The Ponseti method has been proven to be the gold standard of treatment for clubfoot. The question however remains about the treatment of atypical and complex feet with this method. The Ponseti technique has been used to treat all clubfeet at the our institution for the past 10 years. We interviewed 70 patients (114 affected feet) ages 5–9 regarding the current state of their clubfoot using the 10 item Disease Specific Instrument (DSI) developed by Roye et al. Of these, 16 patients had a complex foot defined by a transverse medial crease. The DSI scores from all patients were transformed onto a 100 point scale and compared based on overall score as well as functional outcome and satisfaction. There was no significant difference in the overall scores with a mean of 76.43 (sd= 21.1) in patients who did not have a complex deformity compared to a mean of 79.17 (sd= 19.4) in those who did have a complex foot (p=0.644). On the functional subscale the mean scores were 74.07 (sd=27.1) and 89.58 (sd=25.9) for patients who had non-complex and complex feet, respectively (p=0.474). Regarding satisfaction, the non-complex group had a mean score of 79.51 (sd=19.7) compared to the mean of 78.75 (sd=16.7) in the complex group (p=0.888). Primary treatment with the Ponseti method achieves very successful correction of the clubfoot deformity with good outcome scores. Furthermore, even in patients with a complex deformity, the Ponseti method still achieves equally successful outcomes

Introduction. It has been postulated that a mild clubfoot does better than a severe clubfoot no matter what treatment course is taken. There have been previous efforts to classify clubfoot. For units worldwide that use the Ponseti Method of clubfoot management, the Pirani scoring system is widely used. This scoring system has previously been shown to predict the number of plasters required to gain correction. Our study aimed to investigate whether the Pirani score gave an indication of longer-term outcome using tibialis anterior tendon transfer as an endpoint. Methods. A prospectively collated database was used to identify all patients treated in the Ponseti clinic at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital between 2002 and 2005 with idiopathic clubfoot who had not received any treatment prior to their referral. Rate of tibialis tendon transfer as well as the patient's presenting Pirani score were noted. Feet were grouped for analytical purposes into a mild clubfoot (Pirani score <4) and a severe clubfoot (Pirani score 4) category depending on initial examination. Clinic records were reviewed retrospectively to identify patients who were poorly compliant at wearing boots and bars and were categorised into having “good” or “bad” compliance with orthosis use. Results. 132 feet in 94 children were included in the study. 30 (23%) tibialis tendon transfers were performed at a mean of 4.2 years (range 2.3–5.5 years). Children with severe clubfoot had a significantly higher rate of tendon transfer compared with those with mild clubfoot (28% vs. 6%; p=0.0001). 81% of patients were classified as being “good” boot wearers. Tibialis tendon transfer rates in those who were poorly compliant with boot usage were significantly higher compared with those with good compliance (52% vs. 16%; p=0.0003). There was a significantly higher tendon transfer rate in those with severe disease and poor compliance compared with good compliance (69% vs. 20%; p=0.0002). There was no association between boot compliance and tendon transfer rates in those with mild disease. Conclusion. This study shows that late recurrences, requiring tibialis anterior tendon transfer, are associated with severity of disease at presentation and compliance with use of orthoses. Tendon transfer rates are higher for those with severe disease. We have confirmed previous reports that compliance with orthotic use is associated with recurrence. However, the novel findings regarding recurrence rates in mild clubfeet may have implications regarding usage of orthoses in the management of mild idiopathic clubfeet after initial manipulation using the Ponseti method

Actually conservative treatment and/or minimal invasive surgical approach is considered the gold standard in the treatment of CF all around the world. Two main italian pediatric hospitals (Bambino Gesù in Rome and Meyer in Florence) will present own series in order to realize how the two methods (Ponseti in Rome and Seringe in Florence) can be used, the right indications for each method and sharp limits as well. The aim of this study is to compare two methods for evaluating their effectiveness and their applicability. Patients, Methods and Results. Rome series: from 1998 to 2009 pediatric hospital Bambino Gesù in Rome had treated 1350 patients with the Ponseti method (1980 feet). All feet had been scored according to Pirani classification. At age of 3–4 months, the 72% of feet treated had minimal surgery consisted in transversal tenotomy of achille's tendon. Casting for further 3 weeks and Denis-Brown splint wore full time until walking age and during the night only for 3 years after walking age. Surgery had been performed in 72% of case and surgery has been directly related to CF severity. Florence series: the Unit of Pediatric Orthopaedics Meyer Children's Hospital of Florence was born in January 2004 and therefore the series includes patients from January 2004 to December 2009. 173 patients (239 feet) were treated. Dimeglio's classification was used. At the age of 4–5 months were treated with tenotomy of Achille's tendon 51,9% of patients, mainly stage 3, and immobilization in long leg cast was used only for three weeks after surgery. Discussion. Minimally invasive treatment for CF is universally considered one of the best way to correct the deformity without using the extensive surgery that often causes stiffness, pain and shoes discomfort in adulthood. The long-term results of two series are similar and this enhance our mind that not invasive method for CF treatment is effective, low-cost, with very low rate of recurrence, only if applied following strictly the protocol. In our series in fact the highest rate of recurrence concerns the missing of Denis-Brown device or early dismission of Denis-Brown as well. The adherence to the protocol is chiefly recommended by the authors when surgery is not performed and therefore the risk of recurrence is higher. The French method especially needs a skill panel of physical therapist that are in confidence with the bandage manoeuvres. Only medical operators in confidence with the methods are able to guarantee good results and a low rate of recurrence as well. For this reason the method recommended by Dr. Seringe is easy exported in geographic areas where health service and health support are well represented

To our knowledge, we are the only centre in the UK where Achilles tenotomies (TA) for CTEV Ponseti correction are performed in outpatient clinic under local anaesthetic by an Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner (APP) in orthopaedics. This study aims to present the outcomes and safety of this practice. Retrospective analysis of cases of idiopathic CTEV undergoing Ponseti correction January 2020 to October 2022. Demographic data: Pirani score and number of casts before boots and bar. Patients were divided into five groups: Group 1: TA performed by an Orthopaedic consultant under general anaesthetic (GA) in theatre. Group 2: TA performed by an Orthopaedic consultant under local anaesthetic (LA) in theatre. Group 3: TA performed by APP under GA in theatre. Group 4: TA performed by APP under LA in theatre. Group 5: TA performed by an APP under LA in outpatient clinic. Complications recorded: revision TA, infection, neurovascular injury or need for re-casting. Mean follow up 18 months. 45 feet included. Mean Pirani score 5.5, age started casting 33 days and total number of casts 6. No significant difference in demographic details between groups. 6, 4, 20, 5 and 10 tenotomies were performed in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively. Complications were 1 revision tenotomy from group 2, one from group 4 and 1 renewal of cast from 3. This study demonstrates that TAs performed in outpatient clinic under LA by an APP is safe and feasible. No increase in complications were observed compared to TAs performed by orthopaedic consultants