Aim. In recent years, many studies on revision for infection after arthroplasty have been published. In national arthroplasty registers, revision for infection is defined as surgical debridement, with or without removal or exchange of the entire or parts of the prosthesis due to deep infection, and should be reported to the register immediately after surgery. The diagnosis of infection is made at the surgeon's discretion, based on pre- and perioperative assessment and evaluation, and is not to be corrected to the register based on peroperative bacterial cultures. Due to this lack of validation, the rate of revision for infection will only be an approximation of the true rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our aim was to validate the reporting of infection after total hip arthroplasty, and to assess if revisions for infection actually represented true PJI. Methods. We investigated the reported revisions for infection and aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty from 12 hospitals, representing one region of the country, reported during the period 2010–2020. The electronic patient charts were investigated for information on surgical treatment, use of antibiotics, biochemistry and microbiology findings. PJI was defined as growth of at least two phenotypically identical microbes in perioperative tissue samples. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. Results. 145 revisions for infection and 137 revisions for aseptic loosening were reported. Of the reported infections, there were 141/145 true positives and 4/145 false positives. Of the reported aseptic loosenings, there were 126/137 true negatives and 11/137 false negatives. This gives a positive predictive value of 0.97, negative predictive value of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.97 and accuracy of 0.95. Interpretation. We found the reporting revision for infection after total hip arthroplasty to the national register accurate. There was high correlation between reported revision for infection and PJI. Studies on revision for infection from arthroplasty registers may therefore be considered as reliable as studies of true PJI

Physical examination is critical to formation of a differential diagnosis in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain. Although the specificity and sensitivity of some of those tests have been reported in the literature, the prevalence of positive findings of those provocative maneuvers has not been reported. The aim of the study is to find the prevalence of positive findings of the most commonly performed tests for ulnar sided wrist pain in a population presenting to UE surgeon clinics, and to correlate those findings with wrist arthroscopy findings. Patients with ulnar sided wrist pain were identified from a prospective database of patients presented with wrist pain from September 2014. Prevalence of positive findings for the following tests were gathered: ECU synergy test, ECU instability test (Ice cream and Fly Swatter), Lunotriquetral ballottement, Kleinman shear, triquetrum tenderness, triquetrum compression test, triquetral-hamate tenderness, pisotriquetral shuck test, ulnar fovea test, ulnocarpal impaction (UCI) maneuver, UCI maneuver with fovea pressure (ulnar carpal plus test), piano key sign. A subgroup was then created for those who underwent wrist arthroscopy, and analysis of the sensitivities, the specificities and the predictive values of these provocative tests was carried out with correlation to arthroscopic finding. Prevalence of ECU instability tests was t 1.13% (ice cream scoop) and 1.5% (fly swatter). Lunotriquetral ballottement test's positive findings range from 4.91% (excessive laxity) to 14.34% (pain reproducing symptoms. The Kleinman shear test yielded pain in 13.58% of patients, and instability in only 2.26%. Triquetrum compression test reproduces pain in 32.83% of patients, and triquetral-hamate tenderness reproduced pain in 13.21%. Pisotriquetral grind test yields 15.85% positive findings for pain, and 10.57% for crepitus with radioulnar translation. The ulnar fovea test revealed pain in 69.05% of cases. The UCI maneuver yielded pain in 70.19%. The UCI maneuver plus ulnar fovea test reproduced pain in 80.38% of cases. Finally, the piano key sign yields positive finding in 2.64% of cases. For patients who underwent surgery, sensitivities, specificities and predictive values were calculated based on arthroscopic findings. The lunotriquetral ballottement test has 59.6% sensitivity, 39.6% specificity, 20.3% positive predictive value and 85.4% negative predictive value. The sensitivity of Kleinman test was 62.4%, the specificity was 41.3%, the positive predictive value was 23.5%, and the negative predictive value was 83.2%. The sensitivity of fovea test was 94.3%, the specificity was 82.5%, the positive predictive value was 89.5% and the negative predictive value was 92.3%. The UCI maneuver plus ulnar fovea test has 96.5% sensitivity, 80.7% specificity 86.4% positive predictive value, and 95.3% negative predictive value. Among the provocative tests, the prevalence of positive findings is low in the majority of those maneuvers. The exceptions are the fovea test, the UCI maneuver, and the UCI plus maneuver. With regard to the sensitivity and the specificity of those tests, the current study reproduces the numbers reported in the literature. Of those patients who underwent wrist arthroscopy, the tests are better at predicting at the absence of injury rather than at predicting its presence

