Background. Specifically designed control interventions can account for expectation effects in clinical trials. For the interpretation of efficacy trials of physical, psychological, and self-management interventions for people living with pain, the design, conduct, and reporting of control interventions is crucial. Objectives. To establish a quality standard in the field, core recommendations are presented alongside additional considerations and a reporting checklist for control interventions. Methods. Three Delphi rounds with 64 experts in placebo research and/or non-pharmacological clinical trials were conducted. The panel was presented with a systematic review and meta-analysis of control and blinding methods. A draft guidance document included 63 consensus items (≥80% agreement) and was discussed with patient partners. Finally, the draft guidance and results from stakeholder interviews were discussed at consensus meetings with Delphi participants and patient representatives. Results. Forty-four experts completed the process. When treatment efficacy or mechanisms are to be studied, the advocated principle is to design control interventions as similar as possible to the tested intervention, apart from the components that the study examines. Structured reasoning in the planning phase, early engagement with stakeholders, feasibility work, and piloting will enhance the quality and acceptability of control interventions. With participant blinding being a primary objective, blinding effectiveness should be routinely assessed and reported. Transparent and detailed reporting will improve interpretability and repeatability of clinical trials. Conclusion. This guideline provides the much-needed standards to enhance the quality of efficacy clinical trials in physical, psychological, and self-management intervention research, ultimately improving patient care. Study registration: . https://osf.io/jmyhq/. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Sources of Funding: Alain and Sheila Diamond Charitable Trust PhD Studentship

Purpose and background. To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a physical and psychological group intervention (BOOST programme) compared to physiotherapy assessment and advice (best practice advice [BPA]) for older adults with neurogenic claudication (NC) which is a debilitating spinal condition. Methods and results. A randomised controlled trial of 438 participants. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months. Data was also collected at 6 months. Other outcomes included Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (symptoms), ODI walking item, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and falls. The analysis was intention-to-treat. We collected the EQ5D and health and social care use to estimate cost-effectiveness. Participants were, on average, 74.9 years old (SD 6.0). There was no significant difference in ODI scores between groups at 12 months (adjusted mean difference (MD): −1.4 [95% Confidence Intervals (CI) −4.03,1.17]), but, at 6 months, ODI scores favoured the BOOST programme (adjusted MD: −3.7 [95% CI −6.27, −1.06]). Symptoms followed a similar pattern. The BOOST programme resulted in greater improvements in walking capacity (6MWT MD 21.7m [95% CI 5.96, 37.38]) and ODI walking item (MD −0.2 [95% CI −0.45, −0.01]) and reduced falls risk (odds ratio 0.6 [95% CI 0.40, 0.98]) compared to BPA at 12 months. Probability that the BOOST programme is cost-effective ranged from 67%–89% across cost-effectiveness thresholds. Conclusions. The BOOST programme improves mobility and reduces falls in older adults with NC compared to BPA at 12 months follow-up. It is good value for the NHS. Future iterations of the programme will consider ways to reduce symptoms and disability long-term. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: National Institute of Health Research – Programme for Applied Research NIHR - PTC-RP-PG-0213-20002: Better Outcomes for Older people with Spinal Trouble (BOOST). Publication and presentations: The clinical effectiveness paper has just been accepted for publication in the Journal of Gerontology Series A. The health economic analysis is not yet published. It was presented at the Physiotherapy UK conference and the International Back and Neck Pain Forum in 2021

Compare the prevalence of psychological distress in claustrophobic patients compared with a non-affected group, together with determination of presenting disability and overall intervention rates. Retrospective case notes review. 33 patients (13 males) all requiring MRI scan under sedation for claustrophobia (Group 1) were compared with an age and sex matched cohort that had MRI without sedation (Group 2). Both groups were drawn from the same chronic back clinic. Average age in both groups was 54 years (range 27-79 years). Both groups had standard conservative therapy, together with psychometric evaluation. Primary: Zung Depression Index (ZDI), Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ). Secondary: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), intervention rates (surgery, injections and physiotherapy sessions). Comparison of means -. 22 patients (66.7%) in Group 1 were discharged after their MRI with no intervention compared to 7 patients (21.2%) in Group 2. Claustrophobic patients with back pain showed higher levels of depression than non-claustrophobic patients, with a greater prevalence of psychological distress. Disability however was the same. The majority of claustrophobic patients had no intervention, with a lower rate than their non-claustrophobic peers. Claustrophobia is a proxy for psychological distress and should be considered in the overall evaluation of chronic back patients

