in the plate group. There were 9 complications in the K-wire group with 3 patients requiring a second operation (1 corrective osteotomy for malunion, 1 median nerve decompression and 1 retrieval of a migrated wire). The remaining complications included: 5 pin site infections (3 treated with early pin removal and 2 with oral antibiotics only), and 1 superficial radial nerve palsy. There were no tendon ruptures. Both groups scored satisfactory functional results with no statistical difference. There was a statistically significant difference in the radiological outcomes with the plate group achieving better results. We conclude that in unstable dorsally angulated distal radius fractures volar fixed-angle plate fixation is able to achieve comparable functional results to K-wire fixation with better radiological results and fewer complications. This has resulted in a change in our clinical practice

Acute scaphoid fractures are commonly treated with cast for 8–12 weeks. With this prolonged period of immobilisation patients can encounter joint stiffness and muscle wasting requiring extensive physiotherapy. Despite best practice, these fractures also pose a risk of non-union and suboptimal function. Fracture location, duration of time lost from work and impairment in activities of daily living are key factors in scaphoid fracture management. The aim of our study was to compare percutaneous screw fixation of the scaphoid with other operative fixation techniques. Parameters documented were length of conservative treatment, mechanism of injury, post-op complications and patient satisfaction levels with each technique using a standardised questionnaire. Economic benefit was also measured by examining time to return to work, number of x-rays and outpatient visits required per treatment group. In this study, 76 patients requiring operative scaphoid fixation were evaluated. 27 patients underwent percutaneous fixation. Waist fractures accounted for 66% (n= 18), proximal pole fractures 33% (n=8) and distal pole fractures 4% (n=1). There were 16 non-displaced fractures (59%) and 11 displaced fractures (41%). The average length of conservative treatment was 77 days (range: 2–256 days). Within the percutaneous group 2 patients developed non-union. We did not encounter any wound infection or superficial radial nerve damage. Patients treated with early percutaneous fixation had highest satisfaction levels, returned to work earlier and required less follow-up (P< 0.001). In conclusion percutaneous screw fixation provides earlier bone union and avoids the need for prolonged immobilisation when compared to other treatment modalities. The economic benefit of early percutaneous fixation must also be considered when managing patients with scaphoid fractures

The patterns of nerve and associated skeletal injury were reviewed in 84 patients referred to the brachial plexus service who had damage predominantly to the infraclavicular brachial plexus and its branches. Patients fell into four categories: 1. Anterior glenohumeral dislocation (46 cases); 2. ‘Occult’ shoulder dislocation or scapular fracture (17 cases); 3. Humeral neck fracture (11 cases); 4. Arm hyperextension (9 cases). The axillary (38/46) and ulnar (36/46) nerves were most commonly injured as a result of glenohumeral dislocation. The axillary nerve was ruptured in only 2 patients who had suffered high energy trauma. Ulnar nerve recovery was often incomplete. ‘Occult’ dislocation refers to patients who had no recorded shoulder dislocation but the history was suggestive that dislocation had occurred with spontaneous reduction. These patients and those with scapular fractures had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those with known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in 11 of 17 cases. In cases of humeral neck fracture, nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral shaft. Surgery was performed in 7 cases to reduce and fix the fracture. Arm hyperextension cases were characterised by injury to the musculocutaneous nerve, with the nerve being ruptured in 8 of 9. Five had humeral shaft fracture or elbow dislocation. There was variable involvement of the median and radial nerves, with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Most cases of infraclavicular brachial plexus injury associated with shoulder dislocation can be managed without operation. Early nerve exploration and repair should be considered for:. Axillary nerve palsy without recorded shoulder dislocation or in association with fracture of the scapula. Musculocutaneous nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation is necessary for nerve injury resulting from fracture of the humeral neck to relieve ongoing pressure on the nerves

Radial head fractures with fragment displacement should be reduced and fixed, when classified as Mason II type injuries. We describe a method of arthroscopic fixation which is performed as a day case trauma surgery, and compare the results with a more traditional fixation approach, in a case controlled manner. We prospectively reviewed six Mason II radial head fractures which were treated using an arthroscopic reduction and fixation technique. The technique allows the fracture to be mobilised, reduced, and anatomically fixed using headless screws. All arthroscopic surgeries were conducted as day-cases. We retrospectively collected age and sex matched cases of open reduction and fixation of Mason II fractures using headless screws. The arthroscopic cases required less analgesia, shorter hospital admissions, and had fewer complications. The averaged final range of follow-up, at 1 year post-operation was 15 to 140 degrees in the arthroscopic group and 35 to 120 degrees in the open group. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 95/100 and 90/100 respectively. No acute complications were noted in the arthroscopic group, and a radial nerve neuropraxia [n=1], superficial wound infection [n=1], and loose screw [n=1]. Two patients of the arthroscopic group required secondary motion gaining operations [n=1 arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy for a fixed flexion contracture of 35 degrees, and n=1 loss of supination requiring and arthroscopic radial scar excision]. Three patients in the open group required secondary surgery [n=2 arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy for fixed flexion deformities, and n=1 arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy for fixed flexion deformities, and n=1 arthroscopic radial head excision for prominent screws, loss of forearm rotation, and radiocapitellar arthrosis pain]. The technique of arthroscopic fixation of Mason II radial head fractures appears to be valid, with respect to anatomical restoration of the fracture, minimal hospital admission, reduction in analgesia requirement, fewer complications, and a decreased need for secondary surgery