There is an apparent need for easily accessible research data on Periprosthetic hip joint infections (PJI)(1). Administrative discharge registers could be a valuable single-sources for this purpose, and studies originating from such registers have been published(2–4). However, the quality of routinely collected data for administrative purposes may be questionable for use in epidemiological research. The aim of this study was to estimate the positive predictive value of the International Classification of Disease 10th revision (ICD-10) periprosthetic hip joint infection diagnose code T84.5. The study was performed as a cross-sectional study on data extracted from the Danish National Patient Register. Patients with a registration of performed surgical treatment for hip PJI were identified via the ICD-10 code T84.5 (Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal joint prosthesis) in association with hip-joint associated surgical procedure codes. Medical records of the identified patients (n=283) were verified for the existence of a periprosthetic hip joint infection. Positive predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A T84.5 diagnosis code irrespective of the associated surgical procedure code had a positive predictive value of 85 % (95% CI: 80–89). Stratified to T84.5 in combination with an infection-specific surgical procedure code the positive predictive value increased to 86% (95% CI: 80–91), and in combination with a noninfection-specific surgical procedure code decreased to 82% (95% CI: 72–89). This study is the first to evaluate the only discharge diagnose code of prosthesis-related infection in an administrative discharge register. It is apparent, that codes in administrative discharge registers are prone to misclassification on an administrative level, either by wrongful coding by the physician or administrative personal in the registration process. Misclassification must be expected and taken into consideration when using single-source administrative discharge registers for epidemiological research on periprosthetic hip joint infection. We believe that the periprosthetic hip joint infection diagnose code can be of use in single-source register based studies, but preferably should be used in combination with alternate data sources to ensure higher validity(5). This study is funded in part by the Lundbeck foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Surgery, Denmark

The risk of AVN is high in Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) and the optimal surgical treatment remains controversial. Our AVN rates in severe, unstable SCFE remained unchanged following the introduction of the Modified Dunn Procedure (MDP) and as a result, our practice evolved towards performing an Anterior Open Reduction and Decompression (AOR) in an attempt to potentially reduce the “second hit” phenomenon that may contribute. The aim of this study was to determine the early surgical outcomes in Unstable SCFE following AOR compared to the MDP. All moderate to severe, Loder unstable SCFEs between 2008 and 2022 undergoing either an AOR or MDP were included. AVN was defined as a non-viable post-operative SPECT-CT scan. Eighteen patients who underwent AOR and 100 who underwent MPD were included. There was no significant difference in severity (mean PSA 64 vs 66 degrees, p = 0.641), or delay to surgery (p = 0.973) between each group. There was no significant difference in the AVN rate at 27.8% compared to 24% in the AOR and MDP groups respectively (p = 0.732). The mean operative time in the AOR group was 24 minutes less, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). The post-reduction PSA was 26 degrees (range, 13–39) in the AOR group and 9 degrees (range, -7 to 29) in the MDP group (p<0.001). Intra-operative femoral head monitoring had a lower positive predictive value in the AOR group (71% compared to 90%). Preliminary results suggest the AVN rate is not significantly different following AOR. There is less of an associated learning curve with the AOR, but as anticipated, a less anatomical reduction was achieved in this group. We still feel that there is a role for the MDP in unstable slips with a larger remodelling component

Aim. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is assessed using clinical history and examination, imaging studies and laboratory investigations which inform diagnostic tools such as that proposed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society to determine the probability of infection. Infection is often confirmed by microbiology culture and histology from intraoperative samples, but ideally a diagnosis of infection is made preoperatively to guide management decisions. At our institution, a tertiary referral centre for PJI, ultrasound (US)-guided synovial biopsy is routinely used as an adjunct to preoperative joint aspiration. Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of microbiology and histology results from US-guided synovial biopsy samples when compared to intraoperative samples. Method. In this retrospective study we analysed all prosthetic hip and knee US-guided biopsies performed at our institution over a 5 year period between 2018 and 2022. Microbiology and histology results from preoperative biopsy samples were individually compared to microbiology and histology findings from intraoperative samples. Results. 381 biopsies were performed; 281 knee, 100 hip. US-guided biopsy results showed strong positive predictive values (PPVs) in hip biopsies (microbiology PPV (79.3%), histology PPV (85.7%)) and knee biopsies (microbiology PPV (77%), histology PPV (85%)). Biopsies showed low sensitivity in predicting intraoperative findings (hip microbiology sensitivity (62%), hip histology sensitivity (31%), knee microbiology sensitivity (70%), knee histology sensitivity (21%). Biopsies showed high specificity for knee (microbiology specificity (89%), histology specificity (97%)) and hip (microbiology specificity (73%), histology specificity (91%)). Conclusions. This study demonstrates that US-guided biopsy is a valuable diagnostic aid for PJI with high specificities and PPVs. Furthermore US-biopsy is valuable when there is limited fluid for aspiration

