Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 11 - 11
1 Jan 2013
Pincus T Underwood M Vogel S Taylor S
Full Access

Purpose and background. Effective reassurance is an essential element of treatment for conditions that do not require further investigations, referrals and on-going monitoring. However, research defining what reassurance should consist of and how to deliver it is scarce. The aim of this review was to identify consultation-related processes that improved patients' outcomes, in order to build an evidence-based model of effective reassurance in primary care. Method and results. A literature search identified prospective observational studies that explicitly measured consultation-related factors in appropriate primary care patient groups. The findings from empirical studies were combined with theoretical and systematic reviews to develop a model of effective reassurance. Scrutiny of 8193 Abstracts yielded 29 empirical studies fitting inclusion criteria, and 64 reviews. The majority of studies measured patient satisfaction. Clinical outcomes (e.g. health status / symptom reduction) appear to improve with patients' active participation in the consultation. Behavioural outcomes (e.g. adherence/ health care utilization) were only measured in a handful of studies, but may improve when information was given in the final stage of the consultation. Psychological outcomes (e.g. health concerns) were consistently improved by patient-centred approaches. Conclusion. The synthesis of empirical evidence and theory resulted in a model with two distinct stages: Affective reassurance, which focuses on eliciting patient concerns empathically and leads to trust in the clinician. Cognitive reassurance should then follow, involving iterative and interactive education, leading to enablement and impacting on medium and long term outcomes. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. None