Background. Being involved in litigation is associated with poor outcomes, higher levels of pain, disability, catastrophising, fear-avoidance and other psychological factors. Poor access to treatments can contribute to chronicity of symptoms and poor outcomes, especially in patients involved in litigation with a longer time since the accident. Purpose. To examine the relationship between time since the accident, access to treatments and current psychological variables. Methods. Eleven patients completed the Pain Catastrophising Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Zung Depression Inventory, Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire as well as details about the accident, working status and recalled access to treatments. The results were analysed qualitatively and quantitavely. Results. The mean time since the accident was 32 months and the mean measures are: ZDI (41.9±9.3), PCS (33.3±9.4), TSK (47.5±9.2), MSPQ (15±8.4). Eight subjects are not currently working and three are working part-time. There was a positive correlation between time since the accident and depression (r=0.679) and MSPQ (r=0.547) but not for other variables. Average sequence of recalled treatments is outlined. Conclusion. Our results indicate that measures of depression and somatic perceptions keep increasing with time whereas catastrophising and kineshiophobia are relatively constant in a small group of litigants with spinal pain. The recalled treatments reflect a focus on invasive treatments with little long-term positive outcome and only one patient receiving the recommended combined physical and psychological programme. I can confirm that this abstract has not previously been published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Source of funding: No funding obtained

Background. Depression, anxiety, catastrophising, and fear-avoidance beliefs are some of the so-called “yellow flags” that predict a poor outcome in back patients. Many surgeons have difficulty assessing yellow flags, perhaps due to the complexity of existing instruments and time constraints during consultations. We developed a brief tool to allow the systematic evaluation of core flags. Methods. Data from 4 questionnaires (ZUNG depression (N=399); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Anxiety-subscale) (N=308); Pain Catastrophising (N=766); Fear Avoidance Beliefs (N=736)) were analysed to identify the respective single item that best represented the full scale score. The 4 items formed the “Core Yellow Flags Index” (CYFI). 1'768 patients completed CYFI and a Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) preoperatively, and COMI 3 and 12mo later (FU). Results. The individual flag items correlated with their corresponding full-length questionnaires: 0.71 (depression), 0.81 (catastrophising), 0.77 (anxiety), 0.83 (fear avoidance beliefs). Cronbach's α for the 4 items was 0.79. Structural equation modelling revealed that CYFI explained a unique proportion of the variance in COMI at 3 months' FU (β=0.23, p< 0.001) and also at 12 months FU (β=0.20, p< 0.001). Conclusion. The 4-item CYFI proved to be a simple, practicable tool for routinely assessing key psychological attributes in spine surgery patients; it made a relevant contribution in predicting postoperative outcome. CYFI's items were similar to those in the “STarTBack screening-tool”, used in primary care to predict back pain chronicity, further substantiating its validity. Its wider use may help improve the accuracy of predictive models derived using spine registry data. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background:. Combined physical and psychological (CPP) programmes are widely recommended for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) patients. Patients with longstanding CLBP participating in a two-week CPP-programme improve in functional status and quality of life and the results are maintained for at least one year. First indications of maintenance of improved patient-reported outcomes are shown at two-year follow-up assessment. Purpose:. Evaluation of the long-term (at least five years of follow up) maintenance of positive results of a short, intensive, evidence based CPP-programme. Methods and Results:. A consecutive cohort study was performed, with a mean follow up of 6.5 years (range: 5.5–7.5). At follow up a response rate of 85% (n=277) was achieved. At pre-treatment the mean age was 46.1years (SD9.3) and the mean CLBP-duration 12.3years (SD10.9). Primary outcome was functional status (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI;0-100]). Secondary outcomes: pain intensity, quality of life, and satisfaction. A Repeated Measures analysis of variance was used to identify changes over time. The mean ODI-score showed improvement at post-treatment and maintenance of results over time (ODI df[1,276], F = 0.146, p = 0.703). Secondary outcomes showed the same pattern. At long-term follow up almost half of the CLBP-patients (45.3%) reached a functional status equivalent to an acceptable, normal healthy population value (ODI≤22), comparable to the 1-year follow-up assessment. 80.1% of the participants are satisfied with treatment results and 76.2% would recommend the programme to family/friends. Conclusion:. Long-term effectiveness of a CPP-programme is demonstrated. Patients improve during the programme and 1-year follow-up results are maintained after 6.5 years follow up