Background. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenge in clinical practice and the analysis of synovial fluid (SF) is a useful diagnostic tool. Recently, two synovial biomarkers (leukocyte esterase (LE) strip test, alpha-defensin (AD)) have been introduced into the MSIS (MusculoSkeletal Infection Society) algorithm for the diagnosis of PJI. AD, although promising with high sensitivity and specificity, remains expensive. Calprotectin is another protein released upon activation of articular neutrophils. The determination of calprotectin and joint CRP is feasible in a routine laboratory practice with low cost. Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate different synovial biomarkers (calprotectin, LE, CRP) for the diagnosis of PJI. Methods. In this monocentric study, we collected SF from hip, knee, ankle and shoulder joints of 42 patients who underwent revision or puncture for diagnostic purposes. Exclusion criteria included a joint surgery in the previous 3 months and a diagnosis of a systemic inflammatory disease. PJI was diagnosed in a multidisciplinary consultation meeting (RCP) of the Reference Centers for Osteoarticular Infections of the Great West (CRIOGO). SF was analysed for LE, CRP and calprotectin. The cut-off values used were 50 mg/L for calprotectin, 8.8 mg/L for CRP and 125 WBC/µL for LE. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for these different synovial markers. Results. Of the 42 patients included, 28 were considered as infected and 14 uninfected. The statistical parameters are presented in Table 1. Conclusion. The present study shows that the synovial calprotectin assay has an excellent sensitivity and a 100% NPV for the diagnosis of PJI, suggesting that a result < 50 mg/L could exclude PJI. This promising study suggests that calprotectin should be included with synovial CRP in a new decision algorithm for the diagnosis of PJI. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the main reasons for revision surgery after primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently the MSIS and EBJIS criteria sets are considered to be the gold standards in determining PJI. These criteria sets are complex and contain tests that are time-consuming and many are rather costly. Therefore, further research is indicated to find a simpler but equally reliable diagnostic test. In this study we evaluated the additional value of calprotectine measurement in synovial fluid in patients undergoing hip and knee (revision) arthroplasty following routine work-up. Method. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 182 synovial fluid samples from 143 patients with suspected PJI after UKA, TKA, THA or revision arthroplasty. Twenty-six of those cases were classified as PJI according to the MSIS and EBJIS criteria. Subsequently, synovial calprotectin was determined, using a lateral flow assay and two cut-off thresholds of ≥14 mg/L and ≥50 mg/L. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of synovial calprotectin was determined. Results. When applying the MSIS and EBJIS criteria and a calprotectin level ≥14 mg/L, synovial calprotectin revealed an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.00), with 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 92.9% respectively. When applying the MSIS and EBJIS criteria and a calprotectin level ≥ 50 mg/L, synovial calprotectin revealed an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI 0.87-1.00), with 88.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 89.7% respectively. Conclusions. The value of calprotectin in synovial fluid gives valuable information with a single test result, resulting in high predictive value in the diagnosis of PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty and should seriously be considered as part of PJI diagnostics in an outpatient clinical setting. The high specificity can help rule in patients that are suspected of PJI. Therefor this test can be helpful in a preop diagnostic work-up to avoid unnecessary revisions in patients with well-placed and well-fixed arthroplasties with a suspected PJI. These conclusions are independent of which criteria set was used as a gold standard

