Introduction. Total knee and hip arthroplasty were the main arthroplasty surgery performed in Brazil. In Brazil, around 50% of arthroplasty surgeries are performed by the public health system, knowing as SUS . 1. SUS is the biggest public and universal health system in the world, attending 100% of the Brazilian population (220 million), with 2020's expected budget of US$ 31 billion . 2,3. . The National Institute of Clinical Excellence utilizes the QALY system (Quality adjustment year life)to calculate the best cost-benefit between medical interventions . 4. In compliance with the study, an operated person has a QALY index of £5000 while a non-operated person has an index of £7182. In March 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemics, the Brazilian Health Ministry oriented for the postponing of elective surgery, to prioritize combating the virus . 5. This postponing, it was important but will cause an impact in the economy at the public health system from Brazil this year and in the next years. Therefore, this study aims to present the economic impact caused by COVID-19 pandemics in the public heal system, SUS, of Brazil. Methods. Data about total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Brazil were collected from the TABNET portal of the Brazilian Health Ministry/Datasus . 6. It was collected information per month about hospitalization authorization (AIH), and total cost per AIH. The information regards the period of January to June from years 2015 to 2020. Results and Discussion. After the orientation in march 2020 to postpone elective surgery, there was a reduction of up to 91% in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 76% in total hip arthroplasty (THA), compared to the same period in the previous years (see Figure 1). This represents a reduction of more than 5000 surgeries in the first semester. According to Brazilian doctors, the retention of surgeries will result in excessive demand for the sector in the upcoming months . 7. . Due to the reduction of the AIH, which occurs a reduction US$3,881,494 of the budget destined for arthroplasty surgeries in the first semester of 2020 (see Figure 2), being used to the combat of COVID-19. Consequently, the purchase of new hip and knee prostheses decreases, harming the implant sales sector in Brazil. Furthermore, by the QALY system, the cost of a non-operated patient is up to 43% bigger than that of an operated patient. Thus, this will generate an increase in the expenses of the SUS in the upcoming months or years. Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemics generate the need of postponing elective surgery of the SUS, such as total hip and knee arthroplasty. Because of this, there was a reduction of 67% of the number and expense of knee and hip arthroplasties in the first semester of 2020. This generates an economic loss for the implants companies and it will increase overly the demand for new surgeries in the upcoming months or years. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Aim:. To audit pertrochanteric fractures treated with a cephalomedullary device in a public health institution. Method:. A retrospective 3 year analysis from January 2007 to December 2010 using theatre records and patient files. Analysis was done in terms of age, time to surgery, duration of surgery, elective or emergency, type of device used, perioperative complications and other factors. Results:. A total of 96 cases were confirmed. The average age was 67.4 years (13 to 99 years). The average time to theatre was 6.9 days. The average duration of surgery was 2 hours 59 minutes. A Trigen reconstruction nail was used in 59.4 % of the cases followed by a PFNA (26%) and others (13.6%). In 30% of cases surgery time was >3 hours and most were done electively (85.4%) during normal working hours. Revision surgery due to poor surgical technique was reported in 8 of 96 (8.3%) cases. Conclusion:. Our audit confirms that pertrochanteric fractures are common in elderly and young patients involved in high velocity trauma especially motor vehicle accidents. Pertrochanteric fractures lead to prolonged morbidity in hospital stay and theatre time. Cephalomedullary devices have reduced these complications and resulted in early rehabilitation and hospital discharge with only 8% of revisions in 3 years

Orthopaedic paediatric deformities, globally, are often corrected later than initial identification due to resource constraints (bed availability, investigative modalities, surgical skill set). The study aims to analyse experiences and challenges met with running a flagship scoliosis surgery week in a tertiary public health care facility, with the goal of reducing patient waiting time on the waiting list. In this retrospective study, patients from an existing deformity correction waiting list were selected for a 5 day scoliosis surgery week. Investigations relevant to clinical findings were carried out and patients were scheduled on a “one patient per day” surgery list. Inclusion criteria was any patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of varying degree that was symptomatic. Exclusion criteria was any other deformity of any age. Outcomes measured include: Administrative hurdles (obtaining funding, organising ward and ICU beds, getting nursing staff), Surgical challenges (severity of the curve, intraoperative time, approach chosen) and perioperative management (anaesthesia, pain management, cost of equipment) will be looked at to better define the experiences and challenges. All scheduled surgeries were completed. This meant more cases were carried out than what was done in the last 2 years at the facility combined. Lack of Nursing staff availability and few ICU beds delayed starting cases. Anterior fusion took a shorter surgical time in comparison to posterior and cost far less to carry out owing to deformity severity. Intra and post operative management also varied due to daily changes in theatre staff and a lack of standardized protocols. Running a scoliosis surgery week helps to lower the waiting time for deformity correction in public health care facilities. Pre organising resources results in more successful outcomes and an increase in the number of cases done over a shorter period