Background. Combined physical and psychological (CPP) programmes are widely recommended for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) patients, but not often implemented. Patients with longstanding CLBP participating in a two-week CPP programme improve in functional status and quality of life and this is maintained at two-year follow up. One-year follow-up data is available of 955 participants. Purpose:. Evaluation of one-year follow-up outcomes of a large cohort (n=848) compared to previously published results of the first 107 patients. Methods and Results. Pre-treatment age (43.4 years [SD8.4]), CLBP duration (12.3 years [SD10.9]), being employed (70%), and previous surgery (32%) were compared. Except for age (48.0 [SD 11.6], t=−4.0, p<0.001), no significant differences in pre-treatment characteristics were found. Primary outcome was functional status (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI;0-100]). Secondary outcomes: self-efficacy and quality of life. A Repeated Measures analysis of variance was used to identify changes over time (R. 2. ) and to compare differences between cohorts. The mean ODI score showed a similar pattern: improvement at post-treatment and maintenance of results over time (ODI df[1,848], F = 917.0, p<0.001; R. 2. = 0.52). Secondary outcomes showed the same pattern. Compared to previously reported results, significantly more improvement over time is shown. Half of the CLBP patients (50.1%) reached a functional status equivalent to an acceptable value (ODI ≤ 20). Conclusion. These results demonstrate the efficacy of this CPP programme. Patients improve during the programme, have further improved at one-year follow up, and half of the patients improve such that their functional status is comparable to that of the healthy population

Background

The BACK To Health programme is part of the wider North of England back pain and radicular pain pathway. The purpose of this programme is to provide a CPPP approach based on the NICE guidelines CG88 for those with back pain that has not responded to early management and simpler therapies. The purpose of this study is to present preliminary results of this programme.

Purpose and background. Understanding patients’ expectations of back pain treatment can help improve their experiences, adherence and outcomes. Patients typically expect a diagnosis and exercise-based physiotherapy, but often undervalue the role of psychological factors. This study explored patients’ expectations of outpatient physiotherapy treatment for back pain in primary care. Methods and Results. The design, a secondary analysis of a qualitative cross-sectional study, involved 25 patients (13M:12F), aged 20–81, referred with low back pain (duration 7 weeks to 9 years). This sample did not include patients with serious spinal pathologies, known psychological disorders, or those unable to communicate without assistance. Face-to-face interviews were undertaken in patients’ homes, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the six stages of thematic analysis outlined by Braun and Clarke. Patients expected a caring clinician and a strong therapeutic relationship, where they felt believed, openly communicated with and valued as an individual. Most patients expected a diagnosis and credible explanation for their pain. There was an almost equal split between those keen to take responsibility for their care and those who felt this was the clinicians’ role. Expectations of passive therapies were slightly higher in this study than existing research. Most patients were realistic about outcomes and expected treatment to reduce their pain, but not cure it. Conclusion. A positive experience mattered most to patients, valuing the relational aspects of their care more than the clinical content provided. Patients saw back pain through a biomedical lens, and most failed to recognise the role of psychosocial factors in their condition or treatment. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. Funding for primary data: Arthritis Research UK (now Versus Arthritis)

Aims. Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of ‘full-time bracing’ versus ‘night-time bracing’ in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods. UK paediatric spine clinics will recruit 780 participants aged ten to 15 years-old with AIS, Risser stage 0, 1, or 2, and curve size (Cobb angle) 20° to 40° with apex at or below T7. Patients are randomly allocated 1:1, to either full-time or night-time bracing. A qualitative sub-study will explore communication and experiences of families in terms of bracing and research. Patient and Public Involvement & Engagement informed study design and will assist with aspects of trial delivery and dissemination. Discussion. The primary outcome is ‘treatment failure’ (Cobb angle progression to 50° or more before skeletal maturity); skeletal maturity is at Risser stage 4 in females and 5 in males, or ‘treatment success’ (Cobb angle less than 50° at skeletal maturity). The comparison is on a non-inferiority basis (non-inferiority margin 11%). Participants are followed up every six months while in brace, and at one and two years after skeletal maturity. Secondary outcomes include the Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire and measures of quality of life, psychological effects of bracing, adherence, anxiety and depression, sleep, satisfaction, and educational attainment. All data will be collected through the British Spine Registry. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(11):873–880