A stiff spine leads to increased demand on the hip, creating an increased risk of total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation. Several authors propose that a change in sacral slope of ≤10° between the standing and relaxed-seated positions (ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated) identifies a patient with a stiff lumbar spine and have suggested use of dual-mobility bearings for such patients. However, such assessment may not adequately test the lumbar spine to draw such conclusions. The aim of this study was to assess how accurately ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated can identify patients with a stiff spine. This is a prospective, multi-centre, consecutive cohort series. Two-hundred and twenty-four patients, pre-THA, had standing, relaxed-seated and flexed-seated lateral radiographs. Sacral slope and lumbar lordosis were measured on each functional X-ray. ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated seated was determined by the change in sacral slope between the standing and relaxed-seated positions. Lumbar flexion (LF) was defined as the difference in lumbar lordotic angle between standing and flexed-seated. LF≤20° was considered a stiff spine. The predictive value of ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated for characterising a stiff spine was assessed. A weak correlation between ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated and LF was identified (r2= 0.15). Fifty-four patients (24%) had ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10° and 16 patients (7%) had a stiff spine. Of the 54 patients with ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10°, 9 had a stiff spine. The positive predictive value of ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10° for identifying a stiff spine was 17%. ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10° was not correlated with a stiff spine in this cohort. Utilising this simplified approach could lead to a six-fold overprediction of patients with a stiff lumbar spine. This, in turn, could lead to an overprediction of patients with abnormal spinopelvic mobility, unnecessary use of dual mobility bearings and incorrect targets for component alignment. Referring to patients ΔSSstanding→relaxed-seated ≤10° as being stiff can be misleading; we thus recommend use of the flexed-seated position to effectively assess pre-operative spinopelvic mobility

Aim. Diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infections (PSI) is difficult as they are mostly caused by low-virulent bacteria and patients do not show typical infection signs, such as elevated blood markers, wound leakage, or red and swollen skin. Ultrasound-guided biopsies for culture may therefore be an alternative for mini-open biopsies as less costly and invasive method. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and reliability of ultrasound-guided biopsies for cultures alone and in combination polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and/or synovial markers for preoperative diagnosis of PSI in patients undergoing revision shoulder surgery. Method. A prospective explorative diagnostic cohort study was performed including patients undergoing revision shoulder replacement surgery. A shoulder puncture was taken preoperatively before incision to collect synovial fluid for interleukin-6 (IL-6), calprotectin, WBC, polymorphonuclear cells determination. Prior to revision surgery, six ultrasound-guided synovial tissue biopsies were collected for culture and two additional for PCR analysis. Six routine care tissue biopsies were taken during revision surgery and served as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV; primary outcome measure), and accuracy were calculated for ultrasound-guided biopsies, and synovial markers, and combinations of these. Results. Fifty-five patients were included. In 24 patients, routine tissue cultures were positive for infection. Cultures from ultrasound-guided biopsies diagnosed an infection in 7 of these patients, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 29.2%, 93.5%, 77.8%, 63.0%, and 65.6%, respectively. Ultrasound-guided biopsies in combination with synovial WBC increased the NPV to 76.7% and accuracy to 73.8%. When synovial WBC and calprotectin were combined with ultrasound-guided biopsies, it resulted in a better diagnostic value: sensitivity 69.2%, specificity 80.0%, PPV 69.2%, NPV 80.0%, and accuracy 75.8%. Ultrasound-guided biopsies in combination with calprotectin and ESR yielded a sensitivity of 50.0%, specificity of 93.8%, PPV of 80.0%, NPV of 78.9%, and accuracy of 79.2%. Synovial fluid was obtained in 42 patients. Sensitivities of WBC, PMN, IL-6, and calprotectin were between 25.0% and 35.7%, specificities between 89.5% and 95.0%, PPVs between 60.0% and 83.3%, NPVs between 65.4% and 69.4%, and accuracies between 64.5% and 70.6%. Conclusions. In this prospective study we showed that ultrasound-guided biopsies for cultures alone and in combination with PCR and/or synovial markers are not reliable enough to use in clinical practice for the preoperative diagnosis of low grade PSI

Aim. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a clinical dilemma, since presentations of PJI usually greatly overlap with aseptic failure (AF). The aim of this study is to evaluate the values of plasma fibrinogen, individually or in combination with CRP, ESR and WBC, for distinguishing PJI from AF. Method. We retrospectively enrolled 357 cases who underwent revision hip or knee arthroplasties in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2013 to December 2021, including 197 AF, 116 PJI and 44 reimplantation. The diagnostic capacity of preoperative fibrinogen, CRP, ESR and WBC as well as their combinations for differentiating PJI from AF were assessed by ROC curves. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were calculated according to the optimal cutoff value based on the Youden index. All biomarkers were further investigated for their potential ability to predict optimal timing of reimplantation as well as their diagnostic capacity in the subgroups of the knee and hip PJI. Furthermore, the correlations among fibrinogen, CRP and ESR in the patients with PJI and AF were analyzed to further evaluate the potential capacity of fibrinogen in the diagnosis of PJI. Results. The levels of fibrinogen, CRP, ESR and WBC were significantly higher in PJI group than in AF group. ROC analyses showed that the AUCs of fibrinogen, CRP, ESR and WBC were 0.879, 0.903, 0.879 and 0.685, respectively. The optimal threshold of fibrinogen is 4.04 g/L (74.1% sensitivity, 85.6% specificity, 76.1% PPV, 85.0% NPV and 81.8% accuracy). Combining fibrinogen with CRP and/or ESR (AUC: 0.903∼0.914) yielded almost equivalent diagnostic efficiency compared with the combination of CRP and ESR (AUC: 0.910). Besides, fibrinogen yielded AUCs of 0.869 (cutoff: 3.44 g/L) and 0.887 (cutoff: 4.12 g/L) in the hip and knee subgroups, with higher specificity and PPV of 93.1% and 96.1% in the knee PJI. Intriguingly, as for the cases with CRP < 10mg/L and ESR ≧ 30 mm/h, the specificity and NPV of fibrinogen for diagnosing PJI were 92.2% and 83.9%. Conclusions. Plasma fibrinogen is considered as a potential first-line screening marker for PJI detection and timing of reimplantation. As for the patients with an increased ESR but normal CRP, a low fibrinogen level (below 4.04 g/L) is more likely to rule out PJI