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic public health measures were implemented to limit virus spread. After initial implementation of a province-wide lockdown (Stage 1), there followed a sequential ease of restrictions through Stages 2 and 3 over a 6-month period from March to September 2020 (Table 1). We aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 public health measures on the epidemiology of operative paediatric orthopaedic trauma and to determine differential effects of each stage of lockdown. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing all emergency department (ED) visits for musculoskeletal trauma and operatively treated orthopaedic trauma cases at a Level-1 paediatric trauma center during Mar-Sep 2020 (pandemic), compared with Mar-Sep 2019 (pre-pandemic). All operative cases were analyzed based on injury severity, mechanism of injury (MOI) and anatomic location (AL). Comparisons between groups were assessed using chi-square testing for categorical variables, and student t-tests and Fisher's exact tests for continuous variables. During the pandemic period, ED visits for orthopaedic trauma decreased compared to pre-pandemic levels by 23% (1370 vs 1790 patients) and operative treatment decreased by 28% (283 vs 391 patients). There was a significant decrease in the number of operative cases per day in lockdown Stage 1 (1.25 pandemic vs 1.90 pre- pandemic; p < 0 .001) and Stage 2 (1.65 pandemic vs 3.03 pre-pandemic; p< 0.001) but no difference in operative case number during Stage 3 (2.18 pandemic vs 2.45 pre-pandemic; p=0.35). Significant differences were found in MOI and AL during Stage 1 (p < 0 .001) and Stage 2 (p < 0 .001) compared to pre-pandemic. During Stage 1 and 2, playground injuries decreased by 95% and 82%, respectively; sports injuries decreased by 79% and 13%, and trampoline injuries decreased 44% and 43%, compared to pre-pandemic. However, self-propelled transit injuries (bicycles/skateboards) increased during Stage 1 and Stage 2 by 67% and 28%, respectively compared to pre- pandemic. During lockdown Stage 3 there were no differences in MOI nor AL. There were no significant differences in injury severity in any lockdown stage compared to pre-pandemic. COVID-19 lockdown measures significantly reduced the burden of operative paediatric orthopaedic trauma. Differences in volume, mechanism and pattern of injuries varied by lockdown stage offering evidence of the burden of operative trauma related to specific childhood activities. These findings will assist health systems planning for future pandemics and suggest that improvements in safety of playgrounds and self-propelled transit are important in reducing severe childhood injury requiring operative intervention. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Escalating health care expenditure worldwide is driving the need for effective resource decision-making, with medical practitioners increasingly making complex resource decisions within the context of patient care. Despite raising serious legal and ethical issues in practice, this has attracted little attention in Australia, or internationally. In particular, it is unknown how orthopaedic surgeons perceive their obligations to the individual patient, and the wider community, when rationing care, and how they reconcile competing obligations. This research explores legal and ethical considerations, and resource allocation by Australian orthopaedic surgeons, as a means of achieving public health cost containment driven by macro-level policy and funding decisions. This research found that Australian orthopaedic surgeon's perceptions, and resource allocation decision making, can be explained by understanding how principles of distributive justice challenge, and shift, the traditional medical paradigm. It found that distributive justice, and challenges of macro level health policy and funding decisions, have given rise to two new medical paradigms. Each which try to balance the best interests of individual patients with demands in respect of the sustainability of the health system, in a situation where resources may be constrained. This research shows that while bedside rationing has positioned the medical profession as the gate keepers of resources, it may have left them straddling an increasingly irreconcilable void between the interests of the individual patient and the wider community, with the sustainability of the health system hanging in the balance

Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite improvements in trauma-related morbidity and mortality in high-income countries over recent years, outcomes following MSK injuries in low and middle-income countries, such as South Africa (SA), have not. Despite governmental recognition that this is required, funding and research into this significant health burden are limited within SA. This study aims to identify research priorities within MSK trauma care using a consensus-based approach amongst MSK health care practitioners within SA. Members from the Orthopaedic Research Collaborative (ORCA), based in SA, collaborated using a two round modified Delphi technique to form a consensus on research priorities within orthopaedic trauma care. Members involved in the process were orthopaedic healthcare practitioners within SA. Participants from the ORCA network, working within SA, scored research priorities across two Delphi rounds from low to high priority. We have published the overall top 10 research priorities for this Delphi process. Questions were focused on two broad groups - clinical effectiveness in trauma care and general trauma public health care. Both groups were represented by the top two priorities, with the highest ranked question regarding the overall impact of trauma in SA and the second regarding the clinical treatment of open fractures. This study has defined research priorities within orthopaedic trauma in South Africa. Our vision is that by establishing consensus on these research priorities, policy and research funding will be directed into these areas. This should ultimately improve musculoskeletal trauma care across South Africa and its significant health and socioeconomic impacts

Pacific people in New Zealand experience significant disparity in health outcomes. There is little known about the burden of arthritis within this community or difficulties accessing specialist orthopaedic care. This qualitative study evaluated the experiences of Pacific patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty with a goal to identify barriers to accessing arthroplasty for this community. We interviewed Pacific patients within the Bay of Plenty region who had received either elective hip or knee arthroplasty between 2013 and 2022. Interviews were centred on perceptions of arthritis severity, duration of symptoms, primary care and specialist interactions. Patients were encouraged to offer feedback on ways to improve this experience. We identified 6087 publicly funded primary joints performed in Tauranga hospital and 58 patients were of Pacific ethnicity. After exclusion criteria was applied, we successfully interviewed 20 patients eligible for our study. Pacific patients represented 2.9% of the of the BOP catchment but only received 0.43% of the publicly funded joints. Most reported reluctance to seek help from primary care until symptoms were present for at least a year. Most commonly cited reasons for not seeking help were fear of hospital services and lack of awareness in the community about osteoarthritis. We identified a lack of community awareness of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty among Pacific. This may result in delayed presentation to primary care and decreased utilisation of publicly funded joint surgery. It is reassuring that most patients of Pacific ethnicity who receive primary hip or knee arthroplasty report a positive experience. Public health initiatives together with positive feedback from Pacific patients who have undergone surgery will help to increase awareness of arthroplasty as an option to restore function and relieve pain

Low-energy fractures complications are a major public health issue that make osteoporosis even worse. In sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence of osteoporosis varies from 18.2% to 65.8%. There was no change in bone mineral density between HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected women in Sub-Saharan Africa, where HIV is widespread. Other investigations that demonstrated that HIV-infected people had poor BMD both before and after starting anti-retroviral treatment did not consistently show a low BMD finding. Inflammation-mediated bone remodelling has been associated with low BMD in HIV-infected patients. Antiretroviral Therapy has been demonstrated to exacerbate bone loss in addition to the pre-existing intrinsic risk of developing osteoporosis. Question: Is there loss of bone in HIV-infected patients before initiating ART?. The patients who were HIV-positive and enrolled in the ADVANCE research were retrospectively reviewed on a desk. All of the 1053 individuals in the ADVANCE research had a DXA scan performed to evaluate BMD as part of the initial screening and recruitment approach. The ADVANCE research enrolled HIV-positive people and randomly assigned them to three ART arms. A total of 400 patients were reviewed. Of these 400 records reviewed, 62.3% were female. 80% of the participants were younger than 40 years old, and 3% were older than 50 years. 82% were virally suppressed with less than 50 viral copies. The prevalence of osteopenia was 25.5% and osteoporosis was 2.8%, observed in predominantly African female participants aged between 30 and 39 years. The findings of this study confirm that there is pre-existing bone loss among HIV-infected ART naïve individuals. Approximately 28.3% in our study had clinically confirmed evidence of bone loss and of these, 2.8% of the entire cohort had osteoporosis. Bone loss was most prevalent in black females who are virologically suppressed