Aims. People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial). Methods. An online cross-sectional survey was piloted by the multidisciplinary research team, then shared with clinical professional groups in the UK who are involved in the management of adults with severe, persistent LBP. The survey had seven sections that covered the demographic details of the clinician, five hypothetical case vignettes of patients with varying presentations, a series of questions regarding the preferred management, and whether or not each clinician would be willing to recruit the example patients into future clinical trials. Results. There were 72 respondents, with a response rate of 9.0%. They comprised 39 orthopaedic spine surgeons, 17 neurosurgeons, one pain specialist, and 15 allied health professionals. Most respondents (n = 61,84.7%) chose conservative care as their first-choice management option for all five case vignettes. Over 50% of respondents reported willingness to randomize three of the five cases to either surgery or BCC, indicating a willingness to participate in the future randomized trial. From the respondents, transforaminal interbody fusion was the preferred approach for spinal fusion (n = 19, 36.4%), and the preferred method of BCC was a combined programme of physical and psychological therapy (n = 35, 48.5%). Conclusion. This survey demonstrates that there is uncertainty about the role of lumbar spine fusion surgery and BCC for a range of example patients with severe, persistent LBP in the UK. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):612–620

Purpose. Cognitive Muscular Therapy (CMT) is a new treatment for low back pain which integrates psychological techniques for pain management alongside training to improve postural control. Rather than focus on postural alignment or strength, CMT aims to improve the regulation of postural tone (low-level activity which supports the body against gravity). This is achieved by teaching patients an awareness of compensatory paraspinal activation, which can be triggered by overactivity of the abdominal muscles. The aim of this study was to understand whether CMT could reduce symptoms associated with low back pain and improve paraspinal muscle activation. Methods and results. Fifteen patients with chronic low back pain received seven weekly sessions of CMT from a physiotherapist. Clinical data was captured at baseline and two weeks after the intervention using the Roland-Morris questionnaire and the pain catastrophising scale. Activation of the erector spinae muscle during walking was also measured at baseline and after the final intervention session. Change data were analysed using paired t-tests. There was a 75% reduction (p<0.001) in the Roland-Morris score from a mean (SD) of 9.3(2.9) to 2.3(2.6), along with a 78% reduction in pain catastrophising (p<0.002) from 16.6(13) to 3.7(4.8). Activation of the contralateral erector spinae muscles reduced by 30% (p<0.01) during the contralateral swing phase of walking. Conclusion. In this small sample, CMT delivered large clinical improvements and reduced activation of the low back muscles during walking. Larger randomised trials are now required to confirm whether CMT could outperform existing physiotherapy treatments for chronic back pain. Conflict of interest. No conflicts of interest. Source of funding. University of Salford

Purpose of study and background. Psychological factors are considered to play a role in development and maintenance of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Stress or anxiety can change pain sensitivity; however, this has predominantly been studied in healthy individuals with limited work in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of acute exposure to a psychosocial stressor on mechanical pain sensitivity in individuals with and without CLBP. Summary of methods and results. Six individuals with CLBP and 10 individuals without CLBP performed a 10-minute computer task under conditions of low and high psychosocial stress. Psychosocial stress was manipulated using mental maths and memory tasks combined with social evaluative threat. The effect of the stressor was evaluated using blood pressure, heart rate and the state anxiety component of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Index. Mechanical pressure pain threshold (PPT) was recorded on the tibialis anterior muscle using a handheld digital pressure algometer. The stress manipulation increased self-reported anxiety (p<0.001), but not blood pressure or heart rate (p>0.06). Change in PPT from low to high stress was greater in the CLBP group (median ΔPPT = −0.5 kg/cm. 2. ) than in the control group (−0.15 kg/cm. 2. ; p=0.005). Conclusion. Individuals experienced an increase in pain sensitivity after acute exposure to a stressor designed to mimic low-level workplace stressors, and this increase was greater in individuals with CLBP than asymptomatic individuals. These results indicate that this experimental model can be used to study links between pain sensitivity and psychosocial stressors and increase our understanding of their potential role in CLBP. Conflicts of Interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Purposes of the study and background. Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a psychologically informed, physiotherapist-led intervention that targets the biopsychosocial complexity of persistent low back pain (LBP). CFT has demonstrated positive outcomes in two randomised controlled trials (RCT) but has not previously been evaluated in the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). This study aimed to determine the feasibility of completing a definitive RCT, that will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of CFT in comparison to usual physiotherapy care (UPC) for people with persistent LBP in the NHS. Methods and results. A two-arm parallel feasibility RCT compared CFT with UPC in participants with persistent LBP. Data concerning study processes, resources, management and patient reported outcome measures (disability, pain intensity, quality of life and psychosocial function) were collected at baseline, three and six-month follow-up, analysed and evaluated in order to establish feasibility. Sixty participants (n=30 CFT and n=30 UPC) were recruited with 71.6% (n=43) retained at six-month follow-up. CFT was delivered to fidelity, relevant and clinically important outcome data were rigorously collected and CFT was tolerated by participants with no safety concerns. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire was the most suitable primary outcome measure and sample size calculations were completed for a definitive RCT. Intention to treat analysis indicated a signal of effect in favour of CFT with moderate and large between group effect sizes observed across outcome measures at six-month follow-up. Conclusion. It is feasible to conduct a randomised study of CFT in comparison to UPC for NHS patients. A future fully powered clinical and cost effectiveness RCT could be completed. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, Physiotherapy Research Foundation

