Clinically applied methods of assessing implant fixation and implant loosening are of sub-optimal precision, leading to the risk of unsecure indication of revision surgery and late recognition of bone defects. Loosening diagnosis involving measuring the eigenfrequencies of implants has its roots in the field of dentistry. The changing of the eigenfrequencies of the implant-bone-system due to the loosening state can be measured as vibrations or structure-borne sound. In research, vibrometry was studied using an external shaker to excite the femur-stem-system of total hip replacements and to measure the resulting frequencies by integrated accelerometers or by ultrasound. Since proper excitation of implant components seems a major challenge in vibrometry, we developed a non-invasive method of internal excitation creating an acoustic source directly inside the implant. In the concept proposed for clinical use, an oscillator is integrated in the implant, e.g. the femoral stem of a total hip replacement. The oscillator consists of a magnetic or magnetisable spherical body which is fixed on a flat steel spring and is excited electromagnetically by a coil placed outside the patient. The oscillator impinges inside the implant and excites this to vibrate in its eigenfrequency. The excitation within the bending modes of the implant leads to a sound emission to the surrounding bone and soft tissue. The sound waves are detected by an acoustic sensor which is applied on the patient's skin. Differences in the signal generated result from varying level of implant fixation. The sensor principle was tested in porcine foreleg specimens with a custom-made implant. Influence of the measurement location at the porcine skin and different levels of fixation were investigated (press-fit, slight loosening, advanced loosening) and compared to the
To assess the current literature on suture anchor placement for the purpose of identifying factors that lead to suture anchor perforation and techniques that reduce the likelihood of complications. Three databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE) were searched, and two reviewers independently screened the resulting literature. Methodological quality of all included papers was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment tool. Results are presented in a narrative summary fashion using descriptive statistics. Fourteen studies were included in this review. Four case series (491 patients, 56.6% female, mean age 33.9 years), nine controlled cadaveric/laboratory studies (111 cadaveric hips and 12 sawbones, 42.2% female, mean age 60.0 years), and one randomized controlled trial (37 hips, 55.6% female, mean age 34.2 years) were included. Anterior cortical perforation by suture anchors led to pain and impingement of pelvic neurovascular structures. The anterior acetabular positions (three to four o'clock) had the thinnest bone, smallest rim angles, and highest incidence of articular perforation. Drilling angles from 10° to 20° measured off the coronal plane were acceptable. The mid-anterior (MA) and distal anterolateral (DALA) portals were used successfully, with some studies reporting difficulty placing anchors at anterior locations via the DALA portal. Small-diameter (< 1 .8-mm) suture anchors had a lower in vivo incidence of articular perforation with similar stability and
Recent clinical data suggest improvement in the fixation of tibia trays for total knee arthroplasty when the trays are additive manufactured with highly porous bone ingrowth structures. Currently, press-fit TKA is less common than press-fit THA. This is partly because the loads on the relatively flat, porous, bony apposition area of a tibial tray are more demanding than those same porous materials surrounding a hip stem. Even the most advanced additive manufactured (AM) highly porous structures have bone ingrowth limitations clinically as aseptic loosening still remains more common in press-fit TKA vs. THA implants. Osseointegration and antibacterial properties have been shown in vitro and in vivo to improve when implants have modified surfaces that have biomimetic nanostructures designed to mimic and interact with biological structures on the nano-scale. Pre-clinical evaluations show that TiO. 2. nanotubes (TNT), produced by anodization, on Ti6Al4V surfaces positively enhance the rate at which osseointegration occurs and TNT nano-texturization enhances the antibacterial properties of the implant surface. 2. In this in vivo sheep study, identical Direct Metal laser Sintered (DMLS) highly porous Ti6Al4V specimens with and without TNT surface treatment are compared to sintered bead specimens with plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite-coated surface treatment. Identical DMLS specimens made from CoCrMo were also implanted in sheep tibia bi-cortically (3 per tibia) and in the cancellous bone of the distal femur and proximal tibia (1 per site). Animals were injected with fluorochrome labels at weeks 1, 2 and 3 after surgery to assess the rate of bone integration. The cortical specimens were mechanically tested and processed for PMMA histology and histomorphometry after 4 or 12 weeks. The cancellous samples were also processed for PMMA histology and histomorphometry. The three types of bone labels were visualized under UV light to examine the rate of new bony integration. At 4 weeks, a 42% increase in average
