Objective. Tibia vara seen in Japanese patients reportedly influences the tibial component alignment when performing TKA. However, it is unclear whether tibia vara affects the component position and size selection. We therefore determined (1) the amount of medial tibial bow, (2) whether the tibia vara influences the aspect ratio of the tibial resected surface in aligning the tibial component with the tibial shaft axis (TSA), and (3) whether currently available tibial components fit the shapes of resected proximal tibias in terms of aspect ratio. Material and Methods. The study was performed using CT data from 90 lower limbs in 74 Japanese female patients with primary varus knee OA, scheduled for primary TKAs between January 2010 and March 2012. We measured the tibia vara angle (TVA; the angle between the TSA and the tibial mechanical axis), proximal varus angle (PVA; angle between the TSA and the line connecting the center of the tibial eminence and the center of the proximal 1/3 of the tibia) using three-dimensional preoperative planning software [Fig.1]. Then the mediolateral and middle AP dimensions of the resected surface when the tibial component was set so that its center aligned with the TSA was measured. We determined the correlations of the aspect ratio (the ML dimension divided by the AP dimension) of the resected surface with TVA or PVA and compared the aspect ratios to those of five prosthesis designs. Results. The mean TVA and PVA were 0.6° and 2.0°, respectively. The aspect ratio negatively correlated with both TVA and PVA (r = −0.53 and −0.55, respectively) [Fig. 2, 3]. The mean aspect ratio of the resected surface was 1.48 but gradually decreased with increasing AP dimension, whereas four of the five prostheses had a constant aspect ratio. Conclusions. The aspect ratio of resected tibial surface was inversely correlated to the degree of tibia vara, and currently available prosthesis designs do not fit well to the resected surface in terms of aspect ratio

Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) is a procedure to treat a number of conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), post-traumatic arthritis, and osteoarthritis. To date, there has been minimal literature published on the Latitude since its release in 2001. There is one study reporting outcomes from the Latitude, a German study published in 2010. The purpose of this study was to analyse outcomes from primary Latitude TEAs. We performed a retrospective case series of 23 TEAs performed on 20 patients. 6 patients required revision surgery and were not included in the analysis. One patient was lost to follow up, resulting in 17 patients included for ROM analysis. All patients received Latitude TEA through a posterior approach and underwent a standard rehab protocol. 11 Patients were recalled at least two years post-op and were administered DASH and MAYO questionnaires. Complications such as triceps insufficiency, ulnar nerve dysfunction, infection, and aseptic loosening were recorded. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test in STATA. Immediate post-op radiographs and patients most recent radiographs were analysed by a blinded upper-extremity surgeon not involved in the initial operation and analysed for loosening and implant malpostioning. Mean follow up was 4.8 years (range 2.6–7.5 years). Analysis of 17 TEAs in 16 patients revealed no difference in pre-operative ROM and post-operative ROM for flexion (121°±20 vs 129°±16, p=0.13) extension (40°±27 vs 27°±15, p=0.19), pronation (73°±13 vs 75°±24, p=0.55) or supination (64°±22 vs 68°±14, p=0.52). Patients who underwent TEA for RA had a significant improvement in flexion (121°±15 vs 135°±10, p<0.02). There was a statistically significant improvement in flexion-extension arc post-operatively (101°±28) compared to pre-operative scores (83±23 degrees, p<0.02). DASH and MAYO scores were calculated from 11elbows in 11 non-revision patients able to return for examination. The average MAYO score was 87.9 with nine patients in the “excellent” category, two patients in the “good” category, one patient in the “fair” category, and one in the “poor” category. The average DASH score was 32.9. Two patients underwent revision for periprosthetic fractures, two patients underwent revision for infection, one underwent revision for aseptic loosening and two for radial head dissociation (rate of 30%). This is one of the first studies examining the outcomes of the Latitude TEA. This retrospective case series demonstrates that the Latitude TEA has promising outcomes with respect to improving patient pain and functioning as assessed by the MAYO. Treatment using the Latitude TEA results in favorable functional outcomes for a majority of patients and offers an improvement in flexion-extension arc. Furthermore, our results are comparable to the MAYO scores reported by other studies analysing different prosthesis designs. The complication rate in our series was comparable to published rates of 20–40%