Surgical site infections following spinal surgery profoundly influence continued treatment, significantly impacting psychological and economic dimensions and clinical outcomes. Its reported incidence varies up to 20%, with the highest incidence amongst neuromuscular scoliosis and metastatic cord compression patients. We describe the first reported biphasic osteoconductive scaffold (Cerament G) with a logarithmic elution profile as a cumulative strategic treatment modality for adjacent spinal surgery infections. All patients who developed surgical site infections following instrumented fusion (May 2021-December 2021) had their demographics (age, sex), type and number of procedures, isolated organism, antibiotics given, comorbidities, and WHO performance status analysed. The infected wound was debrided to healthy planes, samples taken, and Cerament g applied. Thirteen patients were treated for deep SSI following spinal instrumentation and fusion procedures with intraoperative Cerament G application. There were four males and nine females with an average age of 40 ranging between 12 and 87. Nine patients underwent initial surgery for spinal deformity, and four were treated for fractures as index procedure. 77% of infections were attributable to MSSA and Cutibacteriousm acnes; others included Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Streptococcus and targeted with multimodal cumulative therapy. A WHO performance score improved in 11 patients. In addition, there was no wound leak, and infection was eradicated successfully in 12/13 with a single procedure. This series shows the successful eradication of the infection and improved functional outcomes with Cerament G. However, the low numbers of patients in our series are an essential consideration for the broader applicability of this device

Background. Chronic pain is a complex condition that demonstrates better outcomes in multidisciplinary rehabilitation, typically delivered to groups of patients by tertiary healthcare teams. An inter-disciplinary pain management course for individual patients was developed to increase the scope of physical therapists working in primary care by integrating osteopathic manual therapy with psychological interventions from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a form of ‘3rd wave’ Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. Method and Results. A single cohort study with pre-course (n=180) and post-course (n=79) self-report measures (44% response rate) evaluated six week interventions which combined individual manual therapy with self-management, delivered by teams of qualified and student osteopaths. Data included: quality of life (European Quality of Life Questionnaire); pain, mood and coping (Bournemouth Questionnaire); psychological flexibility (Revised Acceptance and Action Questionnaire); and mindfulness (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory). Participants were predominantly female (68%), unemployed (59%), with an average age of 49 and pain duration of more than 12 months (86%). Commonly reported symptoms were low back pain (82%), neck pain (60%) and multiple sites (86%). At six months, there were statistically significant improvements in all four outcome measures (p<0.0005), with promising effect sizes in quality of life and pain coping (r=0.52) which appeared to be mediated by changes in psychological flexibility. Conclusions. This innovative, integrated, patient-centred chronic pain management course demonstrated promising outcomes when delivered by osteopaths with varying experience. Randomised clinical trials are now needed to assess outcomes in comparison with standard care, and optimal ways of training physical therapists to deliver effective psychological interventions. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: A Department of Health ‘Innovation, Excellence and Strategic Development’ (IESD) grant for the Voluntary Sector Investment Programme (AIMS Ref: 2527190; ISRCTN: 04892266). The results of this study are being submitted for publication in the International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine and will be presented at the COME Collaboration Osteopathic Conference in Barcelona on September 30th 2017 and at the Therapy Expo 2017 at the NEC in Birmingham on November 22nd 2017

