Introduction. There are controversies in the literature about thoracoplasty and its effect on lung function changes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect and outcome of thoracoplasty in conjunction with pedicle screw construct in the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on lung functions. Materials and methods. It is a retrospective study of consecutive series of 62 patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgically treated by single surgeon between 2007 and 2008 at a tertiary referral Orthopaedic Spinal unit. Posterior spinal fusion and thoracoplasty (n=32, all but one girls) were compared with 30 without thoracoplasty (all but one girls). Clinical and radiographic analysis was performed, including the SRS-30 questionnaire and Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT). Absolute and percent-predicted values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and total lung capacity (TLC) were evaluated preoperatively and at 3-months, 1 year and/or 2-year follow-up, and comparisons were made between two groups. The minimum follow-up was one year. Results. No statistical differences were found between the two groups in PFT's both pre-operatively and at latest follow up ranging 1 to 3 years. Our findings suggest that thoracoplasty did not adversely affected long-term PFT's in AIS patients compared to patients treated by posterior spinal fusion alone. Three-month postoperative pulmonary function test values in both groups experienced 15–30% decline which returned to the preoperative baseline at 1 year in > 90% patients. In thoracoplasty group, 5 to 8 ribs were resected and used for bone graft. Chest complications were observed in 2 patients requiring chest drainage. Prolonged donor site morbidity was noted in 3 patients. Conclusions. Thoracoplasty showed comparable clinical and radiological correction without any significant pulmonary function compromise. Pulmonary function test values returned to the preoperative baseline at 1 year in > 90% patients

7% of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients also present with a pars defect. To date, there are no available data on the results of fusion ending proximal to a spondylolysis in the setting of AIS. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in this patient cohort, to investigate if maintaining the lytic segment unfused represents a safe option. Retrospective review of all patients who received PSF for AIS, presented with a spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis and had a min. 2-years follow-up. Demographic data, instrumented levels and preoperative radiographic data were collected. Mechanical complications, coronal or sagittal parameters, amount of slippage and pain levels were evaluated. Data from 22 patients were available (age 14.4 ± 2.5 years), 18 Lenke 1–2 and four Lenke 3–6. Five patients (24%) had an isthmic spondylolisthesis, all Meyerding I. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the instrumented curves was 58 ± 13°. For 18 patients the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was the last touched vertebra (LTV); for two LIV was distal to the LTV; for two, LIV was one level proximal to the LTV. The number of segments between the LIV and the lytic vertebra ranged from 1 to 6. At the last follow-up, no complications were observed. The residual curve below the instrumentation measured 8.5 ± 6.4°, the lordosis below the instrumented levels was 51.4 ± 13°. The magnitude of the isthmic spondylolisthesis remained constant for all included patients. Three patients reported minimal occasional low back pain. The LTV can be safely used as LIV when performing PSF for the management of AIS in patients with L5 spondylolysis

This study aimed to identify factors associated with increased rates of blood transfusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). A retrospective case-control study was performed for AIS patients treated at a large children's hospital between August 2018 and December 2020. All patients with a diagnosis of AIS were evaluated. Data on patient demographics, AIS, and transfusion parameters were collected. Univariate regression and multivariate logistic modeling were utilized to assess risk factors associated with requiring transfusion. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Surgeries were done by three surgeons and thirty anesthesiologists. To quantify the influence of anesthesia practice preferences a categorical variable was defined as “higher-transfusion practice preference”, for the provider with the highest rate of transfusion. A total of 157 AIS patients were included, of whom 56 were transfused RBC units (cases), and 101 did not receive any RBC transfusion (controls). On univariate analysis, the following variables were significantly correlated with receiving RBC transfusion: “higher-transfusion practice preference,” “administration of crystalloids,” “receiving fresh frozen plasma (FFP),” “receiving platelets,” “pre-operative hemoglobin,” “cell saver volume,” and “surgical time.” On multiple regression modeling, “pre-operative hemoglobin less than 120 g/L” (OR 14.05, 95% CI: 1.951 to 135.7) and “higher-transfusion practice preference” (OR 11.84, 95% CI: 2.505 to 63.65) were found to be meaningfully and significantly predictive of RBC transfusion. In this cohort, we identified pre-operative hemoglobin of 120 g/L as a critical threshold for requiring transfusion. In addition, we identified significant contribution from anesthesia transfusion practice preferences. Our multivariate model indicated that these two factors are the major significant contributors to allogenic blood transfusion. Although further studies are required to better understand factors contributing to transfusion in AIS patients, we suggest standardized, peri-operative evidence-based strategies to potentially help reduce variations due to individual provider preferences