Aim. Treatment algorithms for fracture-related nonunion depend on the presence or absence of bacterial infection. However, the manifestation of septic nonunion varies. Low-grade infections, unlike manifest infections, lack clinical signs of infection and present similarly to aseptic nonunion. The clinical importance of low-grade infection in nonunion is not entirely clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of low-grade infection in the development and management of femoral or tibial nonunion. Method. A prospective, multicenter clinical study enrolled patients with nonunion and regular healed fractures. Preoperatively, complete blood count without differential, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin were obtained, clinical signs of infection were recorded, and a suspected septic or aseptic diagnosis was made based on history and clinical examination. During surgical nonunion revision or routine implant removal, tissue samples were collected for microbiology and histopathology, and osteosynthesis material for sonication. Nonunion patients were followed for 12 months. Definitive diagnosis of “septic” or “aseptic” nonunion was made according to diagnostic criteria for fracture-related infection, considering the results of any further revision surgery during follow-up. Results. 34 patients with regular healed fractures were included. 62 nonunion patients were diagnosed as aseptic, 22 with manifest, and 23 with low-grade infection. The positive predictive value was 88% and the negative predictive value 72% for the suspected diagnosis. The nonunion groups had significantly higher CRP levels than the regular healer group. Differentiation between septic and aseptic nonunion based on blood values was not possible. Low-grade infection demonstrated less frequently histopathologic signs of infection than manifest infection (22% vs. 50%, p=0.048), with 15% of regular healers having histopathologic signs of infection. Cutibacterium acnes was less present in manifest compared to low-grade infection (p=0.042). Healing rates for septic nonunion involving C. acnes were significantly lower for manifest infection (20%) than for low-grade infection (100%, p=0.002). Patients with low-grade infection were treated with systemic antibiotics less frequently than patients with manifest infection (p=0.026), with no significant difference in healing rate (83% vs. 64%), which was slightly lower for low-grade infection than for aseptic nonunion (90%). Conclusions. Low-grade infections play a significant role in nonunion development and are difficult to diagnose preoperatively due to the lack of clinical signs of infection and unremarkable blood counts. However, our results imply that for low-grade infections, antibiotic therapy may not always be mandatory to heal the nonunion. This study was supported by the German Social Accident Insurance (FF-FR0276)

Aim. Prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE® Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. Method. Synovial fluid samples were prospectively collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to culture-based methods as reference standard. Results. A total of 45 samples were analyzed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100%, 95% CI 73 – 100) and positive predictive value (100%, 95% CI 79 – 100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were 83% (95% CI 36 – 99) and 88% (95% CI 47 – 99) respectively for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis (n=12), 77% (95% CI: 46 – 94) and 63% (95% CI: 26 – 90) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI (n=14), and 27% (95% CI 7 – 61) and 27% (95% CI: 7 – 61) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI (n=19). Conclusions. The results of this pilot study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of low-grade microorganisms in the panel