During total knee replacement (TKR), knee surgical navigation systems (KSNS) report in real time relative motion data between the tibia and the femur from the patient under anaesthesia, in order to identify best possible locations for the corresponding prosthesis components. These systems are meant to support the surgeon for achieving the best possible replication of natural knee motion, compatible with the prosthesis design and the joint status, in the hope that this kinematics under passive condition will be then the same during the daily living activities of the patient. Particularly, by means of KSNS, knee kinematics is tracked in the original arthritic joint at the beginning of the operation, intra-operatively after adjustments of bone cuts and trial components implantation, and after final components implantation and cementation. Rarely the extent to which the kinematics in the latter condition is then replicated during activity is analysed. As for the assessment of the active motion performance, the most accurate technique for the in-vivo measurements of replaced joint kinematics is three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy. This allows joint motion tracking under typical movements and loads of daily living. The general aim of this study is assessing the capability of the current KSNS to predict replaced joint motion after TKR. Particularly, the specific objective is to compare, for a number of patients implanted with two different TKR prosthesis component designs, knee kinematics obtained intra-operatively after final component implantation measured by means of KSNS with that assessed post-operatively at the follow-up by means of three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy. Thirty-one patients affected by primary gonarthrosis were implanted with a fixed bearing posterior-stabilized TKR design, either the Journey® (JOU; Smith&Nephew, London, UK) or the NRG® (Stryker®-Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ-USA). All implantations were performed by means of a KSNS (Stryker®-Leibinger, Freiburg, Germany), utilised to track and store joint kinematics intra-operatively immediately after final component implantation (INTRA-OP). Six months after TKR, the patients were followed for clinical assessment and three-dimensional video fluoroscopy (POST-OP). Fifteen of these patients, 8 with the JOU and 7 with the NRG, gave informed consent and these were analyzed. At surgery (INTRA-OP), a spatial tracker of the navigation system was attached through two bi-cortical 3 mm thick Kirschner wires to the distal femur and another to the proximal tibia. The conventional navigation procedure recommended in the system manual was performed to calculate the preoperative deformity including the preoperative lower limb alignment, to perform the femoral and tibial bone cuts, and to measure the final lower limb alignment. All these assessment were calculated with respect to the initial anatomical survey, the latter being based on calibrations of anatomical landmarks by an instrumented pointer. Patients were then analysed (POST-OP) by three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy (digital remote-controlled diagnostic Alpha90SX16; CAT Medical System, Rome-Italy) at 10 frames per second during chair rising-sitting, stair climbing, and step up-down. A technique based on CAD-model shape matching was utilised for obtaining three-dimensional pose of the prosthesis components. Between the two techniques, the kinematics variables analysed for the comparison were the three components of the joint rotation (being the relative motion between the tibial and femoral components represented using a standard joint convention, the translation of the line through the medial and lateral contact points (being these points assumed to be where the minimum distance between the femoral condyles and the tibial baseplate is observed) on the tibial baseplate and the corresponding pivot point, and the location of the instantaneous helical axes with the corresponding mean helical axis and pivot point. In all patients and in both conditions, physiological ranges of flexion (from −5° to 120°), and ab-adduction (±5°) were observed. Internal-external rotation patterns are different between the two prostheses, with a more central pivoting in NRG and medial pivoting in JOU, as expected by the design. Restoration of knee joint normal kinematics was demonstrated also by the coupling of the internal rotation with flexion, as well as by the roll-back and screw-home mechanisms, observed somehow both in INTRA- and POST-OP measurements. Location of the mean helical axis and pivot point, both from the contact lines and helical axes, were very consistent over time, i.e. after six months from intervention and in fully different conditions. Only one JOU and one NRG patient had the pivot point location POST-OP different from that INTRA-OP, despite cases of paradoxical translation. In all TKR knees analysed, a good restoration of normal joint motion was observed, both during operation and at the follow-up. This supports the general efficacy of the surgery and of both prosthesis designs. Particularly, the results here reported show a good consistency of the measurements over time, no matter these were taken in very different joint conditions and by means of very different techniques. Intra-operative kinematics therefore does matter, and must be taken into careful consideration for the implantation of the prosthesis components. Joint kinematics should be tracked accurately during TKR surgery, and for this purpose KSNS seem to offer a very good support. These systems not only supports in real time the best possible alignment of the prosthesis components, but also make a reliable prediction of the motion performance of the replaced joint. Additional analyses will be necessary to support this with a statistical power, and to identify the most predicting parameters among the many kinematics variables here analysed preliminarily

