Total knee replacement (TKR) design aims to restore normal kinematics with emphasis on flexion range. The survivorship of a TKR is dependent on the kinematics in six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DoF). Stepping up, such as stair ascent is a kinematically demanding activity after TKR. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by 6-DoF in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared kneeling kinematics in three TKR designs. 68 participants were randomised to receive either cruciate retaining (CR-FB), rotating platform (CR-RP) or posterior stabilised (PS-FB) prostheses. Image quality was sufficient for 49 of these patients to be included in the final analysis following a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients completed a step-up task while being imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy. Femoral and tibial computer-aided design (CAD) models for each of the TKR designs were registered to the fluoroscopic images using bespoke software OrthoVis to generate six-degree-of-freedom kinematics. Differences in kinematics between designs were compared as a function of flexion. There were no differences in terminal extension between the groups. The CR-FB was further posterior and the CR-RP was more externally rotated at terminal extension compared to the other designs. Furthermore, the CR-FB designs was more posteriorly positioned at each flexion angle compared to both other designs. Additionally, the CR-RP design had more external femoral rotation throughout flexion when compared with both fixed bearing designs. However, there were no differences in total rotation for either step-up or down. Visually, it appears there was substantial variability between participants in each group, indicating unique patient-specific movement patterns. While use of a specific implant design does influence some kinematic parameters, the overall patterns are similar. Furthermore, there is high variability indicating patient-specific kinematic patterns. At a group level, none of these designs appear to provide markedly different step-up kinematic patterns. This is important for patient expectations following surgery. Future work should aim to better understand the unique patient variability

Abstract. Objectives. There is debate regarding the optimal surgical technique for fixing femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12 years. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the complication rate following flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN), plate fixation and external fixation (EF) for traumatic femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases for interventional and observational studies. Two independent reviewers screened, assessed quality and extracted data from the identified studies. The primary outcome was the risk of any complication. Results. Nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 19 observational studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Within the RCTs, five analysed FIN (n=161), two analysed plates (n=51) and five analysed EF (n=168). Within the observational studies, 13 analysed FIN (n=610), seven analysed plates (n=214) and six analysed EF (n=153). The overall risk of complications was lower following plate fixation when compared to FIN (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73, p=0.001) in the observational studies. The overall risk of complications was higher following EF when compared to FIN in both RCTs (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.01, p=0.003) and observational studies (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.58, p<0.001). The overall risk of complications was higher following EF when compared to plate fixation in both RCTs (RR 7.42, 95% CI 1.84 to 29.98, p=0.005) and observational studies (RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.64 to 7.30, p<0.001). Conclusions. This study reports a significantly decreased relative risk of complications when femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12 are managed with plates. The overall quality of evidence is low, highlighting the need for a prospective multicentre randomised trial at low risk of bias due to randomisation and outcome measurement to identify if any fixation technique is superior

Introduction and Objective. The most common paediatric orthopaedic injury requiring hospital admission is a femoral fracture. There is debate regarding the optimal surgical technique for fixing femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12 years. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) have issued relevant guidelines, however, there is limited evidence to support these. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the complication rate following flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN), plate fixation and external fixation (EF) for traumatic femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12. Materials and Methods. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases for interventional and observational studies. Two independent reviewers screened, assessed quality and extracted data from the identified studies. The primary outcome was the risk of any complication. Secondary outcomes assessed the risk of pre-specified individual complications. Results. Nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 19 observational studies (six prospective and 13 retrospective) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Within the RCTs, five analysed FIN (n=161), two analysed plates (n=51) and five analysed EF (n=168). Within the observational studies, 13 analysed FIN (n=610), seven analysed plates (n=214) and six analysed EF (n=153). The overall risk of complications was lower following plate fixation when compared to FIN fixation (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73, p=0.001) in the observational studies. The overall risk of complications was higher following EF when compared to FIN fixation in both RCTs (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.01, p=0.003) and observational studies (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.58, p<0.001). The overall risk of complications was higher following EF when compared to plate fixation in both RCTs (RR 7.42, 95% CI 1.84 to 29.98, p=0.005) and observational studies (RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.64 to 7.30, p<0.001). Conclusions. Although NICE and the AAOS recommend FIN for femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12, this study reports a significantly decreased relative risk of complications when these injuries are managed with plates. Our findings provide valuable information to healthcare professionals who are involved in discussing the risk and benefits of different management options with patients and their families. The overall quality of evidence is low, highlighting the need for a rigorous prospective multicentre randomised trial at low risk of bias due to randomisation and outcome measurement to identify if any fixation technique is superior