The diagnosis of infection following shoulder arthroplasty is notoriously difficult. The prevalence of prosthetic shoulder infection after arthroplasty ranges from 3.9 – 15.4% and the most common infective organism is Cutibacterium acnes. Current preoperative diagnostic tests fail to provide a reliable means of diagnosis including WBC, ESR, CRP and joint aspiration. Fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous synovial biopsy (PSB) has previously been reported in the context of a pilot study and demonstrated promising results. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous synovial biopsy compared with open culture results (gold standard). This was a multicenter prospective cohort study involving four sites and 98 patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty. The cohort was 60% female with a mean age was 65 years (range 36-83 years). Enrollment occurred between June 2014 and November 2021. Pre-operative fluoroscopy-guided synovial biopsies were carried out by musculoskeletal radiologists prior to revision surgery. A minimum of five synovial capsular tissue biopsies were obtained from five separate regions in the shoulder. Revision shoulder arthroplasty was performed by fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons. Intraoperative tissue samples were taken from five regions of the joint capsule during revision surgery. Of 98 patients who underwent revision surgery, 71 patients underwent both the synovial biopsy and open biopsy at time of revision surgery. Nineteen percent had positive infection based on PSB, and 22% had confirmed culture positive infections based on intra-operative tissue sampling. The diagnostic accuracy of PSB compared with open biopsy results were as follows: sensitivity 0.37 (95%CI 0.13-0.61), specificity 0.81 (95%CI 0.7-0.91), positive predictive value 0.37 (95%CI 0.13 – 0.61), negative predictive value 0.81 (95%CI 0.70-0.91), positive likelihood ratio 1.98 and negative likelihood ratio 0.77. A patient with a positive pre-operative PSB undergoing revision surgery had an 37% probability of having true positive infection. A patient with a negative pre-operative PSB has an 81% chance of being infection-free. PSB appears to be of value mainly in ruling out the presence of peri-prosthetic infection. However, poor likelihood ratios suggest that other ancillary tests are required in the pre-operative workup of the potentially infected patient

Aim. The aim of the study is to evaluate the specificity and sensibility of leukocyte esterase for the diagnosis of periposthetic joint infection (PJI). Method. Between October 2016 and April 2017 we enrolled 65 patients underwent to hip and knee revision arthroplasty due to uncertain joint infection. Synovial fluid was obtained from 64 joints that underwent revision arthroplasty. Each patient was evaluated in the preoperative time with CRP, ESR and leukoscan, in the intraoperative time with frozen section and leukocyte esterase strip and post-operative with sonication fluid culture, periprosthetic tissues cultures and histological examination. Results of all of these exams were compared to assess the specificity, the sensibility, the positive and negative predicting values of leukocyte esterase for the diagnosis of PJI. Results. The leukocyte esterase test with a threshold of +/++ had a sensitivity of 80.2%, a specificity of 82.8%, a positive predictive value of 63.8%, and negative predictive value of 92.1%. Using the threshold of ++ as a positive leukocyte esterase result, the specificity reached 97.8%, the positive predictive value 90.8%, and the negative predictive value 89.0%. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that leukocyte esterase is a quite accurate, effective marker of periprosthetic joint infection and that it is a valuable tool that can be used in conjunction with the the other tests for diagnosis of PJI

Introduction. The wrist arthroscopy has been performed since 1979. With the advances in technology and surgical expertise, wrist arthroscopy has become third commonest procedure after knee and shoulder joint. Wrist arthroscopy has become a gold standard for diagnosing TFCC pathologies and other intercarpal disorders. Our aim was to compare the clinical, MRI and arthroscopic findings while treating various wrist pathologies. Materials/Method. In retrospective trial, 30 patients (19 male and 11 female) with clinical evidence of wrist lesions were evaluated with MRI followed by wrist arthroscopy. The mean age of the patients at the time of outpatient appointment was 44 years with an average waiting time of 6.6 months. Inclusion criteria: all patients undergoing wrist surgery. Exclusion criteria: septic arthritis, acute distal radius fractures. Kappa analysis was used to compare the three methods of wrist pathology assessment. The total 30 patients were assessed for clinical findings, MRI report and corresponding arthroscopic findings. Results. According to the clinical findings, 22 patients (68% of all patients) were diagnosed with suspected TFCC injury. In 21 patients, the MRI showed TFCC tear (partial to complete) and this was confirmed by arthroscopy in 22 patients. There was a correlation of clinical, MRI and arthroscopy in detecting TFCC lesions in 95% cases. Sensitivity 93%, specificity 90%, positive predictive value 89% and negative predictive value 94%. The Scapho-lunate ligament tear was suspected in 8 (28% of all patients). In 6 patients, MRI showed scapho-lunate tear and this was confirmed by wrist arthroscopy in 10 patients. Correlation with wrist arthroscopy was 80%, sensitivity 94%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 90% and negative predictive value 93%. 15 patients (50% of all patients) showed signs of moderate to severe cartilage wear and 12 patients had confirmation with MRI. Correlation with wrist arthroscopy was 75%, Sensitivity 90%, Specificity 91%, positive predictive value 89% with negative predictive value 92%. However clinical examination and MRI had poor correlation with wrist arthroscopy in diagnosing synovitis. Discussion. The MRI and wrist arthroscopy has fair correlation, though MRI sensitivity approaches that of arthroscopy, it cannot replace it at the moment. However, it is a potent additional tool for wrist diagnosis if intra-articular contrast is used. It can facilitate diagnosis and indications for surgery of the wrist. It may make arthroscopic and more invasive interventions for diagnostic purposes avoidable in future. Our results showed clinical examination is crucial for diagnosing wrist pathologies, MRI can be used as an adjunct but the wrist arthroscopy still remains the gold standard tool for diagnosis and therapeutic interventions

Aim. Our goal is to assess diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid testing in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). In addition to differential leukocyte count, simples and inexpensive biomarkers such as synovial fluid C-reactive protein (CRP), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and alpha-2-macrogloblulin(A2M) were also investigated and its possible role in increasing accuracy assessed. Method. Between January/2013 and December/2019 total hip or knee arthroplasty revision cases (regardless of preoperative diagnosis) were prospectively included provided enough synovial fluid for biomarker analysis was collected and at least four tissue samples, as well as the implant for sonication, were gathered for microbiological study. Definitive diagnosis was classified according to the new EBJIS PJI definition. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we determined cutoff values as well as diagnostic accuracy for each marker. Results. Out of 364 revision arthroplasties performed, 102 fully respected inclusion criteria. There were 58 unlikely, 8 likely and 36 confirmed infections. Synovial fluid total leukocyte count, proportion of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN), CRP, ADA and A2M were significantly different between groups. Area under the curve was 0.94 for total leucocyte count, 0.91 for proportion of PMN, 0.90 for CRP, 0.82 for ADA and 0.76 for A2M. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for statistically optimal but also selected rule-in and rule-out cutoffs values are shown in Table 1. Interpreting a raised level of CRP(>2.7mg/L) or ADA(>60U/L) together with high leukocyte count (>1470 cells/μL) or proportion of PMN (>62.5%) significantly increases specificity and positive predictive value for affirming PJI. Conclusions. Differential leukocyte count cutoffs proposed by the EBJIS PJI definition are shown to perform well in ruling out (<1,500 cells/μL) and ruling in (>3,000 cells/μL) PJI. Adding simple and inexpensive biomarkers such synovial CRP or ADA is helpful in interpreting inconclusive results. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Hospital systems have recently instituted early systemic sepsis recognition systems, where vital signs and laboratory findings are monitored and automatically alert providers to potential sepsis. Although there are very few reports evaluating the use of sepsis alert systems outside of the emergency room or intensive care unit, many hospital systems have made the decision to apply the sepsis alarm protocols to all inpatients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if an alarm system using systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria is a valuable tool to predict systemic sepsis in the immediate postoperative period (POD#0–4) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Method. 10,791 primary and revision TJA patients at one institution, from 2010–2014, were retrospectively reviewed for positive SIRS criteria on each hospital day from the date of surgery to postoperative day four (POD#4). SIRS criteria included temperature > 38°C or < 36°C, heart rate > 90 beats per minute, respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute, and white blood cell (WBC) > 12,000/mm3 or < 4,000/mm3. Additionally, hospital coding data was cross-referenced to identify patients who were diagnosed with systemic sepsis within 10 days after having a TJA. Results. Of the 10,791 patients undergoing a primary or revision TJA, only 1 patient was diagnosed with sepsis within 10 days of TJA, yielding a prevalence of 0.00009. During POD#0–4, 1798 patients would have triggered at least a 2 criteria SIRS alarm, yielding a false positive rate of 16.7% and a positive predictive value for systemic sepsis of 0.06% (95%CI: 0 to 0.31%). 416 patients would have triggered at least 3 criteria SIRS alarm, yielding a false positive rate of 3.9% and positive predictive value of 0.24% (95%CI:0.01 to 1.33%). The SIRS criteria in the one septic patient in this study did become positive, but did so only after the clinical team had already initiated sepsis care. Conclusions. A SIRS based alarm system for sepsis does not appear to have any utility in the postoperative period after TJA. We are concerned that the high false positive rate of these alarms may result in unnecessary sepsis work-ups, extended hospital stays, and potentially degrade the perceived importance of the sepsis alarms in other cohorts of hospital patients. Further research is necessary to determine if TJA patients with a length of stay greater than normal may benefit from an automatic sepsis alarm system