Aims. To evaluate the results of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN) for displaced, unstable paediatric forearm diaphyseal fractures. Method. A retrospective, consecutive series study of 60 patients treated with ESIN between February 1996 and July 2005. Results. There were 43 (72%) boys and 17 (28%) girls with median age of 11.5 years (range: 2.6-15.9). 54 (90%) patients had a closed injury and 6 (10%) sustained a Grade I open injury. Seven patients had an isolated radius fracture. 49 (82%) fractures were stabilised with both bone ESIN, 10 (16%) with radial and one with isolated ulnar ESIN by standard technique under tourniquet control. All but two patients were protected with an above elbow cast. Thirty-six cases (60%) were primary procedures and 24 (40%) were performed due to re-displacement following a MUA. 36 patients (60%) required a minimal open reduction. Average hospital stay was 1.8 days (1-8 days). Average length of immobilisation was 5.4 weeks (3-9 weeks). Average time for clinical fracture union was 5.7 weeks (3-13 weeks). ESIN were removed after mean period of 33.8 weeks (approx: 7.9 months). One patient had a forearm compartment syndrome and required formal fasciotomy. One patient had ulnar delayed union and one had ulnar non-union. Five patients had transient superficial radial nerve neuropraxia. Ten had soft tissue irritation leading to early nail removal in two patients and two had superficial wound infection. Three patients sustained a re-fracture with the nail in situ following a new injury. 53 (88%) patients had full elbow and wrist movements on discharge. Seven patients had restriction of forearm rotations of less than 15°. Conclusion. Good clinical outcome, transitory and modest complications; quick and safe nail removal; and better cosmesis compared to plating makes ESIN an attractive treatment option for displaced, unstable paediatric forearm diaphyseal fractures

Increased use of locking volar plates for distal radius fractures led to a number of reports in literature of flexor tendon injuries from impingement and attrition against hardware. Repair of the pronator quadratus is critical in preventing tendon injury. We present a pronator quadratus sparing approach to the distal radius. The senior author has used a pronator quadratus sparing lateral pillar approach for for the past five years. A lateral incision is used over the radial styloid. The first dorsal compartment is released and APL and EPB tendons retracted. The underlying brachio-radialis tendon and insertion fascia is split and the palmar portion elevated off the distal radius with the pronator quadratus as a single contiguous sheet. The distal edge of the pronator quadratus is elevated from the wrist capsule by sharp dissection. The radial artery is protected by the retracted tissue. Repair of the brachio-radialis tendon and insertion fascia is much more robust than that of the pronator quadratus covering the entire plate. Since 2004, the senior author has used the pronator quadratus sparing approach for volar plating of the distal radius, in 183 cases. At last follow-up there were no instances of flexor tendon injury, which was considered to be one of the outcome measures and end-points. There was no impingement in the first dorsal compartment, except in two cases of lateral pillar hardware impingement from additional lateral pillar plate fixation through the same approach. Nine cases had minor persistent superficial radial nerve parasthesia. One case had a superficial wound infection requiring drainage. The repaired pronator quadratus formed a barrier protecting the plate. The infection was aggressively treated and the plate left in situ for three months till fracture union. Cultures from the retrieved plate showed no organisms. Another implant had two of the locking screws back out. The pronator quadratus fascia was tented with an underlying haematoma. The fascia however only showed minimum screw penetration and no flexor tendon injury. Average wrist dorsiflexion was 72 deg and palmar flexion 65 deg. Average pronation was 81 deg and average supination 69 deg. Supination range was slow to recover in younger patients. One explanation could be the tight pronator quadratus repair. Average PRWE and DASH scores were 19. The quadratus sparing approach to the volar distal radius is easy to perform and protects the flexor tendons at the wrist. Cases demonstrated that an intact pronator quadratus can act as an effective barrier to prominent hardware and superficial infection. Supination range may be reduced by this approach due to a tight repair, though a palmar DRUJ capsule contracture may also be an explanation