Introduction:. Due to improvement in overall prosthesis designs and surgical methods, there have been increasing numbers of total ankle arthroplasty performed with encouraging intermediate results. While European registries have been able to perform long term follow-ups and analysis on total ankle arthroplasty patients, majority of the US studies have been based on experiences at a single institution. There is currently limited data on the recent trends of total ankle arthroplasty. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the in-patient demographics, complications and readmission rate in patients after total ankle arthroplasty at academic medical centers in United States. Patients & Methods:. We queried the University Healthsystems Consortium (UHC) administrative database from 2007 to 2011 for patients who underwent total ankle arthrolasty by ICD-9 procedure code 81.56. A descriptive analysis of demographics was performed, followed by a similar analysis of patient clinical benchmarks, including hospital length of stay, hospital direct cost, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Results:. Our cohort consisted of 2,361 adult patients who underwent a total ankle arthroplasty at 95 different academic medical centers across the country during the specified time period. The annual surgical volume for individual surgeons who performed this procedure was 5 cases +/− 3. The cohort was comprised of 47% male and 53% female patients. The majority of the cohort 2,091 (88.5%) was white, 85 (3.6%) were black, 23 (1%) were Hispanic, and 162 (6.8%) other. The mean age of the cohort was 62 years old +/− 11. At least 70% of the cohort had one or more chronic medical conditions. The mean LOS for the cohort was 2.2 days +/− 1.26. The mean total direct cost for the hospital was $16,000 +/− 7,000 per case. 83% of the cohort had private insurance, 15% had Medicare, and 2% had Medicaid. In hospital mortality was less than 1% for the cohort during their index hospitalization. Inpatient complication rate include: DVT 2.3%, re-operation 0.7%, and infection 3.2%. There was a readmission rate of 2.6% within the first 30 days from the time of discharge. Discussion/Conclusion:. Total ankle arthroplasty in the United States is a relatively safe procedure with low overall complication rates including infection (3.2%), DVT (2.3%), and re-operation (0.7%). Length of stay after the procedure is around 2 days with a total direct hospital cost of $16,000 +/− $7,000 and 2.6% readmission rate (30 days). Majority of the patients were Caucasian and had private insurance

Introduction. It is well known that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) does not preserve normal knee kinematics. This outcome has been attributed to alteration of soft-tissue balance and differences between the geometry of the implant design and the normal articular surfaces. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) has been developed to replace the medial and anterior compartments, while preserving the lateral compartment, the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). In a previous study, we reported that unicompartmental knee arthroplasty did not significantly change knee kinematics and attributed that finding to a combination of preservation of soft-tissue balance and minimal alteration of joint articular geometry (Patil, JBJS, 2007). In the present study, we analyzed the effect of replacing trochlear surface in addition to the medial compartment by implanting cadaver knees with a bicompartmental arthroplasty design. Our hypothesis was that kinematics after BCKA will more closely replicate normal kinematics than kinematics after TKA. Methods. Eight human cadaveric knees underwent kinematic analysis with a surgical navigation system. Each knee was evaluated in its normal intact state, then after BKA with the Deuce design (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN), then after ACL sacrifice, and finally after implanting a PCL-retaining TKA (Legion, Smith & Nephew). Knees were tested on the Oxford knee rig, which simulates a quadriceps-driven dynamic deep knee bend. Tibiofemoral rollback and rotation and patellofemoral shift and tilt were recorded for each condition and compared using repeated measures ANOVA for significance. Results. Statistically significant differences were noted in femoral rollback between TKA and Intact conditions but not