Purpose. By systematic literature review, to quantify the association between vertebral endplate signal changes (VESC) and non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Materials and methods. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SveMED databases were searched for the period 1984 to June 2009. Articles were included which investigated the association between VESC and NSLBP and reported sufficient data to construct two-by-two tables. Articles on specific low back pain conditions were excluded. A standardised data collection and quality assessment were performed. To estimate the association between VESC and NSLBP, two-by-two tables were created and exact odds ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analysis was performed on homogeneous studies. Results. Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. A statistically significant positive association between VESC and NSLBP was found in 10 of 14 studies from the general, working, and clinical populations with odds ratios ranging from 2.0 to 27.9. Two of the other four studies showed positive associations, one study a neutral association and the other a negative association but all these results were not statistically significant. Meta-analysis of the eight discography studies included in the review showed a pooled odds ratio between VESC and pain on discography of 4.50 (CI 1.96-10.32). The median prevalence of pain on discography was 88.8% in people with VESC and 41.6% in those without VESC (46.8% overall). Conclusions. The results from this systematic review show that VESC in the lumbar spine is associated with pain and therefore should be noted routinely in MRI reports

Objectives

We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the safety and efficacy of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) compared with bone graft when used specifically for revision spinal fusion surgery secondary to pseudarthrosis.

The aim of this study was to determine whether obesity affects pain, surgical and functional outcomes following lumbar spinal fusion for low back pain (LBP).

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was made of those studies that compared the outcome of lumbar spinal fusion for LBP in obese and non-obese patients. A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference in the pain and functional outcomes. Lumbar spinal fusion in the obese patient resulted in a statistically significantly greater intra-operative blood loss (weighted mean difference: 54.04 ml; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.08 to 93.00; n = 112; p = 0.007) more complications (odds ratio: 1.91; 95% CI 1.68 to 2.18; n = 43858; p < 0.001) and longer duration of surgery (25.75 mins; 95% CI 15.61 to 35.90; n = 258; p < 0.001). Obese patients have greater intra-operative blood loss, more complications and longer duration of surgery but pain and functional outcome are similar to non-obese patients. Based on these results, obesity is not a contraindication to lumbar spinal fusion.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1395–1404.

Aims

Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the incidence of post-operative epidural haematomas and wound infections after one-, or two-level, non-complex, lumbar surgery for degenerative disease in patients with, or without post-operative wound drainage.