Since the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a technologically based progression to almost every sector of society. This has led to an influx of e-hailing motorcycle drivers (online based consumable transportation platforms) and thus an increase in road traffic accidents. This group experiences an abundance of Orthopaedic related trauma with a considerable economic burden. Therefore, the study aimed to determine the incidence of this study group as well as quantify the severity and cost implications thereof for the sake of public health and epidemiology. This was an observational study whereby a prospective cohort analysis was respectively conducted at a single centre to determine the incidence, of the study group, over a seven-month period. The study included any e-hailing motorcycle driver who sustained Orthopaedic related trauma, whilst on duty, within the catchment area whereas all other patients were excluded and used as a comparator. A descriptive statistical analysis was done to further delineate the severity of injury by comparing the type of injury, anatomical location injured, and management plan incurred. A total of 5096 individuals experienced Orthopaedic related trauma with 60 individuals (1.18%) being e-hailing motorcyclists who sustained injury whilst on duty. The incidence being 118 per 10000 patients. Further analysis revealed that 78.33% of the population experienced fractures or dislocations with 52.31% of these injuries requiring surgical intervention. The Upper limb (53.85%) and Lower limb (43.08%) were the most affected anatomical locations. The Orthopaedic care for this population group places a meaningful burden on the South African Health sector. These drivers work in unsafe environments and sustain high energy impacts, yet very little oversight exists. Therefore, continued research with new regulations needs to be drafted, looking into vehicle safety, working conditions, operative hours, and the need for public awareness

INTRODUCTION. Tuberculosis (TB) is a public health challenge. However, musculoskeletal involvement represents 10–15% of all extrapulmonary cases. Upper extremity involvement is extremely rare. The slow progressive course of clinical symptoms and lack of radiological signs lead to difficulties in establishing early diagnosis. Hence, the patients who have tuberculosis of the wrist are usually misdiagnosed. We report 5 cases of tuberculosis of the wrist seen in our unit from the year 2012 to 2021. METHODS. Cases were retrospectively evaluated on demographics, nature of history, clinical presentation, culture finding, and histopathological findings from 2012 to 2021 at our unit. RESULTS. A total of 5 cases were evaluated retrospectively. Three patients were more than 60 years old and two were less than 30 years old. Four of the patients presented with wrist swelling 2 of them had wrist pain and only 1 patient had discharge from the wound. The duration of the symptoms ranges from 2 months to 3 years. Only one of the patients had a history of pulmonary TB contact whereas the others didn't. All patients underwent surgery. All of the patients had positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and histopathological examination showed necrotizing granulomatous inflammation from specimens taken intraoperatively, which confirmed the diagnosis of tuberculosis of the wrist. DISCUSSIONS. Our cases show that the common presentation of tuberculosis of the wrist was comparable to other literature. Most of the patients presented with chronic wrist swelling with or without wrist pain. The diagnosis of the disease was delayed an average of 10 - 12 months from symptoms onset to diagnosis. S. Bayram et al reported a case where the diagnosis was made 45 months later. Due to its rarity, it often is misdiagnosed, resulting in delays in the proper treatment. CONCLUSION. The diagnosis of the TB wrist remains difficult because of insidious and non-specific. presentation. However, early diagnosis is essential to avoid delays in treatment and complications. Hence, chronic wrist pain, and swelling with or without unexplained bone erosion around the wrist area must be highly suspected of being osteoarticular tuberculosis

Aim. Melioidosis is a significant public health problem in endemic regions such as India. Lack of awareness, predominant empiric antibiotic use reducing culture yields, morphotypic variability of cultures and frequent misidentification by automated blood culture systems, pose myriad challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Through this series, we present our experience of Hematogenous Osteomyelitis with Burkholderia pseudomallei. Method. This was a single centre, retrospective, observational study performed at a tertiary case hospital in Mumbai, India from June 2011 to June 2021. Results. The study comprised of 7 cases (6:1, M: F). Mean age was 53.7 years (5 to 75). All had an underlying co- morbidity or were immunosuppressed. 3 patients were misidentified by automated systems prior to presentation (e coli, burkholderia cepacieae, acinetobacter). Most common site of infection was femur (n= 3), followed by tibia and foot and ankle (n= 2, each). One had disseminated meliodosis involving the spleen, lymph nodes, pulmonary) in addition to involvement of bilateral feet and ankles. B. pseudomallei was identified in all following surgical debridement at our institute. Each patient underwent mean 2 procedures. 3 needed local rotation flap surgeries for wound cover. All were treated with ceftazidime along with trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole (TMP- SMX) during the 6 week induction phase. TMP- SMX was continued for a further 6 months in the consolidation phase. All patients had infection remission at a mean 19.3 months follow up. There were no mortalities in our series. Conclusions. Clinically Burkholderia infections mimic other pyogenic infections, Gram-negative sepsis, tuberculosis and has been referred to as the “remarkable imitator” and the “mimicker of maladies”. Diabetes and alcoholism are risk factors. The need for diagnosing this entity is due to the fact that the septicemic form has a mortality rate that exceeds 90%. Melioidosis is frequently misidentified. A high clinical suspicion, communication with microbiologist, knowledge about the biochemical, cultural and phenotypic susceptibility patterns may help in optimising diagnosis. Adequate debridement coupled with targeted prolonged antibiotics help achieve good outcomes

