Posterior lumber interbody fusion (PLIF) has the theoretical advantage of optimising foraminal decompression, improving sagittal alignment and providing a more consistent fusion mass in adult patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) compared to posterolateral fusion (PLF). Previous studies with only short-term follow-up have not shown a difference between fusion techniques. An observational cohort study was performed of a single surgeon's patients treating IS over a ten year period (52 patients), using either PLF (21 pts) or PLIF (31pts). Preoperative and 12-month data were collected prospectively, and long-term follow-up was by mailed questionnaire. Preoperative patient characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different. Average follow-up was 7 years, 10 months, and 81% of questionnaires were returned. Outcome measures were Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS), SF-12v2 and SF-6D R2. The SF-6D R2 is a “whole of health” measure. PLIF provided better short- and long-term results than PLF. The PLIF group had significantly better LBOS scores in the long term, and non-significantly better RMDQ scores in the long term. As measured by RMDQ Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) short term set at 4, RMDQ MCID set at 8, the LBOS MCID set at 7.5 points and by SF-12v2 physical component score (PCS), PLIF patients performed better than PLF patients. When analysing single level fusions alone, the difference is more pronounced, with PCS, mental component scores and SF-6D R2 all being significantly better in the PLIF group rather than the PLF group. This paper strongly supports the use of PLIF to obtain equivalent or superior clinical outcomes when compared to PLF for spinal fusion for lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. The results of this study are the first to report to such long-term follow-up comparing these two procedures

Instrumented fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) has been challenged recently with high impact trials demonstrating similar changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and less morbidity/cost with laminectomy alone. Randomized trials often fail, however, to evaluate a heterogeneous population of patients. A standardized clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP) was created as a decision aid for surgeons based on the radiographic stability and clinical presentation of patients. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of those patients who followed the decision aid with respect to fusion/no fusion to those who did not. Patients were prospectively enrolled from eleven different Canadian institutions and followed from 2015–2019. A degenerative spondylolisthesis instability classification system (DSIC) was created using best available evidence stratifying patients into three different subtypes (1. stable degenerative spondylolisthesis, 2. potentially unstable spondylolisthesis and 3. unstable spondylolisthesis). The decision aid recommends laminectomy alone for group 1 patients, posterolateral fusion with pedicle screws in type 2 patients and pedicle screw and interbody fusion for type 3 patients. One year changes in HRQOL, length of hospital stay (LOS), medication use and surgical time were compared between each group and in context of whether the treatment fell within the decision aid recommendation. Statistics were performed with STATA software. There were 394 patients initially enrolled and 334 (84.8%) with full one year data available for comparison. There were 95 type 1 (stable), 224 type 2 (potentially unstable) and 75 type 3 (unstable) patients initially classified. Baseline Ostwestry disability index (ODI), EQ-5D, and SF-12 MCS scores were significantly worse for type 3 patients versus type 1 patients. One hundred and eight patients were treated within the recommendations of the DSIC system (108/334, 32.3%). Surgeons performed interbody fusions in 141 patients (42%) rather than follow DSIC recommending a less invasive approach. There were no significant differences EQ-5D, SF-12 PCS/MCS, PHQ-9 or ODI at one year between patient groups. There was a trend towards shorter operating times for those patients following the DSIC system (195 minutes non-followers versus 180 followers, p=0.078) and reduced hospital stay (4.46 days non-followers versus 3.98 followers, p=0.065). There were no significant clinical differences in outcome at 1 year whether patients underwent decompression alone, decompression/posterolateral fusion or interbody fusion regardless of the stability classification. Surgeons were more likely to perform potentially unnecessary interbody fusions even in those patients with stable or potentially unstable spondylolisthesis. Although not statistically significant, there is some suggestion that following the DSIC system based on best evidence recommendations leads to more judicious/responsible use of hospital resources. Further study is required to determine why surgeons are more likely to choose more invasive, higher rigidity constructs in patients with LDS

Introduction. The need for regeneration and repair of bone presents itself in a variety of clinical situations. The current gold standard of treatment is autograft harvested from the iliac crest or local bone. Inherent disadvantages associated with the use of autogenous bone include limited supply, increased operating time and donor site morbidity. This study utilized a challenging model of posterolateral fusion to evaluate the in vivo response of an engineered collagen carrier combined with nano-structured hydroxyapatite (NanOss Bioactive 3D, Pioneer Surgical) compared to a collagen porous beta-tricalcium phosphate bone void filler (Vitoss BA, Orthovita). Materials and Methods. A single level posterolateral fusion was performed in 72 adult rabbits at 6, 12 and 26 weeks (8 per group per time point). Group 1: nanOss Bioactive 3D + bone marrow aspirate (BMA) + autograft, Group 2: Vitoss BA + BMA and Group 3: Autograft + BMA were compared were compared using radiographic (X-ray and Micro-computed tomography (μCT), biomechanics (manual palpation and tensile testing at 12 and 26 weeks) and histology. Results. Radiographic grading and μCT demonstrated progressive increases in radiopacity at the transverse processes and at the middle of the developing fusion for Groups 1 and 3. New bone formation was noted for Group 2 only at the transverse processes (not in the middle of the fusion site). In this challenging model, manual palpation revealed comparable fusion rates in Groups 1 and 3 (43% and 38%, respectively). None of the animals from Group 2 were fused by manual palpation. Group 3 outperformed Group 2 (P<0.05) while the results were similar to Group 1. Histology on the transverse processes at 6, 12, and 26 weeks demonstrated an osteoconductive response with woven bone formation and subsequent remodeling for all groups. Histology in the middle of the fusion mass (between the transverse processes) also demonstrated an osteoconductive response with remodeling and the development of marrow spaces in the Groups 1 and 3 at 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Bone formation in the middle of the fusion was negligible at 6, 12 and 26 weeks for Group 2. Discussion. Posterolateral fusion models represent an extremely challenging biological site to evaluate bone graft materials and provide insight into clinical performance. Group 1 (nanOss Bioactive 3D + Autograft + BMA) performed well in the current model providing an osteoconductive scaffold that supported new bone formation on the transverse processes as well as in the middle of the fusion mass and that remodeled with time based on all endpoints. The graft materials had yet to completely resorb by 26 weeks in the current model. Group 2 performed well on the transverse processes in terms of new bone formation however new bone in the middle of the fusion mass was negligible at 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Group 3 (Autograft + BMA) performed well with new bone formation and remodeling on the transverse process and in the middle of the fusion mass as well as is consistently reported with this model

Posterolateral spinal fusion using autograft in adult rabbits has been reported by many groups using the Boden model. Age in general has an adverse effect on skeletal healing; although, its role in posterolateral fusion is not well understood. This study examined the influence of animal age on spinal fusion using a standard model and experimental endpoints. We hypothesised that fusion quality and quantity would be less with increasing age. A single level posterolateral fusion between the fifth and sixth lumbar segments were performed in six-month and two-year-old New Zealand white rabbits (n=6 per group) using morcelized iliac crest autograft. All animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks following surgery. Posteroanterior Faxitron radiographs and CT scans were taken and DICOM data was analysed (MIMICS Version 12, Materialise, Belgium). Axial, sagittal, coronal and three-dimensional models were created to visualise the fusion masses. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the fusion mass was measured using a Lunar DPXL Dexa machine. An MTS Bionix testing machine was then used to assess peak load and stiffness. Sagittal and coronal plane histology was evaluated in a blinded fashion using H&E, Tetrachrome and Pentachrome stains. Assessment included overall bony response on and between the transverse processes. Radiographs and CT confirmed a more robust healing response in younger animals. Radiographic union rates decreased from 83% to 50% in the aged animals. A neo- cortex surrounding the fusion mass was observed in the younger group but absent in the aged animals. Fusion mass BMD and that of the vertebral body was decreased in the older animals (P<0.05). Tensile mechanical data revealed a 30% reduction in peak load (P=0.024) and 34% reduction in stiffness (P=0.073) in the two-year-old animals compared with the six-month-old animals. Histological evaluation demonstrated a reduction in overall biological activity in the two-year-old animals. This reduction in activity was observed in the more challenging intertransverse space as well as adjacent to the transverse processes and vertebral bodies at the decortication sites. Numerous sites of new bone formation was present in the middle of the fusion mass in the six-month-old animals while the bone graft in the two-year- old animals were less viable. Skeletal healing is complex and mediated by both local and systemic factors. This study demonstrated that ageing leads to an impaired and delayed skeletal repair. Where autograft is utilised, diminished graft osteoinductivity and reduced levels of growth factors and nutritional supply in the surrounding milieu explains our observations. The aged rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion model has not been previously described but would be a useful to evaluate new treatment modalities in a more challenging host environment

Single level posterolateral spinal fusion in rabbits is the accepted preclinical model for evaluating bone graft substitutes or treatments to enhance/augment healing. This study aimed to improve preclinical testing by developing a multi-level unilateral fusion model that could be used as a screening tool prior to larger scale preclinical experiments. A four level unilateral posterolateral fusion was performed in nine animals. The materials were randomly allocated and placed between the decorticated surfaces of the transverse processes and vertebral bodies. Animals were euthanised at three, six and 12 weeks. The materials were (1) 25 kGy y-irradiated rabbit allograft chips (RAC), (2) SCF RAC, (3) 60% tri-calcium phosphate, 40% hydroxyapatite formagraft (BiOstetic) (4) Autograft (1.5 cc morsellised to 1-2.5 mm granules). The autograft was harvested from the iliac crest using the L5-L6 incision. Endpoints included x-ray, CT, micro CT and histology. The animals tolerated the surgery well. Radiographic data provided a useful method to differentiate between groups. Micro CT however was extremely valuable demonstrating new bone formation as early as three weeks across the groups. Gamma irradiated samples demonstrated an initial inflammatory reaction while the autograft, SCF allograft and synthetic TCP did not show this response. As expected, time was an important factor demonstrating the maturity in the fusions. These materials responded in a similar fashion in this model as observed in a single level fusion. A unilateral multi-level fusion can be performed in rabbits to provide a useful screening for different materials. Gamma irradiated allograft has an initial inflammatory reaction that may be related to the presence of residual cellular material whereas SCF and synthetic materials do not