Hip resurfacing has generally been used in younger patients with early osteoarthritis of the hip. There has been considerable recent interest in this over the past few years. We conducted a prospective randomised trial comparing 2 hip resurfacing implants, Durom and ASR looking at radiological and clinical outcomes. Forty-nine patients (78% male) with hip osteoarthritis which met the criteria for hip resurfacing were randomised to receive either a Durom or ASR resurfacing implant. These patients have so far been followed up for a minimum of one year. The groups were comparable in age (p=0.124) and gender (p=0.675). The average age in the ASR group was 54.04 years and in the Durom group it was 51.25. Radiological views were scrutinised immediately post op and at final follow up so far to look at cup inclination, stem-shaft angle, and acetabular osseointegration. Clinical outcomes were compared using the Oxford hip scores, WOMAC scores and SF12 scores. At minimum follow up of 1 year the mean post operative Oxford hip score was not significantly different between the Durom (45.32, SD 3.93) and ASR (43.44, SD 8.44). The mean post operative WOMAC score was also not significantly different between the Durom (52.56, SD 6.06) and ASR (49.63, SD 2.23). There was no difference between the groups with regards to signs of osseointegration from radiological assessment (p=0.368). There were 3 periprosthetic femoral neck fractures (5.7%) and one revision for pain. We conclude from this trial that there is no difference in the clinical or radiological findings between the Durom and ASR implants

Around 1% of total hip replacements are follow by prosthetic joint infection (PJI). There is uncertainty about best treatment method for PJI, and the most recent high quality systematic reviews in unselected patients indicates that re-infection rates following one-stage and two-stage revision arthroplasty are relatively similar. In the absence of evidence randomised controlled trials will help to identify the most clinically and cost-effective treatment for PJI. Before such trials are conducted, there is a need to establish reasons for current practice and to identify whether trials are feasible. This study aimed to deliver research that would inform trial design. Specifically, we aimed to characterise consultant orthopaedic surgeons' decisions about performing either one-stage or two-stage exchange arthroplasty for patients with PJI after hip replacement and to identify whether a randomised trial comparing one-stage with two-stage revision would be possible. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 consultant surgeons from 5 high-volume National Health Service (NHS) orthopaedic departments in the UK. Surgeons were sampled on the basis that they perform revision surgery for PJI after hip arthroplasty and final sample size was justified on the basis of thematic saturation. Surgeons were interviewed face-to-face (n=2) or via telephone (n=10). The interview study took place before design of a multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial comparing patient and clinical outcomes after one-stage or two-stage revision arthroplasty. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and analysed using a thematic approach, with 25% of transcripts independently double-coded. Results: There is no standard surgical response to the treatment of PJI and surgeons manage a complex balance of factors when choosing a surgical strategy. These include multiple patient-related factors, their own knowledge and expertise, available infrastructure and the infecting organism. Surgeons questioned whether evidence supports the emergence of two-stage revision as a method. They described the use of loosely cemented articulating spacers as a way of managing uncertainty about best treatment method. All surgeons were supportive of a randomised trial to compare one-stage and two-stage revision surgery for PJI after hip replacement. Surgeons reported that they would put patients forward for randomisation when there was uncertainty about best treatment. Surgeons highlighted the need for evidence to support their choice of revision. Some surgeons now use revision methods that can better address both clinical outcomes and patients' quality of life, such as loosely cemented articulating spacers. Surgeons thought that a randomised controlled trial comparing one-stage and two-stage exchange joint replacement is needed and that randomisation would be feasible. The next stage of the work was to design a multi-centre randomised controlled trial, this has been achieved and the trial is now ongoing in the UK