Traditionally, sports Injuries have been sub-optimally managed through Emergency Departments (ED) in the public health system due to a lack of adequate referral processes. Fractures are ruled out through plain radiographs followed by a reactive process involving patient initiated further follow up and investigation. Consequently, significant soft tissue and chondral injuries can go undiagnosed during periods in which early intervention can significantly affect natural progression. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to assess the efficacy of an innovative Sports Injury Pathway introduced to detect and treat significant soft tissue injuries. A Sports Injury Pathway was introduced at Fiona Stanley Hospital (WA, Australia) in April 2019 as a collaboration between the ED, Physiotherapy and Orthopaedic Departments. ED practitioners were advised to have a low threshold for referral, especially in the presence of a history of a twisting knee injury, shoulder dislocation or any suggestion of a hip tendon injury. All referrals were triaged by the Perth Sports Surgery Fellow with early follow-up in our Sports Trauma Clinics with additional investigations if required. A detailed database of all referrals was maintained, and relevant data was extracted for analysis over the first 3 years of this pathway. 570 patients were included in the final analysis. 54% of injuries occurred while playing sport, with AFL injuries constituting the most common contact-sports injury (13%). Advanced Scope Physiotherapists were the largest source of referrals (60%). A total of 460 MRI scans were eventually ordered comprising 81% of total referrals. Regarding Knee MRIs, 86% identified a significant structural injury with ACL injuries being the most common (33%) followed by isolated meniscal tears (16%) and multi-ligament knee injuries (11%). 95% of Shoulder MRI scans showed significant pathology. 39% of patients required surgical management, and of these 50% were performed within 3 months from injury. The Fiona Stanley Hospital Sports Injury Pathway has demonstrated its clear value in successfully diagnosing and treating an important cohort of patients who present to our Emergency Department. This low threshold/streamlined referral pathway has found that the vast majority of these patients suffer significant structural injuries that may have been otherwise missed, while providing referring practitioners and patients access to prompt imaging and high-quality Orthopaedic sports trauma services. We recommend the implementation of a similar Sports Injury Pathway at all secondary and tertiary Orthopaedic Centres

Most cost containment efforts in public health systems have focused on regulating the use of hospital resources, especially operative time. As such, attempting to maximize the efficiency of limited operative time is important. Typically, hospital operating room (OR) scheduling of time is performed in two tiers: 1) master surgical scheduling (annual allocation of time between surgical services and surgeons) and 2) daily scheduling (a surgeon's selection of cases per operative day). Master surgical scheduling is based on a hospital's annual case mix and depends on the annual throughput rate per case type. This throughput rate depends on the efficiency of surgeons’ daily scheduling. However, daily scheduling is predominantly performed manually, which requires that the human planner simultaneously reasons about unknowns such as case-specific length-of-surgery and variability while attempting to maximize throughput. This often leads to OR overtime and likely sub-optimal throughput rate. In contrast, scheduling using mathematical and optimization methods can produce maximum systems efficiency, and is extensively used in the business world. As such, the purpose of our study was to compare the efficiency of 1) manual and 2) optimized OR scheduling at an academic-affiliated community hospital representative of most North American centres. Historic OR data was collected over a four year period for seven surgeons. The actual scheduling, surgical duration, overtime and number of OR days were extracted. This data was first configured to represent the historic manual scheduling process. Following this, the data was then used as the input to an integer linear programming model with the goal of determining the minimum number of OR days to complete the same number of cases while not exceeding the historic overtime values. Parameters included the use of a different quantile for each case type's surgical duration in order to ensure a schedule within five percent of the historic overtime value per OR day. All surgeons saw a median 10% (range: 9.2% to 18.3%) reduction in the number of OR days needed to complete their annual case-load compared to their historical scheduling practices. Meanwhile, the OR overtime varied by a maximum of 5%. The daily OR configurations differed from historic configurations in 87% of cases. In addition, the number of configurations per surgeon was reduced from an average of six to four. Our study demonstrates a significant increase in OR throughput rate (10%) with no change in operative time required. This has considerable implications in terms of cost reduction, surgical wait lists and surgeon satisfaction. A limitation of this study was that the potential gains are based on the efficiency of the pre-existing manual scheduling at our hospital. However, given the range of scenarios tested, number of surgeons included and the similarity of our hospital size and configuration to the majority of North American hospitals with an orthopedic service, these results are generalizable. Further optimization may be achieved by taking into account factors that could predict case duration such as surgeon experience, patients characteristics, and institutional attributes via machine learning