Introduction. The aim of this study was to assess patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) opinions on the validity of using a biopsychosocial model rather than a biomedical model in alleviating patient symptoms/pain. Method. We constructed a questionnaire to assess beliefs on the effectiveness of using a biopsychosocial or biomedical model to develop a treatment plan to optimise patient symptoms/pain. We distributed the questionnaire to new and follow-up patients and healthcare professional in the orthopaedic department. Results. 246 questionnaires were completed - 183 patients and 63 HCPs. The patient group consisted of 77 males and 106 females, the HCP group of 27 males and 36 females. 77(42%) of patients and 9(14%) of HCPs agree the biomedical model is best suited to treat symptoms. 81(44%) of patients and 62(98%) of HCPs agree the biopsychosocial model is best suited to treat symptoms. 70(38%) of patients and 61 (97%) of HCPs agree stress can increase pain. 87(48%) of patients and 62(98%) of HCPs agree distress can increase pain. 83(45%) of patients and 56(89%) of HCPs agree stress can increase disability. 81(44%) of patients and 56(89%) of HCPs agree distress can increase disability. 39(21%) of patients and 43(68%) of HCPs agree if all investigations show no abnormality in explaining symptoms, the main contributor is stress, distress or psychological/socioeconomic factor. Conclusion. HCPs recognise the biopsychosocial model as a useful tool in managing patients pain/symptoms which not recognised by patients. HCPs believe that stress, distress, psychological/socioeconomic factors have a significant impact on a patients pain and disability when compared to patients. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Aim. To use Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to determine the effectiveness of lumbar spinal surgery at a single UK institution. Methods. Consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery (discectomies or decompressions) from 1 January 2011 to 13 March 2013 at a UK District General Hospital were assessed. The procedures were performed or supervised by a senior Consultant Orthopaedic spinal surgeon. All patients completed PROM questionnaires before and three months following surgery. These included Visual Analogue Scores (VAS), SF-12, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Roland Morris Low Back Pain Questionnaire (RMQ). Results. A total of 230 patients had surgery. Of these, 189 (82%) completed both pre- and post-operative questionnaires. All PROMs showed improvement: VAS for constant back pain improved from 4.1 to 2.1 and exacerbations of back pain from 5.8 to 2.4. VAS for constant leg pain improved from 6.3 to 1.7 and for exacerbations of leg pain from 8.2 to 1.8. Mean ODI from 47 to 21; RMQ from13 to 5; and SF12-psychological and physical components increased by 7.2 and 12.4, respectively. Those patients with better psychological health pre-operatively, (high SF-12 score, >60 [n=14]) had a reduction in mean score (decrease of 3.2) post-operatively. However, those with poorer psychological health pre-operatively (low SF-12 score, <30 [n=18]) showed a marked improvement in mean score post-operatively (increase of 18.9). Conclusions. These results show that lumbar spinal surgery is safe and effective at a District General Hospital. Baseline psychological scores may help predict psychological outcomes following surgery. This warrants further prospective evaluation. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Our aim was to judge the influence of preoperative psychological disturbance on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. We evaluated 66 patients, before and after operation, using a self-administered questionnaire. Disability was assessed using the Oswestry disability index and psychological disturbance the Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM) score. Patients were classified as normal, at risk or distressed, and the outcome of surgery in the three groups was compared at a follow-up of six months. The mean self-reported preoperative disability was significantly higher in those with psychological disturbance. A total of 54 patients (82%) returned completed postoperative questionnaires. Postoperative disability scores at six months were not significantly different in the three risk groups. Psychological disturbance improved after surgery. Our study suggests that the early outcome of lumbar discectomy is not affected by preoperative psychological disturbance. We conclude that a patient with a symptomatic prolapsed intervertebral disc should not be denied surgery on the basis of preoperative psychological assessment

Purpose and background. Acute and chronic spinal pain are major causes of disability, and many patients use analgesics to treat their pain. However, increased use of analgesics, particularly prescription opioids have the potential to be overused and cause dependence. Psychological factors such as stress, anxiety, depression, pain acceptance, pain catastrophising and alexithymia influence both the pain response and analgesic use, yet to date no studies have explored these variables in spinal pain patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the nature, prevalence and correlates of analgesic dependence among patients with acute or chronic spinal pain. Methods and results. Patients over the age of 18 attending outpatient services at the Royal Derby Hospital with complaints of either acute or chronic spinal pain and currently using analgesics to treat their pain completed the Current Opioid Misuse Measure, the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8, the Pain Catastrophising Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, and the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire, a measure of analgesic dependence. Preliminary findings from 52 patients (16 males and 36 females) with chronic spinal pain ranging from 23–88 years old, show that greater pain catastrophising is a significant predictor of analgesic dependence (t = 2.74, df = 51, p = 0.009). Conclusion. The study findings can inform the development of appropriate interventions targeting pain catastrophising to prevent and/or treat analgesic dependence, as well as contributing to potential future research on the understanding of tapering spinal pain patients off analgesic medication. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained