The current study aims to compare the clinico radiological outcomes between Non-Fusion Anterior Scoliosis (NFASC) Correction and Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) for Lenke 5 curves at 2 years follow up. Methods:38 consecutive Lenke 5 AIS patients treated by a single surgeon with NFASC (group A) or PSF (group B) were matched by age, Cobb's angle, and skeletal maturity. Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, LOS, coronal Cobbs, and SRS22 scores at 2 years were compared. Flexibility was assessed by modified Schober's test. Continuous variables were compared using student t-tests and categorical variables were compared using chi-square. The cohort included 19 patients each in group A and B . Group A had M:F distribution of 1:18 while group B had 2:17. The mean age in group A and group B were 14.8±2.9 and 15.3±3.1 years respectively. The mean follow-up of patients in groups A and B were 24.5±1.8 months and 27.4±2.1 months respectively. Mean pre-op thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) cobbs for group A and group B were 55°±7° and 57.5°±8° respectively. At two years follow up, the cobbs for group A and B were 18.2°±3.6° and 17.6°±3.5° respectively (p=0.09). The average operating time for groups A and B were 169±14.2 mins and 219±20.5 mins respectively (p<0.05). The average blood loss of groups A and B were 105.3±15.4 and 325.3±120.4 respectively (p<0.05). The average number of instrumented vertebra between groups A and B were 6.2 and 8.5 respectively (p<0.05). The average LOS for NFASC and PSF was 3.3±0.9 days and 4.3±1.1 days respectively (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference in SRS 22 score was noted between the two groups. No complications were recorded. Our study shows no significant difference in PSF and NFASC in terms of Cobbs correction and SRS scores, but the NFASC group had significantly reduced blood loss, operative time, and fewer instrumented levels. NFASC is an effective alternative technique to fusion to correct and stabilize Lenke 5 AIS curves with preservation of spinal motion

Posterior spinal surgery is associated with a significant amount of blood loss. The factors predisposing the patient to excessive bleeding-and therefore transfusion- are not well established nor is the effect of transfusion on the outcomes following spinal surgery. We had two goals in this study. First, we were to investigate any suspected risk factors of transfusion in posterior thoraco-lumbar fusion patients. Second, we wanted to observe the negative impact-if one existed- of transfusion on the outcomes of surgery. All adults undergoing posterior thoraco-lumbar spine fusion in our institution from May 2015 to May 2018 were included. Data collected included demographic data as well as BMI, preoperative hemoglobin, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA), delta Hemoglobin, estimated blood loss, incidence of transfusion, number of units transfused, number of levels fused, length of stay and re-admission within 30 days. The data was analyzed to correlate these variables with the frequency of transfusion and then to assess the association of adverse outcomes with transfusion. 125 patients were included in the study. Only 6 patients (4.8%) required re-admission within the first 30 days after discharge. Length of stay averaged 8.4 days (3–74). 18 patients (14.4%) required transfusion peri-operatively. When multiple variables were analyzed for any correlation, the number of levels fused, age and BMI had statistically significant correlation with the need for transfusion (P <0.005). Patients undergoing posterior thoraco-lumbar fusion are more likely to require blood transfusion if they were older, over-weight & obese or had a multi-level fusion. Receiving blood transfusion is associated with increased complication rates

Pseudoarthrosis after spinal fusion is an important complication leading to revision spine surgeries. Iliac Crest Bone Graft is considered the gold standard, but with limited availability and associated co-morbidities, spine surgeons often utilize alternative bone grafts. Determine the non-inferiority of a novel submicron-sized needle-shaped surface biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP<µm) as compared to autograft in instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion. Adult patients indicated for instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion of one to six levels from T10-S2 were enrolled at five participating centers. After instrumentation and preparation of the bone bed, the randomized allocation side of the graft type was disclosed. One side was grafted with 10cc of autograft per level containing a minimum of 50% iliac crest bone. The other side was grafted with 10cc of BCP<µm granules standalone (without autograft or bone marrow aspirate). In total, 71 levels were treated. Prospective follow-up included adverse events, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a fine-cut Computerized Tomography (CT) at one year. Fusion was systematically scored as fused or not fused per level per side by two spine surgeons blinded for the procedure. The first fifty patients enrolled are included in this analysis (mean age: 57 years; 60% female and 40% male). The diagnoses included deformity (56%), structural instability (28%), and instability from decompression (20%). The fusion rate determined by CT for BCP<μm was 76.1%, which compared favorably to the autograft fusion rate of 43.7%. Statistical analysis through binomial modeling showed that the odds of fusion of BCP<μm was 2.54 times higher than that of autograft. 14% of patients experienced a procedure or possible device-related severe adverse event and there were four reoperations. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score decreased from a mean of 46.0 (±15.0) to a mean of 31.7 (±16.9), and 52.4% of patients improved with at least 15-point decrease. This data, aiming to determine non-inferiority of standalone BCP<μm as compared to autograft for posterior spinal fusions, is promising. Ongoing studies to increase the power of the statistics with more patients are forthcoming