Aims. The increase in prescription opioid misuse and dependence is now a public health crisis in the UK. It is recognized as a whole-person problem that involves both the medical and the psychosocial needs of patients. Analyzing aspects of pathophysiology, emotional health, and social wellbeing associated with persistent opioid use after injury may inform safe and effective alleviation of pain while minimizing risk of misuse or dependence. Our objectives were to investigate patient factors associated with opioid use two to four weeks and six to nine months after an upper limb fracture. Methods. A total of 734 patients recovering from an isolated upper limb fracture were recruited in this study. Opioid prescription was documented retrospectively for the period preceding the injury, and prospectively at the two- to four-week post-injury visit and six- to nine-month post-injury visit. Bivariate and multivariate analysis sought factors associated with opioid prescription from demographics, injury-specific data, Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS), Depression computer adaptive test (CAT), PROMIS Anxiety CAT, PROMIS Instrumental Support CAT, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and measures that investigate levels of social support. Results. A new prescription of opioids two to four weeks after injury was independently associated with less social support (odds ratio (OR) 0.26, p < 0.001), less instrumental support (OR 0.91, p < 0.001), and greater symptoms of anxiety (OR 1.1, p < 0.001). A new prescription of opioids six to nine months after injury was independently associated with less instrumental support (OR 0.9, p < 0.001) and greater symptoms of anxiety (OR 1.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that potentially modifiable psychosocial factors are associated with increased acute and chronic opioid prescriptions following upper limb fracture. Surgeons prescribing opioids for upper limb fractures should be made aware of the screening and management of emotional and social health. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):119–124

Obesity is an increasing public health concern associated with increased perioperative complications and expense in lumbar spine fusions. While open and mini-open fusions such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF) are more challenging in obese patients, new MIS procedures like oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLLIF) may improve perioperative outcomes in obese patients relative to TLIF and MIS-TLIF. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of obesity on perioperative outcomes in OLLIF, MIS-TLIF, and TLIF. This is a retrospective cohort study. We included patients who underwent OLLIF, MIS-TLIF, or TLIF on three or fewer spinal levels at a single Minnesota hospital after conservative therapy had failed. Indications included in this study were degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, spondylosis, herniation, stenosis, and scoliosis. We measured demographic information, body mass index (BMI), surgery time, blood loss, and hospital stay. We performed summary statistics to compare perioperative outcomes in MIS-TLIF, OLLIF, and TLIF. We performed multivariate regression to determine the effects of BMI on perioperative outcomes controlling for demographics and number of levels on which surgeries were operated. OLLIF significantly reduces surgery time, blood loss, and hospital stay compared to MIS-TLIF, and TLIF for all levels. MIS-TLIF and TLIF do not differ significantly except for a slight reduction in hospital stay for two-level procedures. On multivariate analysis, a one-point increase in BMI increased surgery time by 0.56 ± 0.47 minutes (p = 0.24) in the OLLIF group, by 2.8 ± 1.43 minutes (p = 0.06) in the MIS-TLIF group, and by 1.7 ± 0.43 minutes (p < 0.001) in the TLIF group. BMI has positive effects on blood loss for TLIF (p < 0.001) but not for OLLIF (p = 0.68) or MIS-TLIF (p = 0.67). BMI does not have significant effects on length of hospital stay for any procedure. Obesity is associated with increased surgery time and blood loss in TLIF and with increased surgery time in MIS-TLIF. Increased surgery time may be associated with increased perioperative complications and cost. In OLLIF, BMI does not affect perioperative outcomes. Therefore, OLLIF may reduce the disparity in outcomes and cost between obese and non-obese patients