Currently, the cement being used for hemiarthroplasties and total hip replacements by the authors and many other surgeons in the UK is Palacos® (containing 0.5g Gentamicin). Similar cement, Copal® (containing 1g Gentamicin and 1g Clindamycin) has been used in revision arthroplasties, and has shown to be better at inhibiting bacterial growth and biofilm formation. We aim to investigate the effect on SSI rates of doubling the gentamicin dose and adding a second antibiotic (clindamycin) to the bone cement in hip hemiarthroplasty. We randomised 848 consecutive patients undergoing cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured NOF at one NHS trust (two sites) into two groups: Group I, 464 patients, received standard cement (Palacos®) and Group II, 384 patients, received high dose, double antibiotic-impregnated cement (Copal®). We calculated the SSI rate for each group at 30 days post-surgery. The patients, reviewers and statistician were blinded as to treatment group. The demographics and co-morbid conditions (known to increase risk of infection) were statistically similar between the groups. The combined superficial and deep SSI rates were 5 % (20/394) and 1.7% (6/344) for groups I and II respectively (p=0.01). Group I had a deep infection rate 3.3 %(13/394) compared to 1.16% (4/344) in group II (p=0.082). Group I had a superficial infection rate 1.7 % (7/394) compared to 0.58% (2/344) in group II (p=0.1861). 33(4%) patients were lost to follow up, and 77 (9%) patients were deceased at the 30 day end point. There was no statistical difference in the 30 day mortality, C. difficile infection, or the renal failure rates between the two groups. Using high dose double antibiotic-impregnated cement rather than standard low dose antibiotic-impregnated cement significantly reduced the SSI rate (1.7% vs 5%; p=0.01) after hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur in this prospective randomised controlled trial

Prosthesis migration and acetabular cup wear are useful short term measurement which may predict later implant outcome. However, the significance of the magnitude and pattern of the migration is very much dependent on the specific design studied. This study aimed to characterise patterns of migration by following four cemented femoral stem designs using Radiostereometry (RSA) within a prospective randomised longitudinal trial. 164 patients undergoing cemented femoral hip replacement for osteoarthritis were randomised to receive either an Exeter (Howmedica Stryker), Ultima Tapered Polished Stem (TPS) (Depuy), Ultima Straight Stem (USS) (Johnson and Johnson) or Elite Plus (Depuy) stem. Each subject received the OGEE PE cemented acetabular component (Depuy). RSA examinations were performed at 1 week and 6, 12, 18, 24 and 60 months post surgery. They were analysed using the UMRSA system (RSA Biomedical AB, Umea, Sweden), and our local geometric stem measurement software. 149 patients had RSA measurements available to 2 years, and 96 patients to 5 years. Differences were analysed using mixed linear modelling (SPSS). Median linear proximal cup wear rate reduced to a minimum of 0.02-0.06mm/year in year two. Between 2 and 5 years the wear rate increased, being significantly higher for the Elite. Cup migration was small but continuous. At 2 years it was median 0.3mm proximally, increasing to 0.5 mm at 5 years. Median rotations were less than 0.3 degrees. Proximal migration was positive and increasing at all time points for all stems. For the tapered polished designs, while the overall magnitude was significantly higher, the rate of migration significantly decreased, whereas for the other stem designs it did not. The TPS stem showed a tendency for posterior tilt which was significant compared to the other stems at 5 years. All stems tended to retroversion, with the USS significantly less than the others and the Elite showing and relative increase at 5 years. In summary migration patterns are characterised by the stem design, including where there were only small changes between designs. We are now testing measured migrations as predictors of outcome, and will continue to follow this group of patients to 10 years

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the results and complications of tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail with treatment using the traditional Ilizarov method.