between Intact and BKA or between Intact and BKA without ACL. Statistically significant differences were noted in tibiofemoral rotation between TKA and Intact conditions but not between Intact and BKA or between Intact and BKA without ACL. No significant differences in patellar lateral shift or lateral tilt were found among the four conditions tested. Discussion & Conclusion. BKA prostheses that preserve the ACL and PCL allow for more normal knee kinematics than does conventional TKA. Our results supported our primary hypothesis that a bicompartmental approach would not significantly alter knee kinematics. These results also imply that replacement of the medial compartment and trochlear surface are not major factors contributing to altered knee function. The results that we observed may not necessarily apply to other BKA designs and should therefore not be extrapolated beyond the prosthesis designs in this study. Additionally, the current study was designed to only evaluate kinematics, and we can not make conclusions regarding implant wear, fixation, durability, ideal patient selection, and reproducibility of successful clinical outcomes. Lastly, the current study was undertaken using relatively normal cadaveric knees whereas in vivo arthroplasty is typically reserved for arthritic knees that are often affected by contracture and/or deformity. We therefore believe that clinical studies with well-defined measures of success need to be conducted before far-reaching conclusions can be drawn regarding the utility of these implants in clinical practice

Representative pre-clinical analysis is essential to ensure that novel prosthesis concepts offer an improvement over the state-of-the-art. Proposed designs must, fundamentally, be assessed against cyclic loads representing common daily activities [Bergmann 2001] to ensure that they will withstand conceivable in-vivo loading conditions. Fatigue assessment involves:. –. cyclic mechanical testing, representing worst-case peak loads encountered in-vivo, typically for 10 million cycles, or. –. prediction of peak fatigue stresses using Finite Element (FE) methods, and comparison with the material's endurance limit. Cyclic stresses from gait loading are super-imposed upon residual assembly stresses. In thick walled devices, the residual component is small in comparison to the cyclic component, but in thin section, bone preserving devices, residual assembly stresses may be a multiple of the cyclic stresses, so a different approach to fatigue assessment is required. Modular devices provide intraoperative flexibility with minimal inventories. Components are assembled in surgery with taper interfaces, but resulting residual stresses are variable due to differing assembly forces and potential misalignment or interface contamination. Incorrect assembly can lead to incomplete seating and dissociation [Langdown 2007], or fracture due to excessive press-fit stress or point loading [Hamilton 2010]. Pre-assembly in clean conditions, with reproducible force and alignment, gives close control of assembly stresses. Clinical results indicate that this is only a concern with thick sectioned devices in a small percentage of cases [Hamilton 2010], but it may be critical for thin walled devices. A pre-clinical analysis method is proposed for this new scenario, with a case study example: a thin modular cup featuring a ceramic bearing insert and a Ti-6Al-4V shell (Fig. 1). The design was assessed using FE predictions, and manufacturing variability from tolerances, surface finish effects and residual stresses was assessed, in addition to loading variability, to ensure physical testing is performed at worst case:. –. assembly loads were applied, predicting assembly residual stress, verified by strain gauging, and a range of service loads were superimposed. The predicted worst-case stress conditions were analysed against three ‘constant life’ limits [Gerber, 1874, Goodman 1899, Soderberg 1930], a common aerospace approach, giving predicted safety factors. Finally, equivalent fatigue tests were conducted on ten prototype implants. Taking a worst-case size (thinnest-walled 48 mm inner/58 mm outer), under assembly loading the peak tensile stress in the titanium shell was 274 MPa (Fig. 2). With 5kN superimposed jogging loading, at an extreme 75° inclination, 29 MPa additional tensile stress was predicted. This gave mean fatigue stress of 288.5 MPa and stress amplitude of 14.5 MPa (R=0.9). Against the most conservative infinite life limit (Soderberg), the predicted safety factor was 2.40 for machined material, and 2.03 for forged material, or if a stress-concentrating surface scratch occurs during manufacturing or implantation (Fig. 3). All cups survived 10,000,000 fatigue cycles. This study employed computational modelling and physical testing to verify the strength of a joint prosthesis concept, under worst case static and fatigue loading conditions. The analysis technique represents an improvement in the state of the art where testing standards refer to conventional prostheses; similar methods could be applied to a wide range of novel prosthesis designs