Total knee arthroplasty is a successful procedure that reduces knee pain and improves function in most patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patient dissatisfaction however remains high, and along with implant longevity, may be affected by component positioning. Surgery in obese patients is more technically challenging with difficulty identifying appropriate landmarks for alignment and more difficult exposure of the joint. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced with the goal to increase accuracy of component positioning by custom fitting cutting guides to the patient using advanced imaging. A strong criticism of this new technology however, is the cost associated. The purpose of this study was to determine, using a prospective, randomized-controlled trial, the cost-effectiveness of PSI compared to standard instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in an obese patient population. Patients with a body mass index greater than 30 with osteoarthritis and undergoing a primary total knee arthroplasty were included in this study. We randomized patients to have their procedure with either standard instrumentation (SOC) or PSI. At 12-weeks post-surgery patients completed a self-reported cost questionnaire and the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). We performed a cost-effectiveness analyses from a public health payer and societal perspective. As we do not know the true cost of the PSI instrumentation, we estimated a value of $100 for our base case analysis and used one-way sensitivity analyses to determine the effect of different values (ranging from $0 to $500) would have on our conclusions. A total of 173 patients were enrolled in the study with 86 patients randomized to the PSI group and 87 to the SOC group. We found the PSI group to be both less effective and more costly than SOC when using a public payer perspective, regardless of the cost of the PSI. From a societal perspective, PSI was both less costly, but also less effective, regardless of the cost of the PSI. The mean difference in effect between the two groups was −1.61 (95% CI −3.48, 026, p=0.091). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $485.71 per point increase in the WOMAC, or $7285.58 per clinically meaningful difference (15 points) in the WOMAC. Overall, our results suggest that PSI is not cost-effective compared to standard of care from a public payer perspective. From a societal perspective, there is some question as to whether the decreased effect found with the PSI group is worth the reduced cost. The main driver of the cost difference appears to be time off of volunteer work, which will need to be investigated further. In future, we will continue to follow these patients out to one year to collect cost and effectiveness data to investigate whether these results remain past 12 weeks post-surgery

With an ageing population and an increasing number of primary arthroplasties performed, the revision burden is predicted to increase. The aims of this study were to 1. Determine the revision burden in an academic hospital over a 11-year period; 2. identify the direct hospital cost associated with the delivery of revision service and 3. ascertain factors associated with increased cost. This is an IRB-approved, retrospective, single tertiary referral center, consecutive case series. Using the hospital data warehouse, all patients that underwent revision hip or knee arthroplasty surgery between 2008-2018 were identified. 1632 revisions were identified (1304 patients), consisting of 1061 hip and 571 knee revisions. The majority of revisions were performed for mechanical-related problems and aseptic loosening (n=903; 55.3%); followed by periprosthetic joint infection (n=553; 33.9%) and periprosthetic fractures (176; 10.8%). Cost and length of stay was determined for all patient. The direct in-hospital costs were converted to 2020 inflation-adjusted Canadian dollars. Several patients- (age; gender; HOMR- and ASA-scores; Hemoglobin level) and surgical- (indication for surgery; surgical site) factors were tested for possible associations. The number of revisions increased by 210% in the study period (2008 vs. 2018: 83 vs. 174). Revision indications changed over study period; with prevalence of fracture increasing by 460% (5 in 2008 vs. 23 in 2018) with an accompanying reduction in mechanical-related reasons, whilst revisions for infection remained constant. The mean annual cost over the entire study period was 3.9 MMCAD (range:2.4–5.1 MMCAD). The cost raised 150% over the study period from 2.4 MMCAD in 2008 to 3.6 MMCAD. Revisions for fractured had the greatest length of stay, the highest mean age, HOMR-score, ASA and cost associated with treatment compared to other revision indications (p < 0 .001). Patient factors associated with cost and length of stay included ASA- and HOMR-scores, Charlson-Comorbidity score and age. The revision burden increased 1.5-fold over the years and so has the direct cost of care delivery. The increased cost is primarily related to the prolonged hospital stay and increased surgical cost. For tertiary care units, these findings indicate a need to identify strategies on improving efficiencies whilst improving the quality of patient care (e.g. efficient ways of reducing acute hospital stay) and reducing the raise of the economic burden on a publicly funded health system