Intrathecal morphine (IM) is a common adjunct in paediatric spinal deformity surgery. We previously demonstrated with idiopathic scoliosis it provides safe and effective analgesia in the immediate postoperative period. This study represents our 25 year experience with IM in all diagnostic groups. Our prospective Pediatric Orthopaedic Spine Database (1993–2018) was reviewed to identify all patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery who received IM and who did not. Patients 21 years of age or less who had a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with segmental spinal instrumentation (SSI), and received 9–19 mcg/kg (up to 1 mg) of IM were included. Early onset scoliosis surgical patients were excluded. We assessed demographics, pain scores, time to first dose of opioids, diagnoses, surgical time, paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission and IM complications (respiratory depression, pruritus, nausea/ vomiting). There were 986 patients who met inclusion criteria. This included 760 patients who received IM and 226 who did not. IM was not used for short procedures (< 3 hrs), respiratory concerns, unsuccessful access of intrathecal space, paraplegia, and anesthesiologist decision. Both groups followed the same strict perioperative care path. The patients were divided into 5 diagnostic groups (IM / non IM patients): idiopathic (578/28), neuromuscular (100/151), syndromic (36/17), and congenital scoliosis (32/21) and kyphosis (14/9). Females predominated over males (697/289). The first dose of opioids after surgery was delayed for a mean of 10.6 hrs in IM group compared to 2.3 hrs in the non-IM group (p=0.001). The postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the IM groups in the Post Anesthesia Care Unite (p=0.001). Only 17 IM patients (2%) were admitted to the PICU for observation secondary to respiratory depression, none required re-intubation. None of the IM group were re-intubated. Forty-nine patients (6%) experienced pruritus in the IM group compared to 4 of 226 patients (2%) in the non IM group. There were 169 patients (22%) of the IM patients and 21 patients (9%) of the non IM had nausea and vomiting postoperatively. Three patients (0.39%) had a dural leak from the administration of IM but did not require surgical repair. There were no other perioperative complications related to the use of IM. There were no significant group differences. Pre-incision IM is a safe and effective adjunct for pain management in all diagnostic groups undergoing spinal surgery. The IM patients had lower pain scores and a longer time to first administration of post-operative opioids. Although there is an increased frequency of respiratory depression, pruritus, and nausea/vomiting in the IM group, there were no serious complications

In posterior fixation for deformity correction and spinal fusion, there is increasing discussion around auxiliary rods secured to the pedicle screws, sharing the loads, and reducing stresses in the primary rods. Dual-rod, multiaxial screws (DRMAS) provide two rod mounting points on a single screw shaft to allow unique constructs and load-sharing at specific vertebrae. These implants provide surgical flexibility to add auxiliary rods across a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) or over multiple vertebral levels where higher bending loads are anticipated in primary rods. Other options include fixed-angle devices as multiple rod connectors (MRC) and variable-angle dominoes (VAD) with a single-axis rotation in the connection. The objective in this simulation study was to assess rod bending in adult spinal instrumentation across an osteotomy using constructs with DRMAS, MRC, or VAD multi-rod connections. The study was performed using computer biomechanical models of two adult patients having undergone posterior instrumented spinal fusion for deformity. The models were patient-specific, incorporating the biomechanics of the spine, have been calibrated to assess deformity correction and intra- and postoperative loads across the instrumented spine. One traditional bilateral-rod construct was used as a control for six multi-rod configurations. Spinal fixation scenarios from T10 through S1 with the PSO at L4 were simulated on each patient-specific model. The multi-rod configurations were bilateral and unilateral DRMAS at L2 through S1 (B-DRMAS and U-DRMAS), bilateral DRMAS at L3 and L5 (Hybrid), bilateral MRC over L3-L5, bilateral and unilateral VAD over L3-L5 (B-VAD and U-VAD). Postoperative gravity plus 8-Nm flexion and extension loads were simulated and bending moments in the rods were computed and compared. In the simulated control for each case (#1 & #2), average rod bending moments (of the right and left rods) at the PSO level were 6.7Nm & 5.5Nm, respectively, in upright position, 8.8Nm & 7.3Nm in 8-Nm flexion, and 4.6Nm & 3.7Nm in 8-Nm extension. When the primary rods of the multi-rod constructs were normalized to this control, the bending moments in the primary rods of Case #1 & #2 were respectively 57% & 58% (B-DRMAS), 54% & 62% (B-VAD), 60% & 61% (MRC), 72% & 69% (Hybrid), 81% & 70% (U-DRMAS), and 81% & 73% (U-VAD). Overall, the reduction in primary rod bending moments ranged from 19–46% for standing loads. Under simulated 8-Nm functional moments, the primary rod moments were reduced by 18–46% in flexion and 17–48% in extension. More rods and stiffer connections produced the largest reductions for the primary rods, but auxiliary rods had bending moments that varied from 49% lower to 13% higher than the primary ones. Additional rods through DRMAS, MRC, and VAD connections noticeably reduced the bending loads in the primary rods compared with a standard bilateral-rod construct. Yet, bending loads in the auxiliary rods were higher or lower than those in the primary rods depending on the 3D spinal deformity and stiffness of the auxiliary rod connections. Additional studies and patient-specific analyses are needed to optimize instrumentation parameters that may improve load-sharing in these constructs

Aims

Medical comorbidities are a critical factor in the decision-making process for operative management and risk-stratification. The Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC) risk adjustment model is a powerful measure of illness severity for patients treated by surgeons. The HCC is utilized by Medicare to predict medical expenditure risk and to reimburse physicians accordingly. HCC weighs comorbidities differently to calculate risk. This study determines the prevalence of medical comorbidities and the average HCC score in Medicare patients being evaluated by neurosurgeons and orthopaedic surgeon, as well as a subset of academic spine surgeons within both specialities, in the USA.