We studied twelve parameters (physical appearance, mucin clot, fibrin clot, white cell count, differential count, red blood cell count, gram stain for bacteria, crystal microscopy, aerobic bacterial culture, anaerobic bacterial culture and ratio between synovial sugar and blood sugar) in over 300 samples of synovial fluid from patients with a variety of suspected pathologies (e.g. infection, inflammatory disease, infection adjacent to a joint, aseptic loosening of a prosthesis). The diagnosis of infection was further established using clinical signs, radiological features, full blood count, C-reactive protein and iron profile. Many of the patients came to surgery. This of course created further opportunity to establish or rule out the diagnosis of infection with greater certainty. Nine of the features of synovial fluid were analysed statistically, including turbidity, diminished viscosity, mucin clot, fibrin clot, total white cell count, polymorphs greater than 60%, bacteria observed on direct microscopy, bacteria yielded by culture and concentration of synovial sugar less than 40% of the simultaneous blood sugar. The positive or negative features of infection were determined to be true or false in the light of the cumulative overall features of infection. The data so obtained was analysed to establish sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy. The mass of data so obtained cannot be meaningfully expressed in such a brief abstract. Important examples are when culturing synovial fluid there were 44% false negatives or no growth and 56% true positives. Looking at the ratio between synovial sugar and blood sugar we found that taking 40% as the critical value, this was 62% sensitive, the specificity was 89%, the accuracy was 73%, the positive predictive value was 89%, the negative predictive value was 62.4%. However we went further and separated those who were definitely infected or probably infected i.e. Groups 4 & 5 from those who were probably or definitely NOT infected according to the sum of clinical laboratory and radiological parameters. When thus separated the predictive value of a positive result was 100% in Group 4 & 5 and 0% in Group 1 & 2. The predictive value of a negative result in Group 1 & 2 was 98.7% accurate and 22.4% in Group 4 & 5

Background. Magnetic resonance arthrography is the current method of choice for investigating patients with a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement prior to performing hip arthroscopy. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of this investigation by comparing the findings of MR arthrogram with those found at arthroscopy, with reference to labral tears and chondral damage. Methods. A prospective trial to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and predictive value of MRA for diagnosis of labral tears and chondral defects. Over a 25-month period 69 hips undergoing hip arthroscopy were investigated with MRA prior to the definitive operative procedure. MRA findings were compared to the intraoperative findings. Results. In the assessment of labral tears, MRA demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% with a specificity of 51% and an accuracy of 58%. Positive predictive value of MRA was 33% and negative predictive value 90%. For chondral defects MRA demonstrated a sensitivity of 17%, a specificity of 100% and accuracy of 55%. Positive predictive value of MRA was 100% and negative predictive value was 51%. Conclusions. In what the authors believe to be the first UK study to explore both chondral injury and labral tears in a prospective manner and looking specifically at accuracy, it can be seen that the MRA has poor accuracy for both pathologies. Therefore we suggest a moved away from MRA, which is an invasive procedure with associated risks

Aim. The present study aimed to assess the accuracy of preoperative departmental ultrasound scans in identifying rotator cuff tears at our institution. Methods. Preoperative ultrasound scan reports were obtained from 64 consecutive patients who subsequently underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression and/or rotator cuff repair. Data was collected retrospectively using our 2010 database. The ultrasound reports were compared with the arthroscopic findings. The presence or absence of partial and full thickness rotator cuff tears was recorded. Results. Ultrasound correctly identified 30/43 (70%) of all tears, 18/30 (60%) of full thickness tears but only 1/13 (8%) of partial tears seen at arthroscopy. Of the remaining 12 partial tears seen at surgery, 6 were misdiagnosed as full thickness tears on ultrasound and 6 were not picked up at all. Five partial thickness tears were repaired and the rest were debrided. If both full and partial thickness tears are counted as true positives, ultrasound had a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 67%, a positive predictive value of 81%, a negative predictive value of 51% and an overall accuracy of 69%. If only partial tears are counted as true positives sensitivity decreases to 8% and positive predictive value to 10%. Conclusion. In this series a preoperative departmental ultrasound scan identified 70% of the actual rotator cuff tears present at arthroscopy. However ultrasound was not accurate in identifying partial thickness tears or distinguishing them from full thickness defects. Due to this relatively low sensitivity, we question the usefulness of routine preoperative departmental ultrasound scans in the evaluation of suspected cuff tears