Summary. Optimum position of pedicle screws can be determined preoperatively by CT based planning. We conducted a comparative study in order to analyse manually determined pedicle screw plans and those that were obtained automatically by a computer software and found an agreement in plans between both methods, yet an increase in fastening strengths was observed for automatically obtained plans. Hypothesys. Automatic planning of pedicle screw positions and sizing is not inferior to manual planning. Design. Prospective comparative study. Introduction. Preoperative planning in spinal deformity surgery starts by a proper selection of implant anchors throughout the instrumented spine, where pedicle screws provide the optimum choice for bone fixation. In the case of severe spinal deformities, dysplastic pedicles can limit screw usage, and therefore studying the anatomy of vertebrae from preoperative images can aid in achieving the safest screw position through optimal fastening strength. The purpose of this study is to compare manually and automatically obtained preoperative pedicle screw plans. Materials and Methods. CT scans of 17 deformed thoracic spines were studied by two experienced spine deformity surgeons, who placed 316 pedicle screws in 3D using a software positioning tool by aiming for the safest trajectory that permitted the largest possible screw sizes. The resulting manually obtained screw sizes, trajectory angles, entry points and normalised fastening strengths were compared to those obtained automatically by a dedicated computer software that, basing on vertebral anatomy and bone density in 3D, determined optimal screw sizes and trajectories. Results. Statistically significant differences were observed between manually and automatically obtained plans for screw sizes (p < 0.05) and trajectory angles (p < 0.001). However, for automatically obtained plans, screws were not smaller in diameter (p < 0.05) or shorter in length (p < 0.001), while screw normalised fastening strengths were higher (p < 0.001). Conclusions. In comparison to manual planning, automatically obtained plans did not result in smaller screw diameters or shorter screw lengths, which is in agreement with the definition of the
During the development and early use of the First Generation of Universal Total Knee Replacement Instruments, those instruments supplied with the PCA knee and also available for use with the Kinematic and Total Condylar knees, David Hungerford and I noticed our imperfection in balancing some varus and valgus deformed total knee patients. We decided to start ligament tightening procedures to address this problem. I became impressed with the potential difficulty simply of grasping the medial capsular ligamentous sleeve and pulling it distally on the proximal tibia so that it could be stapled in place. I thought that use of a suture and then incorporation of that suture with a staple or screw could enhance the fixation. The tissue we were working with and are now talking about is rather thin, one to two millimeters, flat and broad with longitudinal fibers running in a caudad-cephalad direction. I wanted some way to grab these longitudinal fibers and exert a distal pull without having the suture material pull through. This suggested the use of a locking loop, analogous to what I had seen in my training when locking stitches were commonly used on different layers of wound closure. I developed in my head the picture of a row of locking loops and then saw the cross-over to the other side which revealed the entire structure with trailing tails. At this writing, I am uncertain of the year, but I am thinking it was 1982. Soon after that I illustrated it with OR suture thru paper and then began using it in surgery. I felt that publication would require studies of relative
During the development and early use of the First Generation of Universal Total Knee Replacement Instruments, those instruments supplied with the PCA knee and also available for use with the Kinematic and Total Condylar knees, David Hungerford and I noticed our imperfection in balancing some varus and valgus deformed total knee patients. We decided to start ligament tightening procedures to address this problem. I became impressed with the potential difficulty of simply grasping the medial capsular ligamentous sleeve and pulling it distally on the proximal tibia so that it could be stapled in place. I thought that use of a suture and then incorporation of that suture with a staple or screw could enhance the fixation. The tissue we were working with and are now talking about is rather thin, 1mm to 2mm, flat and broad with longitudinal fibers running in a caudad-cephalad direction. I wanted some way to grab these longitudinal fibers and exert a distal pull without having the suture material pull through. This suggested the use of a locking loop, analogous to what I had seen in my training when locking stitches were commonly used on different layers of wound closure. I developed in my head the picture of a row of locking loops and then saw the cross-over to the other side which revealed the entire structure with trailing tails. At this writing, I am uncertain of the year, but I am thinking it was 1982. Soon after that I illustrated it with OR suture thru paper and then began using it in surgery. I felt that publication would require studies of relative