Aims. Tuberculosis (TB) infection of bones and joints accounts for 6.7% of TB cases in England, and is associated with significant morbidity and disability. Public Health England reports that patients with TB experience delays in diagnosis and treatment. Our aims were to determine the demographics, presentation and investigation of patients with a TB infection of bones and joints, to help doctors assessing potential cases and to identify avoidable delays. Patients and Methods. This was a retrospective observational study of all adults with positive TB cultures on specimens taken at a tertiary orthopaedic centre between June 2012 and May 2014. A laboratory information system search identified the patients. The demographics, clinical presentation, radiology, histopathology and key clinical dates were obtained from medical records. Results. A total of 31 adult patients were identified. Their median age was 37 years (interquartile range (IQR): 29 to 53); 21 (68%) were male; 89% were migrants. The main sites affected were joints (10, 32%), the spine (8, 26%) and long bones (6, 19%); 8 (26%) had multifocal disease. The most common presenting symptoms were pain (29/31, 94%) and swelling (26/28, 93%). ‘Typical’ symptoms of TB, such as fever, sweats and weight loss, were uncommon. Patients waited a median of seven months (IQR 3 to 13.5) between the onset of symptoms and referral to the tertiary centre and 2.3 months (IQR 1.6 to 3.4.)) between referral and starting treatment. Radiology suggested TB in 26 (84%), but in seven patients (23%) the initial biopsy specimens were not sent for mycobacterial culture, necessitating a second biopsy. Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction-based testing for TB using Xpert MTB/RIF was performed in five patients; 4 (80%) tested positive for TB. These patients had a reduced time between the diagnostic biopsy and starting treatment than those whose samples were not tested (median eight days versus 36 days, p = 0.016). Conclusion. Patients with bone and joint TB experience delays in diagnosis and treatment, some of which are avoidable. Maintaining a high index of clinical suspicion and sending specimens for mycobacterial culture are crucial to avoid missing cases. Rapid diagnostic tests reduce delays and should be performed on patients with radiological features of TB. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:119–24

The Department of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service established the Nosocomial Infection National Surveillance Scheme in order to standardise the collection of information about infections acquired in hospital in the United Kingdom and provide national data with which hospitals could measure their own performance. The definition of superficial incisional infection (skin and subcutaneous tissue), set by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), should meet at least one of the defined criteria which would confirm the diagnosis and determine the need for specific treatment. We have assessed the interobserver reliability of the criteria for superficial incisional infection set by the CDC in our current practice. The incisional site of 50 patients who had an elective primary arthroplasty of the hip or knee was evaluated independently by two orthopaedic clinical research fellows and two orthopaedic ward sisters for the presence or absence of surgical-site infection. Interobserver reliability was assessed by comparison of the criteria for wound infection used by the four observers using kappa reliability coefficients. Our study demonstrated that some of the components of the current CDC criteria were unreliable and we recommend their revision

Obesity is a leading public health concern and it is increasing in prevalence over the last 20 years. Obesity prevalence has doubled in adults and tripled in adolescents. The United States is the leading country in terms of percent obesity. Most alarming is the fact that the fastest growing rates of obesity are in the highest BMI groups. The issue of obesity is a particular concern to arthroplasty surgeons since there is an association between the increasing incidence of obesity and the increasing rate of joint replacement. Also of concern is that obese patients tend to be younger and complication rates and revision rates are higher in young patients which is only compounded by the presence of obesity. The risk of virtually every major complication is substantially higher in obese patients. Of concern, however, is a recent study indicating that bariatric surgery with successful weight loss does not necessarily decrease the complication rate. Obesity is also associated with substantially higher costs. There is some evidence that obesity doesn't necessarily affect implant survival. There is also evidence that the clinical outcomes may not be substantially compromised by the presence of obesity. Based on data from studies such as this, some centers have stated that it is difficult to justify withholding surgery based on BMI alone. The data on weight loss following surgery indicates the vast majority of patients did not lose weight following joint replacement. In one study a higher proportion of patients gained weight than lost weight